RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Interventional cardiologists face challenges in managing chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions, with conflicting results when comparing rotational atherectomy (RA) to conventional PCI. This meta-analysis aims to provide a critical evaluation of the safety and feasibility of RA in CTO lesions. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and Cochrane central library until April 2023 were searched for relevant studies. MACE was our primary outcomes, other outcomes were all cause of death, cardiac death, MI, and TVR. Also, we reported angiographic outcomes as technical success, procedural success, and procedural complications in a random effect model. The pooled data was analyzed using odds ratio (OR) with its 95% CI using STATA 17 MP. RESULTS: Seven studies comprising 5494 patients with a mean follow-up of 43.1 months were included in this meta-analysis. Our pooled analysis showed that RA was comparable to PCI to decrease the incidence of MACE (OR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.74 to 1.3], p = 0.9). Moreover, there was no significant difference between RA and conventional PCI in terms of other clinical or angiographic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that RA had comparable clinical and angiographic outcomes as conventional PCI in CTO lesions, which offer interventional cardiologists an expanded perspective when addressing calcified lesions. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023417362.
Assuntos
Aterectomia Coronária , Oclusão Coronária , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Humanos , Doença Crônica , Oclusão Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão Coronária/cirurgia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Insomnia, as a difficulty in initiating and maintaining sleep, coupled with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) increase the risk of aggravate daytime symptoms, mortality, and morbidity. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is thought to have a significant impact on insomnia treatment, but in patients with CVDs, there is a paucity of data. To provide a comprehensive appraisal on the impact of CBT on the treatment of insomnia in patients with CVDs. We searched Ovid, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane central, to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception till November 2022. Outcomes of interest were insomnia severity index (ISI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), sleep efficiency (SE), Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS), and sleep disorders questionnaire (SDQ). Pooled data were analyzed using mean difference (MD) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random effect model using STATA 17 for Mac. Nine RCTs comprising 365 patients were included in the analysis. CBT significantly reduced scores of ISI (MD = - 3.22, 95% CI - 4.46 to - 1.98, p < 0.001), PSQI (MD = - 2.33, 95% CI - 3.23 to - 1.44, p < 0.001), DBAS (MD = - 0.94, 95% CI - 1.3 to - 0.58, p < 0.001), SDQ (MD = - 0.38, 95% CI - 0.56 to - 0.2, p < 0.001). Also, it increased the score of SE (MD = 6.65, 95% CI 2.54 to 10.77, p < 0.001). However, there was no difference in terms of ESS. CBT is an easy and feasible intervention with clinically significant improvement in insomnia symptoms. Further large-volume studies are needed to assess sustained efficacy.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono , Humanos , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/terapia , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/psicologia , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/complicações , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/psicologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aneurysmal subdural hematoma (aSDH) is a rare complication of aneurysm rupture, affecting between 0.5 and 7.9% of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The clinical presentation, course, and outcomes of these patients are largely unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to systematically review the literature to evaluate the demographics, clinical presentation, aneurysm location, treatment options, and outcomes of patients with aSDH with and without aSAH. METHODS: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar). From identified reports, we extracted data on patients' demographics, clinical presentation, imaging findings, surgical interventions, and clinical outcomes. We compared clinical outcomes, need for surgical treatment, and aneurysm location between patients with aSDH with and without concurrent aSAH using χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. We used simple and multivariable logistic regression models to further examine the association between the presence of aSAH and surgical treatment with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 112 articles with a total of 270 patients (70% women, mean age 52.8 [± 15.5] years). The most common aneurysm locations were the middle cerebral artery, followed by the posterior communicating artery, and the internal carotid artery. Patients with isolated aSDH fully recovered more frequently than those with concomitant aSAH (38% vs. 6%). The presence of aSAH increased the odds of unfavorable outcome (odds ratio [OR] 2.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-5.37). Surgical treatment was inversely associated with unfavorable outcome in the univariable (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.84) but not in the multivariable analysis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35-1.66). CONCLUSION: aSDH occurs infrequently. Simultaneous presence of both aSDH and aSAH from an aneurysmal source is associated with poor outcomes. Surgical treatment is associated with lower rates of unfavorable outcomes including death and severe disability.
Assuntos
Aneurisma Intracraniano , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea , Humanos , Aneurisma Intracraniano/complicações , Aneurisma Intracraniano/cirurgia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/terapia , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/etiologia , Hematoma Subdural/etiologia , Aneurisma Roto/cirurgia , Aneurisma Roto/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Preventing early aneurysm rebleeding is crucial in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Lowering systolic blood pressure (SBP) has been proposed as a potential strategy, but the evidence remains inconclusive. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine if a specific SBP target could reduce the risk of aneurysm rebleeding prior to treatment. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched for studies comparing SBP between SAH patients with and without aneurysm rebleeding before surgical treatment. Data on SBP values, patient characteristics, and rebleeding events were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed to pool mean SBP differences and odds ratios (ORs) for rebleeding at different SBP cut-offs. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the systematic review. Pooled data from the included studies showed that the mean SBP was higher in the rebleeding group (mean difference 5.89, 95 % CI 1.94 to 9.85). SBP ≤160 mmHg was associated with lower rebleeding risk (OR 0.30, 95 % CI 0.14 to 0.65). However, substantial heterogeneity and limitations in study designs and definitions were noted. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that SAH patients with rebleeding may present with higher SBP. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously due to study limitations. Future prospective studies with standardized definitions and comprehensive data collection are needed to elucidate the complex relationship between blood pressure dynamics and rebleeding risk in SAH.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) are an established strategy for coronary artery disease. However, the new generation drug-eluting stent (DES) is recommended for patients with Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for coronary artery revascularization. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive appraisal of the efficacy of DCBs in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. METHODS: We searched the WOS, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL till March 2023, for studies that compared DCBs versus DES in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. We used a random-effects model to compare major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis, Late lumen Loss (LLL), and minimum lumen diameter (MLD) between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirteen studies comprising 2644 patients were included. The pooled OR showed non-inferiority of DCB over DES in terms of MACE (OR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.57 to 1.40], p = 0.63). When we defined MACE as a composite of cardiac death, MI, and TLR; the pooled OR favored DCB over DES (OR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.28 to 0.9], p = 0.02). Moreover, DCB was not inferior to DES in terms of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.8, p = 0.73), cardiac mortality, (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.22 to 1.56, p = 0.29), MI (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.34 to 2.29, p = 0.79), stent thrombosis (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 0.35 to 4.23, p = 0.76), TLR (OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.43 to 1.93, p = 0.8), LLL (MD = -0.6, 95% CI: -0.3 to 0.19, p = 0.64), or MLD (MD = -0.4, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.25, p = 0.76). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis indicated that DCB intervention was not inferior to DES in the PCI setting in patients with AMI, and can be recommended as a feasible strategy in AMI. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023412757.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Stents Farmacológicos , Infarto do Miocárdio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Trombose , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Stents Farmacológicos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Trombose/etiologia , MorteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several physical therapy modalities have been used to improve hand tremors in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, little is known about the efficacy of these techniques. Therefore, we conducted this study to synthesize evidence from published studies on the efficacy of physical therapy techniques for hand tremors in PD patients. METHODS: We followed the PRISMA statement and Cochrane handbook guidelines when conducting this study. We conducted an electronic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, Web of Science, Ovid, and Embase, and then we selected clinical trials assessing the efficacy of any physical therapy intervention for hand tremors in patients with PD. Study outcomes were extracted, and evidence was synthesized narratively. RESULTS: A total of six modalities described in six studies were included in this systematic review. Out of the six interventions, the tremor's glove and electrical stimulation showed significant improvements in root mean square angular velocity (59% and 43.8%, respectively) and UPDRS tremor score (P < 0.05 for both). Also, eccentric exercises were associated with significant reductions in the mean resting tremor amplitude (P < 0.05). These data were dependent on single studies; therefore, a meta-analysis was not feasible. CONCLUSION: Several physical therapy interventions, such as electrical stimulation, exercises, transcranial low voltage pulsed electromagnetic fields, weights, and virtual reality showed promising results in reducing hand tremors. However, this evidence was based on a limited number of included studies, and more RCTs with larger sample sizes are required to confirm the efficacy of these interventions.
Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Tremor/terapia , Tremor/complicações , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Terapia por ExercícioRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the outcomes of the patients who underwent trauma surgery during the peak of the pandemic. METHODS: The UKCoTS collected the postoperative outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent trauma surgery across 50 centres during the peak of the pandemic (April 2020) and during April 2019. RESULTS: Patients who were operated on during 2020 were less likely to be followed up within a 30-day postoperative period (57.5% versus 75.6% p <0.001). The 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher during 2020 (7.4% versus 3.7%, p <0.001). Likewise, the 60-day mortality rate was significantly higher in 2020 than in 2019 (p <0.001). Patients who were operated on during 2020 had lower rates of 30-day postoperative complications (20.7% versus 26.4%, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative mortality was higher during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the same period in 2019, but with lower rates of postoperative complications and reoperation.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Morbidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Although > 70% of patients in the trials assessing EVT for AIS-LVO had successful recanalization, only a third ultimately achieved favorable outcomes. A "no-reflow" phenomenon due to distal microcirculation disruption might contribute to such suboptimal outcomes. Combining intra-arterial (IA) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and EVT to reduce the distal microthrombi burden was investigated in a few studies. We present a pooled-data meta-analysis of the existing evidence of this combinatorial treatment. METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. We aimed to include all original studies investigating EVT plus IA tPA in AIS-LVO patients. Using R software, we calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). A fixed-effects model was adopted to evaluate pooled data. RESULTS: Five studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. Successful recanalization was comparable between the IA tPA and control groups at 82.9% and 82.32% respectively. The 90-day functional independence was similar between both groups (OR= 1.25; 95% CI= 0.92-1.70; P= 0.154). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was also comparable between both groups (OR= 0.66; 95% CI= 0.34-1.26; P= 0.304). CONCLUSION: Our current meta-analysis does not show significant differences between EVT alone and EVT plus IA tPA in terms of functional independence or sICH. However, with the limited number of studies and included patients, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to further investigate the benefits and safety of combined EVT and IA tPA.
Assuntos
AVC Isquêmico , Trombectomia , Humanos , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Hemorragias Intracranianas , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico por imagem , AVC Isquêmico/terapia , Estado Funcional , Terapia Trombolítica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE/AIM: To investigate the effect of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) on the functional and safety outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). METHODS: This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic review and meta-analysis. We included observational studies that recruited AIS-LVO patients, used susceptibility-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect CMBs, and examined the association between them and predefined outcome events. The extracted data included study and population characteristics, risk of bias domains, and outcome measures. The outcomes of interest included functional independence, revascularization success, procedural and hemorrhagic adverse events. We conducted a meta-analysis using the Mantel-Haenszel method and calculated the risk ratios. RESULTS: Four studies with a total of 1,514 patients were included. A significant reduction in the likelihood of achieving a favorable functional outcome was observed in patients with CMBs (Risk ratio (RR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52 to 0.91, P=0.01). No significant differences were observed between the CMBs and no CMBs groups in terms of successful revascularization, mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and parenchymal hematoma. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CMBs significantly reduced the likelihood of achieving functional independence post-EVT in AIS-LVO patients. However, CMBs did not impact the rates of successful revascularization, mortality, or the occurrence of various hemorrhagic events. Future research should explore the mechanisms of this association and strategies to mitigate its impact.
Assuntos
AVC Isquêmico , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea , Humanos , Trombectomia/efeitos adversos , Hemorragias Intracranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragias Intracranianas/etiologia , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
We aimed to assess the efficacy of Hibiscus sabdariffa in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension or metabolic syndrome (MetS) by comparing it against placebo, antihypertensive drugs, or other herbal products. Four databases were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of H. sabdariffa in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension or hypertension associated with MetS. Data on the change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were extracted and analyzed using Review Manager Version 5.3. A total of 13 RCTs (1205 participants) were analyzed. Hibiscus sabdariffa significantly reduced both SBP and DBP compared with placebo (mean difference -6.67, P = 0.004 and -4.35 mm Hg, P = 0.02). Subgroup analysis showed that change in SBP and DBP was statistically significant in patients with only hypertension, whereas not significant in patients with hypertension associated with MetS. When H. sabdariffa was compared with active controls (antihypertensive drugs or other herbals), the change in SBP and DBP was not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). Hibiscus sabdariffa is effective in reducing the SBP and DBP in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, but was neither effective in those with MetS nor superior to antihypertensive drugs. Further RCTs are required to determine the long-term efficacy of H. sabdariffa and to describe patients who would benefit most from this treatment.
Assuntos
Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Hibiscus , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Anti-Hipertensivos/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Hibiscus/química , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Reports of thrombotic response after receiving COVID-19 Adenoviral-Vector Based Vaccines raise concerns about vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT); therefore, we conduct this systematic review to report susceptible demographics outcomes, commonalities, and prognosis of reporting cases. We identified published articles by searching PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from December 2020 till May 2021, with an updated search in September 2021. All case reports and case series reporting thrombotic response after receiving COVID-19 Adenoviral-Vector Based Vaccines were eligible for including. In addition, two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. A total of 157 patients with thrombotic events after the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine and 16 patients with thrombotic events after Ad26.COV2. S vaccine was included in our study. 72% of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 cases were females, while in Ad26.COV2.S subgroup, all reported patients were females. The commonest presentations were deep vein thrombosis 20 (12.7%) and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis 18 (11.5%) in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 subgroup while cerebral venous sinus thrombosis 14 (87.5%) and pulmonary embolism 2 (12.5%) in the Ad26.COV2. S subgroup. In this study, we described the certain demographics associated with VITT and the clinical presentations of those cases in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S vaccines. Young individuals, particularly females, may be more susceptible to VITT, and future studies should seek to confirm this association. In addition, the clinical presentation of VITT commonly includes cerebral thrombi, pulmonary embolism, and deep venous thrombosis, but other presentations are also possible, highlighting the importance of clinical vigilance in recent vaccine recipients.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Trombose dos Seios Intracranianos , Trombocitopenia , Trombose , Vacinas , Ad26COVS1 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Embolia Pulmonar/complicações , SARS-CoV-2 , Trombose dos Seios Intracranianos/complicações , Trombocitopenia/etiologia , Trombose/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (AIS-LVO) is a debatable subject in the field of neuro-interventional surgery. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize evidence from published studies on the outcomes of IVT + MT compared with MT alone in AIS-LVO patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to January 2022 for relevant clinical trials and observational studies. Eligible studies were identified, and all relevant outcomes were pooled in the meta-analysis DerSimonian-Liard random-effects model. RESULTS: Forty-nine studies, with a total of 36,123 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. IVT + MT was significantly superior to MT alone in terms of successful recanalization (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.09), mortality (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.82), favorable functional outcome (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.29), and complete recanalization (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.11). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of improvement of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at 24 h or at discharge (p > 0.05). Complications including symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), procedure-related complications, and parenchymal hematoma were comparable between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: For AIS-LVO, IVT + MT is associated with slightly better rates of survival, successful and complete recanalization, and favorable functional outcome as compared with MT alone. Further clinical trials are needed to corroborate such benefits of bridging IVT.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica , AVC Isquêmico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Humanos , Terapia Trombolítica , Trombectomia , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , AVC Isquêmico/tratamento farmacológico , AVC Isquêmico/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to synthesize evidence from published clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid (TXA) administration in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). METHODS: We followed the standard methods of the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews for interventions and the PRISMA statement guidelines 2020 when conducting and reporting this study. A computer literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from inception until 1 January 2022. We selected observational studies and clinical trials comparing TXA versus no TXA in aSAH patients. Data of all outcomes were pooled as the risk ratio (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals in the meta-analysis models. RESULTS: Thirteen studies with a total of 2991 patients were included in the analysis. TXA could significantly cut the risk of rebleeding (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.72) and mortality from rebleeding (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.92, p = 0.02). However, TXA did not significantly improve the overall mortality, neurological outcome, delayed cerebral ischemia, or hydrocephalus (all p > 0.05). In terms of safety, no significant adverse events were reported. No statistical heterogeneity or publication bias was found in all outcomes. CONCLUSION: In patients with aSAH, TXA significantly reduces the incidence of rebleeding and mortality from rebleeding. However, current evidence does not support any benefits in overall mortality, neurological outcome, delayed cerebral ischemia, or hydrocephalus.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mavoglurant (AFQ056), a selective metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) inhibitor, was tested for t levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). However, clinical trials showed inconsistent results regarding the efficacy of mavoglurant in treating LID in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: A computer literature search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted until March 2021. We selected relevant randomized controlled trials comparing mavoglurant to placebo. Study data were extracted and pooled as mean difference (MD) in the meta-analysis model. RESULTS: Six RCTs were included in this meta-analysis with a total of 485 patients. Mavoglurant was not significantly superior to placebo in terms of the "off-time" (MD -0.27 h, 95% CI -0.65 to 0.11), "on time" (MD 0.29 h, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.66), Lang-Fahn activities of daily living dyskinesia scale (MD -0.95, 95% CI -1.98 to 0.07), UPDRS-III (MD -0.51, 95% CI -1.66 to 0.65), or UPDRS-IV (MD -0.41, 95% CI -0.85 to 0.03). However, the pooled modified abnormal involuntary movement scale favored the mavoglurant group than the placebo group (MD -2.53, 95% CI -4.23 to -0.82). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides level one evidence that mavoglurant is not effective in treating the LID in patients with PD.
Assuntos
Discinesias , Doença de Parkinson , Atividades Cotidianas , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Indóis , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
The nanotechnology approach has been recently adopted to provide more reliable, effective, controlled, and safe drug delivery systems. Nanostructured materials have gained great interest, including siliceous and carbonaceous nanoparticles. The effectiveness of mesoporous carbon nanoparticles (MCNs) in tumor imaging, targeting, and treatment is urging for more future studies. MCNs possess superior properties such as their biocompatibility, large surface area, large pore volume, tunability, and more responsive behavior to internal and external release triggers. These outstanding features make MCNs more applicable for stimuli-responsive drug delivery than the conventional forms of mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) and other carbon nanoparticles. In this review, we outlined the latest updates regarding the safety, benefits, and potential applications of MCNs.
Assuntos
Carbono , Nanopartículas , Portadores de Fármacos , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Porosidade , Dióxido de SilícioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT) has traditionally been treated medically with systemic anticoagulation. Recent advances in endovascular therapy (EVT) may represent an alternative treatment to medical therapy for CSVT. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the use of EVT for CSVT. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included studies that reported outcomes following EVT for CSVT. The primary outcome of interest was rate of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2. Secondary outcomes of interest were rates of complete, partial, and failed recanalization, mortality, and new or expansion of hematoma. We calculated pooled rates (%) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies with 682 patients were included. Rate of mRS 0-2 was 82.6% (95% CI, 75.3%-88.0%). Rate of complete recanalization was 60.9% (95% CI, 49.1%-71.5%), rate of partial recanalization was 34.2% (95% CI, 24.1%-45.9%), and rate of failed recanalization was 5.4% (95% CI, 3.1%-9.2%). Rate of mortality was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.1%-10.8%), and rate of new hematoma or expansion of hematoma was 5.1% (2.9%-8.8%). CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, EVT for CSVT was associated with favorable rates of mRS 0-2 and recanalization. Furthermore, EVT was associated with a promising safety profile. Future prospective, comparative studies are warranted to assess EVT for CSVT.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent studies indicate endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) as a safe, effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large ischemic regions. Our study updates an ongoing living systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of EVT to medical management only. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing EVT to medical management in AIS patients with large ischemic areas. Using fixed-effect models, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare functional independence, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) between EVT and standard medical management. We evaluated bias risk with the Cochrane tool and graded the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Of 1363 new citations, we included six RCTs with a total of 1876 patients. We found low-certainty evidence of improved functional independence (risk difference [RD] 29.9%, 95% CI 17.2% to 46.9%), increase in sICH (RD 2.6%, 95% CI 0.3% to 6.4%), and a non-significant decrease in mortality (RD -1.8%, 95% CI -3.9% to 0.6%) for AIS patients with large infarcts who underwent EVT compared to medical management only. CONCLUSION: Our revised meta-analysis suggests low-certainty evidence that there is improved functional independence, a non-significant decrease in mortality, and an increase in sICH among AIS patients with large infarcts who undergo EVT compared to those receiving medical management alone. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023398742).
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares , AVC Isquêmico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Trombectomia , Humanos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , AVC Isquêmico/cirurgia , AVC Isquêmico/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Trombectomia/métodosRESUMO
Background & objectives: Rigid ring and Flexible band are techniques used to repair tricuspid valve regurgitation. The comparison between both techniques' effectiveness is controversial in the literature. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of rigid ring versus flexible band for tricuspid valve repair in patients with tricuspid valve regurgitation. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic search was performed in major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL to identify relevant published studies. Data were extracted and analyzed using Stata (version 17 for Mac) and Revman (version 5.4 for Windows). Results: Twelve studies were included in this meta-analysis. Total number of patients was 4259. The rigid ring wasn't superior to the flexible band in terms of postoperative tricuspid regurgitation RR 0.74, 95 % CI (0.43-1.27) (P = 0.29). However, the results were not homogeneous. After employing sensitivity analysis, the significance of the pooled effect estimate didn't change, showing no significant difference between the two annuloplasty RR 0.72, 95%CI (0.45-1.15). On the other hand, the rigid ring was associated with a higher bypass time than the flexible band (RR 4.85, P = 0.00). There were no differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, ICU stays, prolonged ventilation, mechanical ventilation time, annuloplasty size, stroke, concomitant mitral valve surgery, concomitant aortic valve surgery, atrial fibrillation, pacemaker implantation, low cardiac output, in-hospital death, or late death (all P > 0.05). Conclusion: Our study findings suggested no difference between rigid ring compared to flexible band regarding the rates of postoperative tricuspid regurgitation; however, rigid ring may encompass a higher bypass time. Therefore, further research is required to ensure our findings.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Invasive revascularization is recommended for cohorts of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, the optimal timing of invasive revascularization is still controversial and no defined consensus is established. We aim to give a comprehensive appraisal on the optimal timing of invasive strategy in the heterogenous population of ACS. METHODS: Relevant studies were assessed through PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane Library from inception until April 2023. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality were our primary outcomes of interest, other secondary outcomes were cardiac death, TVR, MI, repeat revascularization, recurrent ischemia, and major bleeding. The data was pooled as odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random effect model using STATA 17 MP. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies comprising 21,443 patients were included in the analysis. Early intervention was favor to decrease all-cause mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.98, p = 0.03), when compared to delayed intervention. Subgroup analysis showed that early intervention was significantly associated with all-cause mortality reduction in only NSTE-ACS (OR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.7 to 0.99], p = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference between early and delayed intervention in terms of MACE, cardiac death, TVR, MI, repeat revascularization, recurrent ischemia, and major bleeding. CONCLUSION: An early intervention was associated with lower mortality rates compared to delayed intervention in NSTE-ACS with no significant difference in other clinical outcomes. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023415574.