RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether race or ethnicity was associated with the incidence of high-impact chronic low back pain (cLBP) among adults consulting a primary care provider for acute low back pain (aLBP). METHODS: In this secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, patients with aLBP were identified through screening at seventy-seven primary care practices from four geographic regions. Incidence of high-impact cLBP was defined as the subset of patients with cLBP and at least moderate disability on Oswestry Disability Index [ODI >30]) at 6 months. General linear mixed models provided adjusted estimates of association between race/ethnicity and high-impact cLBP. RESULTS: We identified 9,088 patients with aLBP (81.3% White; 14.3% Black; 4.4% Hispanic). Black/Hispanic patients compared to White patients, were younger and more likely to be female, obese, have Medicaid insurance, worse disability on ODI, and were at higher risk of persistent disability on STarT Back Tool (all P < .0001). At 6 months, more Black and Hispanic patients reported high-impact cLBP (30% and 25%, respectively) compared to White patients (15%, P < .0001, n = 5,035). After adjusting for measured differences in socioeconomic and back-related risk factors, compared to White patients, the increased odds of high-impact cLBP remained statistically significant for Black but not Hispanic patients (adjusted odds ration [aOR] = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.87 and aOR = 1.25, 95%CI: 0.83-1.90, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We observed an increased incidence of high-impact cLBP among Black and Hispanic patients compared to White patients. This disparity was partly explained by racial/ethnic differences in socioeconomic and back-related risk factors. Interventions that target these factors to reduce pain-related disparities should be evaluated. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02647658.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Dor Lombar , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Dor Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Incidência , Atenção Primária à SaúdeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Since 2019, the United States (US) has witnessed an unprecedented increase in drug overdose and alcohol-related deaths. Despite this rise in morbidity and mortality, treatment rates for substance use disorder remain inadequate. Insufficient training in addiction along with a dearth of addiction providers are key barriers to addressing the current addiction epidemic. Addiction-related clinical experiences can improve trainee knowledge, yet they remain dependent on practice sites and residency training environments. Asynchronous learning, in the form of video-based modules, may serve as a complement to formal, scheduled lectures and clinical experiences. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the educational impact of a video-based addiction curriculum in 2 residency programs at a large safety net academic medical center with a high volume of patients with substance use disorders. METHODS: Family Medicine (FM) and Internal Medicine (IM) residency interns (PGY1s) (n = 60) had access to 28 minutes of video content related to opioid use disorder (OUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) during the first 2 months of their residency training. Interns were asked to complete voluntary and anonymized pre- and post-surveys in Qualtrics that included knowledge and confidence-based questions about the management of OUD and AUD, in addition to questions about prior exposure to and future interests in addiction training and practice. Data were analyzed with non-parametric sign tests. RESULTS: Twenty-eight interns completed both OUD pre- and post-surveys, and 24 interns completed all AUD survey questions. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of interns who reported increased knowledge of and confidence around diagnosis, management, and ability to provide evidence-based treatment recommendations for both OUD and AUD. CONCLUSIONS: Brief addiction focused video-modules can improve confidence and knowledge in managing OUD and AUD among medical trainees.
RESUMO
This manuscript reports on a youth-driven health assessment engaging youth of color in identifying community health priorities during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Photovoice, a participatory visual ethnographic health assessment strategy, was used to explore the question: What does health or healthiness mean to you and/or your community? Youth captured images that represented their priorities. The photos were discussed using the SHOWed framework and analyzed thematically. Four themes related to community health were identified. Additionally, youth captured their narrative of COVID-19 as "a revealing force that highlights systemic inequities, driving individuals and communities to both cultivate their resilience and take healthcare into their own hands in response to government and policy level failures." Youth are acutely aware of the historical and structural inequities that create multi-level barriers to healthcare access. Health inequities existed long before the pandemic, but the current crisis requires us to examine ways to transform the healthcare landscape moving forward.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Adolescente , Conscientização , Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade/métodos , Desigualdades de Saúde , Humanos , NarraçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although risk-stratifying patients with acute lower back pain is a promising approach for improving long-term outcomes, efforts to implement stratified care in the US healthcare system have had limited success. The objectives of this process evaluation were to 1) examine variation in two essential processes, risk stratification of patients with low back pain and referral of high-risk patients to psychologically informed physical therapy and 2) identify barriers and facilitators related to the risk stratification and referral processes. METHODS: We used a sequential mixed methods study design to evaluate implementation of stratified care at 33 primary care clinics (17 intervention, 16 control) participating in a larger pragmatic trial. We used electronic health record data to calculate: 1) clinic-level risk stratification rates (proportion of patients with back pain seen in the clinic over the study period who completed risk stratification questionnaires), 2) rates of risk stratification across different points in the clinical workflow (front desk, rooming, and time with clinician), and 3) rates of referral of high-risk patients to psychologically informed physical therapy among intervention clinics. We purposively sampled 13 clinics for onsite observations, which occurred in month 24 of the 26-month study. RESULTS: The overall risk stratification rate across the 33 clinics was 37.8% (range: 14.7-64.7%). Rates were highest when patients were identified as having back pain by front desk staff (overall: 91.9%, range: 80.6-100%). Rates decreased as the patient moved further into the visit (rooming, 29.3% [range: 0-83.3%]; and time with clinician, 11.3% [range: 0-49.3%]. The overall rate of referrals of high-risk patients to psychologically informed physical therapy across the 17 intervention clinics was 42.1% (range: 8.3-70.8%). Barriers included staffs' knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, patients' needs, technology issues, lack of physician engagement, and lack of time. Adaptability of the processes was a facilitator. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to key stratified care processes varied across primary care clinics and across points in the workflow. The observed variation suggests room for improvement. Future research is needed to build on this work and more rigorously test strategies for implementing stratified care for patients with low back pain in the US healthcare system. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02647658 ). Registered January 6, 2016.
Assuntos
Dor Aguda , Dor Lombar , Dor nas Costas , Humanos , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Atenção Primária à SaúdeRESUMO
Though integrated behavioral health programs often encourage primary care physicians to refer patients by means of a personal introduction (warm handoff), data are limited regarding the benefits of warm handoffs. We conducted a retrospective study of adult primary care patients referred to behavioral health clinicians in an urban, safety-net hospital to investigate the association between warm handoffs and attendance rates at subsequent initial behavioral health appointments. In multivariable analyses, patients referred via warm handoffs were not more likely to attend initial appointments (OR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79-1.18; P = .71). A prospective study is necessary to confirm the role of warm handoffs.
Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Transferência da Responsabilidade pelo Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Boston , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Pobreza , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Encaminhamento e Consulta/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Yoga is effective for mild to moderate chronic low back pain (cLBP), but its comparative effectiveness with physical therapy (PT) is unknown. Moreover, little is known about yoga's effectiveness in underserved patients with more severe functional disability and pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether yoga is noninferior to PT for cLBP. DESIGN: 12-week, single-blind, 3-group randomized noninferiority trial and subsequent 40-week maintenance phase. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01343927). SETTING: Academic safety-net hospital and 7 affiliated community health centers. PARTICIPANTS: 320 predominantly low-income, racially diverse adults with nonspecific cLBP. INTERVENTION: Participants received 12 weekly yoga classes, 15 PT visits, or an educational book and newsletters. The maintenance phase compared yoga drop-in classes versus home practice and PT booster sessions versus home practice. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were back-related function, measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and pain, measured by an 11-point scale, at 12 weeks. Prespecified noninferiority margins were 1.5 (RMDQ) and 1.0 (pain). Secondary outcomes included pain medication use, global improvement, satisfaction with intervention, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: One-sided 95% lower confidence limits were 0.83 (RMDQ) and 0.97 (pain), demonstrating noninferiority of yoga to PT. However, yoga was not superior to education for either outcome. Yoga and PT were similar for most secondary outcomes. Yoga and PT participants were 21 and 22 percentage points less likely, respectively, than education participants to use pain medication at 12 weeks. Improvements in yoga and PT groups were maintained at 1 year with no differences between maintenance strategies. Frequency of adverse events, mostly mild self-limited joint and back pain, did not differ between the yoga and PT groups. LIMITATIONS: Participants were not blinded to treatment assignment. The PT group had disproportionate loss to follow-up. CONCLUSION: A manualized yoga program for nonspecific cLBP was noninferior to PT for function and pain. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Dor Lombar/terapia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Yoga , Adulto , Dor Crônica/etnologia , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Dor Lombar/etnologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/efeitos adversos , Pobreza , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Integrative Medicine Group Visits (IMGVs) are an 8-week outpatient medical group visit program for chronic pain patients combining mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), integrative medicine, and patient education. The authors conducted a qualitative study with IMGV participants to better understand the effects of IMGVs on patients' health. DESIGN: This qualitative study enrolled a convenience sample of 19 participants from the parent prospective observational cohort study of IMGVs (n = 65). All participants in the parent study were invited to participate. SETTING: Boston Medical Center (BMC) is a private, not-for-profit, 496-bed, academic medical center and the largest safety net hospital in New England. SUBJECTS: Individuals in this study had a diagnosis of chronic pain and/or one or more chronic conditions (e.g., diabetes, depression, or metabolic syndrome), had attended ≥1 group visit, and their 8-week session had ended before completing the interview. METHODS: The authors conducted individual semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed, and analyzed. RESULTS: Participants cite gains from IMGVs including improved self-monitoring, self-regulation, and increased mindfulness. The group setting leads patients to feel "not alone" in their health conditions, gain a sense of perspective on their health, and share coping strategies in a supportive network. These improvements in physical and mental health improved clinical outcomes for participants including reductions in pain. CONCLUSIONS: Group visits and integrative medicine both offer some potential solutions in the treatment of chronic pain. Models such as IMGVs can help individuals living with chronic conditions, addressing their emotional and physical health needs.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of mobile technology or smartphones has grown exponentially in the United States, allowing more individuals than ever internet access. This access has been especially critical to households earning less than US $30,000, the majority of whom indicate that smartphones are their main source of internet access. The increasing ubiquity of smartphones and virtual care promises to offset some of the health disparities that cut through the United States. However, disparities cannot be addressed if the medical information offered though smartphones is not accessible or reliable. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to create a framework to review the strengths and weaknesses of mobile Health (mHealth) apps for diverse, low-income populations. METHODS: Focusing on smoking cessation, diabetes management, and medication adherence as models of disease management, we describe the process for selecting, evaluating, and obtaining patient feedback on mHealth apps. RESULTS: The top 2 scoring apps in each category were QuitNow! and Smoke Free-Quit Smoking Now for smoking cessation, Glucosio and MyNetDiary for diabetes management, and Medisafe and MyMeds for medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that this framework will prove useful for future mHealth app development, and clinicians and patient advisory groups in connecting culturally, educationally, and socioeconomically appropriate mHealth apps with low-income, diverse communities and thus work to bridge health disparities.
RESUMO
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, studies demonstrated an alarming prevalence of burnout in primary care. In the midst of the pandemic, primary care clinician wellbeing deteriorated and burnout rates increased, yet many organizational efforts to reduce burnout were put on hold due to the urgency of the pandemic. In this article, we present the "Reducing Burnout Driver Diagram" as a tool that clinical leaders and policy makers can use to address and mitigate primary care clinician burnout.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Esgotamento Psicológico , Humanos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
Integrated behavioral health care (IBHC) models in primary care are positioned to address the unmet needs of traditional behavioral health models. However, research support is limited to specific populations, settings, and behavioral health conditions. Empirical evidence is lacking for expansion to larger health systems and diverse behavioral health conditions. This study examines perspectives on IBHC implementation in a large medical center. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 health providers and administrators in two primary care clinics with IBHC. Thematic analysis demonstrated that participants had an overall favorable perception of IBHC, but also perceived implementation challenges, including difficulties with access, underutilization, team dynamics, and financial and interdepartmental issues. The findings suggest that IBHC implementation barriers in existing large health systems risk diminishing potential benefits and successful adoption. These barriers can be combated by incorporating systems change strategies into implementation frameworks, with a focus on barrier prevention and detection and long-term sustainability.
Assuntos
Hospitais , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Atenção à Saúde , HumanosRESUMO
Young people are often the intended audience for health and social programs, yet they rarely participate in the decision-making processes that determine how these programs are designed, implemented, or evaluated. Failing to meaningfully engage young people, well-intended adults may miss opportunities to create relevant and effective programs and policies for youth. This article describes a youth-led health assessment conducted with researchers from an academic medical center accountable care organization and stakeholders from a local community center. We explain the process of recruiting and engaging youth in this project, along with health concerns they identified in their communities via a survey, including mental and sexual health, food access, and community safety, as well as recommendations the youth researchers developed for improving health and tackling inequities. Our findings show that youth participation fosters a deeper sense of empowerment and leadership potential. Policy makers and other health leaders should consider engaging young people as they make decisions about health care delivery.
Assuntos
Liderança , Políticas , Adolescente , Adulto , Atenção à Saúde , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current treatment options for chronic pain and depression are largely medication-based, which may cause adverse side effects. Integrative Medical Group Visits (IMGV) combines mindfulness techniques, evidence based integrative medicine, and medical group visits, and is a promising adjunct to medications, especially for diverse underserved patients who have limited access to non-pharmacological therapies. OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of IMGV compared to a Primary Care Provider (PCP) visit in patients with chronic pain and depression. DESIGN: 9-week single-blind randomized control trial with a 12-week maintenance phase (intervention-medical groups; control-primary care provider visit). SETTING: Academic tertiary safety-net hospital and 2 affiliated federally-qualified community health centers. PARTICIPANTS: 159 predominantly low income racially diverse adults with nonspecific chronic pain and depressive symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: IMGV intervention- 9 weekly 2.5 hour in person IMGV sessions, 12 weeks on-line platform access followed by a final IMGV at 21 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: Data collected at baseline, 9, and 21 weeks included primary outcomes depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire 9), pain (Brief Pain Inventory). Secondary outcomes included pain medication use and utilization. RESULTS: There were no differences in pain or depression at any time point. At 9 weeks, the IMGV group had fewer emergency department visits (RR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.12, 0.83) compared to controls. At 21 weeks, the IMGV group reported reduction in pain medication use (Odds Ratio: 0.42, CI: 0.18-0.98) compared to controls. LIMITATIONS: Absence of treatment assignment concealment for patients and disproportionate group attendance in IMGV. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that low-income racially diverse patients will attend medical group visits that focus on non-pharmacological techniques, however, in the attention to treat analysis there was no difference in average pain levels between the intervention and the control group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT02262377.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Depressão/terapia , Medicina Integrativa/métodos , Atenção Plena/métodos , Visita a Consultório Médico , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Centros Comunitários de Saúde/organização & administração , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Medicina Integrativa/organização & administração , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Questionário de Saúde do Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Provedores de Redes de Segurança/organização & administração , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Simples-Cego , Centros de Atenção Terciária/organização & administração , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Description of recruitment methods and lessons learned in a randomized controlled trial of underserved patients using an integrative medical group visits intervention. METHODS: Comparison of the demographic characteristics of participants screened and consented to the study as well as description of recruitment methods used. OUTCOME MEASURES: This paper examines the characteristics of patients who were eligible compared to those who were not, characteristics of patients at the different sites, and patient characteristics over time (by comparing various cohorts) based on our experiences recruiting underserved patients. RESULTS: We screened 338 patients, with 205 (60.6%) meeting eligibility criteria and 159 patients randomized and consented. 133 patients were found ineligible, with the most common reasons being low depression scores (nâ¯=â¯20), manic symptoms (nâ¯=â¯20), and psychotic symptoms (nâ¯=â¯19), and alcohol use (nâ¯=â¯15). We found demographic differences in patients recruited by different methods and at different sites- patients referred by provider letter were older than those referred by self-referral or provider referral (mean age/SD vs. mean age/SD, pâ¯=â¯0.0001). For site-specific differences, patients at DH were older (53 SDâ¯=â¯12.3) than those at the Boston Medical Center (49 SDâ¯=â¯11.3) and CSHC (pâ¯=â¯0.048) in pair-wise comparisons. Patients at DH were also more likely to be white (25%) as compared to BMC (18%) and DH (7%), while those at CSHC were more likely to be black (70%) (pâ¯=â¯0.008).
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Pobreza , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Dor Crônica , Feminino , Processos Grupais , Humanos , Medicina Integrativa , Masculino , Massachusetts , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição Aleatória , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Populações VulneráveisRESUMO
In today's health care system where there are increased demands for health care provider productivity, increased pay for performance metrics, decreased reimbursements, and ever-increasing demands of electronic medical records, providers are at risk for high rates of burnout. Indeed, recent studies have indicated that more than 50% of US physicians are now experiencing burnout and that burnout is rising dramatically faster among physicians than in any other US professional field. These high rates of burnout have many downstream consequences, for both the providers and for the patients they serve.
Assuntos
Esgotamento Profissional/psicologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Satisfação no Emprego , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Esgotamento Profissional/etiologia , Atenção à Saúde/organização & administração , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Liderança , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/organização & administração , Estresse Psicológico/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the acceptance of non-pharmacological group strategies delivered to low income racially diverse patients with chronic pain and depression. This paper examines how the Integrative Medical Group Visit (IMGV) addresses many of the deficits identified with usual care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Six IMGVs cohorts were held at a safety net hospital and two federally funded community health centres. Data was gathered through focus groups. Transcripts were analysed using both a priori codes and inductive coding. INTERVENTION: The intervention included ten sessions of Integrative Medical Group Visits with a primary care provider and a meditation instructor. The curriculum uses principles of Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction and evidence based integrative medicine. The visit is structured similarly to other group medical visits. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data was gathered through four focus groups held after the cohorts were completed. RESULTS: Participants (N=20) were largely low income minority adults with chronic pain and comorbid depression. Six themes emerged from the coding including: chronic pain is isolating; group treatment contributes to better coping with pain; loss of control and autonomy because of the unpredictability of pain as well as dependence on medication and frequent medical appointments; groups improve agency and control over one's health condition; navigating the healthcare system and unsatisfactory treatment options; and changes after the IMGV due to non-pharmacological health management. CONCLUSIONS: The IMGV is a promising format of delivering integrative care for chronic pain and depression which addresses many of the problems identified by patients in usual care.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Atenção à Saúde , Medicina Integrativa , Meditação , Atenção Plena , Satisfação do Paciente , Adaptação Psicológica , Adulto , Agendamento de Consultas , Dor Crônica/complicações , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Depressão/complicações , Depressão/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo/complicações , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Dor Lombar , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Minoritários , Autonomia Pessoal , Pobreza , Grupos Raciais , Isolamento Social , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Given the public health crisis of opioid overprescribing for pain, there is a need for evidence-based non pharmacological treatment options that effectively reduce pain and depression. We aim to examine the effectiveness of the Integrative Medical Group Visits (IMGV) model in reducing chronic pain and depressive symptoms, as well as increasing pain self-management. METHODS: This paper details the study design and implementation of an ongoing randomized controlled trial of the IMGV model as compared to primary care visits. The research aims to determine if the IMGV model is effective in achieving: a) a reduction in self-reported pain and depressive symptoms and 2) an improvement in the self-management of pain, through increasing pain self-efficacy and reducing use of self-reported pain medication. We intend to recruit 154 participants to be randomized in our intervention, the IMGV model (n=77) and to usual care (n=77). CONCLUSIONS: Usual care of chronic pain through pharmacological treatment has mixed evidence of efficacy and may not improve quality of life or functional status. We aim to conduct a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the IMGV model as compared to usual care in reducing self-reported pain and depressive symptoms as well as increasing pain management skills.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica/terapia , Atenção à Saúde/métodos , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Populações Vulneráveis , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/complicações , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Transtorno Depressivo/complicações , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Processos Grupais , Educação em Saúde , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Medicina Integrativa , Atenção Plena , Autoeficácia , Autogestão , Apoio SocialRESUMO
The Preventive Medicine Residency Program collaborated with the Department of Family Medicine's Program for Integrative Medicine and Health Disparities at Boston Medical Center to create a new rotation for preventive medicine residents starting in autumn 2012. Residents participated in integrative medicine group visits and consults, completed an online curriculum in dietary supplements, and participated in seminars all in the context of an urban safety net hospital. This collaboration was made possible by a federal Health Resources and Services Administration grant for integrative medicine in preventive medicine residencies and helped meet a need of the program to increase residents' exposure to clinical preventive medicine and integrative health clinical skills and principles. The collaboration has resulted in a required rotation for all residents that continues after the grant period and has fostered additional collaborations related to integrative medicine across the programs.