3-dimensionally printed patient-specific glenoid drill guides vs. standard nonspecific instrumentation: a randomized controlled trial comparing the accuracy of glenoid component placement in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Traditional, commercially sourced patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) systems for shoulder arthroplasty improve glenoid component placement but can involve considerable cost and outsourcing delays. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the accuracy of glenoid component positioning in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) using an in-house, point-of-care, 3-dimensionally (3D) printed patient-specific glenoid drill guide vs. standard nonspecific instrumentation. METHODS: This single-center randomized controlled trial included 36 adult patients undergoing primary aTSA. Patients were blinded and randomized 1:1 to either the PSI or the standard aTSA guide groups. The primary endpoint was the accuracy of glenoid component placement (version and inclination), which was determined using a metal-suppression computed tomography scan taken between 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. Deviation from the preoperative 3D templating plan was calculated for each patient. Blinded postoperative computed tomography measurements were performed by a fellowship-trained shoulder surgeon and a musculoskeletal radiologist. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were randomized to the patient-specific glenoid drill guide group, and 17 patients were allocated to the standard instrumentation control group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups for native version (P = .527) or inclination (P = .415). The version correction was similar between the 2 groups (P = .551), and the PSI group was significantly more accurate when correcting version than the control group (P = .042). The PSI group required a significantly greater inclination correction than the control group (P = .002); however, the 2 groups still had similar accuracy when correcting inclination (P = .851). For the PSI group, there was no correlation between the accuracy of component placement and native version, native inclination, or the Walch classification of glenoid wear (P > .05). For the control group, accuracy when correcting version was inversely correlated with native version (P = .033), but accuracy was not correlated with native inclination or the Walch classification of glenoid wear (P > .05). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.703 and 0.848 when measuring version and inclination accuracy, respectively. CONCLUSION: When compared with standard instrumentation, the use of in-house, 3D printed, patient-specific glenoid drill guides during aTSA led to more accurate glenoid component version correction and similarly accurate inclination correction. Additional research should examine the influence of proper component position and use of PSI on clinical outcomes.

Editorial Commentary: Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Are Tools Requiring Physician and Patient Input When Screening Patients at Risk for Extended, Postoperative Opioid Use.

As the implementation of artificial intelligence in orthopedic surgery research flourishes, so grows the need for responsible use. Related research requires clear reporting of algorithmic error rates. Recent studies show that preoperative opioid use, male sex, and greater body mass index are risk factors for extended, postoperative opioid use, but may result in high false positive rates. Thus, to be applied clinically when screening patients, these tools require physician and patient input, and nuanced interpretation, as the utility of these screening tools diminish without providers interpreting and acting on the information. Machine learning and artificial intelligence should be viewed as tools that can facilitate these human conversations among patients, orthopedic surgeons, and health care providers.

Two Intramedullary and 1 Extramedullary Cortical Button, With or Without Interference Screw, Show Biomechanical Properties Superior to Native Tendon in Repair of the Distal Biceps Tendon: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Performance.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to use a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the failure strength, maximum strength, stiffness, and displacement of available constructs for distal biceps repair. METHODS: An NMA was conducted to determine the performance of 2 all-suture suture anchors (2x ASA), 2 intramedullary cortical buttons (2x IM CB), 2 suture anchors (2x SA), extramedullary cortical buttons (EM CB), extramedullary cortical button plus interference screw (EM CB+IFS), interference screw (IFS), single intramedullary cortical button (IM CB), single suture anchor (SA), transosseous suture (TOS), tension slide technique (TST), and tension slide technique plus suture tape (TST+ST). Analysis consisted of arm-based network meta-analysis under Bayesian random-effects model with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. Biomechanical outcomes were summarized as treatment effects and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Rank probabilities were calculated and used to generate each treatment's surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve. Biomechanical properties were compared to native tendon. Displacement >10 mm was defined as clinical failure. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included. For failure strength, no construct outperformed the native tendon but 2× SA, IFS, SA, and TOS demonstrated poorer failure strength. For the maximum load to failure, EM CB+IFS outperformed the native tendon. Compared to native tendon, EM CB+IFS, EM CB, and 2×IM CB were stiffer, while 2x SA and IFS were less stiff. No construct demonstrated >10 mm of displacement, but constructs with displacement above the mean (3.5 mm) included 2× ASA, 2xIM CB, and TOS. CONCLUSIONS: The fixation constructs that consistently demonstrated comparable or better biomechanical properties (failure strength, maximum strength, and stiffness) to native tendon in distal biceps tendon repair were the extramedullary cortical button with or without interference screw and two intramedullary cortical buttons. No construct demonstrated displacement beyond standard definitions for clinical failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This network meta-analysis of biomechanical studies suggests that extramedullary cortical button and two intramedullary cortical buttons may be the most stable construct for distal biceps repair fixation, with equivalent or better biomechanical properties compared to native tendon.

Suture Anchor-Based Quadriceps Tendon Repair May Result in Improved Patient-Reported Outcomes but Similar Failure Rates Compared to the Transosseous Tunnel Technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare failure rates and patient-reported outcomes between transosseus (TO) suture and suture anchor (SA) quadriceps tendon repairs. METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, patients who underwent primary repair for quadriceps tendon rupture with TO or SA techniques between January 2009 and August 2018 were identified from an institutional database and retrospectively reviewed. Patients were contacted for satisfaction (1-10 scale), current function (0-100 scale), failure (retear), and revision surgeries; International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) were also collected to achieve a minimum of 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (34 SA, 30 TO) were available by phone or e-mail at a mean of 4.81 ± 2.60 years postoperatively. There were 10 failures, for an overall failure rate of 15.6%. Failure incidence did not significantly differ between treatment groups (P = .83). Twenty-seven patients (47% of nonfailed patients) had completed patient-reported outcomes. The SA group reported higher subjective function (SA: 90 [85-100] vs TO: 85 [60-93], 95% CI of difference: -19.9 to -2.1 × 10-5, P = .042), final IKDC (79.6 [50.0-93.6] vs 62.1 [44.3-65.5], 95% CI of difference: -33.0 to -0.48, P = .048), KOOS Pain (97.2 [84.7-97.2] vs 73.6 [50.7-88.2], 95% CI of difference: -36.1 to -3.6 × 10-5, P = .037), Quality of Life (81.3 [56.3-93.8] vs 50.0 [23.4-56.3], 95% CI of difference: -50.0 to -6.2, P = .026), and Sport (75.0 [52.5-90.0] vs 47.5 [31.3-67.5], 95% CI of the difference: -45.0 to -4.1 × 10-5, P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in failure rate between transosseus and suture anchor repairs for quadriceps tendon ruptures (P = .83). Most failures occur secondary to a traumatic reinjury within the first year postoperatively. Despite the lack of difference in failure rates, at final follow-up, patients who undergo suture anchor repair may report significantly greater subjective function and final IKDC, KOOS Pain, Quality of Life, and Sport scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

PROMIS physical function and pain perform poorly psychometrically in patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the validity, floor and ceiling effects, and dimensionality of PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain compared to legacy patient reported outcome (PRO) measures in patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. METHODS: Patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction between 2018 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperatively, patients completed the IKDC, VR-12, Kujala, SF-12, KOOS JR, PROMIS PF and Pain surveys. Inter-survey convergence was assessed with Spearman correlations. Psychometric analysis included investigations of inter-survey convergent validity, intra-survey floor and ceiling effects, and Rasch analyses with person-item fit and iterative question elimination model fit testing. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients (mean age: 22.6 ± 8.4 years) who completed preoperative surveys were included (compliance: 91.7-96.2%). Preoperatively, age was significantly associated with both PROMIS PF (coefficient: - 0.291, P = 0.005) and Pain scores (coefficient: 0.294, P = 0.002). PROMIS PF had a Very Good correlation with IKDC and PROMIS Pain had a Very Good correlation with KOOS JR. Other correlations ranged from Poor to Good. No significant floor or ceiling effects were observed for any PRO. On iterative question elimination Rasch modelling, only two questions from PROMIS PF remained after 6 rounds of elimination while PROMIS Pain had no questions remaining after 3 rounds of elimination. CONCLUSION: Preoperative PROMIS PF and Pain provided only Fair to Good correlations with most legacy PROs. Although no significant floor and ceiling effects were observed, PROMIS PF and Pain did not perform well psychometrically in this population of patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction. These results suggest PROMIS questionnaires should be used with caution in this population, especially if used in isolation, when discussing clinical expectations with patients. The authors recommend continued use of legacy PROs specific to assessment of patellar instability and function that have established validity in patellar instability populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Incidence and 30- and 90-day readmission rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty in the United States: an analysis using the National Readmissions Database.

BACKGROUND: The field of shoulder arthroplasty has experienced a substantial increase in the number of procedures performed annually and a shift toward more common implantation of reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSAs). Same-day discharge is perceived as beneficial for most patients as well as our health care system, and the number of shoulder procedures performed as same-day surgery has increased substantially. However, the potential benefits of same-day discharge after shoulder arthroplasty may be negatively influenced by unexpected readmissions. As such, an in-depth analysis of readmission rates after primary shoulder arthroplasty is particularly timely. METHODS: The National Readmissions Database was queried for primary shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States between 2016 and 2018. National incidences were calculated, and indications, patient demographic characteristics, comorbidities, facility characteristics, and rates and causes of 30- and 90-day readmissions were determined for all procedures and compared between anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), anatomic hemiarthroplasty (HA), and RSA. RESULTS: During the study period, 336,672 primary shoulder arthroplasties were performed (37% TSAs, 57% RSAs, and 6% HAs). In 2018, national incidences per 100,000 inhabitants were 22.64 for RSA, 12.70 for TSA, and 1.50 for HA. The utilization of these procedures between 2016 and 2018 increased for RSA, decreased for HA, and remained constant for TSA, but these changes did not reach the level of statistical significance. The average all-cause 30-day readmission rates were 3.63%, 1.92%, and 3.81% for RSA, TSA, and HA, respectively, and the average all-cause 90-day readmission rates were 7.76%, 4.37%, and 9.18%, respectively. For both RSA and HA, the most common surgical diagnosis for 30-day and 90-day readmissions was dislocation (0.45% and 0.99%, respectively, for RSA and 0.21% and 0.67%, respectively, for HA). For TSA, the most common surgical diagnosis for 30-day readmission was infection (0.11%); however, this was surpassed by dislocation (0.28%) at 90 days. CONCLUSION: RSA surpassed TSA as the most frequently performed shoulder arthroplasty procedure in the United States between 2016 and 2018. During this period, the 90-day readmission rate was not negligible, with dislocation and infection as the leading orthopedic causes of readmission.

Physical Therapy Combined With Subacromial Cortisone Injection Is a First-Line Treatment Whereas Acromioplasty With Physical Therapy Is Best if Nonoperative Interventions Fail for the Management of Subacromial Impingement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To construct an algorithm to optimize clinical outcomes in subacromial impingement based on current, high-level evidence. METHODS: A systematic review of all clinical trials on subacromial impingement published from 1999 to 2020 was performed. Demographic, clinical, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) data were collected. Interventions were compared via arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis in a random-effects model and treatments ranked via surface under the cumulative ranking curves with respect to 3 domains: pain, PROMs, and ROM. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies comprising 3,643 shoulders (42% female, age 50 ± 5 years) were included. Arthroscopic decompression with acromioplasty ranked much greater than arthroscopic decompression alone for pain relief and PROM improvement, but the difference in absolute PROMs was not statistically significant. Corticosteroid injection (CSI) alone demonstrated inferior outcomes across all 3 domains (pain, PROMs, and ROM) with low cumulative rankings. Physical therapy (PT) with CSI demonstrated moderate-to-excellent clinical improvement across all 3 domains whereas PT alone demonstrated excellent ROM and low-moderate outcomes in pain and PROM domains. PT with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or alternative therapies ranked highly for PROM outcomes and moderate for pain and ROM domains. Finally, platelet-rich plasma injections demonstrated moderate outcomes for pain, forward flexion, and abduction with very low-ranking outcomes for PROMs and external rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic decompression with acromioplasty and PT demonstrated superior outcomes whereas CSI demonstrated poor outcomes in all 3 domains (pain, PROMs, and ROM). For patients with significant symptoms, the authors recommend PT with CSI as a first-line treatment, followed by acromioplasty and PT if conservative treatment fails. For patients with symptoms limited to 1 to 2 domains, the authors recommend a shared decision-making approach focusing on treatment rankings within domains pertinent to individual patient symptomatology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, systematic review and network meta-analysis of Level I studies.

Duration of Care and Operative Time Are the Primary Drivers of Total Charges After Ambulatory Hip Arthroscopy: A Machine Learning Analysis.

PURPOSE: To develop a machine learning algorithm to predict total charges after ambulatory hip arthroscopy and create a risk-adjusted payment model based on patient comorbidities. METHODS: A retrospective review of the New York State Ambulatory Surgery and Services database was performed to identify patients who underwent elective hip arthroscopy between 2015 and 2016. Features included in initial models consisted of patient characteristics, medical comorbidities, and procedure-specific variables. Models were generated to predict total charges using 5 algorithms. Model performance was assessed by the root-mean-square error, root-mean-square logarithmic error, and coefficient of determination. Global variable importance and partial dependence curves were constructed to show the impact of each input feature on total charges. For performance benchmarking, the best candidate model was compared with a multivariate linear regression using the same input features. RESULTS: A total of 5,121 patients were included. The median cost after hip arthroscopy was $19,720 (interquartile range, $12,399-$26,439). The gradient-boosted ensemble model showed the best performance (root-mean-square error, $3,800 [95% confidence interval, $3,700-$3,900]; logarithmic root-mean-square error, 0.249 [95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.26]; R2 = 0.73). Major cost drivers included total hours in facility less than 12 or more than 15, longer procedure time, performance of a labral repair, age younger than 30 years, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) of 1 or greater, African American race, residence in extreme urban and rural areas, and higher household and neighborhood income. CONCLUSIONS: The gradient-boosted ensemble model effectively predicted total charges after hip arthroscopy. Few modifiable variables were identified other than anesthesia type; nonmodifiable drivers of total charges included duration of care less than 12 hours or more than 15 hours, operating room time more than 100 minutes, age younger than 30 years, performance of a labral repair, and ECI greater than 0. Stratification of patients based on the ECI highlighted the increased financial risk borne by physicians via flat reimbursement schedules given variable degrees of comorbidities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Augmentation May Accelerate Allograft Ligamentization in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) augmentation on clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) allografts. METHODS: A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted on 80 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction using BTB allografts. Patients were randomized to 2 groups: (1) bone marrow aspirate was collected from the iliac crest, concentrated, and approximately 2.5 mL was injected into the BTB allograft, or (2) a small sham incision was made at the iliac crest (control). MRI was performed at 3 months and 9 months postoperatively to determine the signal intensity ratio of the ACL graft. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were available for follow-up at 1-year postoperatively (36 BMAC, 37 control). International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were significantly greater in the BMAC group versus the control at the 9-month postoperative period (81.6 ± 10.5 vs 74.6 ± 14.2, P = .048). There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who met the minimal clinically important difference for IKDC between the BMAC and control groups at 9 months (89% vs 85%; P = .7). Three months postoperatively, signal intensity ratio of the inferior third of the ACL graft was significantly greater in the BMAC group versus the control group (3.2 ± 2.2 vs 2.1 ± 1.5; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received BMAC augmentation of the BTB allograft during ACL reconstruction demonstrated greater signal intensity scores on MRI at 3 months, suggesting increased metabolic activity and remodeling, and potentially accelerated ligamentization. Additionally, patients in the BMAC group had greater patient-reported outcomes (IKDC) at 9 months postoperatively when compared with those who underwent a standard surgical procedure. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who met the minimal clinically important difference for IKDC between the BMAC and control groups at 9 months, suggesting limited clinical significance at this time point. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, randomized control trial.

Double-Row Repair With Platelet-Rich Plasma Optimizes Retear Rates After Small to Medium Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: To compare the different interventions described in the literature for the surgical treatment of small and medium complete rotator cuff tears. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of small-medium, full-thickness rotator cuff tears published since 2000 was performed. Clinical characteristics, re-tear rates, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data were collected. Interventions were compared via arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis in a random-effects model. Interventions were ranked for each domain (re-tear risk, pain, ROM, and PROs) via surface under the cumulative ranking curves. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies comprising 2046 shoulders (47% females, mean age 61 ± 3 years, mean follow-up 21 ± 5 months) were included. Interventions that ranked highest for minimizing re-tear risk included arthroscopic single-row repair (A+SR) or double-row repair (A+DR) with or without platelet-rich plasma (PRP). Open repair and A+SR repair with acromioplasty (ACP) ranked highest for pain relief. Interventions that ranked highest for ROM improvement included open repair, PT, and A+DR with or without ACP. Interventions that ranked highest for PROs included arthroscopic footprint microfracture with or without SR, open repair, and A+SR with or without ACP. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a network meta-analysis of level 1 studies, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a SR or DR construct demonstrates similar retear rates, PROs, and clinical outcomes. The highest-ranking treatment for minimizing retears was arthroscopic repair with DR constructs and PRP augmentation, although open repair and arthroscopic SR remain reliable options with excellent clinical outcomes. Addition of PRP to DR constructs trended toward a 56% decreased risk of retear as compared to DR repair alone. Although no single treatment emerged superior, several interventions offered excellent clinical improvements in pain, ROM, and PROs that exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, systematic review and meta-analysis of level I studies.

Two-Year Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship After Isolated Biceps Tenodesis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and survivorship of isolated biceps tenodesis (BT) at a minimum of 2 years and to identify patient-specific factors associated with these outcomes in patients undergoing BT without concomitant rotator cuff repair (RCR). We hypothesized that patient-reported outcomes would be significantly improved on American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Survey (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), with a high rate of survivorship (>90%) at 2-year follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective review of an institutional registry was performed to identify patients who underwent BT from July 2016 to December 2017. Patients >18 years old who underwent an open or arthroscopic BT procedure using an interference screw, button, or anchor for underlying bicipital pathology, without a concomitant RCR or shoulder arthroplasty, and were a minimum of 2 years postoperative were included. Patients were administered ASES and SANE questionnaires preoperatively and at final follow-up. Survivorship was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Failure was defined as any patient who underwent reoperation related to the index surgery. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients (mean ± standard deviation age, 48.60 ± 12.14 years) who underwent isolated BT with a follow-up of 24.90 ± 3.95 months were included in analysis. There was a significant improvement in ASES and SANE at final follow-up (P < .001), with 81% to 84% of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID), 72% to 82% achieving substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and 72% to 80% achieving patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Worker's Compensation (WC) patients had a decreased likelihood of achieving PASS on ASES (P = .015) and SANE (P = .012). Four cases were deemed failures (3 revision BTs and 1 capsular debridement) at 15.09 ± 9.57 months. WC did not have a significant effect on likelihood of BT failure. CONCLUSION: Biceps tenodesis provided significant clinical improvement and high rates of survivorship 2 years postoperatively. WC was associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving PASS. These results support the continued use of isolated BT for treating biceps pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Patients Follow 3 Different Rate-of-Recovery Patterns After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Based on International Knee Documentation Committee Score.

PURPOSE: To determine whether subgroups of patients exist based on the rate-of-recovery pattern of International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to determine clinical predictors for these subgroups. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary or revision ACLR at a single institution from January 2014 to January 2019 were identified. Latent class growth analyses and growth mixture models (GMMs) with 1 to 6 classes were used to identify subgroups of patients based on functional rate-of-recovery patterns by use of preoperative, 1-year postoperative, and 2-year postoperative IKDC scores. RESULTS: A total of 245 patients who underwent ACLR were included in the analysis. A 3-class GMM was chosen as the final model after 6 different models were run. Class 1, showing improvement from preoperatively to 1-year follow-up, with sustained improvement from 1 to 2 years postoperatively, constituted 77.1% of the study population (n = 189), whereas class 2, showing functional improvement between 1- and 2-year follow-up, was the smallest class, constituting 10.2% of the study population (n = 25), and class 3, showing slight improvement at 1-year follow-up, with a subsequent decline in IKDC scores between 1- and 2-year follow-up, constituted 12.7% of the study population (n = 31). Revision surgery (P = .005), a psychiatric history (P = .025), preoperative chronic knee pain (P = .024), and a subsequent knee injury within the follow-up period (P = .011) were the predictors of class 2 and class 3 rate-of-recovery patterns. Patient demographic characteristics, graft type, and concomitant ligament, meniscus, or cartilage injury at the time of surgery were not associated with the different recovery patterns described in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients may follow different rate-of-recovery patterns after ACLR. By use of the GMMs, 3 different rate-of-recovery patterns based on IKDC scores were identified. Although most patients follow a more ideal rate-of-recovery pattern, fewer patients may follow less favorable patterns. Revision surgery, a history of psychiatric illness, preoperative chronic knee pain, and a subsequent knee injury within the follow-up period were predictive of less favorable rate-of-recovery patterns. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Corticosteroid injections 2 months before arthroscopic meniscectomy increases the rate of postoperative infections requiring surgical irrigation and debridement.

PURPOSE: Consensus guidelines recommend administering a corticosteroid injection (CSI) for patients with a symptomatic degenerative meniscus lesion prior to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM). A recent study found that CSI administered within 1 month prior to meniscectomy is associated with an increased risk of postoperative infection. However, infections may range in severity from superficial infections to serious infections requiring surgical interventions. The aim of this analysis was to define the rate of infections requiring surgery after APM and determine its relationship to preoperative CSI. METHODS: The PearlDiver Mariner administrative claims database was queried for patients > 35 years old who had a CSI in the year prior to isolated APM. Rates of deep infection and infection requiring surgery within 6 months were reported between matched patients with a CSI and no injection. RESULTS: After matching, there were 16,009 patients per group with a mean age of 59.4 years (SD = 9.6), 53.5% obesity, and 40% male. Forty-four of 113 patients who developed a postoperative deep infection went on to have a reoperation for irrigation and/or debridement (0.1% of all APM). Of these 44 patients, 30 had a preoperative CSI and 14 were controls unadjusted odds ratio (unadj-OR) if given CSI = 1.95, 95% CI 1.03-3.68, P = 0.04). Having a CSI within the month before surgery conferred a 4.56-fold increase in odds of an infection warranting surgery (95% CI 1.96-10.21, P < 0.01), whilst having a CSI 4-8 weeks before surgery conferred a 2.42-fold increase in odds (95% CI 1.04-5.42, P = 0.03). Receiving multiple CSI in the year prior to APM was associated with 5.27-fold increased odds of an infection requiring surgery (95% CI 1.19-23.27, P = 0.03), compared to having a single CSI. CONCLUSIONS: Serious infections requiring a surgical intervention are rare after a meniscectomy, occurring in 0.1% of APMs in a matched cohort of patients over 35. Patients were five times more likely to return to the operating room for infection after APM if they had a CSI in the month before or had multiple CSIs in the year before surgery. The risk of infection was no longer significant if there was at least a 2-month interval between preoperative CSI and APM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Machine-learning model successfully predicts patients at risk for prolonged postoperative opioid use following elective knee arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: Recovery following elective knee arthroscopy can be compromised by prolonged postoperative opioid utilization, yet an effective and validated risk calculator for this outcome remains elusive. The purpose of this study is to develop and validate a machine-learning algorithm that can reliably and effectively predict prolonged opioid consumption in patients following elective knee arthroscopy. METHODS: A retrospective review of an institutional outcome database was performed at a tertiary academic medical centre to identify adult patients who underwent knee arthroscopy between 2016 and 2018. Extended postoperative opioid consumption was defined as opioid consumption at least 150 days following surgery. Five machine-learning algorithms were assessed for the ability to predict this outcome. Performances of the algorithms were assessed through discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Overall, of the 381 patients included, 60 (20.3%) demonstrated sustained postoperative opioid consumption. The factors determined for prediction of prolonged postoperative opioid prescriptions were reduced preoperative scores on the following patient-reported outcomes: the IKDC, KOOS ADL, VR12 MCS, KOOS pain, and KOOS Sport and Activities. The ensemble model achieved the best performance based on discrimination (AUC = 0.74), calibration, and decision curve analysis. This model was integrated into a web-based open-access application able to provide both predictions and explanations. CONCLUSION: Following appropriate external validation, the algorithm developed presently could augment timely identification of patients who are at risk of extended opioid use. Reduced scores on preoperative patient-reported outcomes, symptom duration and perioperative oral morphine equivalents were identified as novel predictors of prolonged postoperative opioid use. The predictive model can be easily deployed in the clinical setting to identify at risk patients thus allowing providers to optimize modifiable risk factors and appropriately counsel patients preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Incidence and risk factors for symptomatic venous thromboembolism following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a large national database and to identify corresponding independent risk factors. METHODS: The Humana administrative claims database was reviewed for patients undergoing ACL reconstruction from 2007 to 2017. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, as well as concurrent procedures were recorded. Postoperative incidence of VTE was measured by identifying symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) at 30 days, 90 days, and 1 year postoperatively. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression were performed to determine independent risk factors for VTE following surgery. RESULTS: A total of 11,977 patients were included in the study. The incidence of VTE was 1.01% (n = 120) and 1.22% (n = 146) at 30 and 90 days, respectively. Analysis of VTE events within the first postoperative year revealed that 69.6% and 84.3% of VTEs occurred within 30 and 90 days of surgery, respectively. Logistic regression identified age ≥ 45 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-2.68; p < 0.001), inpatient surgery (OR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.01-4.24; p = 0.045), COPD (OR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.02-2.24; p = 0.041), and tobacco use (OR = 1.75; 95% CI 1.17-2.62; p = 0.007), as well as concurrent PCL reconstruction (OR = 3.85; 95% CI 1.71-8.67; p = 0.001), meniscal transplant (OR = 17.68; 95% CI 3.63-85.97; p < 0.001) or osteochondral allograft (OR = 15.73; 95% CI 1.79-138.43; p = 0.013) as independent risk factors for VTE after ACL reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of symptomatic postoperative VTE is low following ACL reconstruction, with the majority of cases occurring within 90 days of surgery. Risk factors include age ≥ 45, inpatient surgery, COPD, tobacco use and concurrent PCL reconstruction, meniscal transplant or osteochondral allograft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

PROMIS Upper Extremity underperforms psychometrically relative to American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score in patients undergoing primary rotator cuff repair.

BACKGROUND: A number of patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) instruments are used to assess shoulder pain, function, and postoperative satisfaction. Computer adaptive tests (CATs) have been developed in an effort to tailor question delivery, decrease time to completion and floor/ceiling effects, and increase compliance. Previous investigations have demonstrated excellent correlation between Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity CAT (UE-CAT) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) instruments, indicating that the PROMIS UE-CAT may be an acceptable alternative to the ASES. Prior to widespread adoption, however, rigorous psychometric validation must be performed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of PROMIS UE-CAT relative to the ASES score in patients undergoing primary rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS: A retrospective study of an institutional RCR registry was performed from July 2018 through March 2019. Preoperative PROMIS UE-CAT and ASES scores were collected. Floor and ceiling effects were determined, and convergent validity was established through Pearson correlations. Rasch partial credit modeling was used for psychometric analysis of the validity of PROMIS UE-CAT and ASES question items, a previously established methodology for assessing shoulder PROMs. Person-item maps were generated to characterize the distribution of question responses along the latent dimension of shoulder disability. RESULTS: Responses from 107 patients (107 shoulders) were included. PROMIS UE-CAT had a strong correlation to ASES (r = 0.684; P < .001), with a 3.7% floor effect and no ceiling effect; ASES had no floor or ceiling effects. PROMIS UE-CAT person-item maps revealed excellent test item coverage between floor and ceiling effects; however, all PROMIS UE-CAT items except "Difficulty putting on a jacket" demonstrated nonsequentially ordered responses, indicating poor reliability of item responses corresponding to shoulder function. Although PROMIS UE-CAT initially demonstrated superior instrument efficiency with fewer test items for overall equivalent coverage of shoulder function assessment, final models after recursive item elimination revealed the ASES instrument to have more well-fitting items over a broader range of shoulder function. CONCLUSION: Despite its overall strong correlation with ASES and equivalent coverage between floor and ceiling effects, the psychometric properties of PROMIS UE-CAT indicate a need for optimization of individual test items to correspond to shoulder function. Until further refinements in the PROMIS UE-CAT instrument are made, it should not replace the ASES instrument in patients undergoing primary RCR.

Establishing Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Pediatric Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish clinically significant outcome values for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in the pediatric and adolescent populations and to assess factors that were associated with achieving these outcomes. METHODS: Patients between the age of 10 to 21 who underwent ACLR between 2016 and 2018 were identified and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Intraoperative variables collected included graft choice, graft size (diameter), graft fixation method, and concomitant procedures. PROs collected for analysis were the International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). MCID and PASS were calculated using receiver operating characteristic with area under the curve analyses for delta (ie, baseline-to-postoperative change) and absolute postoperative PRO scores, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients were included in the analysis. Of the entire study population, 53 (89.8%) reported satisfaction with their surgical outcome. The established MCID threshold values based on the study population were 33.3 for IKDC, 28.6 for (KOOS) Symptoms, 19.4 for Pain, 2.9 for activities of daily living (ADL), 45.0 for Sport, and 25.0 for Quality of Life (QoL). Postoperative scores greater than the following values corresponded to the PASS: 80.5 for IKDC, 75.0 (KOOS) Symptoms, 88.9 for Pain, 98.5 for ADL, 75.0 for Sport, and 68.8 for QoL. CONCLUSION: Clinically meaningful outcomes including MCID and PASS were established for pediatric ACLR surgery using selected PRO measures, IKDC, and KOOS. Patient age, sex, graft type, and graft size were not associated with greater achievement of these outcomes. In contrast, collision sports, fixed-object high-impact rotational landing sports, and concomitant meniscectomy surgery were associated with a decreased likelihood of achieving clinically significant improvement. However, findings must be interpreted with caution due to limitations in follow-up and sample size. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: case series.

Inpatient Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Is Associated With Higher Postoperative Complications Compared With Same-Day Discharge: A Matched Cohort Analysis.

PURPOSE: To compare 90-day postoperative complications between patients undergoing outpatient versus inpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs (RCR) and identify risk factors associated with postoperative complications. METHODS: An administrative claims database was used to identify patients undergoing arthroscopic RCR from 2007 to 2015. Patients were categorized based on length of hospital stay (LOS) with inpatient RCR defined as patients with ≥1 day LOS, and outpatient RCR as patients discharged day of surgery (LOS = 0). Inpatient and outpatient RCR groups were matched based on age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and various medical comorbidities using 1:1 propensity score analysis. Patient factors, concomitant procedures, total adverse events (TAEs), medical adverse events (MAEs), and surgical adverse events (SAEs) were compared between the matched groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with increased complications. RESULTS: After matching, there were 2812 patients (50% outpatient) included in the study. Within 90 days following arthroscopic RCR, the incidence of TAEs (8.9% vs 3.6%, P < .0001), SAEs (2.7% vs 0.9%, P = .0002), and MAEs (6.4% vs 3.0%, P < .0001) were significantly greater for the inpatient RCR group. The multivariate model identified inpatient RCR (LOS ≥1 day), greater CCI, and anxiety or depression as independent predictors for TAEs after arthroscopic RCR. Open biceps tenodesis and inpatient RCR were independent predictors of SAEs, whereas greater CCI, anxiety or depression, and inpatient RCR were independent predictors for MAEs within 90 days after arthroscopic RCR. CONCLUSIONS: Inpatient arthroscopic RCR is associated with increased risk of 90-day postoperative complications compared with outpatient. However, there is no difference for all-cause or pain-related emergency department visits within 90 days after surgery. In addition, the multivariate model identified inpatient RCR, greater CCI, and diagnosis of anxiety or depression as independent risk factors for 90-day TAEs after arthroscopic RCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, Retrospective cohort study.

Vancomycin Presoaking of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tendon Grafts Is Highly Cost-Effective for Preventing Infection.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to (1) determine whether intraoperative graft soaking with vancomycin is a cost-effective measure for preventing infection after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and (2) provide an adaptable model for providers and institutions to determine the cost effectiveness of this strategy over a range of initial infection rates, infection-related care costs, and vancomycin costs. METHODS: Baseline postoperative infection rates and the costs of antibiotics and infection-related care were gathered from the literature. The cost of treating infection was determined for 2 alternative protocols-irrigation and debridement with revision ACL reconstruction or ACL graft retention. Using a break-even economic analysis, we developed an equation to determine the absolute risk reduction (ARR) in infection rate required for the use of vancomycin graft soaking to be deemed cost-effective. To provide a widely applicable robust model, multiple simulations were performed at varying unit costs, infection rates, and ACL reconstruction postoperative infection related care costs. The number needed to treat was calculated from the ARR. RESULTS: Intraoperative vancomycin was determined to be cost-effective if it prevents 1 infection in 550 cases (ARR = 0.182%), given costs of $24,178 and $44/1,000 mg for revision ACL reconstruction and vancomycin, respectively. If the ACL graft is retained following infection, intraoperative vancomycin was considered cost-effective if it prevents 1 infection in 146 cases (ARR = 0.685%), given costs of $6,424 and $44/1,000 mg for arthroscopic debridement and vancomycin prophylaxis, respectively. For any specific cost of treating infection and cost of vancomycin, variation in baseline infection rates did not influence the economic viability of vancomycin graft soaking. This intervention remained economically viable over a wide range of unit costs of vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Through break-even economic analysis, this study demonstrates that the use of intraoperative graft preparation with vancomycin is a highly cost-effective prophylactic measure for infection prevention in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, economic analysis.

Corticosteroid Injections 1 Month Before Arthroscopic Meniscectomy Increase the Risk of Surgical-Site Infection.

PURPOSE: To define the incidence of postoperative infections in patients who receive corticosteroid injections prior to arthroscopic meniscectomy, to determine whether there is a temporal relation between injections and the risk of surgical-site infections, and to identify corresponding risk factors. METHODS: The Humana administrative claims database was reviewed for patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy within 1 year of injection and those undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy without prior injection. Patients with preoperative injections were further stratified by the duration in months between the injection and the surgical procedure. Surgical-site infection within 6 months of surgery was recorded. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression were performed to determine independent risk factors for surgical-site infection. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: We identified patients with (n = 11,652) and without (n = 37,261) a history of a knee corticosteroid injection within 1 year of arthroscopic meniscectomy with at least 6 months of database activity from 2007 to 2017. In patients who received knee injections within 1 month prior to surgery, the rate of development of postoperative infections was twice that in patients who did not receive an injection (1.28% vs 0.63%; odds ratio [OR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-2.62; P = .001). Multivariate logistic regression identified male sex (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.14-1.71; P = .001), diabetes (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.19-1.85; P < .001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.27-1.94; P < .001), obesity (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07-1.63; P = .010), tobacco use (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.30-1.98; P < .001), and preoperative injections within 1 month of surgery (OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.21-2.54; P = .002) as significant predictors, whereas injections administered more than 1 month before surgery were not significantly associated with postoperative surgical-site infection after arthroscopic meniscectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Injections 1 month before arthroscopic meniscectomy significantly increase the risk of surgical-site infection. However, injections can be safely administered more than 1 month prior to surgery because there is no increased risk of postoperative infection at this time point. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.