Toward a low-cost, in-home, telemedicine-enabled assessment of disability in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Remote assessment of neurological disability in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) could improve access to clinical care and efficiency of clinical research. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a telemedicine-based MS disability examination that does not require an in-home examiner. METHODS: Adults with MS were recruited after a standardized in-person Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) evaluation, and within 1 week underwent a blinded televideo-enabled EDSS examination with a different clinician. EDSS and tele-EDSS scores were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 41 adults participated (mean (standard deviation (SD)) age: 47.0 years (11.6); median EDSS: 2 (range: 0-7)); 37 required no in-home assistance for the tele-EDSS evaluation (e.g. help positioning camera). Mean difference between EDSS and tele-EDSS was 0.34 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.61). For 88% of evaluations, tele-EDSS and EDSS scores were within 1 point (similar to reported in-person inter-rater differences). Unweighted kappa for agreement within 0.5 point was 0.72. Correlation for individual functional systems (FS) ranged from modest (vision: 0.37) to high (bowel/bladder: 0.79). Overall correlation between EDSS and tele-EDSS was 0.89 (p < 0.0001); and 0.98 (p < 0.0001) at EDSS range: 4-7. CONCLUSION: In this proof of principle study, disability evaluation in mild to moderate MS is feasible using telemedicine without an aide at the patient's location.

A Videogame-Based Digital Therapeutic to Improve Processing Speed in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Feasibility Study.

INTRODUCTION: Self-administered in-home digital therapeutics could expand access to cognitive rehabilitation for individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS), over half of whom experience cognitive impairment (CI). However, feasibility in an MS population must be clarified. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility of deploying a videogame-like digital treatment for CI in MS, including initial efficacy and barriers to adherence. METHODS: In this pilot study, 21 participants with MS completed an in-clinic baseline neurological evaluation. Cognitive tests included paper-and-pencil Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis [BICAMS-which included the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)] and other unsupervised tablet-based tests (including Match: an unsupervised test of executive functions and processing speed, developed at UCSF; and the Cogstate MS Battery). Participants then completed an in-home, tablet-based, videogame-like investigational digital treatment (Project: EVO™) for 25 min daily, 5 days weekly, for 4 weeks. This was followed by a repeat in-clinic evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 21 participants (mean [standard deviation, SD] age 53.8 [11.6] years, median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) 2.5 [SD 2.0, IQR [2-3.5]]) enrolled to use the digital therapeutic at home (mean [SD] SDMT z score: - 0.21 [1.16]), 18 completed the study, during which they completed an average of 19.7 days (median [SD]: 20.5 [8.4]). Overall, 78% of these 18 participants completed 75% of prescribed days (i.e., at least 15), and 50% completed all 20 days or more. Over the 4-week period, scores of processing speed improved significantly (based on one-sided t test), including SDMT (p = 0.003) and Match (p = 0.006). The Cogstate DET test (psychomotor function) also increased (p = 0.006). Mean increase in SDMT was 3.6 points. Male sex, not being employed, and higher baseline anxiety all were significantly associated with greater improvement in SDMT over the 4-week period. Interestingly, lower baseline cognitive scores were associated with greater number of sessions completed (e.g., SDMT: p = 0.003, R2 = 0.44). Adjusting for employment, a proxy for time available, did not significantly improve the model fit. DISCUSSION: Deploying an in-home digital tool to improve processing speed in MS is feasible, and shows preliminary efficacy. A larger, randomized controlled clinical trial is ongoing.

Association of Continuous Assessment of Step Count by Remote Monitoring With Disability Progression Among Adults With Multiple Sclerosis.

Importance: Disability measures in multiple sclerosis (MS) fail to capture potentially important variability in walking behavior. More sensitive and ecologically valid outcome measures are needed to advance MS research. Objectives: To assess continuous step count activity remotely among individuals with MS for 1 year and determine how average daily step count is associated with other measures of MS disability. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a prospective longitudinal observational cohort study, 95 adults with relapsing or progressive MS who were able to walk more than 2 minutes with or without an assistive device were recruited between June 15, 2015, and August 8, 2016, and remotely monitored in their natural environment for 1 year. Patients were excluded if they had a clinical relapse within 30 days or comorbidity contributing to ambulatory impairment. Longitudinal analysis was performed from October 2017 to March 2018. Revised analysis was performed in December 2018. Intervention: Activity monitoring of step count using a wrist-worn accelerometer. Main Outcomes and Measures: Average daily step count compared with in-clinic assessments and patient-reported outcomes. Results: Of the 95 participants recruited (59 women and 36 men; mean [SD] age, 49.6 [13.6] years [range, 22.0-74.0 years]), 35 (37%) had progressive MS, and the median baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 4.0 (range, 0-6.5). At 1 year, 79 participants completed follow-up (83% retention). There was a modest reduction in accelerometer use during the 1 year of the study. A decreasing average daily step count during the study was associated with worsening of clinic-based outcomes (Timed 25-Foot Walk, ß = -13.09; P < .001; Timed-Up-and-Go, ß = -9.25; P < .001) and patient-reported outcomes (12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale, ß = -17.96; P < .001). A decreasing average daily step count occurred even when the Expanded Disability Status Scale score remained stable, and 12 of 25 participants (48%) with a significant decrease in average daily step count during the study did not have a reduction on other standard clinic-based metrics. Participants with a baseline average daily step count below 4766 (cohort median) had higher odds of clinically meaningful disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale score) worsening at 1 year, adjusting for age, sex, and disease duration (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% CI, 1.17-13.78; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: Continuous remote activity monitoring of individuals with MS for 1 year appears to be feasible. In this study, a decreasing average daily step count during a 1-year period was associated with worsening of standard ambulatory measures but could also occur even when traditional disability measures remained stable. These results appear to support the prospect of using the average daily step count as a sensitive longitudinal outcome measure in MS and as a clinically relevant metric for targeted intervention.

Clinic to in-home telemedicine reduces barriers to care for patients with MS or other neuroimmunologic conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the routine use of telemedicine-enabled neurologic care in an academic outpatient MS and neuroimmunology clinic and quantify its role in reducing patient burden. METHODS: Between January 2017 and December 2017, we surveyed patients and MS neurologists after 50 consecutive routinely scheduled televideo visits and a convenience sample of 100 in-clinic visits. Summary statistics were calculated and comparisons performed. RESULTS: Overall, 98% televideo participants found the technology easy to use, and only 17% believed that an in-person examination would have more effectively addressed their needs for the visit. MS neurologists reported achieving their clinical goals in 47/48 (98%) of televideo visits and an adequate physical examination with 2 exceptions (possible cauda equina syndrome and visual field loss). Three emergency department referrals were avoided due to televideo availability. Telemedicine reduced travel burden, including a mean (±SD) travel distance of 160 (±196) miles and avoiding overnight lodging and air travel. Telemedicine also reduced indirect costs, including time off work (65% of employed patients) and caregiver burden (30% avoided caregiver time off from work/obligations). Across 8 domains of provider interpersonal communication skills, telemedicine and in-clinic participants rated only 1 domain to be different (eye contact), and overall, 96% of in-clinic and 100% of telemedicine participants agreed/strongly agreed that their clinical goals had been met. CONCLUSIONS: When incorporated as part of the continuum of MS/neuroimmunology care, clinic to in-home telemedicine reduces travel and caregiver burden and enables efficient, convenient, and effective follow-up.