Safety of recombinant activated factor VII for treatment of breakthrough bleeds in patients with congenital haemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis: Review of the real-world evidence.

BACKGROUND: Emicizumab is used as a subcutaneous prophylaxis for prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A (HA) with and without inhibitors. While low bleeding rates were observed in clinical trials, patients still experience breakthrough bleeds (BTBs) with emicizumab in the real-world. Current guidelines recommend use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for treatment of BTBs in patients with inhibitors. Due to thrombotic events observed in the HAVEN 1 study, activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) should be used with caution. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review is to identify and discuss real-world data on the frequency of BTBs and the safety of concomitant rFVIIa use in patients with inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis. METHODS: A search of the following databases was conducted on 15 July 2022: BIOSIS Previews® , Current Contents Search® , Embase® , MEDLINE® . Search terms included 'real world', 'haemophilia A', and 'emicizumab'. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Eleven relevant publications were identified (seven original research articles and four congress abstracts). The frequency of BTBs specifically for HA patients with inhibitors was described in three publications with 5%-56% patients on emicizumab reporting ≥1 bleeding episode. Treatment of these BTBs appeared to be managed according to relevant guidelines. Importantly, no thrombotic complications occurred during concomitant rFVIIa use. Due to the nature of real-world studies, direct comparison of the results between studies is limited. However, real-world data show that BTBs in inhibitor patients during emicizumab prophylaxis can be safely treated with rFVIIa.

Preference of treatment characteristics among people with haemophilia or their caregivers, and physicians in the Japanese healthcare environment.

INTRODUCTION: Studies of treatment preferences in haemophilia have been conducted in many countries. This study is the first to examine treatment characteristic preferences among people with haemophilia (PWH) and their caregivers, and physicians in Japan. AIM: To examine current treatment preferences of PWH and their caregivers, plus those of physicians at haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) and non-HTCs for different treatment characteristics in Japan. METHODS: Physicians listed on a survey panel were invited to participate in the survey and to refer PWH and caregivers to participate in the survey. Web-based surveys were conducted to examine physician and PWH/caregiver background, prophylaxis background, prophylaxis goals, understanding of haemophilia treatment products, important information sources, preferences while choosing prophylaxis products, understanding of the patient's condition, and potential product switching. A discrete choice experiment exercise was included in the survey. RESULTS: A total of 107 physicians and 44 PWH/caregivers participated in the study. Key treatment goals of physicians included optimisation of haemophilia management. PWH/caregivers were focused on quality of life and reduced treatment burden. Consistent differences in haemophilia treatment strategies at HTCs and non-HTCs were observed for prescribed treatments, preferences in choosing prophylaxis products, understanding of patients' condition, and reasons for potential product switch. CONCLUSION: Our study utilises real-world survey data and presents preferences for haemophilia treatment characteristics among physicians, PWH and their caregivers in Japan, which could encourage improvements in individualised treatment and disease management. Alignment between treatment approaches at HTCs and non-HTCs could facilitate improvements in the quality of care for PWH across Japan.

Disease and treatment burden of patients with haemophilia entering the explorer6 non-interventional study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to characterise baseline disease and treatment burden in a large population with haemophilia A/B, both with (HAwI/HBwI) and without (HA/HB) inhibitors. METHODS: The prospective, non-interventional explorer6 study included patients ≥12 years old with severe HA, severe/moderate HB or HAwI/HBwI of any severity, treated according to local standard of care (excluding previous/current exposure to concizumab or emicizumab). Baseline characteristics and historical clinical data were collected and patient-reported outcomes, including treatment burden, were assessed. RESULTS: The explorer6 study enrolled 231 patients with haemophilia (84 HAwI/HBwI) from 33 countries. At baseline, patients with HA/HB treated with prophylaxis had the lowest median annualised bleeding rates (ABRs; 2.0), irrespective of haemophilia type; of these patients, 27.5% (HA) and 31.4% (HB) had target joints. Patients with HAwI/HBwI treated episodically reported the highest treatment burden. Of these patients, 28.5% (HAwI) and 25.1% (HBwI) performed sports activities in the month before screening. CONCLUSION: Despite receiving routine clinical care, historical and baseline information from patients enrolled in explorer6 showed that patients with HA/HB treated episodically and patients with HAwI/HBwI had higher ABRs, higher treatment burden and participated in sports less than those with HA/HB treated with prophylaxis. Emerging treatments could be beneficial in addressing these unmet medical needs.

Association of physical activity with bleeding events and safety in patients with haemophilia A starting emicizumab prophylaxis: an interim analysis of the TSUBASA study.

INTRODUCTION: Little information exists on the relationship between bleeding outcomes and physical activity in patients with haemophilia A (PwHA). AIM: This interim analysis of the TSUBASA study (UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000037448) evaluated the association of physical activity with bleeding and safety in PwHA starting emicizumab. METHODS: PwHA without factor VIII inhibitors were recruited. Physical activity and bleed data were obtained using an electronic patient-reported outcome application and wearable activity tracker. Adverse events (AEs) were documented. RESULTS: At data cut-off (31-May-2021), 107 PwHA were enrolled, with a median (range) age of 35 (0-73) years. Physical activity data were obtained for 74 participants. Of these, 47 (63.5%) recorded a total of 396 exercise events. The most common exercise events were walking (32.4%), cycling (14.9%), and football (5.4%). Two (0.5%) exercise events in the same individual were associated with bleeding (running, weight training). The safety analysis population consisted of 106 participants treated with emicizumab (median observation period: 241.5 days). Twenty-one (19.8%) participants experienced a total of 39 AEs. Five (4.7%) experienced a serious AE, none of which was emicizumab-related, and three (2.8%) experienced an adverse drug reaction. CONCLUSIONS: PwHA receiving emicizumab in the TSUBASA study experienced minimal bleeding associated with physical activity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000037448.

Factors Associated with Neutralizing Antibody Responses following 2-Dose and 3rd Booster Monovalent COVID-19 Vaccination in Japanese People Living with HIV.

People living with HIV (PLWH) could be at risk of blunted immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination. We investigated factors associated with neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses against SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern (VOCs), following two-dose and third booster monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in Japanese PLWH. NAb titers were assessed in polyclonal IgG fractions by lentiviral-based pseudovirus assays. Overall, NAb titers against Wuhan, following two-dose vaccination, were assessed in 82 PLWH on treatment, whereby 17/82 (20.73%) were classified as low-NAb participants. Within the low-NAb participants, the third booster vaccination enhanced NAb titers against Wuhan and VOCs, albeit to a significantly lower magnitude than the rest. In the multivariate analysis, NAb titers against Wuhan after two-dose vaccination correlated with age and days since vaccination, but not with CD4+ count, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, and plasma high-sensitivity C-Reactive protein (hsCRP). Interestingly, an extended analysis within age subgroups revealed NAb titers to correlate positively with the CD4+ count and negatively with plasma hsCRP in younger, but not older, participants. In conclusion, a third booster vaccination substantially enhances NAb titers, but the benefit may be suboptimal in subpopulations of PLWH exhibiting low titers at baseline. Considering clinical and immune parameters could provide a nuanced understanding of factors associated with vaccine responses in PLWH.