Empirical Bioethics and the Health 'Brain-Drain': a qualitative study of the experiential and ethical landscape of compulsory community service for a group of South African doctors.

The health 'brain drain' (HBD) is an issue of significant global bioethical concern, resulting in severe maldistribution of healthcare workers (HCWs) and gross inequities in health service provision. The ethics of the HBD and its possible mitigation strategies are, however, complex and areas of active ongoing bioethical debate. South Africa faces a dire and worsening HBD crisis, and use a mitigation strategy of compulsory community service, or 'comserve', for most HCWs. While there is some literature on HCWs' comserve experiences and the various 'push and pull' factors affecting their migratory decisions, there is a notable gap regarding their personal values, beliefs and ethics regarding the HBD and comserve, which, as this research supports, play a prominent role in migratory decisions. This empirical bioethics research aims to explore this among a group of South African doctors who recently completed comserve, as well as how their experiences affected their situation on the individualist-collectivist continuum. This was done qualitatively using semistructured interviews with 11 participants and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis under a methodology of critical realism. Themes identified were 'Special Duties'; 'Freedom and Autonomy'; 'Justice and Accountability'; and 'The Individualist-Collectivist Continuum'. Participants use a variety of ethical theories to discuss the HBD and oppose or support comserve, which play a significant role in their migratory decisions. Most find the policy to be theoretically ethically justifiable but note that procedures undermine this. There are also several factors that appear to affect participants' position on the individualist-collectivist continuum, with some paradoxical effects on the HBD.

The Challenge of Weight Stigma for Women in the Preconception Period: Workshop Recommendations for Action from the 5th European Conference on Preconception Health and Care.

Weight stigma is a well-recognised public health issue affecting many members of society including women during the preconception period. The impacts of preconception weight stigma on women are significant and may result in decreased access to and uptake of healthcare, and mental health concerns. The consequences of this weight stigma may translate to negative maternal outcomes and even intergenerational effects on the child. Eliminating weight stigma is therefore imperative. The aim of this paper is to report recommendations to reduce weight stigma for preconception women produced at a workshop with clinical and academic experts on preconception health and weight stigma at the 5th European Conference on Preconception Health and Care. The recommendations are related to two key areas: general societal recommendations prompting all people to acknowledge and adjust our attitudes towards larger-bodied people; and healthcare-specific recommendations imploring clinicians to upskill themselves to reduce weight stigma in practice. We therefore call for urgent approaches to address societal weight-stigmatising attitudes and norms related to both the general population and preconception women, while providing professional development opportunities for healthcare professionals relating to weight stigma. Eliminating weight stigma for preconception women may have positive impacts on the outcomes for mothers and children during pregnancy and beyond.