World Trade Center workers with asthma and post-traumatic stress disorder perceive airflow limitation more accurately.

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a major risk factor for increased asthma morbidity among World Trade Center (WTC) workers. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether differences in perception of airflow limitation mediate the association of PTSD with worse asthma control in WTC workers. METHODS: We collected data from WTC workers on asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) and daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) measures over 6 weeks. Perception of airway limitation was assessed by comparing guessed vs actual PEF values. Post-traumatic stress disorder was diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview. We used unadjusted and adjusted models to compare PEF and perception measures in WTC workers with PTSD with those of workers without PTSD. RESULTS: Overall, 25% of 224 participants had PTSD. Post-traumatic stress disorder was associated with worse Asthma Control Questionnaire (2.2±0.8 vs 1.1±0.9, P < .001) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (3.9±1.1 vs 5.4±1.1, P < .001) scores. Adjusted analyses showed no significant differences in PEF between WTC workers with (351.9±143.3 L/min) and those without PTSD (364.6±131.6 L/min, P = .55). World Trade Center workers with PTSD vs those without PTSD had increased proportion of accurate perception (67.0±37.2% vs 53.5±38.1%, P = .01) and decreased underperception (23.3.0±32.1% vs 38.9±37.5%, P = .004) of airflow limitation during periods of limitation. Similar results were obtained in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that differences in perception of airflow limitation may mediate the relationship of PTSD and increased asthma symptoms, given WTC workers with PTSD have worse self-reported asthma control, an increased proportion of accurate perception, and decreased underperception, despite no differences in daily PEF measures.

Implementation of a remote behavioral intervention for older adults with asthma - a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Older adults with asthma (OAA) have elevated asthma morbidity rates. A six-session intervention based on self-regulation theory was shown to improve outcomes. However, wide-spread implementation was difficult due to the in-person design. Our objective was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of an updated intervention for OAA that is completely remote, includes a physician component, and utilizes shared decision-making (SDM). METHODS: A pilot study of 12 OAA with uncontrolled asthma and their asthma providers was conducted at three health centers. The remote intervention (titled SOAR) consisted of 4 sessions (2 groups and 2 individual). Asthma providers (both specialists and primary care) were sent updates of progress along with information on how to incorporate SDM into the visit. Implementation (feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness) and clinical (asthma control, asthma quality of life, perceived control, depression, and self-confidence) outcomes were measured. RESULTS: SOAR was found to be feasible, acceptable, and appropriate, with values on validated implementation scales similar to those of in-person behavioral interventions. Asthma providers found the program helpful and intended to change care based on the updates. Asthma control scores improved significantly from baseline (14.2 to 16.8, p = 0.04), as did asthma quality of life (4.2 to 4.9, p = 0.03) and self-confidence to manage asthma (7.1 to 8.5, p = 0.02). There was no change in depression nor perceived control scores. CONCLUSION: A remote behavioral intervention appeared feasible and acceptable for OAA and their health care providers, and can improve outcomes. Larger scale implementation trials are warranted.

ASTHMAXcel PRO patient satisfaction and usability field testing.

Background: ASTHMAXcel PRO, an enhanced version of the ASTHMAXcel mobile application, has been developed to deliver comprehensive, guideline-based asthma education while also facilitating the collection of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and enhancing user experience.Objective: To perform field testing and conduct formative and summative evaluation of the ASTHMAXcel PRO application to assess its impact on patient satisfaction, usability, and usage.Methods: Twenty-eight adult patients completed a baseline visit during which ASTHMAXcel PRO was introduced, health literacy was assessed, and demographic data were collected. They were instructed to use the app for 4 weeks. The Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) questionnaire were administered at baseline and 4 weeks to assess user satisfaction and technology acceptance, respectively. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather feedback regarding the application from patients.Results: The baseline total scores were high for both UTAUT and QUIS (mean (SD): 64.2 (10.1), 6.8 (2.2) respectively) indicating that user satisfaction and acceptance began at high levels. UTAUT total score, as well as all domain scores, improved significantly from baseline to 4 weeks (p < 0.02). QUIS total score along with several domain scores (screen, system capabilities, usability) also increased from baseline to 4-weeks (p = 0.03, 0.01, 0.03, 0.01, respectively). These improvements remained significant when adjusting for age, gender, education, and health literacy. Patients reported that the application was helpful, informative, and easy to understand and use.Conclusion: The significant increases in satisfaction and technology adoption observed among ASTHMAXcel PRO users demonstrate that the application is viable and has the potential to improve upon usability challenges faced by existing mobile health applications.

The Relationship Between Depressive Symptoms, eHealth Literacy, and Asthma Outcomes in the Context of a Mobile Health Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: The ASTHMAXcel PRO mobile app provides asthma education and collects asthma outcome data. The objective of this study was to evaluate the associations between health/electronic health literacy (eHealth literacy) and depressive symptoms with app usage and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Adults with persistent asthma were recruited to use the app. Participants completed the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 to assess for depressive symptoms, Asthma Control Test, Mini Asthma Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire, and the Newest Vital Sign tool to measure health literacy. Data on a subset of participants were available on eHealth literacy ( n = 24) and average number of app logins across 2 months ( n = 40). RESULTS: The total study sample included 96 participants (46% non-Hispanic Black, 44.4% Hispanic). The average participant age was 44.0 (standard deviation = 14.9) years, with 74% identifying as female. Increased depressive symptoms were associated with worse asthma control ( ß = -0.46, p < .001) and asthma QOL ( ß = -0.38, p < .001), but not eHealth literacy. Higher eHealth literacy was associated with worse asthma QOL ( ß = -0.48, p = .02) and more app logins ( ß = 0.59, p = .04). Newest Vital Sign scores were not associated with any of the other measures. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms were associated with worse asthma outcomes. eHealth literacy was associated with increased patient engagement with the app and worse asthma QOL, which may reflect patients with worse QOL seeking out health information on the Internet (although directionality could not be assessed). Digital health literacy may be key to increasing patient engagement with mobile health interventions.Trial Registration: National Clinical Trial No. 03847142, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03847142 .

The relationship between social support, self-efficacy, and asthma outcomes in older adults.

OBJECTIVE: There has been a call for research examining factors that influence asthma outcomes in older adults because of the notable disparities observed in this age group. Social support and self-efficacy are resources that factor into asthma outcomes. The current study aimed to examine the relationship between these resources (independently and jointly) and asthma control and quality of life. METHODS: Older adults with moderate-severe asthma were recruited from NYC. Data were obtained during in-person interviews via validated measures of social support, asthma self-efficacy, asthma control, and asthma quality of life. Linear regression evaluated self-efficacy in the relationship between social support and asthma outcomes. RESULTS: In a sample of 359 older adults (M = 68.04, 47.9% Hispanic, 26.5% Black, and 25.6% other), social support had an inverse association with asthma control. As social support increased, asthma control decreased (ß = 0.95, t(356) = -3.13, p = .002). Self-efficacy significantly moderated this relationship (ß = 0.01, t(356) = 2.37, p = .018). For individuals with low or moderate asthma self-efficacy, more received social support was associated with worse asthma control (ß = -0.33, t(356) = -4.66, p < .0001; ß = -0.20, t(356) = -3.21, p = .0014, respectively). For individuals with high self-efficacy, no relationship was found between received social support and asthma control (ß = -0.10, t(356)= -1.20, p =.23). For asthma quality of life, higher levels of received social support were associated with worse quality of life (ß = -0.88, t(356) = -2.64, p = .009), but this association was not significantly moderated by self-efficacy (ß = 0.01, t(356) = 1.90, p = .0582). CONCLUSIONS: For older adults with asthma, receiving more social support is associated with worse asthma outcomes, especially for older adults with lower asthma self-efficacy.

Obesity-related pediatric asthma: relationships between pulmonary function and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that children with obesity-related asthma would have worse self-reported asthma control, report an increased number of asthma symptoms and have lower FEV1/FVC associated with worse clinical asthma outcomes compared to children with asthma only. METHODS: Cross sectional analyses examined two hundred and eighteen (obesity-related asthma = 109, asthma only = 109) children, ages 7-15 that were recruited from clinics and hospitals within the Bronx, NY. Pulmonary function was assessed by forced expiratory volume in the first second (percent predicted FEV1) and the ratio of FEV1 to the forced vital capacity of the lungs (FEV1/FVC). Structural equation modeling examined if pulmonary function was associated with asthma control and clinical outcomes between groups. RESULTS: Lower percent predicted FEV1 was associated with increased hospitalizations (p = 0.03) and oral steroid bursts in the past 12 months (p = 0.03) in the obesity-related asthma group but not in the asthma only group. FEV1/FVC was also associated with increased hospitalizations (p = 0.02) and oral steroid bursts (p = 0.008) in the obesity-related asthma group but not the asthma only group. Lower FEV1/FVC was associated with the number of asthma symptoms endorsed in the asthma only group but not in the obesity-related asthma group. Percent predicted FEV1 and FEV1/FVC was not associated with asthma control in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary function was associated with oral steroid bursts and hospitalizations but not self-reported asthma control, suggesting the importance of incorporating measures of pulmonary function into the treatment of pediatric obesity-related asthma.

Reduced asthma morbidity during COVID-19 in minority children: is medication adherence a reason?

OBJECTIVES: Asthma control improved during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study examined objectively measured medication adherence, asthma morbidity and quality of life (QoL) outcomes in Black and Latinx children by month for January-June 2019 (pre-COVID) compared to January-June 2020 (including first peak of COVID). METHODS: Secondary analyses of 94 children with asthma (ages 10-17 years, 64% Latinx, 36% Black) and their caregivers assigned to the comparison group of a longitudinal RCT intervention trial. Outcomes included mean aggregate electronic adherence for controller medications, oral steroid bursts, acute healthcare utilization, caregiver asthma QoL, and the Asthma Control Test. Repeated measures analyses were conducted due to multiple observations. RESULTS: Adherence to controller medications declined 48% from 2019 to 2020 (LS Mean = 33.9% vs. 17.6%, p=.0004, f=.92) with levels reaching a low in May 2020. A reduction in steroid bursts was observed over the same timeframe, 1.29 vs. 0.61, p = 0.006, f=.63. Caregiver QoL increased from 2019 to 2020 on total score (5.18 vs. 5.85, p = 0.002, f=.72), activity limitations (5.04 vs. 5.95), and emotional functioning (5.26 vs. 5.80). Although not statistically significant, a clinically meaningful 62% reduction in acute healthcare visits (p = 0.15) was reported in 2020. Children reported better asthma control (OR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.24, 1.73, p < 0.0001) in 2020 versus 2019 driven by improvements from May to June 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased asthma morbidity in minority children during COVID was coupled with decreased adherence to controller medications. This observed decrease in morbidity is not explained by improvements in adherence.

Evaluating the effect and user satisfaction of an adapted and translated mobile health application ASTHMAXcel© among adults with asthma in Pune, India.

OBJECTIVE: ASTHMAXcel© is a mobile application previously shown to improve asthma knowledge, control, and quality of life. In this study, we translated the application to Marathi for pilot testing in Pune, India in order to evaluate its impact on user satisfaction and asthma knowledge among adult asthma patients. METHODS: ASTHMAXcel© was adapted to Marathi with the help of asthma patients and clinicians from Bharati Hospital. 57 different asthma patients were then recruited and received the Asthma Knowledge Questionnaire (AKQ), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-AQLQ) to complete at baseline. Study participants then completed the adapted ASTHMAXcel© application. Post-intervention, participants filled out a post-AKQ and Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS). A subset of participants was also interviewed for qualitative feedback. Paired t-tests and Pearson's correlation were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Mean AKQ improved from 5.0+/-2.4 to 12.4+/-1.6 (p = 0.0001). QUIS results revealed that participants were highly satisfied with the application, scoring an average of 50 out of 54 maximum points. Better baseline asthma control was correlated with greater overall experience with the application (-0.110, p = 0.0417). Finally, the qualitative feedback revealed four themes for future refinement. CONCLUSION: The adapted version of ASTHMAXcel© was linked to significant improvement in patient asthma knowledge and a high level of user satisfaction. These results support the potential utility of mHealth applications in promoting guideline-based asthma care in India. However, further studies are needed to establish a causal relationship between ASTHMAXcel© and improved clinical outcomes.

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms, Underperception of Respiratory Compromise, and Illness Representations in Black and Latino Children With Asthma.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the associations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, underperception of respiratory compromise, and illness representations in Black and Latino children with asthma. We hypothesized that increased child-reported ADHD symptoms, as well as parent reports for their child, would be associated with underperception of respiratory compromise, and maladaptive asthma beliefs. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-six parent-child dyads were recruited from pediatric asthma and primary care clinics in the Bronx. Participants completed demographic questionnaires, the Conners-3 ADHD Index to measure ADHD symptoms, and the Asthma Illness Representation Scale to assess asthma beliefs. Perception of respiratory compromise was assessed by programmable electronic peak flow monitors that measured the child's subjective estimates of peak expiratory flow (PEF) and actual PEF, with underperception as the primary measure. RESULTS: Child-reported ADHD symptoms were associated with greater underperception (ß = .117, p = .049) of respiratory compromise. Parent-reported ADHD symptoms were associated with greater underperception (ß = .129, p = .028) of respiratory compromise. Child-reported ADHD symptoms (ß = -.188, p < .001) were associated with more maladaptive asthma beliefs, F(1, 341) = 13.135. Parent-reported ADHD symptoms (ß = -.203, p ≤ .001) were associated with more maladaptive asthma beliefs, F(1, 341) = 15.644. CONCLUSIONS: ADHD symptoms were associated with a greater underperception of respiratory compromise and more maladaptive asthma beliefs. Deficits of attentional processes and/or hyperactivity levels might be contributing factors. We emphasize the need for psychoeducation and interventions that improve perception and health beliefs in children with comorbid ADHD and asthma.

Asthma history influences gait performance and associated prefrontal cortex activation patterns in older adults.

Walking and cognition are interrelated due to dependence on shared brain regions that include the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Limited literature indicates that asthma is associated with poor mobility in older adults but the mechanisms underlying this relationship are unknown. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that asthma history was associated with poor gait performance due to limited attention resources and neural inefficiency. Participants, older adults age ≥ 65 years reporting positive (n = 36) and negative (n = 36) history of asthma, walked under single and dual-task conditions with a functional near-infrared-spectroscopy (fNIRS) sensor placed on their forehead to assess task-related changes in PFC oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2). Results showed that positive asthma history was associated with slower gait and higher fNIRS-derived HbO2 under dual-task walking. These findings suggest that limited attention resources and neural inefficiency underlie the association between asthma and poor walking performance in older adults.

Assessment of clear aligner accuracy of 2 clear aligners systems.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared treatment efficacy for specific tooth movements between 2 clear aligner systems (Clarity [3M Oral Care Solutions, St Paul, Minn] and Invisalign [Align Technology, San Jose, Calif]). METHODS: The study sample included 47 patients (7 males, 40 females; mean age, 36.57 ± 15.97 years) treated with Invisalign and 37 (4 males, 33 females; mean age, 34.30 ± 16.35 years) treated with Clarity aligners who completed their first set of aligners and had an initial refinement scan. Initial and predicted models were obtained from the initial simulated treatment plan. The first model of the refinement scan was labeled as achieved. SlicerCMF software (version 3.1; http://www.slicer.org) was used to superimpose the achieved and predicted digital models over the initial ones with regional superimposition on the relatively stable first molars. Nine hundred forty teeth in the Invisalign system were measured for horizontal, vertical, and angular movements and transverse width and compared with similar measurements of 740 teeth for the Clarity aligners. The deviation from the predicted was calculated and compared between both systems. RESULTS: The deviation achieved from the predicted was significant between the groups for the mandibular interpremolar and intercanine widths (P <0.05). Clarity aligners significantly undercorrected rotations compared with Invisalign for the mandibular first premolars, mandibular canines, maxillary canines, and maxillary central incisors. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for the achieved vs predicted movements in the horizontal and vertical planes (P >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of clear aligner therapy systems (Clarity and Invisalign) in treating mild and moderate malocclusions was comparable. Deviation of the achieved movements from the predicted was greatest for rotational and vertical movements.

Early to Midlife Smoking Trajectories and Cognitive Function in Middle-Aged US Adults: the CARDIA Study.

BACKGROUND: Smoking starts in early adulthood and persists throughout the life course, but the association between these trajectories and midlife cognition remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Determine the association between early to midlife smoking trajectories and midlife cognition. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 3364 adults (mean age = 50.1 ± 3.6, 56% female, 46% Black) from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study: 1638 ever smokers and 1726 never smokers. MAIN MEASURES: Smoking trajectories were identified in latent class analysis among 1638 ever smokers using smoking measures every 2-5 years from baseline (age 18-30 in 1985-1986) through year 25 (2010-2011). Poor cognition was based on cognitive domain scores ≥ 1 SD below the mean on tests of processing speed (Digit Symbol Substitution Test), executive function (Stroop), and memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test) at year 25. RESULTS: Five smoking trajectories emerged over 25 years: quitters (19%), and minimal stable (40%), moderate stable (20%), heavy stable (15%), and heavy declining smokers (5%). Heavy stable smokers showed poor cognition on all 3 domains compared to never smoking (processing speed AOR = 2.22 95% CI 1.53-3.22; executive function AOR = 1.58 95% CI 1.05-2.36; memory AOR = 1.48 95% CI 1.05-2.10). Compared to never smoking, both heavy declining (AOR = 1.95 95% CI 1.06-3.68) and moderate stable smokers (AOR = 1.56 95% CI 1.11-2.19) exhibited slower processing speed, and heavy declining smokers additionally had poor executive function. For minimal stable smokers (processing speed AOR = 1.12 95% CI 0.85-1.51; executive function AOR = 0.97 95% CI 0.71-1.31; memory AOR = 1.21 95% CI 0.94-1.55) and quitters (processing speed AOR = 0.96 95% CI 0.63-1.48; executive function AOR = 0.98 95% CI 0.63-1.52; memory AOR = 0.97 95% CI 0.67-1.39), no association was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The association between early to midlife smoking trajectories and midlife cognition was dose-dependent. Results underscore the cognitive health risk of moderate and heavy smoking and the potential benefits of quitting on cognition, even in midlife.

Disentangling the impact of alcohol use and hepatitis C on insulin action in Latino individuals.

BACKGROUND: Alcohol, insulin resistance (IR), and hepatitis C (HCV) are all significant contributors to adverse outcomes of chronic liver disease. Latinos are disproportionately affected by these risk factors. We investigated the relationship between alcohol use and insulin action in a prospective cohort of Latino individuals with and without HCV. METHODS: One hundred fifty-three nondiabetic Latino individuals (60 HCV+, 93 HCV-) underwent clinical evaluation and metabolic testing; 56 had repeat testing over a median follow-up of 1.5 years. Peripheral IR and hepatic IR were measured via steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) and endogenous glucose production during a two-step, 240-min insulin suppression test. Insulin secretion (IS) was measured using the graded glucose infusion test. Alcohol use was categorized as none, moderate (≤1 drink/day for women and ≤2 drinks/day for men), and heavy (>moderate). Multivariable models including HCV status assessed associations of alcohol use with baseline SSPG, hepatic IR and IS, and changes in these parameters over time. RESULTS: Overall, the median age was 44 years, 63.4% were male, 66.7% overweight/ obese, and 31.9% had heavy lifetime alcohol use while 60.4% had moderate lifetime alcohol use. SSPG and IS were similar by levels of alcohol use at baseline and alcohol use was not statistically significantly associated with change in these measures over time. However, lifetime daily heavy alcohol use (vs. not heavy, coef 2.4 µU-mg/kg-min-ml, p = 0.04) and HCV status (coef 4.4 µU-mg/kg-min-ml, p = 0.0003) were independently associated with higher baseline hepatic IR, and current heavy alcohol use was associated with greater change in hepatic IR in follow-up (coef 5.8 µU-mg/kg-min-ml, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of Latino individuals, lifetime and current heavy alcohol use influenced hepatic IR and its change over time. Strategies to decrease rates of heavy alcohol use or increase abstinence along with lifestyle modification and anti-HCV therapy to reduce metabolic risk are critical to prevent adverse liver and metabolic outcomes in Latino individuals.

Cognition, symptom perception, and medication non-adherence in older adults with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment (CI) is highly prevalent in elderly asthmatics and is associated with worse asthma self-management (SM) and outcomes. CI may also explain why older adults may under-perceive asthma symptoms. We hypothesized that CI would be associated with low medication adherence and asthma symptom under-perception (ASP). We also hypothesized that ASP would mediate the relationship between CI and medication adherence. METHODS: Participants of this longitudinal cohort study were asthmatics (N = 334) ≥60 years (51% Hispanic, 25% Black). Cognitive measures assessed general cognition, attention, processing speed, executive functioning, memory, and language. Measures of SM were self-reported and electronically measured adherence to controller medications. ASP was assessed for 6 weeks by participants entering estimates of peak expiratory flow (PEF) into a programmable peak flow meter, followed by PEF blows. Participants were blinded to actual PEF values. Percentage of time that participants were in the over-perception zone was calculated as an average. RESULTS: In regression analyses, those with impairments in memory and general cognition had lower odds ratios (OR) for self-reported non-adherence (OR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.93 - 0.98 & OR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 - 0.96, respectively). CI was not associated with electronically measured non-adherence or ASP. In structural equation modeling, while CI was associated with adherence (ß = 0.04, SE = 0.021, p = 0.04), ASP did not mediate this relationship. CONCLUSIONS: While results confirmed the importance of cognition in asthma SM, these findings were not linked to ASP. Future analyses are needed to understand the role of confounding factors.

Impact of caregiver depression on child asthma outcomes in Mexicans and Puerto Ricans.

OBJECTIVE: Examine whether caregiver depressive symptoms at baseline predict longitudinal child asthma outcomes in the two populations with the largest asthma disparities: Mexicans and Puerto Ricans. METHODS: Two hundred and sixty-seven Hispanic caregiver-child dyads (Mexican = 188, Puerto Rican = 79; children 5-12 years) were recruited from clinics and hospitals in Phoenix, AZ and the Bronx, NY. The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale assessed caregiver depressive symptoms; higher scores indicate greater depressive symptomology. Medical records verified child asthma diagnosis. Assessments for outcome variables occurred at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12-month follow-ups. Pulmonary function was measured by spirometry, asthma control was measured by the Asthma Control Test, steroid bursts and acute healthcare utilization were assessed by caregiver report and medical records, and adherence was measured by doser devices on controller medications. Structural equation modeling analyzed baseline caregiver depressive symptoms as a predictor of longitudinal child asthma outcomes, and differences between subgroups. RESULTS: Higher caregiver depressive symptoms predicted better pulmonary function (ß = .02, p = .001) in Mexican children, and fewer steroid bursts (ß = -.41, p = .01) and better medication adherence (ß = .02, p = .07) in Puerto Rican children. Caregiver depressive symptoms did not predict pediatric asthma control or acute healthcare utilization in either subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiver depressive symptomology had unexpected effects on child asthma outcomes. Results may be explained by the Hispanic paradox, caregiver resilience, acculturation, and the study's longitudinal nature. Further research is needed on social determinants of health that may influence differences in child asthma outcomes in heterogeneous Hispanic communities.

Going mobile with primary care: smartphone-telemedicine for asthma management in young urban adults (TEAMS).

BACKGROUND: The majority of adults with persistent asthma have chronically uncontrolled disease and interventions to improve outcomes are needed. We evaluated the efficacy, feasibility, and acceptability of a multi-component smartphone-telemedicine program (TEAMS) to deliver asthma care remotely, support provider adherence to asthma management guidelines, and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: TEAMS utilized: (1) remote symptom monitoring, (2) nurse-led smartphone-telemedicine with self-management training for patients, and (3) Electronic medical record-based clinical decision support software. Adults aged 18-44 (N = 33) and primary care providers (N = 4) were recruited from a safety-net practice in Upstate New York. Asthma control, quality of life, and FEV1 were measured at 0, 3 and 6 months. Acceptability was assessed via survey and end-of-study interviews. Paired t-test and mixed effects modeling were used to evaluate the effect of the intervention on asthma outcomes. RESULTS: At baseline, 80% of participants had uncontrolled asthma. By 6-months, 80% classified as well-controlled. Improvements in control and quality of life were large (d = 1.955, d = 1.579). FEV%pred increased 4.2% (d = 1.687) with the greatest gain in males, smokers, and lower educational status. Provider adherence to national guidelines increased from 43.3% to 86.7% (CI = 22.11-64.55) and patient adherence to medication increased from 45.58% to 85.29% (CI = 14.79-64.62). Acceptability was 95.7%; In follow up interviews, 29/30 patients and all providers indicated TEAMS worked better than usual care, supported effective self-management, and reduced symptoms over time, which led to greater self-efficacy and motivation to manage asthma. DISCUSSION: Based on these findings, we conclude that smartphone telemedicine could substantially improve clinical asthma management, adherence to guidelines, and patient outcomes.

A mixed-methods analysis of younger adults' perceptions of asthma, self-management, and preventive care: "This isn't helping me none".

BACKGROUND: Young adults (ages 18-44) have increased emergency department use for asthma and poor adherence to medications. The objective of this mixed-methods study was to understand experiences with and approaches to managing asthma, of which little is known in this age group. METHODS: Surveys (Asthma Control Questionnaire, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) and 1:1 semi-structured interviews were used to explore experiences with asthma, symptoms, self-management behaviours, and relationship to asthma control and quality of life. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis techniques. Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations were used to examine distributive characteristics and associations between variables. RESULTS: Forty urban adults participated (mean age 32.7 ± 6.2, 1σ). Coughing was reported nearly 46% more often than wheezing, with 42.5% (17/40) coughing until the point of vomiting most days. Most participants delayed using medication for symptoms due to misperceptions about inhalers. Higher symptom frequency and worse asthma control were associated with greater use of non-pharmacologic symptom management strategies (r = 0.645, P < .001; r = 0.360, P = .022, respectively). Five themes were identified regarding young adults experiences with asthma: (1) having asthma means being limited and missing out on life; (2) health care for asthma is burdensome, and other things are more important; (3) there is not enough personal benefit in medical interactions to make preventive care worthwhile; (4) there are insufficient support and education about asthma for adults; and (5) people normalize chronic symptoms over time and find ways of coping that fit with their lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Young adults may tolerate symptoms without using quick-relief medication or seeking preventive care. Increasing engagement with preventive services will require decreasing perceived burdens and increasing the personal benefits of care. Evaluating for non-pharmacologic approaches to managing symptoms and asthma-related coughing may identify uncontrolled asthma. Enhanced training for clinicians in patient-centric asthma care may be needed.

Depressive Symptoms and Overperception of Airflow Obstruction in Older Adults With Asthma.

OBJECTIVE: Older adults are at increased risk for depression and poor asthma outcomes. We examined whether depressive symptoms are associated with overperception of airflow obstruction and a pattern of worse asthma control, but not pulmonary function. METHODS: We recruited a cohort of adults with asthma 60 years and older in East Harlem and the Bronx, New York. Baseline measures included the Geriatric Depression Scale, Asthma Control Questionnaire, and Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Spirometry was conducted at baseline to assess pulmonary function. Perception of airflow obstruction was assessed for 6 weeks following baseline by participants entering estimates of peak expiratory flow (PEF) into a programmable peak flow meter followed by PEF blows. Participants were blinded to actual PEF values. The percentage of time that participants were in the overperception zone was calculated as an average. RESULTS: Among the 334 participants (51% Hispanic, 25% Black), depressive symptoms were associated with overperception of airflow obstruction (ß = 0.14, p = .029), worse self-reported asthma control (ß = 0.17, p = .003), and lower asthma-related quality of life (ß = -0.33, p < .001), but not with lung function (ß = -0.01, p = .82). Overperception was also associated with worse self-reported asthma control (ß = 0.14, p = .021), but not lung function (ß = -0.05, p = .41). CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms were associated with greater perceived impairment from asthma, but not pulmonary function. Overperception of asthma symptoms may play a key role in the relationship between depression and asthma outcomes in older adults.

Evaluation of a Spanish language version of the Asthma Trigger Inventory.

Background: Perceptions of asthma triggers provide important guidance for patients' disease management. A psychometrically valid instrument, the Asthma Trigger Inventory (ATI), is available in English and German language versions, however, a version in Spanish as major world language has been missing.Method: A Spanish-language version of the ATI was evaluated in 339 adult patients with asthma, 223 of these in Peru and 107 in the USA. Principal Component analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation was used to identify coherent trigger domains across and within samples. Resulting subscales were evaluated for internal consistency.Results: PCA suggested differences in factor structures between sites. Whereas the USA sample largely replicated original factors for animal allergens, pollen allergens, physical activity, air pollution/irritants, infections, and psychology, the initial analysis of the Peru sample suggested substantial overlap of air pollution/irritant, infection, and allergen items. Subsequent analysis of an expanded research form of the ATI for the Peru site culminated in extraction of five factors related to psychology, climate/temperature, combined pollen and animal allergens, physical activity, and infection. Internal consistencies were in an acceptable to excellent range (α = 0.74 to 0.94). Additional free trigger responses confirmed the importance of climate variables for patients in Peru. Psychological triggers were reported by 26% (Peru) and 31% (USA) of patients.Conclusion: Coherent trigger domains are readily identified and measured reliably by a Spanish-language ATI version. However, factor structures vary between samples from different Hispanic/Latino cultural and geographic domains. Culturally adapted versions of this instrument are therefore required for Hispanic/Latino population studies.

Explanatory Model for Asthma Disparities in Latino Children: Results from the Latino Childhood Asthma Project.

BACKGROUND: Little research has been conducted that integrates, in one explanatory model, the multitude of factors potentially leading to disparities among Latino children. PURPOSE: A longitudinal, observational study tested an explanatory model for disparities in asthma control between Mexican and Puerto Rican children with persistent asthma requiring daily controller medication use. METHODS: Mexican and Puerto Rican children aged 5-12 years (n = 267) and their caregivers (n = 267) were enrolled and completed interviews and child spirometry at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postenrollment. A 12 month retrospective children's medical record review was completed. Participants were recruited from two school-based health clinics and the Breathmobile in Phoenix, AZ, and two inner-city hospital asthma clinics in the Bronx, NY. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in the social/contextual predictors of asthma illness representations (IRs) were noted between Mexican and Puerto Rican caregivers. The structural equation model results revealed differences in asthma control over time by ethnicity. This model accounted for 40%-48% of the variance in asthma control test scores over 12 months. Caregivers' IRs aligned with the professional model of asthma management were associated with better children's asthma control across 1 year. These results also supported the theoretical notion that IRs change over time impacting caregivers' treatment decisions and children's asthma control. CONCLUSIONS: These findings extend a previous cross-sectional model test using a more comprehensive model and longitudinal data and highlight the importance of considering within-group differences for diagnosis and treatment of children coming from the vastly heterogeneous Latino umbrella group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial number NCT01099800.