The effectiveness of double incision technique in uterus preserving surgery for placenta percreta.

BACKGROUND: Placenta percreta is a life-threatening condition that places patients at risk of massive bleeding. It necessitates very complicated surgery and can result in mortality. Caesarean hysterectomy is the accepted procedure worldwide; however, recent studies discussing conservative treatment with segmental resections have been published. Foetal extraction and segmental resection can be performed through the same incision (single uterine incision) or through two different incisions (double uterine incision). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and results of the double incision technique. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with a diagnosis of placenta percreta who underwent conservative surgery were included. Segmental resection was performed via single incision in ten patients and double incision in twelve patients. RESULTS: There was no difference between the patients who underwent segmental resection via single and double incision in terms of age, gravida, number of previous caesarean deliveries, gestational age at delivery, or rate of elective surgeries. The operation time, transfusion requirement, intensive care unit admission, total hospitalization and success of conservative surgery were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the outcomes of our study, double uterine incision allows for the safe extraction of the foetus during uterus-preserving surgery in patients with placenta percreta without worsening the results compared to single uterine incision. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02702024 , Date of registration: February 26, 2016, retrospectively registered.

Effect of body posture on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure in nonglaucomatous pregnant women.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of different positions on the intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in nonglaucomatous pregnant. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-one women in their third trimester of pregnancy were enrolled in this prospective and observational study. IOP in both eyes was measured with a Tono-pen® in the sitting position (Si-P), in the supine position (Su-P), in the right lateral decubitus position (R-LDP), and left lateral decubitus position (L-LDP). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (sBP and dBP) were measured with a digital automatic blood pressure monitor at after 10 min in each position. Mean blood pressure ([mBP] = dBP + 1/3 [sBP-dBP]) and mean OPP (OPP = 2/3 mBP-IOP) were also calculated. Three IOP measurements were performed by the same clinician at the 15th min in each position. RESULTS: The mean IOP was 13.6 ± 3.4 mmHg in Si-P; 16.7 ± 3.5 mmHg in Su-P; 16.4 ± 3.5 mmHg in the R-LDP, and 16.6 ± 3.7 mmHg in the L-LDP. IOP was significantly lower in Si-P compared to Su-P, R-LDP, or L-LDP. The mean OPP was 46.41 ± 5.54 in Si-P; 39.71 ± 6.96 in Su-P; 36.81 ± 6.57 in the R-LDP; and 33.53 ± 7.63 in the L-LDP. OPP values were significantly different between each body position when multiple comparisons were performed. CONCLUSION: According to our data we conclude that Si-P yields the lowest IOP and the highest OPP compared with Su-P, R-LDP, and L-LDP in healthy pregnant women.