Early Experience with Ovation Alto Stent-Graft.

BACKGROUND: Alto is the latest generation of the Ovation stent-graft platform for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Its ultra-low profile and its proximal sealing zone close to the lowest renal artery (≥7 mm) increase standard EVAR eligibility. We report early clinical and technical outcomes with the Alto stent-graft in our University Hospital Center after CE Mark approval in August 2020. METHODS: Seven patients (all male, mean age 76.1 ± 6.2 years) underwent EVAR with Ovation Alto stent-graft between June 2021 and February 2022. All the EVAR procedures were performed by a team of vascular surgeons experienced on EVAR with previous generation of Ovation platform. Follow-up consisted of duplex ultrasound examination at 1, 3, and 6 months and of a 1-month control computed tomography angiography (CTA). Patients treated gave consent to participate in this case series and publication. A descriptive analysis of variables was performed. SPSS (version 25) and Excel were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Most of the patients had a fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 5; 71.4%). The median maximal transversal aortic diameter was 5.06 cm (range, 3.98-6.99). Because of hostile aortic neck anatomy, on-label EVAR was considered feasible only with Ovation Alto stent-graft. Narrow iliac arteries (<6 mm) were also present in 2 cases. All procedures were performed according to the instruction for the use of the device. Technical success was achieved in all cases. No type IA/IB/III endoleak occurred at completion angiography. No distal migration (>10 mm) but 2 distal displacements (≥2 mm) were observed at control CTA. During follow-up, duplex ultrasound and CTA showed no type I/III endoleak, no stent-graft migration (>10 mm), and no proximal aortic neck variations (P = not statistically significant). Three patients (42.8%) are under strict surveillance because of low-flow type II endoleak not associated with sac variations. CONCLUSIONS: Our early experience shows promising technical and clinical success with Alto stent-graft. The proximal relocation of the proximal sealing rings and the ultra-low profile delivery system allow on-label EVAR in a wider range of aortic anatomies. Notwithstanding, further studies, meta-analysis, and prospective registries are mandatory to evaluate mid- and long-term efficacy and safety of this latest Ovation platform.

Incidence of Post-Implantation Syndrome with Different Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Modalities and Devices and Related Etiopathogenetic Implications.

BACKGROUND: Postimplantation syndrome (PIS) is a systemic inflammatory response occurring in an early phase after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The pathophysiology underlying PIS is still not well understood. It is speculated that the type of the stent graft or the mural thrombus within the AAA may play a role in determining this inflammatory response. At present, there is no consensus about the influence of PIS on clinical outcomes during follow-up. The endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) with the Nellix sac-anchoring endoprosthesis (Nellix Endovascular, Palo Alto, CA) is a novel modality for AAA repair, which obliterates the sac, thus preventing the new onset of thrombus in the aneurysm sac. Our aim was to compare the incidence of postimplantation syndrome following EVAS and after EVAR. Secondary aims were to assess the effect of endoskeleton AFX (Endologix) device compared with other commercially available exoskeleton PTFE stent grafts on the inflammatory response. Finally, we analyzed the potential association of PIS with clinical outcomes. METHODS: From January 2013 to June 2018, 60 AAA patients underwent EVAS (mean age 72 ± 9 years), and 110 patients were submitted to EVAR: 56 AFX devices and 54 other PTFE stent grafts (mean age 74 ± 10 years) at a single center and were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: EVAS with the Nellix system was associated with a lower incidence of PIS compared to EVAR using both AFX device and other endografts (8.3, 30, 35%, respectively, P-value = 0.001). No statistically significant difference in PIS incidence was observed after endoskeleton AFX device deployment compared with other EVAR exoskeleton endografts. During follow up, the major complications were proportionally but not significantly (P = 0.43) less frequent after EVAS (10.3%) than after EVAR and after EVAR using AFX device (8.9%) than after EVAR with other PTFE stent grafts (16.4%). During follow up (mean 24 months), adverse outcome rates did not significantly differ in patients with and without PIS (8.0 vs. 13.4% P = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the lower risk of PIS following EVAS compared to EVAR. Most importantly, this study highlights the role of new-onset mural thrombus in the genesis of PIS. The lower inflammatory reaction observed after EVAS than after EVAR might be related to the endobags of the Nellix system, which completely seal the aneurysm sac, reducing the new onset of mural thrombus. The systemic inflammatory response does not significantly differ after endoskeleton AFX device deployment compared with other EVAR exoskeleton stent grafts. PIS does not seem to have any significant prognostic implications in terms of early major adverse events.

Single-Center Experience in the Treatment of Visceral Artery Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs), although rare, represent a life-threatening disease with high mortality rates. With the more frequent use of diagnostic tests, there has been an incidental detection of these lesions which are mostly asymptomatic. It follows that surgeons are increasingly called to decide on the most appropriate management of VAAs between an open surgical or endovascular approach and among the different endovascular options currently available. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results of open surgery and interventional endovascular strategies of visceral artery aneurysms with respect to technical success, therapy-associated complications, and postinterventional follow-up in the elective and emergency situation. METHODS: From January 1992 to January 2017, 125 open surgical or endovascular interventions for VAA were performed at our institution. Once the VAA was diagnosed and the indication for treatment was assessed, the preoperative diagnostic work-up consisted of contrast computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and, in some patients, digital subtraction angiography. Follow-up included clinical and duplex ultrasound scan (DUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound to assess the treated vessel patency and organ perfusion after 1, 6, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. CT or MRI controls were also performed at 1 year of follow-up and only when DUS was not diagnostic or showed a complication thereafter. After the first 5 years of follow-up, the status of the patient was obtained by a structured telephone survey. RESULTS: The treatment option was endovascular in 56 of 125 cases (44.8%). Technical success was 98.3%. In one case, the procedure was interrupted for the extensive dissection of the afferent vessel. Twenty-six patients were treated by coil embolization while 29 with covered stenting. The endovascular approach was in emergency in two cases (3.6%). In the endovascular group, mortality was nil. Complications occurred in 5 cases (8.9%): 1 subacute intestinal ischemia caused by superior mesenteric artery dissection, 2 aneurysm reperfusion, 1 stent thrombosis, and 1 massive splenic hematoma. In 69 (55.2%) cases, surgical treatment was preferred, with 24 VAA resections and 45 arterial reconstructions. In 20 cases (29%), open surgery was performed in emergency conditions. In the surgical group, 8 emergency patients (40%) died intraoperatively. The mortality after elective surgical interventions was nil. Complications after surgery were 4 graft late thrombosis (5.8%): asymptomatic in three cases and requiring splenectomy in one. CONCLUSIONS: There is no overall consensus regarding the indications for treatment of VAA. Currently in emergent setting, the endovascular approach should be considered as the first choice because of its reduced invasiveness, faster way to access and bleeding control; this accounts for the lower morality of the interventional therapy than open surgery. Endovascular approach is effective for elective repair of VAAs, but procedure-related complications may occur in a not negligible number of patients. Given comparable mortality rates and low procedure-related complication rate, surgical approach still has space in the elective management of VAAs, especially for aneurysms unsuitable or challenging for the endovascular option in patients with low surgical risk. The size, location, and morphology of VAAs, systemic or local comorbidities, and specific anatomical situations such as previous abdominal surgery should dictate treatment choice.

Hypertension, Acute Stent Thrombosis, and Paraplegia 6 Months after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury in a 22-Year-Old Patient.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a less invasive option for managing traumatic injuries of the descending aorta in polytraumatized patients. Concerns arise when treating young patients with TEVAR. A 22-year-old male was admitted to the emergency department following a high-impact road traffic collision. Whole-body computed tomography (CT) scan documented multiple injuries, including rupture of descending thoracic aorta just below the isthmus. There was no evidence of paraplegia or stroke. We decided to treat him in an endovascular fashion with a Zenith Cook (Cook Incorporated, Bloomington, IN) endograft. Final angiography confirmed the proper positioning of the device, no infoldings, and the optimal filling of the thoracic aorta downstream of the endoprosthesis. In the postoperative period, the patient showed high blood pressure which was treated with 4 different antihypertensive drugs. He was discharged on cardioaspirine. CT scan control was scheduled after 30 days and 6 months, but he referred to our emergency department after less than 6 months with paraplegia, abdominal pain, and acute renal failure. He had independently discontinued antiplatelet therapy 3 months before. Emergency CT control documented the presence of intimal flap and thrombus at the distal edge of the device. The magnetic resonance imaging revealed ischemic damage of the spinal cord. We decided to reline the endograft using another Zenith Cook device with very good results. Renal failure and bowel pain gradually improved, but paraplegia is still present. TEVAR is the most suitable treatment for blunt thoracic aortic injury in the modern era. Concerns arise from what can happen to a young aorta receiving a stiff endovascular graft that should be carried all lifelong. These devices have been associated with acute hypertension and cardiac remodeling. Less stiffer stent grafts should be studied for young patients. High attention must be posed in the follow-up for the immediate resolution of eventual problems.

Juxtarenal Inflammatory Aneurysm Treated with Bilateral Iliac-Renal Bypass Using the Gore Hybrid Device and Total Sealing of the Aneurysmal Sac with a Nellix Device.

The aim of this study is to present the treatment of a juxtarenal inflammatory aneurysm using a Nellix device (Endologix, Inc., Irvine, CA) to seal the entire aneurysmatic aorta combined with bilateral iliac-renal bypass using the Gore hybrid vascular graft (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ). A 63-year-old man was diagnosed with a 6-cm juxtarenal inflammatory aneurysm. It was initially decided to treat him with an aorto-aortic bypass and to revascularize the 2 renal arteries with "graft to renal artery bypass" using Gore hybrid vascular grafts. Due to the high intraoperative bleeding preparing the proximal neck and the tight adhesion of the aorta to the adjacent structures, we decided to change our plans and to treat the patient using the Nellix system combined with bilateral iliac-renal bypass using the Gore hybrid vascular grafts. Contrast computed tomography control at 1 month showed complete sealing of the aneurysm sac and patent iliac renal bypasses. The reported case demonstrated that the Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing system combined with Gore hybrid vascular grafts for bilateral iliac-renal bypass showed that it can be an effective modality for the treatment of juxtarenal, inflammatory aortic aneurysm and revascularization of the renal arteries from the distal iliac arteries.

A Peculiar Case of Type 1 Endoleak after Nellix Endovascular Aneurysm Sac Sealing: Clinical Presentation and Management.

We report a case of type 1 endoleak with an outflow via a lumbar artery (LA) following Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) to discuss the specific peculiarities and management of this complication. A 64-year-old man (acetylsalicylic acid 3) underwent Nellix EVAS for an asymptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysm. The 6-month duplex scanning ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging showed a type IA endoleak with an outflow via an LA combined with a stable aneurysmal sac size. The subsequent 9-month imaging controls showed no changes of the endoleak cavity, but there was a slight enlargement in proximal neck size associated with the distal migration of both Nellix grafts. Thus, catheter-directed embolization with detachable coils first of the LA origin and then of the endoleak cavity was carried out. Postoperative course was uneventful. The patient is endoleak free with stable sac size on 6-month computed tomography imaging investigations following the secondary intervention.

Therapeutical Options in the Management of Carotid Dissection.

BACKGROUND: The best management of carotid artery dissection (CAD) is still controversial ranging from antiplatelet medication to open surgery or endovascular treatment. In this retrospective study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of endovascular stent angioplasty for the treatment of CAD. METHODS: From February 2006 to February 2016, 44 patients (28 women and 16 men, age range 25-65 years, mean 42) with CAD were included in this study. The internal carotid artery dissection was spontaneous in 32 patients and posttraumatic in the remaining 12 (in 1 case, it was bilateral). Twenty-eight patients were treated by intravenous heparin infusion followed by standard oral anticoagulation. Carotid artery stenting was carried out in 14 cases with recurrent ischemic events despite optimal anticoagulation management. Two patients with an open trauma of the neck were submitted to a common carotid to internal carotid bypass (CC-CI bypass). The follow-up ranged from 6 to 60 months and was performed clinically first and with Doppler ultrasound and computed tomography or magnetic resonance at 6, 12, and 24 months. RESULTS: Follow-up ranged from 6 to 60 months. Mortality was nil. All patients submitted to the endovascular or surgical management had an immediate relief of their neurologic symptoms with no procedure-related complications. No thrombosis or restenosis of the CC-CI bypass or of carotid artery stents occurred during intraoperative and postoperative period and follow-up. CONCLUSION: An alternative therapeutic option is mandatory in a subset of patients regarded as being at high risk for stroke because anticoagulant therapy was either contraindicated or failed clinically with recurrent transient ischemic attacks/transient symptoms associated with brain infarction. In these selected cases, endovascular stent placement seems to be a safe and effective option to restore vessel lumen integrity and prevent stroke.

Persistent type II endoleak: two cases of successful sacotomy.

Endovascular treatment of persistent type II endoleak may not resolve the complication. We report two cases of sacotomy performed to treat this problem: the first case was in an emergency setting for aneurismal sac rupture, and the second occurred in an elective surgery setting after several unsuccessful endovascular procedures. In both cases, sacotomy allowed us identify the bleeding sources without aortic cross-clamping and endograft explantation. By minimizing hemodynamic modifications and reducing operative time, this procedure can be carried out even in patients considered unfit for surgery. Sacotomy could be considered as an alternative in selected cases of persistent type II endoleak with aneurysm sac enlargement.

Elective Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) for the Treatment of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms of 5.0-5.5 cm: Differences between Men and Women.

BACKGROUND: There is significant debate regarding the existence of sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment, and outcomes of men versus women affected by abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The purpose of this study is to compare endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of infrarenal AAAs with the current sex-neutral 5.0-5.5 cm-diameter threshold for intervention between the two sexes. METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive cases from a single teaching institution over a period of five years of patients who had undergone elective EVAR for AAAs between 5.0 and 5.5 cm in diameter. Outcomes of interest were compared according to sex. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included in the analysis, with a higher prevalence of men (53%). Females were older at the time of repair, 78 ± 5.1 years, versus 71.7 ± 7 years (p < 0.01), and had higher incidence of underlying comorbidities, namely, arrhythmia, chronic kidney disease, and previous carotid revascularization. Women had higher incidence of immediate systemic complications (p = 0.021), post-operative AMI (p = 0.001), arrhythmia (p = 0.006), pulmonary oedema (p < 0.001), and persistent renal dysfunction (p = 0.029). Multivariate analysis for post-operative factors associated to mortality and adjusted for sex confirmed that AMI (p = 0.015), arrhythmia (p = 0.049), pulmonary oedema (p = 0.015), persistent renal dysfunction (p < 0.001), cerebral ischemia (p < 0.001), arterial embolism of lower limbs (p < 0.001), and deep-vein thrombosis of lower limbs (p < 0.001) were associated to higher EVAR-related mortality; a higher incidence of post-operative AMI (p = 0.014), pulmonary edema (p = 0.034), and arterial embolism of lower limbs (p = 0.046) were associated to higher 30-days mortality. In females there was also a higher rate of suprarenal fixation (p = 0.026), insertion outside the instruction for use (p = 0.035), and a more hostile neck anatomy with different proximal aortic diameter (p < 0.001) and angle (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A similar threshold of size of AAA for elective surgery for both males and females might not be appropriate for surgical intervention, as females tend to have worse outcomes. Further population-based studies are needed to guide on sex-related differences and intervention on AAA.

Mid- and long-term results of endovascular treatment in thoracic aorta blunt trauma.

STUDY AIM: Evaluation of results in blunt injury of the thoracic aorta (BAI) endovascular treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients were treated for BAI. Thirteen patients had associated polytrauma, 4 of these had a serious hypotensive status and 4 had an hemothorax. In the remaining 3, two had a post-traumatic false aneurysm of the isthmus and 1 had a segmental dissection. In those 13 patients a periaortic hematoma was associated to hemothorax in 4. All patients were submitted to an endovascular treatment, in two cases the subclavian artery ostium was intentionally covered. RESULTS: One patient died for disseminated intravascular coagulation. No paraplegia was recorded. No ischemic complications were observed. A type I endoleak was treated by an adjunctive cuff. During the followup (1-9 years) 3 patients were lost. A good patency and no endoleaks were observed in all cases. One infolding and 1 migration of the endografts were corrected by an adjunctive cuff. CONCLUSION: The medium and long term results of the endovascular treatment of BAI are encouraging with a low incidence rate of mortality and complications. More suitable endo-suite and endografts could be a crucial point for the further improvement of these results.

Surgery for late type Ia/IIIb endoleak from a fabric tear and stent fracture of AFX2 stent graft.

Technical improvements and labeling updates of the AFX2 stent graft (Endologix Inc, Irvine, CA) seemed to have solved the known issues of its previous generation (AFX Strata). Although most endograft failures after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair will be managed endovascularly, a small subset of patients will still require secondary open conversion. Partial or complete endograft removal can be required, mainly dependent on the characteristics of the stent graft previously placed. We have report a case of secondary open conversion for late type Ia/IIIb endoleak due to stent fracture and fabric tear of the AFX2 stent graft 3 years after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Duplex ultrasound as a reliable alternative to CT angiography for treatment planning of peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this work was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Duplex ultrasound (DUS) and CT angiography (CTA) in the study of arterial vessels, in patients with chronic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) of the lower limbs to undergo endovascular revascularization with the use of intraprocedural digital angiography (DSA). METHODS: Ninety-four patients with obstructive pathology of the arterial axes of the lower limbs were enrolled in the study. In all patients, endovascular revascularization treatment was considered the most suitable therapeutic choice. For this reason, ultrasound and CTA was performed preoperatively in all and based on the data obtained it was decided to classify the arterial tree into five segments: iliac, common femoral, superficial femoral, popliteal and infra-geniculate. According to the degree of stenosis or occlusion, the arteries were scored in no stenotic, stenotic and occluded. The comparison of the data provided by the DUS and the CTA was carried out with reference to the parameters obtained by the DSA. RESULTS: The results of our experience have shown that in the iliac arterial district DUS proved to be less accurate than CT angiography when compared to DSA (Cohen's κ agreement of 0.91 and 1.0, respectively). Good diagnostic concordance was found in the femoro-popliteal district (Cohen's κ agreement 33 between 0.96 and 0.93). On the contrary, when the data of the infra-geniculate area were compared, CT angiography showed a net deficiency compared to DSA and DUS (Cohen's κ: 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: Due to its accuracy, high-quality DUS performed by well-trained operators may therefore represent a good alternative to CTA in patients undergoing endovascular revascularization, in order to reduce the use of contrast-enhanced radiological imaging especially when a condition of intolerance to the contrast medium and/or renal insufficiency coexists.

Nellix endovascular aneurysm-sealing system: a single-center experience and review of current evidence.

Aims: We report the 6-year results of our use of the Nellix® endovascular aneurysm sealing system. Materials & methods: This is a retrospective review of patients we treated from 2013 to 2019. The outcomes described include technical success rate, mortality, all procedure-related complications, reinterventions, open surgical conversion and secondary sac rupture. Results & conclusions: A total of 68 patients were treated. Mortality was 2.9%. Secondary interventions were carried out for distal embolization (3), stent occlusion (1), pseudoaneurysm (1) and endoleak (5). Open surgical conversion was required in 6.4% of cases. Medium- and long-term complications of EVAS occurred more frequently than expected. Because the durability of endovascular aneurysm sealing is questionable, strict postoperative surveillance of Nellix is crucial to identify features of failure.

Post-implantation syndrome: the impact of different devices for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and related etiopathogenetic implications.

BACKGROUND: Postimplantation syndrome (PIS) is a systemic inflammatory response occurring in early phase after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endovascular repair (EVAR). PIS can also occur after endovascular aneurysm sealing (EVAS) with Nellix system which prevent new onset of mural thrombus inside. Aim was to compare the incidence of PIS after EVAS and EVAR to evaluate the possible role of the new-onset thrombus inside the aneurysmal sac. Secondary aims were to assess the effect of AFX (Endologix) endoskeleton compared with other commercially available exoskeleton PTFE stent grafts on inflammatory response and its relationship with the clinical outcomes. METHODS: From 2013 to 2017, data on 60 elective EVAS with Nellix system (Endologix, Irvine, CA, USA) and 110 EVAR with ePTFE devices (56 AFX devices and 54 other stent grafts) for AAA patients were retrospectively collected. PIS was defined as composite of body temperature ≥38 °C coinciding with leukocyte count >12,000/mL and hs-CPR >10 mg/L. New-onset thrombus volume after EVAR was calculated by: endograft volume - preoperative luminal volume=volume of new-onset thrombus, whereas post-EVAS thrombus volume was calculated from difference between AAA volume and volume of Nellix endobags, including balloon expandable stents. Nonparametric χ2 distribution with corresponding P values were used to assess differences among categorical variables with regard to endograft type. Threshold of statistical significance was P<0.05. Subgroup analysis of outcomes by stent-graft design was performed using independent-samples t-test. RESULTS: EVAS with Nellix system was associated with lower incidence of PIS compared to EVAR using both AFX device and other endografts (8.3%, 30%, 35%, respectively, P=0.001). No significant new-onset of mural thrombus occurred following EVAS while an avarage new-onset thrombus of 21% and 14% was found in EVAR group A and group B, respectively. No statistically significant difference of PIS incidence was observed after endoskeleton AFX device deployment compared with other EVAR exoskeleton endografts. During follow-up, major complications were proportionally but not significantly (P=0.43) less frequent after EVAS (10.3%) than after EVAR and after EVAR using AFX device (8.9%) than after EVAR with other PTFE stent grafts (16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The etiology and pathophysiology of PIS is not yet well understood. It is speculated that the type of the stent graft or the mural thrombus within the AAA may play a role in determing this inflammatory response. In this study, PIS was significantly less frequent after EVAS than EVAR. The lower inflammatory reaction observed after EVAS might be related to the endobags of Nellix system which completely seal the aneurysm sac reducing the new onset of mural thrombus. This could confirm the role of new-onset mural thrombus in the genesis of PIS. The systemic inflammatory response does not significantly differ after endoskeleton AFX device deployment compared with other EVAR exoskeleton stent grafts. PIS does not seem to have any significant prognostic implications in terms of major adverse events.

Initial single-site experience with the Ovation abdominal stent-graft system in patients with challenging aortoiliac anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Aim of the study was to evaluate the initial results of endovascular aneurysm repair with the Ovation abdominal stent-graft system in patients with challenging aortoiliac anatomy. METHODS: The Ovation stent-graft is an ultra-low profile, modular endovascular graft characterized by a 14F OD delivery system, active suprarenal fixation, and polymer-filled proximal rings that allow sealing in short (≥7 mm) proximal necks. Between November 2010 and January 2012, 14 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) (male: 100%, mean age: 76 years, mean AAA diameter: 54 mm) and challenging aortoiliac anatomy were treated with the Ovation endograft at a single centre. Mean patient follow-up was 5 months. RESULTS: All cases were performed under local or epidural anesthesia. No operative deaths or major complications were noted. A type I endoleak was detected on final angiogram in one case, which was successfully treated with additional ballooning and Palmaz stenting of the hooking landing zone. One patient died at 2 months due to myocardial infarction unrelated to the device or procedure. AAA-related mortality was 0%. No AAA rupture, AAA enlargement, type I or III endoleak, stent migration, access site complication, or conversion to open surgery was reported during follow-up. A type II endoleak was successfully treated with a right lumbar artery embolization at 4 months. Occlusion of an iliac axis was successfully managed with local fibrinolysis and implantation of a covered stent in the external iliac artery. CONCLUSIONS: Initial outcomes of this single-center experience suggest that the Ovation abdominal stent-graft system is a promising treatment in AAA patients with challenging aortoiliac anatomy.

Carotid stenting and transcranial Doppler monitoring: indications for carotid stenosis treatment.

BACKGROUND: Recently, angioplasty and stenting of carotid arteries (CAS) have taken the place of surgery. The aim of our study is to assess the role of transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring during CAS to address the embolic complications during the stages of the procedure, with or without embolic cerebral protection devices. METHODS: A total of 152 patients were submitted to carotid stenting. All patients were submitted to carotid arteries Duplex scanning. RESULTS: Neurological complications are related to TCD detection of corpuscolate signals in rapid succession. Even if no reduction of the overall incidence rate of microembolic signals (MES) was observed, a decrease in the number of corpuscolate emboli were recorded when a cerebral protection was working. CONCLUSIONS: According to our study, even in selected patients on the basis of preoperative diagnostic criteria, CAS is burdened by a nonnegligible risk of subclinical embolic ischemic events detected at TCD and confirmed by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI).

Carotid body tumors: radioguided surgical approach.

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumours (CBTs) are very rare lesions which should be treated as soon as possible even when benign since small tumour size permits easier removal and lower incidence of perioperative complications and recurrence. Malignant forms are rare and they can be identified by lymph node invasion and metastases in distant locations. The need of reliable and effective diagnostic modalities for both primary CBTs and its metastases or recurrence is evident.The present study reviews our experience and attempt to define the role of colour coded ultrasound (CCU) and Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) with Indium-111-DTPA-pentetretide (Octreoscan(R)) using both planar and single photon emission tomography (SPECT) technique in the diagnosis and follow-up of these uncommon lesions within a multidisciplinary approach. METHODS: From 1997 to 2008, 12 patients suffering from 16 CBTs (4 bilateral) were investigated by CCU and SRS-SPECT before and after surgery. All tumours were grouped according to Shamblin's classification in order to assess the technical difficulties and morbidity of surgical resection on the ground of their size and relationship with the carotid arteries. Intraoperative radiocaptation by Octreoscan(R)) was also carried out in all cases to evaluate the radicality of surgery. All perioperative scans were evaluated by the same nuclear medicine physician. RESULTS: Preoperatively CCU showed CBTs (four were not palpable) with a sensitivity of 100%. Radioisotope imaging identified the CBTs as chemodectomas in 15 cases while no radioisotopic uptake was detected in 1 vagus nerve neurinoma. No evidence of metastasis or multicentricity were seen by total body radioisotopic scans. Combined data from CCU and SRS-SPECT allowed to determine tumour size in order to select 7 larger tumours which were submitted to selective preoperative embolization.Intraoperatively Octreoscan demonstrated microscopic tumour leftovers promptly removed in 1 case and an unresectable remnant at the base of the skull in another case.During follow-up CCI and radioisotope scans showed no recurrence in 14 cases and a slightly enlargement of the intracranial residual as detected during surgery in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: CCU may allow an early and noninvasive detection of CBTs and hence safer operations. The combined use of CCU and SRS-SPECT provide useful data to identify those tumours and to evaluate their extent and carotid arteries infiltration. Radioisotope imaging is a sensitive modality to detect metastases and lymph node involvement that are markers of CBT malignancy. After surgery CCU and SRS-SPECT can be accurate modalities for surveillance for an early detection of CBTs recurrence.