Age and Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is frequently offered to cancer patients who undergo mastectomy. Older women tend to have lower rates of reconstruction mostly due to an age-based discretion. We aimed to assess the safety of this surgery in this population. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy between 2015 and 2020 at "Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete." Patients were classified according to age when the reconstruction process began (group A: < 65 years-group B: > 65 years). Differences in demographics and clinical data were analyzed using Student's t test and Chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CIs) for surgical complications according to age group. Propensity-score matching was used as a sensitivity analysis to test consistency among results. RESULTS: We included 304 women (266: group A-38: group B). Complete reconstruction was achieved in 48.1% of patients in group A vs 10.5% in group B (P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, age was not associated with an increased risk of surgical complications, neither overall (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.40-1.95), early (OR 1.35, 95%CI 0.58-3.13) nor late (OR 1.05, 95%CI 0.40-2.81). Radiotherapy and smoking history were significant predictors for complications in every setting. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, age at breast reconstruction is not associated with a higher risk of surgical complications, in contrast to radiotherapy and smoking history. Therefore, age should not be a limiting factor when considering breast reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Pediatric hand trauma.

Hand injuries in infants are an exciting challenge for those who treat pediatric trauma patients. We will review different hand injuries and provide basic rules for their treatment and followup. We will compare our experience with published results. When compared with adults, two main differences arise in treatment of pediatric hand injuries: children have an exceptional regenerative ability that allows procedures to be used that would not be useful in older patients (eg, replantation after avulsion injuries) and children have a high degree of cooperation with physicians. The main goal of treatment should be to have children return quickly to their daily leisure and academic activities.