Molecular monitoring of T-cell kinetics and migration in severe neurotoxicity after real-world CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CD19-CAR) T-cell therapies mediate durable responses in late-stage B-cell malignancies, but can be complicated by a potentially severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Despite broad efforts, the precise mechanisms of ICANS are not entirely known, and resistance to current ICANSdirected therapies (especially corticosteroids) has been observed. Recent data suggest that inflammatory cytokines and/or targeting of cerebral CD19-expressing pericytes can disrupt the blood-brain barrier and facilitate influx of immune cells, including CAR T cells. However, specific tools for CD19-CAR T-cell analysis within often minute samples of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are not broadly available. Here, we applied our recently developed digital polymerase chain reaction assays to monitor CD19-CAR T-cell kinetics in CSF and blood in real-world patients with neurotoxicity. Consistently, we observed a CAR T-cell enrichment within CSF in ICANS patients with further progressive accumulation despite intense corticosteroid- containing immuno-chemotherapies in a subset of patients with prolonged and therapy-resistant grade 3-4 neurotoxicity. We used next-generation T-cell receptor-b sequencing to assess the repertoire of treatment-refractory cells. Longitudinal analysis revealed a profound skewing of the T-cell receptor repertoire, which at least partly reflected selective expansion of infused T-cell clones. Interestingly, a major fraction of eventually dominating hyperexpanded T-cell clones were of non-CAR T-cell derivation. These findings hint to a role of therapy-refractory T-cell clones in severe ICANS development and prompt future systematic research to determine if CAR T cells may serve as 'door openers' and to further characterize both CAR-positive and non-CAR T cells to interrogate the transcriptional signature of these possibly pathologic T cells.

[Neoehrlichiosis as a cause of feaver of unknown origin]. / Neoehrlichiose als Ursache eines Fiebers unklarer Genese.

Establishing a diagnosis in cases of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in immunocompromised patients can be difficult. In 25-35% infectious diseases are the underlying cause. This article reports the case of a 74-year-old woman with a 5-month history of fever. Through open biopsy of the femoral shaft and microbiological analysis, a diagnosis of neoehrlichiosis could be established. After initiation of treatment with doxycycline, the symptoms quickly resolved resulting in a complete recovery.

Standardized Supportive Care Documentation Improves Safety of High-Dose Methotrexate Treatment.

BACKGROUND: High-dose (HD) methotrexate (MTX) is an essential component of treatment protocols in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, aggressive lymphoma, and osteosarcoma. However, delayed MTX clearance may lead to life-threatening toxicities. Administration of supportive therapy for HD-MTX is complex, and insufficient supportive care increases the risk of MTX toxicity. To improve patient safety, we investigated the implementation of a checklist and urine alkalinization protocol in addition to standard supportive care during HD-MTX therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intervention included individualized patient checklists for control of adequate supportive care for every HD-MTX treatment cycle and a urine alkalinization protocol for documentation and guidance during urine alkalinization therapy. The impact of these tools on the rate of adverse events (acute renal injury, delayed MTX clearance) was retrospectively assessed in patients treated from April 2017 to April 2019 (intervention group) and compared with patients treated from January 2015 to March 2017 who received standard supportive care for HD-MTX according to a standard operating procedure (SOP). RESULTS: In total, 118 patients received 414 HD-MTX cycles in the intervention group compared with 108 patients with 332 treatment cycles in the SOP group. Delayed MTX clearance was observed in 2.6% of treatment cycles in the intervention cohort opposed to 15.2% of cycles in the SOP group. The rate of acute kidney injury was also significantly reduced in the intervention group (6.2%. vs. 0.7%). The use of carboxypeptidase as rescue treatment for severe renal impairment and insufficient MTX clearance was necessary in five cases in the SOP group and in only two cycles within the intervention group. CONCLUSION: The use of standardized documentation for supportive care during HD-MTX therapy is recommended to minimize the risk of adverse events. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) is a commonly used treatment in several cancer types. Distinct supportive measures are necessary to minimize the risk of HD-MTX side effects, which can be life-threatening. Supportive care consists of certain examinations and interventions before starting HD-MTX and permanent alkalinization of the urine, as this greatly increases the elimination of MTX and decreases the risk of kidney injury. After implementing a checklist for control of supportive care and a urine alkalinization protocol to optimize urine alkalinization, a significant decrease of side effects was observed in comparison to the standard of care; therefore, the use of a safety checklist and alkalinization protocol is recommended for all patients who receive HD-MTX.

The mystery of the Hawaii liver disease cluster in summer 2013: A pragmatic and clinical approach to solve the problem.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the fall of 2013, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a preliminary report on a cluster of liver disease cases that emerged in Hawaii in the summer 2013. This report claimed a temporal association as sufficient evidence that OxyELITE Pro (OEP), a dietary supplement (DS) mainly for weight loss, was the cause of this mysterious cluster. However, the presented data were inconsistent and required a thorough reanalysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To further investigate the cause(s) of this cluster, we critically evaluated redacted raw clinical data of the cluster patients, as the CDC report received tremendous publicity in local and nationwide newspapers and television. This attention put regulators and physicians from the medical center in Honolulu that reported the cluster, under enormous pressure to succeed, risking biased evaluations and hasty conclusions. RESULTS: We noted pervasive bias in the documentation, conclusions, and public statements, also poor quality of case management. Among the cases we reviewed, many causes unrelated to any DS were evident, including decompensated liver cirrhosis, acute liver failure by acetaminophen overdose, acute cholecystitis with gallstones, resolving acute hepatitis B, acute HSV and VZV hepatitis, hepatitis E suspected after consumption of wild hog meat, and hepatotoxicity by acetaminophen or ibuprofen. Causality assessments based on the updated CIOMS scale confirmed the lack of evidence for any DS including OEP as culprit for the cluster. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the Hawaii liver disease cluster is now best explained by various liver diseases rather than any DS, including OEP.

Herbal Hepatotoxicity: Clinical Characteristics and Listing Compilation.

Herb induced liver injury (HILI) and drug induced liver injury (DILI) share the common characteristic of chemical compounds as their causative agents, which were either produced by the plant or synthetic processes. Both, natural and synthetic chemicals are foreign products to the body and need metabolic degradation to be eliminated. During this process, hepatotoxic metabolites may be generated causing liver injury in susceptible patients. There is uncertainty, whether risk factors such as high lipophilicity or high daily and cumulative doses play a pathogenetic role for HILI, as these are under discussion for DILI. It is also often unclear, whether a HILI case has an idiosyncratic or an intrinsic background. Treatment with herbs of Western medicine or traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) rarely causes elevated liver tests (LT). However, HILI can develop to acute liver failure requiring liver transplantation in single cases. HILI is a diagnosis of exclusion, because clinical features of HILI are not specific as they are also found in many other liver diseases unrelated to herbal use. In strikingly increased liver tests signifying severe liver injury, herbal use has to be stopped. To establish HILI as the cause of liver damage, RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) is a useful tool. Diagnostic problems may emerge when alternative causes were not carefully excluded and the correct therapy is withheld. Future strategies should focus on RUCAM based causality assessment in suspected HILI cases and more regulatory efforts to provide all herbal medicines and herbal dietary supplements used as medicine with strict regulatory surveillance, considering them as herbal drugs and ascertaining an appropriate risk benefit balance.

Traditional Chinese Medicine and herbal hepatotoxicity: a tabular compilation of reported cases.

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) with its focus on herbal use became popular worldwide. Treatment was perceived as safe, with neglect of rare adverse reactions including liver injury. To compile worldwide cases of liver injury by herbal TCM, we undertook a selective literature search in the PubMed database and searched for the items Traditional Chinese Medicine, TCM, Traditional Asian Medicine, and Traditional Oriental Medicine, also combined with the terms herbal hepatotoxicity or herb induced liver injury. The search focused primarily on English-language case reports, case series, and clinical reviews. We identified reported hepatotoxicity cases in 77 relevant publications with 57 different herbs and herbal mixtures of TCM, which were further analyzed for causality by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) scale, positive reexposure test results, or both. Causality was established for 28/57 different herbs or herbal mixtures, Bai Xian Pi, Bo He, Ci Wu Jia, Chuan Lian Zi, Da Huang, Gan Cao, Ge Gen, Ho Shou Wu, Huang Qin, Hwang Geun Cho, Ji Gu Cao, Ji Xue Cao, Jin Bu Huan, Jue Ming Zi, Jiguja, Kudzu, Ling Yang Qing Fei Keli, Lu Cha, Rhen Shen, Ma Huang, Shou Wu Pian, Shan Chi, Shen Min, Syo Saiko To, Xiao Chai Hu Tang, Yin Chen Hao, Zexie, and Zhen Chu Cao. In conclusion, this compilation of liver injury cases establishes causality for 28/57 different TCM herbs and herbal mixtures, aiding diagnosis for physicians who care for patients with liver disease possibly related to herbal TCM.

Drug induced liver injury: accuracy of diagnosis in published reports.

The diagnosis of drug induced liver injury (DILI) is based primarily on the exclusion of alternative causes. To assess the frequency of alternative causes in initially suspected DILI cases, we searched the Medline database with the following terms: drug hepatotoxicity, drug induced liver injury, and hepatotoxic drugs. For each term, we used the first 100 publications. We reviewed references, selected those reports relevant to our study, and retrieved finally 15 publications related to DILI and alternative causes. A total of 2,906 cases of initially assumed DILI were analyzed in these 15 publications, with diagnoses missed in 14% of the cases due to overt alternative causes. In another 11%, the diagnosis of DILI could not be established because of confounding variables. Alternative diagnoses included hepatitis B, C, and E, CMV, EBV, ischemic hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, Gilbert's syndrome, fatty liver, non alcoholic steatohepatitis, alcoholic liver diseases, cardiac and thyroid causes, rhabdomyolysis, polymyositis, postictal state, tumors, lymphomas, chlamydial and HIV infections. Causality assessment methods applied in these 15 publications were the CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) scale alone (n = 5) or combined with the Maria and Victorino (MV) scale (n = 1), the DILIN (Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network) method (n = 4), or the Naranjo scale (n = 1); the qualitative CIOMS method alone (n = 3) or combined with the MV scale (n = 1). In conclusion, alternative diagnoses are common in primarily suspected DILI cases and should be excluded early in future cases, requiring a thorough clinical and causality assessment.

Inhibition of inflammatory CD4 T cell activity by murine liver sinusoidal endothelial cells.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The liver can mitigate the inflammatory activity of infiltrating T cells by mechanisms that are not entirely clear. Here we investigated the role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) in regulating the activity of inflammatory CD4 T cells. METHODS: Interactions between T helper (Th) 1 or Th17 cells and LSEC were studied by intravital microscopy and by in vitro stimulation assays. RESULTS: Circulating CD4 T cells established lasting and repeated interactions with liver endothelium in vivo. Stimulation of Th1 and Th17 cells by LSEC greatly inhibited their capacity to secrete interferon-γ or interleukin-17 in vitro; in contrast, stimulation by dendritic cells (DCs) resulted in considerable secretion of both cytokines. Cytokine release by Th1 or Th17 cells seemed to be actively suppressed by LSEC, as indicated by the inhibition of cytokine secretion even in the presence of Th1- and Th17-promoting DC. This inhibition of CD4 T cell effector function seemed to depend on the dominance of inhibitory over activating co-stimulatory signals on LSEC, since (1) cytokine secretion could be restored by increased CD28 co-activation; (2) LSEC from interleukin-10(-/-) mice, which manifest increased activating signals, such as MHC II, and decreased inhibitory signals, such as PD-L1, failed to suppress cytokine secretion; and (3) cytokine secretion by Th1 or Th17 cells that lacked PD-1, the ligand for inhibitory PD-L1, could not be suppressed by LSEC. CONCLUSIONS: LSEC inhibit inflammatory cytokine secretion of Th1 and Th17 effector CD4 T cells in dependence of interleukin-10 and PD-1.

Herbal hepatotoxicity: a critical review.

This review deals with herbal hepatotoxicity, identical to herb induced liver injury (HILI), and critically summarizes the pitfalls associated with the evaluation of assumed HILI cases. Analysis of the relevant publications reveals that several dozens of different herbs and herbal products have been implicated to cause toxic liver disease, but major quality issues limit the validity of causality attribution. In most of these reports, discussions around quality specifications regarding herbal products, case data presentations and causality assessment methods prevail. Though the production of herbal drugs is under regulatory surveillance and quality aspects are normally not a matter of concern, low quality of the less regulated herbal supplements may be a critical issue considering product batch variability, impurities, adulterants and herb misidentifications. Regarding case data presentation, essential diagnostic information is often lacking, as is the use of valid and liver specific causality assessment methods that also consider alternative diseases. At present, causality is best assessed by using the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences scale ( CIOMS) in its original or updated form, which should primarily be applied prospectively by the treating physician when evaluating a patient rather than retrospectively by regulatory agencies. To cope with these problems, a common quality approach by manufacturers, physicians and regulatory agencies should strive for the best quality. We propose steps for improvements with impact on future cases of liver injury by herbs, herbal drugs and herbal supplements.

Drug induced liver injury: do we still need a routine liver biopsy for diagnosis today?

For the pathologist, the diagnosis of drug induced liver injury (DILI) is challenging, because histopathological features mimic all primary hepatic and biliary diseases, lacking changes that are specific for DILI. Therefore, in any patient of suspected DILI who underwent liver biopsy, the pathologist will assure the clinician that the observed hepatic changes are compatible with DILI, but this information is less helpful due to lack of specificity. Rather, the pathologist should assess liver biopsies blindly, without knowledge of prior treatment by drugs. This will result in a detailed description of the histological findings, associated with suggestions for potential causes of these hepatic changes. Then, it is up to the physician to reassess carefully the differential diagnoses, if not done before. At present, liver histology is of little impact establishing the diagnosis of DILI with the required degree of certainty, and this shortcoming also applies to herb induced liver injury (HILI). To reach at the correct diagnoses of DILI and HILI, clinical and structured causality assessments are therefore better approaches than liver histology results obtained through liver biopsy, an invasive procedure with a low complication rate.

Herbal hepatotoxicity and WHO global introspection method.

Herbal hepatotoxicity is a rare but highly disputed disease because numerous confounding variables may complicate accurate causality assessment. Case evaluation is even more difficult when the WHO global introspection method (WHO method) is applied as diagnostic algorithm. This method lacks liver specificity, hepatotoxicity validation, and quantitative items, basic qualifications required for a sound evaluation of hepatotoxicity cases. Consequently, there are no data available for reliability, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value. Its scope is also limited by the fact that it cannot discriminate between a positive and a negative causality attribution, thereby stimulating case overdiagnosing and overreporting. The WHO method ignores uncertainties regarding daily dose, temporal association, start, duration, and end of herbal use, time to onset of the adverse reaction, and course of liver values after herb discontinuation. Insufficiently considered or ignored are comedications, preexisting liver diseases, alternative explanations upon clinical assessment, and exclusion of infections by hepatitis A-C, cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and varicella zoster virus (VZV). We clearly prefer as alternative the scale of CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) which is structured, quantitative, liver specific, and validated for hepatotoxicity. In conclusion, causality of herbal hepatotoxicity is best assessed by the liver specific CIOMS scale validated for hepatotoxicity rather than the obsolete WHO method that is liver unspecific and not validated for hepatotoxicity. CIOMS based assessments will ensure the correct diagnosis and exclude alternative diagnosis that may require other specific therapies.

Herbal hepatotoxicity: a tabular compilation of reported cases.

BACKGROUND: Herbal hepatotoxicity is a field that has rapidly grown over the last few years along with increased use of herbal products worldwide. AIMS: To summarize the various facets of this disease, we undertook a literature search for herbs, herbal drugs and herbal supplements with reported cases of herbal hepatotoxicity. METHODS: A selective literature search was performed to identify published case reports, spontaneous case reports, case series and review articles regarding herbal hepatotoxicity. RESULTS: A total of 185 publications were identified and the results compiled. They show 60 different herbs, herbal drugs and herbal supplements with reported potential hepatotoxicity, additional information including synonyms of individual herbs, botanical names and cross references are provided. If known, details are presented for specific ingredients and chemicals in herbal products, and for references with authors that can be matched to each herbal product and to its effect on the liver. Based on stringent causality assessment methods and/or positive re-exposure tests, causality was highly probable or probable for Ayurvedic herbs, Chaparral, Chinese herbal mixture, Germander, Greater Celandine, green tea, few Herbalife products, Jin Bu Huan, Kava, Ma Huang, Mistletoe, Senna, Syo Saiko To and Venencapsan(®). In many other publications, however, causality was not properly evaluated by a liver-specific and for hepatotoxicity-validated causality assessment method such as the scale of CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences). CONCLUSIONS: This compilation presents details of herbal hepatotoxicity, assisting thereby clinical assessment of involved physicians in the future.

Complications and risk factors in 2731 diagnostic mini-laparoscopies in patients with liver disease.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Mini-laparoscopy (ML) allows macroscopic assessment and biopsy under direct vision and therefore is a valuable technique in the diagnosis of liver disease. Herein we report procedure-related complications and risk factors. METHODS: A total of 2731 consecutive patients underwent diagnostic ML at two university hospitals (June 1996-December 2007). ML was performed using standard technique with a 1.9mm optical instrument. Coagulation of the liver biopsy site was performed with APC. The following variables were analysed as risk factors for complications: platelet count (<50/nL), international normalized ratio (INR) (>1.5), Cirrhosis, signs of portal hypertension, prior abdominal surgery. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 1.0% (n=27) of patients and these were, delayed bleeding from the liver biopsy site or abdominal wall (in 0.7% of patients) and intestinal perforation (in 0.3% of patients). Two patients died after severe haemorrhage (mortality 0.07%); the other patients recovered without sequelae. Bleeding risk was increased in patients with low platelets (OR=6.1), increased INR (OR=8.9), cirrhosis (OR=1.9) and portal hypertension (OR=2.1). Logistic regression showed a significant correlation only for the concurrence of low platelets and increased INR (P = 0.001; OR=14.1); bootstrap analysis identified INR >1.5 as significant predictor (P = 0.0002). Prior abdominal surgery did not carry a significant risk for intestinal perforation (OR=1.1; P = 0.142), unless abdominal adhesions were present (OR=9.5; P = 0.0002). None of the patients required surgery for intestinal perforation. CONCLUSION: Mini-laparoscopy is a diagnostic technique with a low complication rate. However, in patients with increased INR, low platelets or after extensive abdominal surgery, complications may occur in up to 5%.

Effectiveness and safety of minilaparoscopy-guided spleen biopsy: a retrospective series of 57 cases.

BACKGROUND: Minilaparoscopy is an accepted method for liver biopsy. We report our experience with minilaparoscopy for splenic biopsy. METHODS: We reviewed the records of all minilaparoscopy procedures performed from 1996 to 2004 at the University of Mainz Medical Center and from 2005 to mid-2011 at the University of Hamburg Medical Center to identify patients who underwent a minilaparoscopy-guided splenic biopsy. All procedures were performed using the previously described method (2.75-mm trocar, 2.3-mm Veress needle, 1.9-mm laparoscope) with the patient under conscious sedation (midazolam/meperidine/propofol). Splenic biopsies were performed using a second trocar with an 18-G Tru-Cut needle. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) and/or fibrin glue (FG) were used to control postbiopsy bleeding. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients underwent minilaparoscopy-guided biopsy of the spleen (27 females, 30 males; median age = 41 years, range = 16-76). A specimen suitable for histopathologic evaluation was obtained in all patients. Grouped by preprocedure indication, a definitive diagnosis was obtained in 70% (7/10) of patients who had splenic mass lesions in prior imaging (3 B-NHL, 2 hemangioma, 1 tuberculosis, 1 sarcoidosis; p < 0.01) compared to 29% (10/34) in the group with unexplained fever or suspected lymphoma (3 tuberculosis, 2 B-NHL, 1 hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma, 1 sarcoidosis, 1 Still's disease, 1 EBV, 1 Q-fever) and 0/13 with unexplained splenomegaly. Focal lesions noted at laparoscopy yielded to a histologic diagnosis in 38% (11/29) of 42 patients compared to 21% (6/28) without laparoscopic abnormality (p = 0.25). Bleeding from the biopsy site was noted in 96.5% (55/57) and was classified as brisk in 9. Control of hemorrhage was achieved in all patients (APC: 47, FG: 1, APC/FG: 7). There was no postprocedure bleeding or other complications. CONCLUSION: Splenic biopsy guided by minilaparoscopy can be performed safely. Postprocedure bleeding is readily controlled with APC with or without fibrin glue. The highest diagnostic yield is in patients with focal splenic lesions.

Greater Celandine hepatotoxicity: a clinical review.

Herbal hepatotoxicity is a rare and poorly described disease because reported cases are mostly scattered and lack an appropriate causality assessment. We now describe in detail the clinical picture of herbal hepatotoxicity by extracts of Greater Celandine (GC), syn. Chelidonium majus L. from the Papaveraceae family, which contain more than 20 ingredients including various biologically active isoquinoline alkaloids. For this purpose, we analyzed and reviewed published cases of 16 patients from various European countries. In all patients, herbal hepatotoxicity was of probable and highly probable causality for GC, using the original and updated scale of CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences). GC associated hepatotoxicity usually has an acute clinical course exhibiting a hepatocellular pattern of injury and is correlated to an idiosyncratic reaction with its metabolic subtype. Jaundice combined with high values of serum aminotransferases was present in virtually all cases with favourable outcome despite severe clinical course. In conclusion, GC hepatotoxicity is a typical herbal hepatotoxicity with a sound causality track for GC, but there is uncertainty regarding the respective causative compound(s). The present detailed review of GC hepatotoxicity may serve as an example for clinical causality assessments of future cases of liver injury due to other herbs.

Initially purported hepatotoxicity by Pelargonium sidoides: the dilemma of pharmacovigilance and proposals for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous reports of herb induced liver injury (HILI) represent a major regulatory issue, and it is in the interest of pharmacovigilance to identify and quantify previously unrecognized adverse reactions and to confirm or refute false positive signals of safety concerns. In a total of 13 spontaneous cases, liver disease has initially been attributed to the use of Pelargonium sidoides (PS), a plant from the South African region. Water/ethanol extracts derived from its roots are available as registered herbal drugs for the treatment of upper respiratory tract infections including acute bronchitis. OBJECTIVES: The present study examines whether and to what extent treatment by PS was associated with the risk of liver injury in these spontaneous cases. STUDY DESIGN: Overall, 13 spontaneous cases with primarily suspected PS hepatotoxicity were included in the study. Their data were submitted to a thorough clinical evaluation that included the use of the original and updated scale of CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences) to assess causality levels. These scales are liver specific, validated for liver toxicity, structured and quantitative. RESULTS: None of the 13 spontaneous cases of liver disease generated a positive signal of safety concern, since causality for PS could not be established on the basis of the applied CIOMS scales in any of the assessed patients. Confounding variables included comedication with synthetic drugs, major comorbidities, low data quality, lack of appropriate consideration of differential diagnoses, and multiple alternative diagnoses. Among these were liver injury due to comedication, acute pancreatitis and cholangitis, acute cholecystitis, hepatic involvement following lung contusion, hepatitis in the course of virus and bacterial infections, ANA positive autoimmune hepatitis, and other preexisting liver diseases. In the course of the case assessments and under pharmacovigilance aspects, data and interpretation deficits became evident. Possible improvements include appropriate data quality of cases in spontaneous reports, case assessment by skilled specialists, use of a validated liver specific causality assessment method, and inclusion only of confirmed cases into the final regulatory case database. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows lack of hepatotoxicity by PS in all 13 spontaneous cases as opposed to initial judgment that suggested a toxic potential of PS. Major shortcomings emerged in the pharmacovigilance section that require urgent improvements.

Spontaneous reports of primarily suspected herbal hepatotoxicity by Pelargonium sidoides: was causality adequately ascertained?

Spontaneous reports of primarily assumed hepatotoxicity in connection with the use of Pelargonium sidoides (PS) have been interpreted by the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association (DCGMA) as showing some hepatotoxic potential of PS used to treat common cold and other respiratory tract infections. Causality for PS was assessed using the liver specific, structured, quantitative, and updated scale of the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). In none of the 15 cases was there a highly probable or probable causality for PS. Analysis revealed confounding factors such as numerous final diagnoses unrelated to PS and poor data quality in virtually all cases. In only a minority of the cases were data provided to consider even common other diseases of the liver. For instance, biliary tract imaging data were available in only 3 patients; data to exclude virus infections by hepatitis A-C were provided in 4 cases and by CMV and EBV in 1 case, whereas HSV and VZV virus infections remained unconsidered. Thus, convincing evidence is lacking that PS was a potential hepatotoxin in the analyzed cases.

Approaches of stem cell mobilization in a large cohort of metastatic germ cell cancer patients.

High-dose chemotherapy (HD-Cx) in refractory germ cell cancer (GCC) is effective but limited data are available concerning the optimal approach for stem cell mobilization (SCM) in these patients. In this analysis 102 patients undergoing SCM during first (n = 25) or subsequent treatment lines (n = 77) were analyzed. Subcutaneous injections of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were given once daily (group 1) in 52 patients (51%), twice daily (group 2) in 39 patients (38%) or one injection Pegylated-G-CSF (PegG-CSF) (group 3) in eleven patients (11%) after one cycle of mobilization chemotherapy. Plerixafor was administered 13 times in group 1, seven times in group 2 and once in group 3. Overall, 77 (75%) patients achieved successful SCM defined as ≥8*106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight for three consecutive HD-Cx plus one backup dose. In group 1, 40 of 52 patients (77%) achieved successful SCM with a median of 11 G-CSF injections, in group 2, 27 of 39 patients (69%) with a median of 14 G-CSF injections and in group 3, 10 of 11 patients (91%) with one injection of PegG-CSF. SCM was more successful if conducted during first-line chemotherapy (p = 0.016) and associated with a beneficial outcome concerning overall survival (p = 0.02) if performed satisfactorily.

Outcome of a Real-World Patient Cohort with Secondary CNS Lymphoma Treated with High-Intensity Chemoimmunotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas with secondary central nervous system (CNS) involvement bear a dismal prognosis. Optimal treatment remains so far unclear, and effective treatment options remain an unmet clinical need. Remission rates are in general low, resulting in rapid relapses and palliative care in the majority of patients. High-intensity treatment combining effective CNS-directed chemoimmunotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation was shown in a recent phase 2 trial to induce durable remissions. Here, we report the outcome of the first real-world patient cohort treated according to the published protocol. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 17 HIV-negative lymphoma patients with secondary CNS involvement, either at first diagnosis or at relapse of lymphoma, treated according to the study protocol published by Ferreri et al. [J Clin Oncol. 2015] at two university medical centers in Germany. Treatment consisted of four cycles of chemoimmunotherapy with a consolidating autologous stem cell transplantation. Adverse events and overall outcome were assessed. RESULTS: Five patients had CNS involvement at first diagnosis and 12 patients at relapse of lymphoma. A complete response was achieved in 9 patients. Median survival was 11 months. Five patients died of septic complications and 4 patients succumbed to progression or relapse of disease. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of our real-world cohort emphasizes the possible toxic character of the treatment protocol by Ferreri et al. [J Clin Oncol. 2015]. Further improvement in treatment regimens is still an unmet need.