Systemic considerations for the surgical treatment of spinal metastatic disease: a scoping literature review.

Systemic assessment is a pillar in the neurological, oncological, mechanical, and systemic (NOMS) decision-making framework for the treatment of patients with spinal metastatic disease. Despite this importance, emerging evidence relating systemic considerations to clinical outcomes following surgery for spinal metastatic disease has not been comprehensively summarised. We aimed to conduct a scoping literature review of this broad topic. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases from Jan 1, 2000, to July 31, 2021. 61 articles were included, accounting for a total of 22 335 patients. Preoperative systemic variables negatively associated with postoperative clinical outcomes included demographics (eg, older age [>60 years], Black race, male sex, low or elevated body-mass index, and smoking status), medical comorbidities (eg, cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, endocrine, vascular, and rheumatological), biochemical abnormalities (eg, hypoalbuminaemia, atypical blood cell counts, and elevated C-reactive protein concentration), low muscle mass, generalised motor weakness (American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale grade and Frankel grade) and poor ambulation, reduced performance status, and systemic disease burden. This is the first comprehensive scoping review to broadly summarise emerging evidence relevant to the systemic assessment component of the widely used NOMS framework for spinal metastatic disease decision making. Medical, surgical, and radiation oncologists can consider these findings when prognosticating spinal metastatic disease-related surgical outcomes on the basis of patients' systemic condition. These factors might inform a shared decision-making approach with patients and their families.

Encrypted smartphone text messaging between spine surgeons may reduce after-hours surgery.

PURPOSE: "After-hours" non-elective spine surgery is associated with increased morbidity. Decision-making may be enhanced by collaborative input from experienced local colleagues. At our center, we implemented routine use of a cross-platform messaging system (CPMS; WhatsApp Inc., Mountain View, California) to facilitate quality care discussions and collaborative surgical decision-making between spine surgeons prior to booking cases with the operating room. Our aim is to determine whether encrypted text messaging for shared decision-making between spine surgeons affects the number or type of after-hours spine procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively compared the number, type and length of after-hours spine surgery over three time periods: (A) June 1, 2016-May 31, 2017 (baseline control); (B) June 1, 2017-May 31, 2018 (implementation of retrospective quality care spine rounds); and (C) June 1, 2018-May 31, 2019 (implementation of CPMS). A qualitative analysis of the CPMS transcripts was also performed to assess the rate of between-surgeon agreement for timing and type of procedure. RESULTS: The mean number of after-hours spine surgeries/month over the three study periods (A, B, C) was 10.83, 9.75 and 7.58 (p = 0.014); length of surgery was 41.82, 33.14 and 25.37 h/month (p = 0.001). Group agreement with the attending spine surgeon plan was 74.3% overall and was highest for the most urgent and least urgent types of indications. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective (i.e., prior to booking surgery) quality care discussion for joint decision-making among spine surgeons using CPMS may reduce both the number and complexity of after-hours procedures.

Nerve root sedimentation sign on MRI: A triage screen for leg dominant symptoms?

PURPOSE: Surgical indications for lumbar spinal stenosis are controversial, but most agree that leg dominant pain is a better predictor of success after decompression surgery. The objective of this study is to analyze the ability of the Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign (SedSign) on MRI to differentiate leg dominant symptoms from non-specific low back pain. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 367 consecutive patients presenting with back and/or leg pain. Baseline clinical characteristics included Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog pain scores, EuroQol Group 5-Dimension Self-Report (EQ5D) and Saskatchewan Spine Pathway Classification (SSPc). Inter- and intra-rater reliability for SedSign was 73% and 91%, respectively (3 examiners). RESULTS: SedSign was positive in 111 (30.2%) and negative in 256 (69.8%) patients. On univariate analysis, a positive SedSign was correlated with age, male sex, several ODI components, EQ5D mobility, cross-sectional area (CSA) of stenosis, antero-posterior diameter of stenosis, and SSPc pattern 4 (intermittent leg dominant pain). On multivariate analysis, SedSign was associated with age, male sex, CSA stenosis and ODI walking distance. Patients with a positive SedSign were more likely to be offered surgery after referral (OR 2.65). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting all types of leg dominant pain were 37.4 and 82.8, respectively (ppv 77.5%, npv 43.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a positive SedSign were more likely to be offered surgery, in particular non-instrumented decompression. The SedSign has high specificity for leg dominant pain, but the sensitivity is poor. As such, its use in triaging appropriate surgical referrals is limited.

Traumatic spinal cord injuries among Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations of Saskatchewan: a prospective outcomes study.

Background: People of Aboriginal (Indigenous) ancestry are more likely to experience traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) than other Canadians; however, outcome studies are limited. This study aims to compare Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations with acute TSCI with respect to preinjury baseline characteristics, injury severity, treatment, outcomes and length of stay. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of participants with a TSCI who were enrolled in the prospective Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR), Saskatoon site (Royal University Hospital), between Feb. 13, 2010, and Dec. 17, 2016. Demographic, injury and management data were assessed to identify any differences between the populations. Results: Of the 159 patients admitted to Royal University Hospital with an acute TSCI during the study period, 62 provided consent and were included in the study. Of these, 21 self-identified as Aboriginal (33.9%) and 41 as non-Aboriginal (66.1%) on treatment intake forms. Compared with non-Aboriginal participants, Aboriginal participants were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a similar severity of neurologic injury and had similar clinical outcomes. However, the time to discharge to the community was significantly longer for Aboriginal participants (median 104.0 v. 34.0 d, p = 0.016). Although 35% of non-Aboriginal participants were discharged home from the acute care site, no Aboriginal participants were transferred home directly. Conclusion: This study suggests a need for better allocation of resources for transition to the community for Aboriginal people with a TSCI in Saskatchewan. We plan to assess outcomes from TSCI for Aboriginal people across Canada.

Contexte: Au Canada, les personnes d'origine autochtone sont plus susceptibles que les autres de vivre un traumatisme médullaire. Malgré cela, il y a peu d'études sur les conséquences de cet événement. Notre étude visait à comparer les cas de traumatisme médullaire aigu dans les populations autochtones et non autochtones sur plusieurs plans : les caractéristiques initiales des patients, la gravité du traumatisme, la nature du traitement, les issues cliniques et la durée de séjour. Méthodes: Nous avons fait une analyse rétrospective des dossiers de personnes ajoutées au Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) [Registre des traumatismes médullaires Rick Hansen] entre le 13 février 2010 et le 17 décembre 2016 pour l'établissement de Saskatoon (l'Hôpital universitaire Royal). Nous avons comparé les renseignements de base des patients ainsi que les données sur le traumatisme et la prise en charge afin de cerner toute différence entre les populations. Résultats: Sur les 159 traumatisés médullaires admis à l'Hôpital universitaire Royal pendant la période à l'étude, 62 ont consenti à l'utilisation de leurs données. Parmi eux, 21 s'étaient identifiés comme Autochtones (33,9 %) sur le formulaire d'hospitalisation, et 41 comme non-Autochtones (66,1 %). Par rapport aux non-Autochtones, les Autochtones étaient plus jeunes, avaient moins de comorbidités, présentaient une atteinte neurologique de gravité comparable et connaissaient à peu près le même tableau clinique. Toutefois, le délai avant leur retour en communauté était significativement plus long (médiane : 104,0 jours contre 34,0 jours; p = 0,016). Aucun participant autochtone n'a été renvoyé directement à la maison, alors que 35 % des participants non autochtones sont retournés chez eux en quittant les soins de première ligne. Conclusion: Cette étude montre qu'il faut améliorer la répartition des ressources de retour dans la communauté pour les traumatisés médullaires autochtones de la Saskatchewan. Enfin, nous comptons examiner les répercussions cliniques du traumatisme médullaire chez les Autochtones de partout au Canada.

Safeguards to prevent neurologic complications after epidural steroid injections: consensus opinions from a multidisciplinary working group and national organizations.

BACKGROUND: Epidural corticosteroid injections are a common treatment for radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniations, spinal stenosis, and other disorders. Although rare, catastrophic neurologic injuries, including stroke and spinal cord injury, have occurred with these injections. METHODS: A collaboration was undertaken between the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safe Use Initiative, an expert multidisciplinary working group, and 13 specialty stakeholder societies. The goal of this collaboration was to review the existing evidence regarding neurologic complications associated with epidural corticosteroid injections and produce consensus procedural clinical considerations aimed at enhancing the safety of these injections. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safe Use Initiative representatives helped convene and facilitate meetings without actively participating in the deliberations or decision-making process. RESULTS: Seventeen clinical considerations aimed at improving safety were produced by the stakeholder societies. Specific clinical considerations for performing transforaminal and interlaminar injections, including the use of nonparticulate steroid, anatomic considerations, and use of radiographic guidance are given along with the existing scientific evidence for each clinical consideration. CONCLUSION: Adherence to specific recommended practices when performing epidural corticosteroid injections should lead to a reduction in the incidence of neurologic injuries.

Effect of older age on treatment decisions and outcomes among patients with traumatic spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Older people are at increased risk of traumatic spinal cord injury from falls. We evaluated the impact of older age (≥ 70 yr) on treatment decisions and outcomes. METHODS: We identified patients with traumatic spinal cord injury for whom consent and detailed data were available from among patients recruited (2004-2013) at any of the 31 acute care and rehabilitation hospitals participating in the Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry. Patients were assessed by age group (< 70 v. ≥ 70 yr). The primary outcome was the rate of acute surgical treatment. We used bivariate and multivariate regression models to assess patient and injury-related factors associated with receiving surgical treatment and with the timing of surgery after arrival to a participating centre. RESULTS: Of the 1440 patients included in our study cohort, 167 (11.6%) were 70 years or older at the time of injury. Older patients were more likely than younger patients to be injured by falling (83.1% v. 37.4%; p < 0.001), to have a cervical injury (78.0% v. 61.6%; p = 0.001), to have less severe injuries on admission (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade C or D: 70.5% v. 46.9%; p < 0.001), to have a longer stay in an acute care hospital (median 35 v. 28 d; p < 0.005) and to have a higher in-hospital mortality (4.2% v. 0.6%; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis did not show that age of 70 years or more at injury was associated with a decreased likelihood of surgical treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-1.07). An unplanned sensitivity analysis with different age thresholds showed that a threshold of 65 years was associated with a decreased chance of surgical treatment (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.80). Older patients who underwent surgical treatment had a significantly longer wait time from admission to surgery than younger patients (37 v. 19 h; p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: We found chronological age to be a factor influencing treatment decisions but not at the 70-year age threshold that we had hypothesized. Older patients waited longer for surgery and had a substantially higher in-hospital mortality despite having less severe injuries than younger patients. Further research into the link between treatment delays and outcomes among older patients could inform surgical guideline development.

Hospitalized head and spine injuries on Saskatchewan farms.

INTRODUCTION: With over 44,000 individual farms, farm dwellers account for 11% of the population of Saskatchewan. There is limited data on brain and spine injuries acquired on farms. The objective of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology of head and spine injuries on Saskatchewan farms to assist the development of injury prevention initiatives. METHODS: Using the Canadian Centre for Agricultural Health and Safety's Saskatchewan Farm Injury Surveillance Database, farm-related head and spine injuries hospitalized > 24 hours were examined (1990-2007). We collected information regarding the type and mechanism of injury as well as the geographic location of both the injury and treatment. RESULTS: The database captured 390 brain injuries and 228 spine injuries, including 16 spinal cord injuries. The majority of patients were male (73.3% of head injuries and 84.2% of spine injuries). The highest risk age groups were 50-59 years, with 24.1% of the spine injuries, and 40-49 years, with 19.2% of the head injuries. The most common causes of injury were falls and/or machinery-related. The average annual incidence of farm-related spine and head injury were 10.8 and 17.6 per 100,000 farm population, respectively. All patients included in this study were hospitalized for over 24 hours, with 44.7% of spine injuries spending over one week in hospital, and 20% of head injuries spending over three days in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Injury prevention initiatives should be targeted towards males aged 40-59 years residing in the southern areas of the province, with increased awareness towards the dangers of falls and operating tractors.

Long-Term (>24 Months) Duration of Symptoms Negatively Impacts Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of long symptom duration (>24 mo) on patient self-reported outcomes for pain, function, and quality of life following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is an effective treatment to relieve the symptoms of cervical radiculopathy. However, there is no consensus on whether prolonged preoperative length of symptoms negatively impacts postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This study included consecutive patients who underwent ACDF for cervical radiculopathy from May 1, 2012 to Dec 1, 2019 by a single surgeon. Patients were stratified by short (<24 mo) and long (>24 mo) duration of symptoms. Outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm, neck disability index (NDI), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and overall state of health (EQ-VAS) were compared between cohort both for absolute values and percentage of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference. RESULTS: A total of 111 consecutive patients were included in our study, including 59 patients in the short symptom duration group and 52 patients in the long symptom duration group. The mean age of the patients was 51.4±9.4 and 41 (36.9%) were female. The baseline VAS neck and arm, NDI, EQ-5D, and EQ-VAS were similar between groups. Patients in both long and short symptom duration groups had clinical improvement following surgery. However, patients with short symptom duration had better VAS Neck and EQ-5D outcomes, and were more likely to meet minimal clinically important difference for NDI, EQ-5D, or any outcome. Multivariate analysis confirmed symptom duration <24 months as an independent predictor for better patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: We appreciated better clinical outcomes in patients with shorter symptom duration who received ACDF for cervical radiculopathy. On the basis of this data, we advocate for prompt treatment of cervical radiculopathy to avoid the potential for long-term impairment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Postoperative C5 Palsy after Anterior or Posterior Decompression for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Subgroup Analysis of the Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Phase III, CSM-Protect Clinical Trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of prospectively accrued data. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a large, prospective, multicentre dataset of surgically-treated DCM cases on the contemporary risk of C5 palsy with surgical approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The influence of surgical technique on postoperative C5 palsy after decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is intensely debated. Comprehensive analyses are needed using contemporary data and accounting for covariates. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe DCM were prospectively enrolled in the multicenter, randomized CSM-Protect clinical trial and underwent either anterior or posterior decompression between Jan 31, 2012, to May 16, 2017. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative C5 palsy, defined as onset of muscle weakness by at least one grade in manual muscle test at the C5 myotome with slight or absent sensory disruption after cervical surgery. Two comparative cohorts were made based on anterior or posterior surgical approach. Multivariate hierarchical mixed-effects logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for C5 palsy. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were included, and 53.4% underwent posterior decompression. The total incidence of postoperative C5 palsy was 7.4% and was significantly higher in patients that underwent posterior decompression compared to anterior decompression (11.26% vs. 3.03%, P=0.008). After multivariable regression, posterior approach was independently associated with greater than four times the likelihood of postoperative C5 palsy (P=0.017). Rates of C5 palsy recovery were comparable between the two surgical approaches. CONCLUSION: The odds of postoperative C5 palsy are significantly higher after posterior decompression compared to anterior decompression for DCM. This may influence surgical decision-making when there is equipoise in deciding between anterior and posterior treatment options for DCM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II.

Riluzole for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Secondary Analysis of the CSM-PROTECT Trial.

Importance: The modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scale is the most common scale used to represent outcomes of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM); however, it lacks consideration for neck pain scores and neglects the multidimensional aspect of recovery after surgery. Objective: To use a global statistical approach that incorporates assessments of multiple outcomes to reassess the efficacy of riluzole in patients undergoing spinal surgery for DCM. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a secondary analysis of prespecified secondary end points within the Efficacy of Riluzole in Surgical Treatment for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM-PROTECT) trial, a multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted from January 2012 to May 2017. Adult surgical patients with DCM with moderate to severe myelopathy (mJOA scale score of 8-14) were randomized to receive either riluzole or placebo. The present study was conducted from July to December 2023. Intervention: Riluzole (50 mg twice daily) or placebo for a total of 6 weeks, including 2 weeks prior to surgery and 4 weeks following surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was a difference in clinical improvement from baseline to 1-year follow-up, assessed using a global statistical test (GST). The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS), arm and neck pain numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score, and Nurick grade were combined into a single summary statistic known as the global treatment effect (GTE). Results: Overall, 290 patients (riluzole group, 141; placebo group, 149; mean [SD] age, 59 [10.1] years; 161 [56%] male) were included. Riluzole showed a significantly higher probability of global improvement compared with placebo at 1-year follow-up (GTE, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.00-0.16; P = .02). A similar favorable global response was seen at 35 days and 6 months (GTE for both, 0.07; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.15; P = .04), although the results were not statistically significant. Riluzole-treated patients had at least a 54% likelihood of achieving better outcomes at 1 year compared with the placebo group. The ASIA motor score and neck and arm pain NRS combination at 1 year provided the best-fit parsimonious model for detecting a benefit of riluzole (GTE, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of the CSM-PROTECT trial using a global outcome technique, riluzole was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with DCM. The GST offered probability-based results capable of representing diverse outcome scales and should be considered in future studies assessing spine surgery outcomes.

Bilateral occipital condyle fracture with an avulsion fracture of the foramen magnum: nonoperative care guided by a traction test. Illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) with involvement of the inferior clivus, otherwise known as "avulsion of the anterior foramen magnum," are an exceedingly rare injury with only a few published reports. OBSERVATIONS: A 24-year-old male presented with bilateral OCFs with involvement of the clivus after a motor vehicle accident. The patient had no neurological deficits and was successfully managed nonoperatively using a halo vest. The authors used a traction test to guide the duration of nonoperative care. The operative and nonoperative management of this rare injury is discussed with respect to other cases in the literature. LESSONS: External immobilization through a halo vest is an effective treatment option for bilateral OCFs with clivus involvement. The traction test can be used, along with computed tomography, to guide the duration of treatment.

Patient, clinical, surgical, and institutional factors associated with length of stay in scheduled degenerative thoracolumbar spine surgery: National Multicenter Cohort Analysis from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network.

OBJECTIVE: Length of stay (LOS) is a contributor to costs and resource utilization. The primary goal of this study was to identify patient, clinical, surgical, and institutional variables that influence LOS after elective surgery for thoracolumbar degenerative pathology. The secondary objective was to examine variability in LOS and institutional strategies used to decrease LOS. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from a multicentric cohort enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN) between January 2015 and October 2020 who underwent elective thoracolumbar surgery (discectomy [1 or 2 levels], laminectomy [1 or 2 levels], and posterior instrumented fusion [up to 5 levels]). Prolonged LOS was defined as LOS greater than the median. Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with prolonged LOS for each procedure. A survey was sent to the principal investigators of the participating healthcare institutions to understand institutional practices that are used to decrease LOS. RESULTS: A total of 3700 patients were included (967 discectomies, 1094 laminectomies, and 1639 fusions). The median LOSs for discectomy, laminectomy, and fusion were 0.0 (IQR 1.0), 1.0 (IQR 2.0), and 4.0 (IQR 2.0) days, respectively. On multivariable analysis, predictors of prolonged LOS for discectomy were having more leg pain, higher Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, symptom duration more than 2 years, having undergone an open procedure, occurrence of an adverse event (AE), and treatment at an institution without protocols to reduce LOS (p < 0.05). Predictors of prolonged LOS for laminectomy were increased age, living alone, higher ODI scores, higher BMI, open procedures, longer operative time, AEs, and treatment at an institution without protocols to reduce LOS (p < 0.05). For posterior instrumented fusion, predictors of prolonged LOS were older age, living alone, more comorbidities, higher ODI scores, longer operative time, AEs, and treatment at an institution without protocols to reduce LOS (p < 0.05). The laminectomy group had the largest variability in LOS (SD 4.4 days, range 0-133 days). Three hundred fifty-four patients (22%) had an LOS above the 75th percentile. Ten institutions (53%) had either Enhanced Recovery After Surgery or standardized protocols in place. CONCLUSIONS: Among the factors identified in this study, worse baseline ODI scores, experiencing AEs, and treatment at an institution without protocols aimed at reducing LOS were predictive of prolonged LOS in all surgical groups. The laminectomy group had the largest variability in LOS.

Contemporary treatment strategy for spinal metastasis: the "LMNOP" system.

The choice of treatment for spinal metastasis is complex because (1) it depends on several inter-related clinical and radiologic factors, and (2) a wide range of management options has evolved in recent years. While radiation therapy and surgery remain the cornerstones of treatment, radiosurgery and percutaneous vertebral augmentation have also established a role. Classification systems have been developed to aid in the decision-making process, and each has different strengths and weaknesses. The comprehensive scoring systems developed to date provide an estimate of life expectancy, but do not provide much advice on the choice of treatment. We propose a new decision model that describes the key factors in formulating the management plan, while recognizing that the care of each patient remains highly individualized. The system also incorporates the latest changes in technology. The LMNOP system evaluates the number of spinal Levels involved and the Location of disease in the spine (L), Mechanical instability (M), Neurology (N), Oncology (O), Patient fitness, Prognosis and response to Prior therapy (P).

Comparison of post-operative lordosis with the PEEK cage and the cervical plate.

OBJECTIVE: The maintenance of post-operative lordosis has been shown to be a key factor in decreasing adjacent level disc stress. Previous studies of the PEEK (polyether ketone) cage have used intervertebral bony fusion as the primary measure of surgical success; however, little is known about its effects on spinal curvature. Our objective was to compare the PEEK cage to the cervical plate with respect to the maintenance of cervical lordosis at one year. Secondary outcomes included fusion and complication rates. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent ACDF (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) by two different methods; 13 patients were treated with the PEEK cage, and 22 with allograft and plating. RESULTS: Patient and treatment characteristics were similar in both groups. Average global lordotic curvature (C2-C7) was increased by 1.7 degrees for the PEEK cage and decreased by 1.6 degrees for the plate after an average follow-up of 12.46 and 14.95 months, respectively. Regional lordosis for the PEEK cage and plate was decreased by 2.5 and 2.1 degrees, respectively for the same time period. These differences did not achieve statistical significance. Bony fusion was observed in all patients. One patient in each group developed persistent mild dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: The PEEK cage is comparable to the anterior cervical plate in the maintenance of post-operative cervical lordosis.

Does a Multidisciplinary Triage Pathway Facilitate Better Outcomes After Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN: Single-center prospective non-randomized matched cohort comparison. OBJECTIVE: To compare elective lumbar spine surgery outcomes for cases triaged through a multidisciplinary spine pathway versus conventional referral processes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Many health care systems have facilitated low back pain (LBP) guidelines into primary care practice by creating local or regional "pathways" with the goal of enhanced quality of care, improved patient satisfaction and optimal resource utilization, particularly for imaging and surgery. Few comparative outcomes exist for LBP pathways, particularly for surgical outcomes. METHODS: One-hundred-fifty patients (SSP group n = 75; conventional group n = 75) undergoing elective lumbar surgery for degenerative conditions between 2011 and 2016 were analyzed with 1-year follow-up. Patient self-reported outcomes included the Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue pain scores (VAS) for back and leg, and EuroQol Group 5-Dimension self-report (EQ-5D). We also assessed baseline clinical features, indications for surgery, therapies received prior to surgery, type of surgery, wait times, and overall patient satisfaction. RESULTS: The groups had equivalent baseline demographics, body mass index, Saskatchewan Spine Pathway (SSP) classification of pain pattern, pain scores, functional scores, quality of life scores, indication for surgery, and type of surgery (instrumented or non-instrumented). There was no difference with respect to wait times to see the surgeon or for surgery. Wait time for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was significantly shorter for the SSP group (16.8 vs. 63.0 days, P < 0.001). Patients triaged through the SSP were significantly more likely to utilize multiple nonoperative treatment strategies prior to seeing the surgeon (P < 0.04). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher for SSP patients prior to surgical assessment (P = 0.03) but did not differ between groups after surgery. CONCLUSION: The SSP facilitates significantly shorter wait times for MRI and promotes nonoperative treatment strategies. Preoperative patient satisfaction is significantly higher among SSP patients, but there were no significant differences in surgical outcomes.Level of Evidence: 3.

Development of a Patient-Oriented Intervention to Support Patient-Provider Conversations about Unnecessary Lower Back Pain Imaging.

BACKGROUND: despite the efforts of multiple stakeholders to promote appropriate care throughout the healthcare system, studies show that two out of three lower back pain (LBP) patients expect to receive imaging. We used the Choosing Wisely Canada patient-oriented framework, prioritizing patient engagement, to develop an intervention that addresses lower back pain imaging overuse. METHODS: to develop this intervention, we collaborated with a multidisciplinary advisory team, including two patient partners with lower back pain, researchers, clinicians, healthcare administrators, and the Choosing Wisely Canada lead for Saskatchewan. For this qualitative study, data were collected through two advisory team meetings, two individual interviews with lower back pain patient partners, and three focus groups with lower back pain patient participants. A lower back pain prescription pad was developed as an outcome of these consultations. RESULTS: participants reported a lack of interactive and informative communication was a significant barrier to receiving appropriate care. The most cited content information for inclusion in this intervention was treatments known to work, including physical activity, useful equipment, and reliable sources of educational material. Participants also suggested it was important that benefits and risks of imaging were explained on the pad. Three key themes derived from the data were also used to guide development of the intervention: (a) the role of imaging in LBP diagnosis; (b) the impact of the patient-physician relationship on LBP diagnosis and treatment; and (c) the lack of patient awareness of Choosing Wisely Canada and their recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: the lower back pain patient-developed prescription pad may help patients and clinicians engage in informed conversations and shared decision making that could support reduce unnecessary lower back pain imaging.