Protective effects of COVID-19 vaccination in splenectomized patients with immune thrombocytopenia.

Splenectomy is an effective treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The effect of COVID-19 vaccination on splenectomized patients with ITP during the COVID-19 pandemic has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on clinical outcomes in these patients. This was a longitudinal study of splenectomized patients with ITP. A total of 191 splenectomized patients were included in this study. After a median follow-up of 114 months, 146 (76.4%) patients had a sustained response to splenectomy. During COVID-19 infection, vaccinated patients showed a lower risk of severe infections (odds ratio [OR], 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.36; p < 0.001), hospitalization (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.48; p = 0.002), and ITP exacerbation (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.67; p = 0.012). These findings indicate that COVID-19 vaccination plays a protective role in splenectomized patients with ITP.

Application of plasma metagenomic next-generation sequencing improves prognosis in hematology patients with neutropenia or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for infection.

Introduction: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a novel technique for detecting pathogens. This retrospective study evaluated the diagnostic value of mNGS using plasma for infections in hematology patients and its impact on clinical treatment and prognosis in different subgroups of hematology patients. Methods: A total of 153 hematology patients with suspected infection who underwent mNGS using plasma were enrolled in the study. Their clinical histories, conventional microbiological test (CMT) results, mNGS results, treatment and prognosis were retrospectively analyzed. Results: In 153 plasma samples, mNGS yielded a higher positivity rate than CMT (total: 88.24% vs. 40.52%, P<0.001; bacteria: 35.95% vs. 21.57%, P < 0.01; virus: 69.93% vs. 21.57%, P<0.001; fungi: 20.26% vs. 7.84%, P<0.01). mNGS had a higher positivity rate for bacteria and fungi in the neutropenia group than in the non-neutropenia group (bacteria: 48.61% vs. 24.69%, P<0.01; fungi: 27.78% vs. 13.58%, P<0.05). mNGS demonstrated a greater advantage in the group of patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Both the 3-day and 7-day efficacy rates in the HSCT group were higher than those in the non-HSCT group (3-day: 82.22% vs. 58.65%, P < 0.01; 7-day: 88.89% vs. 67.31%, P < 0.01), and the 28-day mortality rate was lower in the HSCT group than in the non-HSCT group (6.67% vs. 38.89%, P < 0.000). The neutropenia group achieved similar efficacy and mortality rates to the non-neutropenia group (7-day efficiency rate: 76.39% vs. 71.43%, P > 0.05; mortality rate: 29.17% vs. 29.63%, P > 0.05) with more aggressive antibiotic adjustments (45.83% vs. 22.22%, P < 0.01). Conclusion: mNGS can detect more microorganisms with higher positive rates, especially in patients with neutropenia. mNGS had better clinical value in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or neutropenia, which had a positive effect on treatment and prognosis.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Lymphoma-Associated Hemophagocytic Syndrome: A Retrospective, Single-Center Study of 51 Patients.

Purpose: To investigate clinical characteristics, management, and prognosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive lymphoma-associated hemophagocytic syndrome (LAHS) patients in real-world practice. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. EBV-positive LAHS patients diagnosed from January 2010 to December 2021 in our center were enrolled. Clinical characteristics, treatment, overall response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Univariate and multivariate analysis of potential factors were conducted. Results: Of the 51 patients, 44 were T/NK cell lymphoma; five were B cell lymphoma; two were Hodgkin lymphoma. EBV-positive T/NK cell LAHS patients were significantly younger and showed lower fibrinogen levels and C-reactive protein levels than EBV-positive B cell LAHS patients (P=0.033, P=0.000, and P=0.004, respectively). Combined treatment of anti-hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) and anti-lymphoma treatment was conducted in 24 patients; anti-HLH treatment was conducted in 18 patients; anti-lymphoma treatment was conducted in three patients; glucocorticoid treatment was conducted in one patient. ORR was 47.8%, and the median OS was 61 (95% confidence interval 47.9-74.1) days for overall patients. Patients who received anti-HLH treatment and turned to anti-lymphoma treatment early displayed higher ORR and OS than those of anti-HLH patients (P=0.103, and P=0.003, respectively). Elevated alanine aminotransferase level was the independent risk factor of EBV-positive LAHS prognosis. Conclusions: Prognosis of EBV-positive LAHS patients was poor. Anti-lymphoma treatment should be initiated as soon as HLH was rapidly controlled.