RESUMO
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was a global pandemic with high mortality and morbidity that led to an increased health burden all over the world. Although the virus mostly affects the pulmonary tract, cardiovascular implications are often observed among COVID-19 patients and are predictive of poor outcomes. Increased values of myocardial biomarkers such as troponin I or NT-proBNP were proven to be risk factors for respiratory failure. Although the risk of acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) was greater in the acute phase of COVID-19, there were lower rates of hospitalization for ACSs, due to patients' hesitation in presenting at the hospital. Hospitalized ACSs patients with COVID-19 infection had a prolonged symptom-to-first-medical-contact time, and longer door-to-balloon time. The mechanisms of myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients are still not entirely clear; however, the most frequently implicated factors include the downregulation of ACE2 receptors, endothelial dysfunction, pro-coagulant status, and increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the long-term outcomes and prognosis of COVID-19 survivors that presented an acute myocardial infarction, by reviewing existing data. The importance of the association between this infectious disease and myocardial infarction arises from the increased mortality of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and AMI (10-76%, compared with 4.6% for NSTEMI patients and 7% for STEMI patients without COVID-19). The literature review showed an increased risk of cardiovascular events in COVID-19 survivors compared with the general population, even after the acute phase of the disease, with poorer long-term outcomes.
RESUMO
Ischemic coronary artery disease in all its forms remains the main cause of death worldwide. Coronary artery bifurcation lesions are a challenge because of their complexity and possible complications. The goal of treating bifurcation lesions is the optimal revascularization of the main vessel without compromising the side branch. Although the study of bifurcation stenting aims to keep the side branch viable, the outcomes regarding major acute cardiovascular events and survivability are related to the optimal treatment of the main vessel. There are many trials that have tried to evaluate the best technique to use with respect to bifurcation lesions, and early studies support provisional stenting as the election treatment. More recent trials highlighted the superior outcomes of the double kissing crush technique used on unprotected distal left main bifurcation lesions. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, two-stent techniques were avoided because of the prolonged procedural time in unstable patients, with high risks of complications. We present the case of a 53-year-old woman with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (dyslipidemia, hypertension, active cancer, post-COVID-19 state) and acute antero-lateral myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary intervention with the use of the TAP technique for stenting the bifurcation culprit coronary lesion (left anterior descendent artery and first diagonal artery).