Liver transplantation for NAFLD cirrhosis: Age and recent coronary angioplasty are major determinants of survival.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of end-stage non-alcoholic liver disease (NAFLD), that is decompensated cirrhosis and/or complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Few data on long-term outcome are available. The aim of this study was to evaluate overall patient and graft survivals and associated predictive factors. METHOD: This retrospective multicentre study included adult transplant patients for NAFLD cirrhosis between 2000 and 2019 in participating French-speaking centres. RESULTS: A total of 361 patients (69.8% of male) were included in 20 centres. The median age at LT was 62.3 years [57.4-65.9] and the median MELD score was 13.9 [9.1-21.3]; 51.8% of patients had HCC on liver explant. Between 2004 and 2018, the number of LT for NAFLD cirrhosis increased by 720%. A quarter of the patients had cardiovascular history before LT. Median follow-up after LT was 39.1 months [15.8-72.3]. Patient survival at 1, 5 and 10 years after LT was 89.3%, 79.8% and 68.1% respectively. The main causes of death were sepsis (37.5%), malignancies (29.2%) and cardiovascular events (22.2%). In multivariate analysis, three risk factors for overall mortality after LT were recipient pre-LT BMI < 32 kg/m2 at LT time (OR: 2.272; p = .012), pre-LT angioplasty during CV check-up (OR: 2.916; p = .016), a combined donor and recipient age over 135 years (OR: 2.020; 95%CI: p = .035). CONCLUSION: Survival after LT for NAFLD cirrhosis is good at 5 years. Donor and recipient age, and cardiovascular history, are major prognostic factors to consider.

Long-term impact of preventive UDCA therapy after transplantation for primary biliary cholangitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) after liver transplantation (LT) is frequent and can impair graft and patient survival. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the current standard therapy for PBC. We investigated the effect of preventive exposure to UDCA on the incidence and long-term consequences of PBC recurrence after LT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study in 780 patients transplanted for PBC, between 1983-2017 in 16 centers (9 countries), and followed-up for a median of 11 years. Among them, 190 received preventive UDCA (10-15 mg/kg/day). The primary outcome was histological evidence of PBC recurrence. The secondary outcomes were graft loss, liver-related death, and all-cause death. The association between preventive UDCA and outcomes was quantified using multivariable-adjusted Cox and restricted mean survival time (RMST) models. RESULTS: While recurrence of PBC significantly shortened graft and patient survival, preventive exposure to UDCA was associated with reduced risk of PBC recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.41; 95% CI 0.28-0.61; p <0.0001), graft loss (aHR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.82; p <0.05), liver-related death (aHR 0.46; 95% CI 0.22-0.98; p <0.05), and all-cause death (aHR 0.69; 95% CI 0.49-0.96; p <0.05). On RMST analysis, preventive UDCA led to a survival gain of 2.26 years (95% CI 1.28-3.25) over a period of 20 years. Exposure to cyclosporine rather than tacrolimus had a complementary protective effect alongside preventive UDCA, reducing the cumulative incidence of PBC recurrence and all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive UDCA after LT for PBC is associated with a reduced risk of disease recurrence, graft loss, and death. A regimen combining cyclosporine and preventive UDCA is associated with the lowest risk of PBC recurrence and mortality. LAY SUMMARY: Recurrence of primary biliary cholangitis after liver transplantation is frequent and can impair graft and patient survival. We performed the largest international study of transplanted patients with primary biliary cholangitis to date. Preventive administration of ursodeoxycholic acid after liver transplantation was associated with reduced risk of disease recurrence, graft loss, liver-related and all-cause mortality. A regimen combining cyclosporine and preventive ursodeoxycholic acid was associated with the best outcomes.

[Efficacy of new therapies]. / Hépatite D†: efficacité des nouvelles thérapies.

Hepatitis D virus causes chronic hepatitis D. The virus is defective, meaning it requires simultaneous presence of hepatitis B virus within the hepatocytes to complete its viral cycle. Globally, 15 to 20 millions people are estimated to be chronically co-infected by hepatitis B and D viruses. Current therapy remains limited to pegylated interferon alfa, which has an unsatisfactory success rate, several contraindications and many side effects. Drugs directly targeting the hepatitis D virus life cycle are being developed with promising results. These drugs target viral entry into hepatocytes, virion assembly or secretion from infected hepatocytes. This article provides an overview of the newly developed therapies and their efficacy.

L'hépatite D chronique est une infection causée par le virus de l'hépatite D, un virus défectueux nécessitant l'infection concomitante des hépatocytes par le virus de l'hépatite B. On estime que 15 à 20 millions d'individus dans le monde pourraient être co-infectés chroniquement par ces deux virus. Le seul traitement disponible est l'interféron alfa pégylé dont l'efficacité est encore insatisfaisante avec des effets indésirables fréquents. Des thérapies ciblant le virus de l'hépatite D sont en développement avec des résultats prometteurs. Parmi eux, les inhibiteurs de l'entrée du virus dans l'hépatocyte, de son assemblage ou encore de sa sécrétion. Cet article fait le point sur les thérapies en développement et leur efficacité.

[NASH: new terminology and what else is new in 2020]. / NASH†: nouvelle terminologie et nouveautés en 2020.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) includes a spectrum of hepatic pathology ranging from non-alcoholic fatty liver, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) occasionally complicated with hepatic fibrosis or even cirrhosis. In order to propose a diagnosis with positive criteria, a panel of experts recently proposed the use of an alternative nomenclature, metabolic-dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) whose use remains debated. In addition, in Switzerland and elsewhere, there is strong epidemiological growth of NAFLD. The next years will probably see the approval of new therapies for NAFLD/NASH but, at present, management remains focused on lifestyle interventions and joint monitoring by the primary care physician and, when necessary, the specialist.

La stéatopathie non alcoolique (NAFLD) comprend un spectre de pathologies allant de la stéatose hépatique non alcoolique à la stéatohépatite non alcoolique (NASH) parfois compliquée d'une fibrose hépatique, voire d'une cirrhose. Afin de proposer un diagnostic avec des critères positifs, un panel d'experts a récemment proposé l'utilisation d'une nomenclature alternative, la stéatopathie associée à la dysfonction métabolique (Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease, MAFLD) dont l'utilisation reste discutée. D'autre part, la NAFLD est en pleine croissance épidémiologique en Suisse comme ailleurs. Les prochaines années vont probablement voir l'approbation de nouvelles thérapeutiques pour la NAFLD/NASH mais, à l'heure actuelle, la prise en charge reste centrée sur les mesures hygiéno-diététiques et le suivi conjoint par le médecin de premier recours et, si nécessaire, par le spécialiste.

Usefulness of a systematic approach at listing for vaccine prevention in solid organ transplant candidates.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) candidates may not be immune against potentially vaccine-preventable diseases because of insufficient immunizations and/or limited vaccine responses. We evaluated the impact on vaccine immunity at transplant of a systematic vaccinology workup at listing that included (1) pneumococcal with and without influenza immunization, (2) serology-based vaccine recommendations against measles, varicella, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis A virus, and tetanus, and (3) the documentation of vaccines and serology tests in a national electronic immunization registry (www.myvaccines.ch). Among 219 SOT candidates assessed between January 2014 and November 2015, 54 patients were transplanted during the study. Between listing and transplant, catch-up immunizations increased the patients' immunity from 70% to 87% (hepatitis A virus, P = .008), from 22% to 41% (hepatitis B virus, P = .008), from 77% to 91% (tetanus, P = .03), and from 78% to 98% (Streptococcus pneumoniae, P = .002). Their immunity at transplant was significantly higher against S. pneumoniae (P = .006) and slightly higher against hepatitis A virus (P = .07), but not against hepatitis B virus, than that of 65 SOT recipients transplanted in 2013. This demonstrates the value of a systematic multimodal serology-based approach of immunizations of SOT candidates at listing and the need for optimized strategies to increase their hepatitis B virus vaccine responses.

Human genomics of acute liver failure due to hepatitis B virus infection: An exome sequencing study in liver transplant recipients.

Acute liver failure (ALF) or fulminant hepatitis is a rare, yet severe outcome of infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) that carries a high mortality rate. The occurrence of a life-threatening condition upon infection with a prevalent virus in individuals without known risk factors is suggestive of pathogen-specific immune dysregulation. In the absence of established differences in HBV virulence, we hypothesized that ALF upon primary infection with HBV could be due to rare deleterious variants in the human genome. To search for such variants, we performed exome sequencing in 21 previously healthy adults who required liver transplantation upon fulminant HBV infection and 172 controls that were positive for anti-HBc and anti-HBs but had no clinical history of jaundice or liver disease. After a series of hypothesis-driven filtering steps, we searched for putatively pathogenic variants that were significantly associated with case-control status. We did not find any causal variant or gene, a result that does not support the hypothesis of a shared monogenic basis for human susceptibility to HBV-related ALF in adults. This study represents a first attempt at deciphering the human genetic contribution to the most severe clinical presentation of acute HBV infection in previously healthy individuals.

[Liver transplantation and acute failure in chronic liver disease]. / Transplantation hépatique et défaillance aiguë lors d'hépatopathie chronique.

Acute cirrhotic decompensation is characterized by a rapid and sudden deterioration of hepatocellular function. It may be associated with secondary failure of one or more organs. The definition and understanding of a complex cirrhotic decompensation with multi-organ damage, is still poorly defined. This entity is currently called Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF). Depending on the number of affected organs, decompensation is classified into 4 stages, from 0 to 4. Mortality is proportional to the number of failed organs, with mortality from 50 % to 80 % at 30 days when 3 or more organs are affected. The interest of liver transplantation in the most severe forms, which has been debated for a long time, seems to be a safe alternative with good results in well selected patients.

La décompensation cirrhotique aiguë est caractérisée par une péjoration rapide et brutale de la fonction hépatocellulaire. Elle peut être associée à une défaillance secondaire d'un ou plusieurs organes. La définition et la compréhension d'une décompensation cirrhotique complexe avec atteinte multi-organes sont encore mal définies. Cette entité est actuellement appelée Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF). Selon le nombre d'organes affectés, la décompensation est classifiée en 4 stades, de 0 à 4. La mortalité est proportionnelle au nombre d'organes défaillants, avec une mortalité de 50 à 80 % à 30 jours lors d'atteinte de 3 organes ou plus. La transplantation hépatique dans les formes les plus graves, longtemps débattue, semble être une alternative sûre et avec de bons résultats, chez des patients bien sélectionnés.

[Outpatient follow-up of liver transplant recipients: the essential role of the general practitioner]. / Suivi ambulatoire du patient transplanté hépatique: le rôle essentiel du médecin généraliste.

The population of liver transplant recipients has increased in Switzerland over the last few years. Morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation are due, in the early post-transplant period, to surgical and infectious complications as well as to rejection, whereas cardiovascular, metabolic, renal and oncologic complications are the most frequent complications in the late post-transplant period. The role of the general practitioner in the long-term follow-up of liver transplant recipients is of the highest importance and can represent the first-line care of these patients as soon as 6 to 12 months post-transplantation, while maintaining a close and regular collaboration with the transplant center. Multidisciplinary and structured follow-up, along with some specific screening tests, is warranted in order to refine patient management in a timely manner and to optimize outcomes.

Les patients greffés hépatiques représentent une population croissante en Suisse. La morbidité et la mortalité après cette procédure sont liées, dans la phase précoce, aux complications chirurgicales et infectieuses ainsi que, dans une moindre mesure, au rejet, puis surviennent dans la phase tardive les complications cardiovasculaires, métaboliques, rénales et oncologiques, liées en grande partie aux traitements immunosuppresseurs. Le rôle du médecin généraliste dans le suivi médical du patient greffé hépatique est essentiel et peut être de premier recours dès 6 à 12 mois après la transplantation, tout en gardant une collaboration étroite et régulière avec le centre de transplantation. Un suivi multidisciplinaire, régulier et structuré, associé à certaines mesures de dépistage, est indispensable, afin d'adapter précocement la prise en charge et ainsi d'optimaliser le devenir des patients après la greffe.

The effectiveness of daclatasvir based therapy in European patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced liver disease.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence for the effectiveness of daclatasvir in patients whose hepatitis C threatens their life expectancy. The Named Patient Program in Europe included patients with advanced chronic hepatitis C, a life expectancy of less than 12 months and no other treatment options. METHODS: A retrospective multi-country cohort of patients with chronic hepatitis C who received daclatasvir as part of the Named Patient Program in Austria, Denmark, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Treatment response was defined as a sustained virologic response (unquantifiable hepatitis C RNA) at 12 weeks post treatment. We summarised the characteristics of the patients in this cohort and estimated the rate of sustained virologic response for patients receiving daclatasvir and sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin using hierarchical Bayesian modelling. RESULTS: The 249 patients included had a median age of 56 years; most were male (78%), hepatitis C genotype 1 (75%), treatment experienced (65%) and with decompensated cirrhosis (59%). Many had had a liver transplant before receiving daclatasvir (40%). Of the 249 patients, 242 patients received daclatasvir and sofosbuvir and either reached 12 weeks post treatment or died during (n = 9) or after treatment (n = 4) or were lost to follow up during treatment (n = 1). The estimated rate of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post treatment was 87% (95% credible interval 75 to 94%) for previously treated genotype 1 patients with decompensated cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: Daclatasvir with sofosbuvir is an effective treatment in clinical practice for hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with decompensated cirrhosis.

Peribiliary Gland Dilatation in Cirrhosis: Relationship with Liver Failure and Stem Cell/Proliferation Markers.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dilated peribiliary glands (PBG) in patients with cirrhosis are often an incidental finding although their significance and physiopathology remain unclear. We aimed to identify clinical factors associated with dilated PBG and to perform a detailed morphometric assessment of dilated PBG in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: All consecutive cirrhotic patients undergoing LT at our institution between October 2006 and October 2011 were assessed for inclusion. Ten non-cirrhotic patients were included as controls. We performed morphometrical assessment of PBG, assessed baseline clinical factors associated with dilated PBG, immunohistochemistry staining with CK-19, MiB-1 and EpCAM, and radiological assessment of all available cases. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients met the inclusion criteria, 24% had PBG dilatation of >1000 µm. On multivariable analysis, MELD (OR 1.11 per unit increase in MELD, p = 0.004) was the only significant factor associated with dilated PBG. Compared to PBG < 1000 µm, large PBG had a higher proportion of EpCAM-positive (69 vs. 28%, p < 0.001) and MiB-1-positive lining cells (2.8 vs. 0.55%, p = 0.036). Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging had high specificity but low sensitivity for the diagnosis of dilated PBG > 1000 µm (specificity 90-100%, sensitivity 25-29%). CONCLUSIONS: Dilated PBGs are a common finding in explants of cirrhotic subjects undergoing LT and are associated with liver failure although diagnostic performance of cross-sectional imaging is inconstant. The high number of proliferative and EpCAM-positive cells lining the PBG may suggest a role of PBG in organ repair during liver failure.