Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 106(11): 1970-5, 2011 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21989146

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Resistance to standard Helicobacter pylori (HP) treatment regimens has led to unsatisfactory cure rates in HP-infected patients. This study was designed to evaluate a novel four-drug regimen (three antibiotics and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI)) for eradication of HP infection in treatment-naive patients. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of HP gastritis or peptic ulcer disease confirmed using endoscopy and stool antigen testing were eligible for inclusion in this study. All patients underwent a washout period of 6 weeks from any prior antibiotic or PPI usage. Patients were then randomized to either levofloxacin, omeprazole, nitazoxanide, and doxycycline (LOAD) therapy for 7 days (LOAD-7) or 10 days (LOAD-10), including levofloxacin 250 mg with breakfast, omeprazole 40 mg before breakfast, nitazoxanide (Alina) 500 mg twice daily with meals and doxycycline 100 mg at dinner, or lansoprozole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (LAC) therapy for 10 days, which included lansoprozole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g with breakfast and dinner, and clarithromycin 500 mg with breakfast and dinner. HP eradication was confirmed by stool antigen testing at least 4 weeks after cessation of therapy. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis revealed significant differences (P<0.05) in the respective eradication rates of the LOAD therapies (88.9% (80/90) LOAD-10, 90% (81/90) LOAD-7, 89.4% (161/180) for combined LOAD) compared with those receiving LAC, 73.3% (66/90). There were no differences in adverse effects between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This open-label, prospective trial demonstrates that LOAD is a highly active regimen for the treatment of HP in treatment-naive patients. A large randomized controlled trial is warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of this regimen.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , 2-Piridinilmetilsulfinilbenzimidazóis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antiulcerosos/administração & dosagem , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Doxiciclina/administração & dosagem , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Lansoprazol , Levofloxacino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrocompostos , Ofloxacino/administração & dosagem , Ofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Omeprazol/administração & dosagem , Omeprazol/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Recidiva , Tiazóis/administração & dosagem , Tiazóis/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem
2.
Top Lang Disord ; 41: 209-231, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34421168

RESUMO

Personalized AAC intervention refers to an approach in which intervention is tailored to the individual's needs and skills, the needs and priorities of the individual's family and other social environments, the evidence base, and the individual's response to intervention. This approach is especially relevant to AAC intervention for young children with complex communication needs given their unique constellations of strengths and challenges, and the qualitative and quantitative changes that they experience over time as they develop, as well as the diversity of their families, schools, and communities. This paper provides detailed documentation of personalized AAC intervention over a six-month period for a 3-year-old girl with developmental delay and complex communication needs. The paper describes (1) personalization of multimodal AAC supports to provide this child with the tools to communicate; (2) personalized intervention to build semantic and morphosyntactic skills; and, (3) personalized instruction in literacy skills (i.e., letter-sound correspondences, sound blending, decoding, sight word recognition, reading simple stories, reading comprehension, and encoding skills). Specific goals, instructional materials, and procedures are described; data on speech, language, and literacy outcomes are presented.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA