Radical accelerated radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A 5-year retrospective review of two dose fractionation schedules.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Numerous fractionation regimes are used for inoperable NSCLC patients not suitable for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (CHART, 54 Gy, 36 fractions over 12 days) and hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy (55 Gy, 20 fractions over 4 weeks) are recommended UK schedules. In this single-centre retrospective analysis, we compare both fractionation schemes for patients treated at our institution from 2010 to 15. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical demographic, tumour and survival data were collected alongside radiotherapy dosimetric data from the Varian Eclipse Scripting application programming interface. Differences were assessed using independent samples t-tests. Multivariate survival analysis was performed using Cox regression. RESULTS: We identified 563 eligible patients; 43% received CHART and 57% hypofractionated radiotherapy. Median age was 71 years, 56% were male, 95% PET staged with 53% WHO performance status 0-1. 30%, 14%, 50% and 6% were stage I, II, III and IV, respectively. 38% of patients underwent induction chemotherapy. 99% completed their prescribed radiotherapy treatment. Overall response rate was 50% with a 6.5% 90-day mortality rate. Median disease-free survival was 19 months, 50% recurred locally. Median overall survival was 22.5 months with 48% alive at 2 years. Multivariate analysis identified histology, stage, performance status, chemotherapy and radiotherapy response as independent predictors of survival; no significant differences between radiotherapy regimes were observed. CONCLUSION: In our centre, CHART and hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy produce similar outcomes. Dose escalation studies are in progress to develop these schedules to match outcomes reported in concurrent chemo-radiation studies.

Oncolytic herpesvirus therapy for mesothelioma - A phase I/IIa trial of intrapleural administration of HSV1716.

OBJECTIVES: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) remains a major oncological challenge with limited therapeutic options. HSV1716 is a replication restricted oncolytic herpes simplex virus with anti-tumor effects in multiple cell lines including MPM. Intrapleural treatment appeals because MPM is typically multifocal but confined to the pleura, and distant metastases are uncommon. We assessed the safety and possible efficacy of intrapleural HSV1716 for inoperable MPM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with MPM received 1 × 107iu HSV1716 injected via an indwelling intrapleural catheter (IPC) on one, two or four occasions a week apart. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of HSV1716. Secondary endpoints were assessment of HSV1716 replication, detection of immune response and evaluation of tumor response. RESULTS: Of thirteen patients enrolled, five had received previous pemetrexed-cisplatin chemotherapy, and eight were chemotherapy naïve. Three patients were enrolled to receive one dose, three patients to two doses and seven patients to four doses. The treatment was well-tolerated with few virus-related adverse events and no dose limiting toxicities. Twelve patients were evaluable for response, as one patient withdrew early after a catheter fracture. There was evidence of viral replication/persistence in pleural fluid in seven of the twelve patients. Induction of Th1 cytokine responses to HSV1716 treatment occurred in eight patients and four patients developed novel anti-tumor IgG. No objective responses were observed but disease stabilization was reported in 50 % of patients at 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Intrapleural HSV1716 was well-tolerated and demonstrated an anti-tumor immune response in MPM patients. These results provide a rationale for further studies with this agent in MPM and in combination with other therapies.

Oral presentation of malignant mesothelioma.

We report a case of metastatic mesothelioma presenting as an oral metastasis in a 46-year-old patient. The patient presented with 2 polypoid lesions that appeared to be benign on the dorsum of the tongue. Excisional biopsy showed the presence of metastatic carcinoma that on further investigation proved to be mesothelioma. The initial presentation of mesothelioma as an oral metastasis is not previously reported. This article highlights the importance of biopsy and histopathological diagnosis in presumed benign lesions and the role of the general dental practitioner in screening for oral neoplasms.