Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with worse patient and graft survival following adult liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on adult liver transplant recipient outcomes is not clear at a national level. Further understanding of the impact of SDOH on patient outcomes can inform effective equitable healthcare delivery. METHODS: Unadjusted and multivariable models were used to analyze the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to evaluate the association between the Social Deprivation Index (SDI) based on liver transplant recipient's residential location and patient and graft survival. We included adult recipients between 1/1/2008-12/1/2021. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were lower in adults living in areas with deprivation scores above the median. Five-year patient and graft survival were 78.7% and 76.5% respectively in the cohort above median SDI compared to 80.5% and 78.3% below median SDI. Compared to the recipients in low deprivation residential areas, recipients residing in highest deprivation (SDI quintile=5) cohort had 6% higher adjusted risk of mortality (Adjusted Hazard Ratio [AHR]=1.06,95%C.I. 1.01-1.13) and 6% higher risk of graft failure (AHR=1.06,95% C.I. 1.001-1.11). The increased risks for recipients residing in more vulnerable residential areas were higher (AHR=1.11,95% CI 1.03-1.20 for both death and graft loss) following the first-year post-transplantation. Importantly, overall risk for graft loss associated with SDI was not linear but instead accelerated above the median level of deprivation. DISCUSSION: In the United States, SDOH, as reflected by residential distress, significantly impact 5-year patient and graft survival. The overall effect of residential deprivation are modest, but importantly, results illustrate they are more strongly associated with longer-term follow up and accelerate at higher deprivation levels. Further research is needed to evaluate effective interventions and policies to attenuate disparities in outcomes among recipients in highly disadvantaged areas.

Long-Term Obeticholic Acid Therapy Improves Histological Endpoints in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune disease characterized by bile duct destruction that can progress to cirrhosis. A liver biopsy substudy was conducted in the PBC obeticholic acid (OCA) International Study of Efficacy (POISE) to determine the long-term effects of OCA on liver damage and fibrosis in patients with PBC. POISE is a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial with a 5-year open-label extension that evaluated 5 to 10 mg OCA daily in patients who were intolerant or unresponsive to ursodeoxycholic acid. METHODS: Liver biopsy specimens were collected from 17 patients at time of enrollment in the double-blind phase and after 3 years of OCA treatment. Histologic evaluations were performed by 2 pathologists in a blinded, randomized fashion to determine the effects of OCA on fibrosis and other histologic parameters. Collagen morphometry assessments were performed by automated second harmonic generation and 2-photon excitation microscopy to observe quantitative measures of fibrosis. RESULTS: From the time of enrollment until 3 years of treatment, most patients had improvements or stabilization in fibrosis (71%), bile duct loss (76%), ductopenia (82%), ductular reaction (82%), interface hepatitis (100%), and lobular hepatitis (94%). Over the 3-year period, we found significant reductions in collagen area ratio (median, -2.1; first quartile, -4.6, third quartile, -0.3; P = .013), collagen fiber density (median, -0.8; first quartile, -2.5; third quartile, 0; P = .021), collagen reticulation index (median, -0.1; first quartile, -0.3; third quartile, 0; P = .008), and fibrosis composite score (median, -1.0; first quartile, -2.5; third quartile, -0.5; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: A subanalysis of data from the POISE study showed that long-term OCA treatment in patients with PBC is associated with improvements or stabilization of disease features, including ductular injury, fibrosis, and collagen morphometry features (ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01473524 and EudraCT no: 2011-004728-36).

Pro: Steroids Can Be Withdrawn After Transplant in Recipients With Autoimmune Hepatitis.

Corticosteroids have been a mainstay of immunosuppression following liver transplantation. However, evolution in the field of transplant immunology has produced steroid-free options, resulting in most transplant centers weaning steroids after transplant within days to months-an evidence-based management decision. Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), however, receive corticosteroids prior to transplant. This raises the question of whether these patients should also be weaned from corticosteroids. In this review, we discuss the benefits of avoiding steroid use in this population of patients-an approach that not only avoids the adverse effects of corticosteroids but does so without risking graft failure from recurrent AIH or from acute cellular rejection.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of maralixibat in adults with primary sclerosing cholangitis: Open-label pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is frequently associated with pruritus, which significantly impairs quality of life. Maralixibat is a selective ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitor that lowers circulating bile acid (BA) levels and reduces pruritus in cholestatic liver diseases. This is the first proof-of-concept study of IBAT inhibition in PSC. METHODS: This open-label study evaluated the safety and tolerability of maralixibat ≤10 mg/d for 14 weeks in adults with PSC. Measures of pruritus, biomarkers of BA synthesis, cholestasis, and liver function were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 27 enrolled participants, 85.2% completed treatment. Gastrointestinal treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 81.5%, with diarrhea in 51.9%. TEAEs were mostly mild or moderate (63.0%); 1 serious TEAE (cholangitis) was considered treatment related. Mean serum BA (sBA) levels decreased by 16.7% (-14.84 µmol/L; 95% CI, -27.25 to -2.43; p = 0.0043) by week 14/early termination (ET). In participants with baseline sBA levels above normal (n = 18), mean sBA decreased by 40.0% (-22.3 µmol/L, 95% CI, -40.38 to -4.3; p = 0.004) by week 14/ET. Liver enzyme elevations were not significant; however, increases of unknown clinical significance in conjugated bilirubin levels were observed. ItchRO weekly sum scores decreased from baseline to week 14/ET by 8.4% (p = 0.0495), by 12.6% (p = 0.0275) in 18 participants with pruritus at baseline, and by 70% (p = 0.0078) in 8 participants with ItchRO daily average score ≥3 at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Maralixibat was associated with reduced sBA levels in adults with PSC. In participants with more severe baseline pruritus, pruritus improved significantly from baseline. TEAEs were mostly gastrointestinal related. These results support further investigation of IBAT inhibitors for adults with PSC-associated pruritus. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02061540.

Risk of advanced fibrosis with grafts from hepatitis C antibody-positive donors: a multicenter cohort study.

Over the last decade, the use of liver grafts from hepatitis C virus antibody-positive donors [HCV(+)Ds] has tripled in the United States. Although previous studies have demonstrated no association between an HCV(+)D status and graft loss, the effects of an HCV(+)D on histological outcomes are not well known. Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients at 5 US centers (2002-2007) who survived more than 30 days with 1 or more posttransplant biopsy samples were included. Cox regression was used to examine the association between an HCV(+)D status and advanced fibrosis (stage 3/4 or higher). Ninety-nine of the 1206 patients (8%) received an HCV(+)D graft. Recipients of HCV(+)D grafts were older than recipients of hepatitis C virus antibody-negative donor [HCV(-)D] grafts (P = 0.03), but they were otherwise similar. HCV(+)D grafts were significantly lower in quality according to the donor risk index (P < 0.001). Advanced fibrosis occurred in 32% of HCV(+)D graft recipients and in 28% of HCV(-)D graft recipients (P = 0.39). The unadjusted 1- and 3-year rates of advanced fibrosis were significantly higher for HCV(+)D graft recipients (14% and 48%) versus HCV(-)D graft recipients (7% and 33%, P = 0.01). Transplantation with HCV(+)D grafts was associated with a 58% increased risk of advanced fibrosis [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-2.36, P = 0.03]. However, in an analysis stratified by the mean donor age of 45 years, an HCV(+)D status was associated with advanced fibrosis only with donors >45 years old [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.06-2.93, P = 0.03] and not with donors ≤45 years old (HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.47-1.87, P = 0.85). In conclusion, a careful consideration of the risks and benefits is needed with HCV(+)D grafts. Recipients of HCV(+)D grafts (especially from older donors) should undergo close monitoring for more rapidly progressive fibrosis. Studies are needed to determine whether early HCV therapy modifies this risk.

Hepatitis C virus-infected women have a higher risk of advanced fibrosis and graft loss after liver transplantation than men.

UNLABELLED: In natural history studies of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, women have a lower risk of disease progression to cirrhosis. Whether female sex influences outcomes of HCV in the posttransplantation setting is unknown. All patients transplanted for HCV-related liver disease from 2002-2007 at five United States transplantation centers were included. The primary outcome was development of advanced disease, defined as biopsy-proven bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis. Secondary outcomes included death, graft loss, and graft loss with advanced recurrent disease. A total of 1,264 patients were followed for a median of 3 years (interquartile range, 1.8-4.7), 304 (24%) of whom were women. The cumulative rate of advanced disease at 3 years was 38% for women and 33% for men (P=0.31), but after adjustment for recipient age, donor age, donor anti-HCV positivity, posttransplantation HCV treatment, cytomegalovirus infection and center, female sex was an independent predictor of advanced recurrent disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.70; P=0.04). Among women, older donor age and treated acute rejection were the primary predictors of advanced disease. The unadjusted cumulative 3-year rates of patient and graft survival were numerically lower in women (75% and 74%, respectively) than men (80% and 78%, respectively), and in multivariable analyses, female sex was an independent predictor for death (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67; P=0.04) and graft loss (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.67; P=0.03). CONCLUSION: Female sex represents an underrecognized risk factor for advanced recurrent HCV disease and graft loss. Further studies are needed to determine whether modification of donor factors, immunosuppression, and posttransplantation therapeutics can equalize HCV-specific outcomes in women and men.

Statin-Induced Rhabdomyolysis Associated With Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Placement.

Rhabdomyolysis is a known rare and potentially lethal complication of statin use. This toxic effect is potentiated by alterations in hepatic physiology in patients with cirrhosis. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement has the potential to further compound this effect; yet, examples of this have not previously been described in the literature. We present a case of a patient who experienced statin-induced rhabdomyolysis likely as a direct consequence of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement.

Statins Show Promise Against Progression of Liver Disease.

Content available: Audio Recording.

HBIg discontinuation with maintenance oral anti-viral therapy and HBV vaccination in liver transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B (HBV) is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation in the US accounting for approximately 5% of cases. Recurrence prophylaxis is typically long-term hepatitis B immune-globulin (HBIg) and an oral anti-HBV agent. Because of high HBIg costs and improving efficacy of new oral agents, there is increasing interest in HBIg discontinuation. AIM: To describe results of a protocol at our center including HBV vaccination and HBIg discontinuation. METHODS: All patients received HBIg therapy and an oral anti-viral agent from the time of transplant. Patients transplanted for HBV with a stable post-operative clinical course underwent HBV vaccination and HBIg discontinuation. After HBIg discontinuation, patients were monitored for HBV recurrence for at least one year. Recurrence was defined as either viral (HBV-DNA 10(4) copies/ml on two consecutive occasions) or hepatitis (viral recurrence with elevated liver transaminases). RESULTS: Of 1182 recipients, 36 (3%) had HBV. Twenty-four were excluded from the protocol, and the remaining 12 patients underwent HBIg withdrawal. Median age at HBIg discontinuation was 56 (range, 36-70) years, median time from transplant to HBIg discontinuation was 62.8 (range, 27.5-128) months, and median time of follow-up after discontinuation was 27.4 (range, 13-69) months. Of the 12 patients vaccinated, no patients maintained HBSAb >or= 10 IU/l at last follow-up. There was no viral or hepatitis recurrence and no deaths or graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: HBIg discontinuation with maintenance oral anti-viral monotherapy is safe and effective for HBV liver transplant recipients. Vaccination is not effective in this population.

Long-term management after liver transplantation: primary care physician versus hepatologist.

As long-term survival after liver transplantation increases, metabolic complications are becoming increasingly prevalent. Given concerns about which group of providers should be managing liver recipients and how well metabolic complications are managed, we administered a postal survey to 280 transplant hepatologists to determine attitudes, perceptions, and practice patterns in the management of metabolic complications after transplantation. The response rate was 68.2%. There was great variation in patterns of practice across the United States with respect to the number of posttransplant clinics, clinic format, and number of recipients cared for per week. Hepatologists, primary care physicians (PCPs), and surgeons were primarily responsible for the overall care of liver recipients 1 year or more after liver transplantation according to 66%, 24%, and 8% of respondents, respectively. Hepatologists felt that metabolic complications were common, but few strongly agreed that hypertension (33.3%), chronic renal insufficiency (3.8%), diabetes mellitus (8.8%), dyslipidemia (11.1%), and bone disease (12.8%) were well controlled. The majority of hepatologists indicated that ideally PCPs should be managing recipients' hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and bone disease (78.8%, 63.1%, 78.3%, and 72.5%), but they felt that in actuality, PCPs were managing these conditions less frequently (45.4%, 51.4%, 44.6%, and 38%). In conclusion, metabolic complications are perceived to be common but not well controlled post-transplant, and most hepatologists feel that PCPs should take a more active role in the management of these complications. Future studies are needed to identify barriers to care in the treatment of metabolic complications post-transplant with the goal of improving long-term morbidity and mortality.

Hepatitis C genotype influences post-liver transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In nontransplant patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), HCV genotype has been linked with a differential response to antiviral therapy, risk of steatosis and fibrosis, as well as all-cause mortality, but the role of HCV genotypes in posttransplant disease progression is less clear. METHODS: Using the multicenter CRUSH-C cohort, genotype-specific rates of advanced fibrosis, HCV-specific graft loss and response of antiviral therapy were examined. RESULTS: Among 745 recipients (605 [81%] genotype 1, 53 [7%] genotype 2, and 87 [12%] genotype 3), followed for a median of 3.1 years (range, 2.0-8.0), the unadjusted cumulative rate of advanced fibrosis at 3 years was 31%, 19%, and 19% for genotypes 1, 2, and 3 (P = 0.008). After multivariable adjustment, genotype remained a significant predictor, with genotype 2 having a 66% lower risk (P = 0.02) and genotype 3 having a 41% lower risk (P = 0.07) of advanced fibrosis compared to genotype 1 patients. The cumulative 5-year rates of HCV-specific graft survival were 84%, 90%, and 94% for genotypes 1, 2, and 3 (P = 0.10). A total of 37% received antiviral therapy, with higher rates of sustained virologic response in patients with genotype 2 (hazard ratios, 5.10; P = 0.003) and genotype 3 (hazard ratios, 3.27; P = 0.006) compared to patients with genotype 1. CONCLUSION: Risk of advanced fibrosis and response to therapy are strongly influenced by genotype. Liver transplantation recipients with HCV genotype 1 have the highest risk of advanced fibrosis and lowest sustained virologic response rate. These findings highlight the need for genotype-specific management strategies.

To transplant or not to transplant recurrent hepatitis C and liver failure.

In summary, re-OLT accounts for 10% of all OLTs performed and is associated with significantly increased resource use, and decreased survival compared with primary OLT. After transplantation into an HCV-infected recipient, infection of the allograft by HCV is invariable. As patients survive longer after liver transplantation, it is likely that allograft failure related to HCV recurrence will occur. Results of re-OLT for HCV are inferior to those of primary grafting, paralleling the results for retransplantation for other indications. Many studies have demonstrated that HCV infection significantly impairs patient and allograft survival after liver retransplantation, regardless of etiology of allograft failure. Patient survival rates with HCV infection are 57% to 65% at 1 year, as compared with 65% to 82% among patients without HCV infection. Experience with retransplantation is limited, however, and studies are difficult to interpret because of small sample sizes and lack of uniform definitions of survival, HCV recurrence, and allograft failure. Similar to outcomes after retransplantation for non-HCV related indications, the most common causes of death are sepsis and multi-organ failure. The high mortality associated with retransplantation has not universally been caused by recurrent disease, however recent studies have demonstrated that re-recurrent HCV occurs and the natural history is similar, if not more accelerated, after the second transplant. HCV infection may, in fact, increase mortality in a group of patients already predisposed to an inferior outcome. Preoperative serum creatinine and bilirubin have been consistently associated with survival after retransplantation and favorable results are attainable with strict selection criteria. The increasing use of expanded donor criteria, in particular, LRLT, raises important practical and ethical issues with regards to the HCV-positive transplant recipient and will become a challenge to the transplant community as a whole. With the donor morbidity and mortality associated with LRLT currently estimated at 32% and 0.3%, respectively, one must determine how much risk is acceptable to the donor in relation to the outcome in the recipient. This is especially true in HCV-infected recipients, in whom HCV re-recurrence may occur in the second allograft and lead to accelerated failure. LRLT, however, would not deplete the organ pool and would lead to the use of scarce cadaveric organs to patients who are awaiting primary liver transplantation. Despite inferior outcomes, a better tactic may be to consider retransplantation for recurrent HCV in those whose primary transplant was a LDLT, as the initial allograft did not deplete the donor pool. Given the shortage of donor organs and the increasing number of patients with HCV-induced allograft cirrhosis, identifying ways to improve allograft survival in HCV-infected patients represents an important focus for further research. Additional studies are needed to further explore the mechanisms underlying the reduction in survival and to identify which HCV-positive individuals are at greatest risk for poor survival. Studies are beginning to emerge that demonstrate that HCV recurrence can be modified with combination antiviral therapy and that the HCV virus can be eliminated. Additional longitudinal prospective studies are needed to assess the exact impact of HCV on survival after retransplantation, the effects of the newer immunosuppressive agents such as sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil on HCV, the use of preemptive antiviral therapy on HCV eradication and fibrosis modification, and the appropriateness of expanded donor criteria. Until we have longer follow-up and greater experience with the HCV-positive recipient with allograft failure, retransplantation should be considered a viable option for highly selected patients, particularly in patients in whom renal failure and severe hyperbilirubinemia have not occurred.

The association between hepatitis C infection and survival after orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The effect of hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection on patient and allograft survival after orthotopic liver transplantation is controversial. Hepatitis C recurrence after transplant is inevitable, but studies to date have not found a survival difference between recipients with and without HCV. METHODS: Using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing, we performed a retrospective cohort study of 11,036 patients who underwent 11,791 liver transplants between 1992 and 1998. The hazard rates of patient and allograft survival for patients who were HCV-positive as compared with patients who were HCV-negative were assessed by proportional-hazards analysis, with adjustment for potential confounding variables, including donor, recipient, and transplant center characteristics. RESULTS: Liver transplantation in HCV-positive recipients was associated with an increased rate of death (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.35) and allograft failure (hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.21-1.39), as compared with transplantation in HCV-negative recipients. This reduction in survival persisted after adjusting for potential confounders. There was an interaction between HCV and sex (P < 0.001) with the effect of HCV on survival being most pronounced in female recipients (patient survival hazard ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.35-1.81; allograft survival hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.34-1.70). CONCLUSIONS: HCV infection significantly impairs patient and allograft survival after liver transplantation.

Survival following liver transplantation from non-heart-beating donors.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient and graft survival following transplantation with non-heart-beating donor (NHBD) hepatic allografts is equivalent to heart-beating-donor (HBD) allografts. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With the growing disparity between the number of patients awaiting liver transplantation and a limited supply of cadaveric organs, there is renewed interest in the use of hepatic allografts from NHBDs. Limited outcome data addressing this issue exist. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of graft and patient survival among adult recipients of NHBD hepatic allografts compared with recipients of HBD livers between 1993 and 2001 using the United Network of Organ Sharing database. RESULTS: NHBD (N = 144) graft survival was significantly shorter than HBD grafts (N = 26856). One- and 3-year graft survival was 70.2% and 63.3% for NHBD recipients versus 80.4% and 72.1% (P = 0.003 and P = 0.012) for HBD recipients. Recipients of an NHBD graft had a greater incidence of primary nonfunction (11.8 vs. 6.4%, P = 0.008) and retransplantation (13.9% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.04) compared with HBD recipients. Prolonged cold ischemic time and recipient life support were predictors of early graft failure among recipients of NHBD livers. Although differences in patient survival following NHBD versus HBD transplant did not meet statistical significance, a strong trend was evident that likely has relevant clinical implications. CONCLUSIONS: Graft and patient survival is inferior among recipients of NHBD livers. NHBD donors remain an important source of hepatic grafts; however, judicious use is warranted, including minimization of cold ischemia and use in stable recipients.

Atrial septal perforation from TIPS stent migration.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) are safe and effective for the treatment of portal hypertension. Cardiac complications are unusual. This study reports a case of TIPS stent migration to the right atrium causing perforation of the atrial septum in a patient with end-stage liver disease. The shunt was removed transvenously but attempts at transvenous occlusion of the septal perforation were unsuccessful. The patient went on to undergo combined open-heart surgery with septum repair and liver transplantation. The case highlights a rare complication of TIPS and methods for treatment including transvenous removal, transvenous repair, and combined cardiotomy-liver transplantation surgery.