Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 154(3): 565-570, 2019 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31227222

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in primary vulvar cancer. Assessing risk factors for the incidence and extent of LN metastases may help to select the optimal treatment strategy for each individual patient. METHODS: In a subgroup analysis of the large multicenter AGO-CaRE-1 study we included all patients treated with radical groin dissection. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed in order to detect factors associated with the prevalence and extent of nodal involvement. RESULTS: In total, 1162 patients were analyzed. Univariate analyses detected age, ECOG as well as multiple tumor characteristics such as FIGO stage, grading, depth of invasion, tumor diameter, and (lymph)vascular space invasion to be related with the prevalence of LN metastases. Interestingly, only tumor stage, tumor diameter and depth of infiltration were found to be significantly associated with the number of LN metastases. In multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.03), lymphvascular space invasion (OR 4.97), tumor stage (OR 2.22) and depth of infiltration (OR 1.08) showed an association with the prevalence of LN metastases. Regarding the number of metastatic LNs, only tumor stage (OR 2.21) or, if excluded, tumor diameter (OR 1.02) were tested significant. CONCLUSION: This large analysis of the multicenter AGO-CaRE-1-study identified lymphvascular space invasion, tumor stage, and depth of infiltration as factors with the strongest association regarding the prevalence of LN metastasis. Interestingly, tumor stage or, if excluded, tumor diameter were the only factors associated with the prevalence as well as the extent of LN metastases.


Assuntos
Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise de Variância , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Virilha/cirurgia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Invasividade Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Vulvares/cirurgia
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(5): 1314-1321, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27896515

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Analyzing the large patient cohort of the multicenter AGO-CaRE-1 study, we compared isolated sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) with radical lymph node dissection (LND) of the groin in relation to recurrence rates and survival. METHODS: The AGO-CaRE-1 study retrospectively collected data on treatment patterns and follow-up of vulvar cancer patients [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage ≥1B] treated at 29 gynecologic cancer centers between 1998 and 2008. This subgroup analysis evaluated the influence of SLND alone on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: In 487 (63.1%) of 772 included patients with tumors smaller than 4 cm, an LND was performed and no metastatic lymph nodes were detected (LN0). Another 69/772 (8.9%) women underwent SLND alone, showing a negative SLN (SLN0). Tumors in the LN0 group were larger and showed a deeper invasion (LN0 vs. SLN0 tumor diameter: 20.0 vs. 13.0 mm, p < 0.001; depth of invasion: 4.0 vs. 3.0 mm, p = 0.002). After a median follow-up of 33 months (0-156), no significant differences in relation to isolated groin recurrence rates (SLN0 3.0% vs. LN0 3.4%, p = 0.845) were detected. Similarly, univariate 3-year PFS analysis showed no significant differences between both groups (SLN0 82.7% vs. LN0 77.6%, p = 0.230). A multivariate Cox regression analysis, including tumor diameter, depth of invasion, age, grading, and lymphovascular space invasion was performed: PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.970, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.517-1.821] and OS (HR 0.695, 95% CI 0.261-1.849) did not differ significantly between both cohorts. CONCLUSION: This subgroup analysis of the large AGO-CaRE-1 study showed similar results for groin LND and SLND alone with regard to recurrence rates and survival in node-negative patients with tumors <4 cm.


Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Linfonodo Sentinela/cirurgia , Neoplasias Vulvares/cirurgia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Canal Inguinal , Metástase Linfática , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Carga Tumoral , Neoplasias Vulvares/patologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA