Visualizing the nucleating and capped states of f-actin by Ca2+-gelsolin: Saxs data based structures of binary and ternary complexes.

Structural insight eludes on how full-length gelsolin depolymerizes and caps filamentous (F-)actin, while the same entity can nucleate polymerization of G-actins. Analyzing small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) data, we deciphered assemblies which enable these contrasting processes. Mixing Ca2+-gelsolin with F-actin in high salt F-buffer resulted in depolymerization of ordered F-actin rods to smaller sized species which became monodispersed upon dialysis with low salt G-buffer. These entities were the ternary (GA2) and binary (GA) complexes of gelsolin and actin with radius of gyration and maximum linear dimension of 4.55 and 4.68 nm, and 15 and 16 nm, respectively. Using size exclusion chromatography in-line with SAXS, we confirmed that initially GA and GA2 species are formed as seen upon depolymerization of F-actin followed by dialysis. Interestingly, while GA2 could seed formation of native-like F-actin in both G- and F-buffer, GA failed in G-buffer. Thus, GA2 and GA are the central species formed via depolymerization or towards nucleation. SAXS profile referenced modeling revealed that: 1) in GA, actin is bound to the C-terminal half of gelsolin, and 2) in GA2, second actin binds to the open N-terminal half accompanied by dramatic rearrangements across g1-g2 and g3-g4 linkers.

Ending Trans Fat-The First-Ever Global Elimination Program for a Noncommunicable Disease Risk Factor: JACC International.

Industrially produced trans fat (iTFA) is a harmful compound created as a substitute for animal and saturated fats. Estimated to cause up to 500,000 deaths per year, it is replaceable. In 2018, Resolve to Save Lives, the World Health Organization (WHO), Global Health Advocacy Incubator, and NCD Alliance partnered to achieve global trans fat elimination. The WHO Director-General called for the elimination of trans fat by 2023 through best practice policies outlined in the WHO REPLACE package. Since the accelerated global efforts in 2018, 43 countries have adopted best practice regulations protecting an additional 3.2 billion people and building momentum toward global elimination. Current coverage will prevent 66% of deaths estimated to be caused each year by trans fat in foods. Despite producing and selling iTFA-free products in many countries, companies continue to sell iTFA-containing products in unregulated markets. Global incentives, accountability mechanisms, and regional policies will help achieve the elimination goal.

Autoimmune Thyroid Disease in Psoriasis Patients: A Case-Control Study.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a common immunologically mediated inflammatory disease characterized by skin inflammation, epidermal hyperplasia, an increased risk of painful and destructive arthritis, cardiovascular morbidity, and psychosocial challenges. Some autoimmune diseases are mediated by stimulating or blocking auto-antibodies. Auto-antibodies may act as antagonists and bind to hormone receptors, blocking receptor function. It may result in impaired secretion of mediators and gradual dysfunction of the affected organ, e.g., Graves disease and myasthenia gravis. OBJECTIVE: This study was planned to evaluate the association between anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody (anti-TPO Ab) and anti-thyroglobulin antibody (anti-TG Ab) as biochemical markers in 30 clinically diagnosed psoriasis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This hospital-based, epidemiological case-control study was conducted in the Department of Biochemistry in collaboration with the Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology at Bhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College for Women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India. Thirty subjects diagnosed clinically with psoriasis and an equal number of age-matched controls with no known autoimmune disease from the outpatient department were also enrolled. The following hormonal tests, i.e., thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4), and antibodies, anti-TPO Ab and anti-TG Ab, were performed. The study period was one year. The data thus obtained was analyzed using SPSS Statistics version 26.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). The significance level (p-value) was taken as <0.05. RESULTS: The mean age of psoriasis subjects was 37.83±12.89 years compared to 36.91±12.32 years in the control group and was found to be non-significant (p=0.432), reflecting a similar age distribution. A male preponderance was observed in the present study, where the psoriasis group consisted of 80% males and 20% females, while the control group had 60% males and 40% females. All six psoriasis patients diagnosed with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) were euthyroid at the time of enrollment, compared to only one control subject in a subclinical hypothyroid state. The mean values of anti-TPO Ab were 30.93±41.26 IU/mL in psoriasis patients and 11.39±28.42 IU/mL in the control group (p=0.001), while the mean values of anti-TG Ab were 11.21±27.69 IU/mL in psoriatic subjects and 2.49±9.05 IU/mL in the control group (p=0.004). No significant correlation between AITD and psoriasis was found when both parameters were analyzed statistically for correlation; even when one marker was considered, no significant correlation was found. The odds ratio was calculated to find an association between the disease and thyroid autoimmunity. The odds ratio was estimated to be 2.25 for psoriasis and the control group, with a confidence interval of 95% (0.77-6.59) and a p-value of 0.139, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Psoriasis, a dermatological disorder, has been seen as related to AITD. The role of early detection of anti-thyroid antibodies, i.e., anti-TPO Ab and anti-TG Ab, can be of prognostic value in AITD and psoriasis.

HEARTS en las Américas: salvar vidas de la enfermedad más letal del mundo

[EXTRACTO]. HEARTS en las Américas, la adaptación a nivel regional de la iniciativa de la OMS dirigida por la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS), está iniciando ahora su sexto año de implementación, al mes de junio del 2022, más de un millón de pacientes estaban recibiendo tratamiento en el marco de esta iniciativa en aproximadamente 2 000 centros de atención primaria de salud en 24 países. Los programas de salud pública funcionan mejor cuando se centran en metas específicas, cuantificables, ambiciosas y alcanzables. En el caso del control de la hipertensión, esto significa centrarse en el aumento sostenido de la proporción de todas las personas con problemas de hipertensión que reciben un tratamiento adecuado. Actualmente, más de seis de cada 10 personas que presentan hipertensión en la Región no reciben un trata- miento adecuado. A menos que se acelere sustancialmente el progreso en la provisión de un tratamiento antihipertensivo que salve vidas, y se aborde con ello esta necesidad de salud y este derecho humano que son fundamentales, la Región no proporcionará un tratamiento eficaz ni siquiera a la mitad de la población que lo necesita hasta el 2050, y es probable que no alcance la meta de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible (ODS) de prevenir la muerte por enfermedades no transmisibles a una edad joven. De actuarse con intención y rapidez, la mayoría de las personas de la Región puede ser tratada eficazmente. La aplicación generalizada de la estrategia HEARTS con un énfasis en el logro de la meta 80-80-80 para el diagnóstico, tratamiento y control de la hipertensión podría salvar millones de vidas, prevenir gastos y sufrimientos evitables, acelerar el progreso hacia el logro de los ODS y hacer de la Región de las Américas un modelo de prevención de las enfermedades cardiovasculares para el resto del mundo.

HEARTS in the Americas: saving lives from the world’s deadliest disease

[EXTRACT]. The articles in this special issue on HEARTS in the Americas illustrate a wide range of important research on implementing the comprehensive HEARTS model throughout the Americas. Results show that this approach works in countries with differ- ing social and political environments and can be scaled up to serve large populations. Public health programs work best when they focus on specific, measurable, ambitious, achievable targets. In hypertension con- trol, this means focusing on steadily increasing the proportion of all people with estimated hypertension who are adequately treated.

Building the health-economic case for scaling up the WHO-HEARTS hypertension control package in low- and middle-income countries

[ABSTRACT]. Generally, hypertension control programs are cost-effective, including in low- and middle-income countries, but country governments and civil society are not likely to support hypertension control programs unless value is demonstrated in terms of public health benefits, budget impact, and value-for-investment for the individual country context. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) established a standard, simplified Global HEARTS approach to hypertension control, including preferred antihypertensive medicines and blood pressure measurement devices. The objective of this study is to report on health economic studies of HEARTS hypertension control package cost (especially medication costs), cost-effectiveness, and budget impact and describe mathematical models designed to translate hypertension control program data into the optimal approach to hypertension care service delivery and financing, especially in lowand middle-income countries. Early results suggest that HEARTS hypertension control interventions are either cost-saving or cost-effective, that the HEARTS package is affordable at between US$ 18-44 per person treated per year, and that antihypertensive medicines could be priced low enough to reach a global standard of an average <US$ 5 per patient per year in the public sector. This health economic evidence will make a compelling case for government ownership and financial support for national scale hypertension control programs.

[RESUMEN]. En general, los programas de control de la hipertensión son costo-eficaces, incluso en los países de ingresos bajos y medios. Aun así, es poco probable que los gobiernos nacionales y la sociedad civil apoyen los programas de control de la hipertensión a menos que se demuestre su valor en términos de beneficios para la salud pública, impacto presupuestario y valor de la inversión para el contexto individual del país. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) y la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) implementaron la iniciativa HEARTS, un enfoque mundial estandarizado y simplificado para el control de la hipertensión, que incluye los medicamentos antihipertensivos y los dispositivos de medición de la presión arterial de preferencia. El objetivo de este estudio es informar sobre los estudios en el ámbito de la economía de la salud relativos al costo de las medidas de control de la hipertensión previstas en HEARTS (especialmente, de los medicamentos), la costo-efectividad y el impacto presupuestario, así como describir los modelos matemáticos diseñados para traducir los datos de este programa en un enfoque óptimo para la prestación y el financiamiento de los servicios de atención de la hipertensión, especialmente en países de ingresos medianos y bajos. Los primeros resultados indican que las intervenciones de HEARTS para el control de la hipertensión son de bajo costo o costo-eficaces, que el conjunto de medidas HEARTS es asequible, a un precio que oscila entre US$ 18 y US$ 44 al año por paciente tratado, y que los medicamentos antihipertensivos podrían tener un precio lo suficientemente bajo como para alcanzar un estándar medio mundial de <US$ 5 por paciente al año en el sector público. Estos datos del ámbito de la economía de la salud serán argumentos convincentes para que los gobiernos se involucren en los programas de control de la hipertensión a escala nacional y les brinden apoyo financiero.

[RESUMO]. Geralmente, os programas de controle de hipertensão são custo-efetivos, inclusive em países de baixa e média renda, mas os governos dos países e a sociedade civil provavelmente não apoiarão tais programas a menos que demonstrem valor em termos de benefícios à saúde pública, impacto orçamentário e retorno sobre o investimento no contexto individual do país. A Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) e a Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS) criaram a Global HEARTS, uma abordagem padrão e simplificada ao controle da hipertensão arterial, que inclui medicamentos anti-hipertensivos preferidos e dispositivos para aferição da pressão arterial preferidos. O objetivo deste estudo é relatar os estudos de economia em saúde que analisaram o custo (especialmente custos de medicamentos), custo-benefício e impacto orçamentário do pacote HEARTS para controle da hipertensão e descrever modelos matemáticos elaborados para traduzir os dados do programa de controle de hipertensão em uma abordagem ideal para a prestação e financiamento de serviços de atenção às pessoas com hipertensão, especialmente em países de baixa e média renda. Os primeiros resultados sugerem que as intervenções HEARTS para controle da hipertensão são de baixo custo ou custo-efetivas, que o pacote HEARTS é acessível (custando de US$ 18 a 44 por pessoa tratada por ano) e que o preço dos medicamentos anti-hipertensivos poderia ser baixo o suficiente para atingir uma média global de <US$ 18 por paciente por ano no setor público. Estas evidências do campo da economia em saúde serão um argumento convincente para que os governos se responsabilizem por programas de controle de hipertensão em escala nacional e os dotem de recursos financeiros.

Building the health-economic case for scaling up the WHO-HEARTS hypertension control package in low- and middle-income countries / Argumentos de la economía de la salud para ampliar las medidas de control de la hipertensión de la iniciativa HEARTS de la OMS en los países de ingresos medianos y bajos / Ampliação do pacote de controle da hipertensão OMS-HEARTS em países de baixa e média renda: argumentos a partir da perspectiva da economia em saúde

ABSTRACT Generally, hypertension control programs are cost-effective, including in low- and middle-income countries, but country governments and civil society are not likely to support hypertension control programs unless value is demonstrated in terms of public health benefits, budget impact, and value-for-investment for the individual country context. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) established a standard, simplified Global HEARTS approach to hypertension control, including preferred antihypertensive medicines and blood pressure measurement devices. The objective of this study is to report on health economic studies of HEARTS hypertension control package cost (especially medication costs), cost-effectiveness, and budget impact and describe mathematical models designed to translate hypertension control program data into the optimal approach to hypertension care service delivery and financing, especially in low- and middle-income countries. Early results suggest that HEARTS hypertension control interventions are either cost-saving or cost-effective, that the HEARTS package is affordable at between US$ 18-44 per person treated per year, and that antihypertensive medicines could be priced low enough to reach a global standard of an average <US$ 5 per patient per year in the public sector. This health economic evidence will make a compelling case for government ownership and financial support for national scale hypertension control programs.

RESUMEN En general, los programas de control de la hipertensión son costo-eficaces, incluso en los países de ingresos bajos y medios. Aun así, es poco probable que los gobiernos nacionales y la sociedad civil apoyen los programas de control de la hipertensión a menos que se demuestre su valor en términos de beneficios para la salud pública, impacto presupuestario y valor de la inversión para el contexto individual del país. La Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) y la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) implementaron la iniciativa HEARTS, un enfoque mundial estandarizado y simplificado para el control de la hipertensión, que incluye los medicamentos antihipertensivos y los dispositivos de medición de la presión arterial de preferencia. El objetivo de este estudio es informar sobre los estudios en el ámbito de la economía de la salud relativos al costo de las medidas de control de la hipertensión previstas en HEARTS (especialmente, de los medicamentos), la costo-efectividad y el impacto presupuestario, así como describir los modelos matemáticos diseñados para traducir los datos de este programa en un enfoque óptimo para la prestación y el financiamiento de los servicios de atención de la hipertensión, especialmente en países de ingresos medianos y bajos. Los primeros resultados indican que las intervenciones de HEARTS para el control de la hipertensión son de bajo costo o costo-eficaces, que el conjunto de medidas HEARTS es asequible, a un precio que oscila entre US$ 18 y US$ 44 al año por paciente tratado, y que los medicamentos antihipertensivos podrían tener un precio lo suficientemente bajo como para alcanzar un estándar medio mundial de <US$ 5 por paciente al año en el sector público. Estos datos del ámbito de la economía de la salud serán argumentos convincentes para que los gobiernos se involucren en los programas de control de la hipertensión a escala nacional y les brinden apoyo financiero.

RESUMO Geralmente, os programas de controle de hipertensão são custo-efetivos, inclusive em países de baixa e média renda, mas os governos dos países e a sociedade civil provavelmente não apoiarão tais programas a menos que demonstrem valor em termos de benefícios à saúde pública, impacto orçamentário e retorno sobre o investimento no contexto individual do país. A Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) e a Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS) criaram a Global HEARTS, uma abordagem padrão e simplificada ao controle da hipertensão arterial, que inclui medicamentos anti-hipertensivos preferidos e dispositivos para aferição da pressão arterial preferidos. O objetivo deste estudo é relatar os estudos de economia em saúde que analisaram o custo (especialmente custos de medicamentos), custo-benefício e impacto orçamentário do pacote HEARTS para controle da hipertensão e descrever modelos matemáticos elaborados para traduzir os dados do programa de controle de hipertensão em uma abordagem ideal para a prestação e financiamento de serviços de atenção às pessoas com hipertensão, especialmente em países de baixa e média renda. Os primeiros resultados sugerem que as intervenções HEARTS para controle da hipertensão são de baixo custo ou custo-efetivas, que o pacote HEARTS é acessível (custando de US$ 18 a 44 por pessoa tratada por ano) e que o preço dos medicamentos anti-hipertensivos poderia ser baixo o suficiente para atingir uma média global de <US$ 18 por paciente por ano no setor público. Estas evidências do campo da economia em saúde serão um argumento convincente para que os governos se responsabilizem por programas de controle de hipertensão em escala nacional e os dotem de recursos financeiros.