Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
World J Urol ; 40(6): 1299-1309, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32839862

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery pathways vary amongst institutions but include key components for anesthesiologists, such as haemodynamic optimization, use of short-acting drugs (and monitoring), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis, protective ventilation, and opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia. METHODS: After critical appraisal of the literature, studies were selected with particular attention being paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English literature was examined and reviewed. RESULTS: Patients should be permitted to drink clear fluids up to 2 h before anaesthesia and surgery. Oral carbohydrate loading should be used routinely. All patients may have an individualized plan for fluid and haemodynamic management that matches the monitoring needs with patient and surgical risk. Minimizing the side effects of anaesthetics and analgesics using short-acting drugs with careful perioperative monitoring should be encouraged. Protective ventilation with alveolar recruitment maneuvers is required. Preventive use of a combination with 2-3 antiemetics in addition to propofol-based total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is most likely to reduce PONV. While the ideal analgesia regimen remains to be determined, it is clear that a multimodal opioid-sparing analgesic strategy has significant benefits. CONCLUSION: Careful evaluation of single patient and planning of the anesthetic care are mandatory to join the ERAS philosophy. Optimal fluid management, use of short-acting drugs, prevention of PONV, protective ventilation, and multimodal analgesia are the cornerstones of the anaesthesia management within ERAS protocols.


Assuntos
Antieméticos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios , Analgésicos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anestesia Geral , Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos
2.
Urol Int ; 106(2): 171-179, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34569540

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess whether enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) improves, at different time points, postoperative complications in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective monocentric study using prospectively maintained databases including all patients treated by radical cystectomy between January 2015 and July 2019. An ERAS protocol was applied in all patients from February 2018. We analyzed and compared between non-ERAS and ERAS groups early and 90-day postoperative complications and 90-day readmission. ERAS was analyzed to know its implication in fast recovery improvement over time. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients underwent radical cystectomy, 74 without ERAS and 76 with ERAS protocol. ERAS decreased significantly early (p = 0.039) and 90-day (0.012) postoperative complications. In multivariate analysis, ERAS was an independent factor associated with less early (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.96; p = 0.37) and 90-day (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.14-0.68; p = 0.004) postoperative complications. There was no significant difference between groups for 90-day readmission (p = 0.349). Mean length of stay did not differ significantly between ERAS and non-ERAS groups (12.7 ± 6.2 and 13.1 ± 5.7 days, respectively; p = 0.743). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our study shows that ERAS has an early positive impact that lasts over time on postoperative complications. ERAS implementation has decreased early and 90-day postoperative complications without increasing 90-day readmission. In our cohort, length of stay was not improved with ERAS protocol.


Assuntos
Cistectomia , Recuperação Pós-Cirúrgica Melhorada , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cistectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
3.
World J Urol ; 39(2): 327-337, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32588203

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The landscape of the management of metastatic prostate cancer is changing rapidly and there is growing interest in the local treatment of the primary in these patients. The effect of local treatment on the outcome of metastatic prostate cancer patients was addressed based on retrospective analysis but now also based on prospective randomized trials. This article provides an overview of the currently available literature in this field. METHODS: A literature review was done searching the Medline database for English language articles using the keywords "metastatic prostate cancer", and "local treatment", "radiotherapy", "prostatectomy". The data of prospective randomized studies and the data of case-control studies or retrospective analysis were summarized in a narrative fashion. RESULTS: Data from two prospective randomized trials exploring the effect of local treatment of the prostate in hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer showed no improvement of overall survival in the individual overall cohorts as well as in the pooled analysis (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-1.04). There was an improvement of failure-free survival (pooled analysis HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.0.84). There was also an improved overall survival associated with radiotherapy in patients with < 5 metastases and with low volume disease. Data from prospective non-randomized or retrospective studies are inconclusive and underlies major selection biases. CONCLUSION: Based on prospective randomized trials, local treatment by radiotherapy does not improve the overall survival in unselected metastatic prostate cancer patients. An effect can be seen in low volume patients or patients with < 5 metastases.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Metástase Neoplásica , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia
4.
Int J Hyperthermia ; 38(1): 1633-1638, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34775896

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate Hyperthermic-Intra-Vesical Chemotherapy (HIVEC) efficacy regarding 1-year disease-free survival (RFS) rate and bladder preservation rate in patients with High-risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) who fail BCG therapy or are contraindicated to BCG. METHODS: Between June 2016 and October 2019, patients treated with HIVEC for mostly high-risk NMIBC who failed BCG or BCG-naive if BCG contraindicated have been included in our study. These patients had a theoretical indication for cystectomy but were ineligible for surgery or refused it. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients, median age 72 [39-93] years, were included in this study (n = 29 BCG-failure and n = 24 BCG-naive). The median follow-up was 18 months. The bladder preservation rate was 92.4%. The 12 months-RFS rate was 60.5%. The RFS rates for BCG-naive and BCG-failure groups were respectively 70% and 52.2% at 12 months. Three patients progressed to muscle infiltration, all in the BCG-failure group and all in the very high-risk EORTC group. Two of them developed metastatic disease and died from bladder cancer. CONCLUSION: Chemohyperthermia using HIVEC achieved a RFS rate of 60% at 1 year and enabled a bladder preservation rate of 92%. Given the low risk of progression in the BCG-naive group, HIVEC could be a good alternative. Conversely, for patients with very high-risk tumors that fail BCG, cystectomy should remain the standard of care and HIVEC may be discussed cautiously for patients who are not eligible for surgery and well informed of the risk of progression to muscle-invasive disease.


Assuntos
Hipertermia Induzida , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Administração Intravesical , Idoso , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Invasividade Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico
5.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 73(2): 215-224, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32083413

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is suspected to influence the complication rates in patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). The aim of our study was to assess variations in sarcopenia in patients scheduled for neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) and RC for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and to explore the impact of sarcopenia on complications linked to NAC or surgery. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, 82 consecutive patients who underwent NAC and RC for cT2-T4 N0 MIBC were retrospectively selected. Using CT scan before and after NAC, Lumbar Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI) was assessed by two observers. We defined severe sarcopenia as SMI <50 cm2/m2 for men and SMI <35 cm2/m2 for women. We evaluated pre- and post-NAC cisplatin-based chemotherapy renal function and post-operative complication rates after cystectomy using the Clavien-Dindo classification. We explored risk factors of complications by logistic regression models. RESULTS: According to the SMI, 47 patients (57.3%) were classified as sarcopenic and 35 patients (42.7%) non-sarcopenic. Patients' characteristics between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients were not significantly different except for BMI (P<0.001). Among patients non-sarcopenic before NAC, nine (25.7%) became sarcopenic after NAC. In multivariate analysis, sarcopenia was an independent significant predictor of renal impairment after NAC (P=0.02). Moreover, sarcopenia and ASA score were independent significant predictors of postoperative early complications (P=0.01 and P=0.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant changes in sarcopenic status during NAC. Sarcopenia, estimated by the lumbar SMI measurement, was an independent predictor associated with the risk of renal impairment during NAC and early postoperative complications after RC.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Insuficiência Renal/etiologia , Sarcopenia/complicações , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Cistectomia , Feminino , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Insuficiência Renal/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/complicações , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia
6.
Urology ; 156: 322-323, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34133980

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To show different approaches for sexual-sparing robot assisted radical cystectomy in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a mainstay treatment for localized muscle invasive bladder cancer and high-risk non muscle invasive bladder cancer not responding to adequate endovesical therapy.1 In women traditionally RC is performed with hystero-adnexectomy and resection of the anterior vaginal wall, but this technique often brings sexual disorders. With time, vaginal sparing techniques have been developed to improve functional outcomes in women motivated to preserve their sexual function.2-4 The indications for vaginal-sparing RC are absence of tumor in bladder neck or urethra and no sign of infiltration of anterior vaginal wall and parametria at preoperative staging. RESULTS: Procedure steps as follows. Step 1: Bilateral adnexectomy and ureteral isolation until their distal portion. Step 2: Vesico-vaginal dissection. Step 3: Bilateral pelvic and common iliac node dissection. Step 4: Ureteral clamping and section. Step5: Posterolateral bladder pedicle dissection. Step 6: Anterior dissection of the bladder towards the urethra. In women, this should be achieved without injuring the Santorini plexus and innervation of the clitoris. Step 7: Bladder neck identification and urethral dissection. Cystectomy is completed. Step 8: En bloc hystero-adnexectomy with anterior vaginal wall preservation; the vaginal pedicles are spared too. Step 9: Specimen extraction from the vagina and vaginal suture.It is also possible to perform a fully sexual-sparing robotic RC by following the vesico-vaginal plan without dissecting the vaginal dome and leaving internal genitalia intact. This technique is typically carried out in case of young women with no pathological uterine and ovarian findings.Vesico-vaginal plan can also be developed after opening the vaginal dome. This approach gives the possibility to subsequently dissect the cervix, to identify and spare the vaginal pedicles and to perform an "en bloc" radical cystectomy, with preservation of the anterior vaginal wall.In case of neobladder, diversion is carried out intracorporeally following the principles of the Saint Augustin neobladder.5 CONCLUSIONS: Robot assisted anterior pelvectomy with anterior vaginal wall preservation is a feasible and mini-invasive technique. For a satisfying functional result, it is crucial to preserve the vaginal neurovascular pedicles. This sexual-sparing approach must be carried out after a correct patient selection: women motivated to preserve their sexual function and ideally in the neobladder setting, when a posterior support for the urinary diversion is needed. Absence of tumor in bladder neck and urethra at magnetic resonance imaging could help patient selection.


Assuntos
Cistectomia/métodos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Vagina , Feminino , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA