RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of baseline screening and follow-up with MRI to detecting trilateral retinoblastoma (TRb) and assessing the risk of TRb development. DESIGN: Prospective multicenter cohort study METHODS: A total of 607 retinoblastoma patients from 2012 through 2022 were included and followed up until 1-9-2023. At each center a neuroradiologist categorized pineal glands on baseline and follow-up scans into four groups: (A) normal, (B) cystic gland, (C) suspicious gland, or (D) TRb. Different follow-up schedules were assigned to each category. Categories (B) and (C) were followed-up with MRI after approximately 3-months and after another 3 months if suspicion remained. On each MRI, they measured the height and width, evaluated the aspect (solid, partly cystic and completely cystic) of the pineal gland and evaluated radiological features suspicious of pineal TRb. The effectiveness of the current TRb screening method was assessed by evaluating its sensitivity and specificity to detect TRb. Determining the TRb incidence was a secondary outcome measure. RESULTS: Heritable retinoblastoma patients had a risk of 3.78% to develop TRb. One out of four pineal TRbs was detected during a follow-up scan and four out of five non-pineal TRbs were detected on the baseline MRI. Screening for pineal TRb had a sensitivity of 25% and specificity of 100%, for non-pineal TRb the sensitivity was 80%. It required 494 follow-up scans to detect one pineal TRb. However, when restricting the follow-up to solely suspicious glands, only 22 scans were required to detect one pineal TRb. CONCLUSION: During extended follow-up after baseline MRI, only one pineal trilateral retinoblastoma was detected in our study. Follow-up after three months should be restricted to patients with a suspicious pineal gland defined as irregularly thickening of the cyst wall (>2mm), fine nodular aspect of the cyst wall or when a solid or cystic gland exceeds the upper 99% prediction interval for size; patients with an unsuspicious cystic gland should not be followed up. Baseline MRI screening was able to detect most non-pineal trilateral retinoblastomas.
RESUMO
Protective strategies against perinatal brain injury represent a major challenge for modern neonatology. Erythropoietin (Epo) enhances endogenous mechanisms of repair and angiogenesis. In order to analyse the newest evidence on the role of Epo in prematurity, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) and perinatal stroke, a critical review using 2020 PRISMA statement guidelines was conducted. This review uncovered 26 clinical trials examining the use of Epo for prematurity and brain injury-related outcomes. The effects of Epo on prematurity were analysed in 16 clinical trials. Erythropoietin was provided until 32-35 weeks of corrected postnatal age with a dosage between 500-3000 UI/kg/dose. Eight trials reported the Epo effects on HIE term newborn infants: Erythropoietin was administered in the first weeks of life, at different multiple doses between 250-2500 UI/kg/dose, as either an adjuvant therapy with hypothermia or a substitute for hypothermia. Two trials investigated Epo effects in perinatal stroke. Erythropoietin was administered at a dose of 1000 IU/kg for three days. No beneficial effect in improving morbidity was observed after Epo administration in perinatal stroke. A positive effect on neurodevelopmental outcome seems to occur when Epo is used as an adjuvant therapy with hypothermia in the HIE newborns. Administration of Epo in preterm infants still presents inconsistencies with regard to neurodevelopmental outcome. Clinical trials show significant differences mainly in target population and intervention scheme. The identification of specific markers and their temporal expression at different time of recovery after hypoxia-ischemia in neonates might be implemented to optimize the therapeutic scheme after hypoxic-ischemic injury in the developing brain. Additional studies on tailored regimes, accounting for the risk stratification of brain damage in newborns, are required.
RESUMO
Background The higher cardiovascular variability and the increased prevalence of arrhythmias in patients with obstructive sleep apneas may contribute to their higher rate of fatal events during sleep. In this regard, the use of beta blockers (BB) is debated because they may induce bradyarrhythmias and alter the pattern of heart rate changes induced by apneas. Thus, the aim of our study is to quantify peri-apneic heart-rate swings and prevalence of nocturnal bradyarrhythmias in BB-treated and BB-naïve patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Methods and Results Our real-life, retrospective, cohort study analyzed data from patients with obstructive sleep apnea after a basal cardiorespiratory polysomnography. Among 228 eligible participants, we enrolled 78 BB-treated and 88 BB-naïve patients excluding those treated with antiarrhythmic drugs or pacemakers, or with uninterpretable ECG traces during polysomnography. In each patient, type and frequency of arrhythmias were identified and peri-apneic changes of RR intervals were evaluated for each apnea. BB-treated patients were older and with more comorbidities than BB-naïve patients, but had similar obstructive sleep apnea severity, similar frequency of arrhythmic episodes, and similar prevalence of bradyarrhythmias. Apnea-induced heart-rate swings, unadjusted for age, showed lower RR interval changes in BB-treated (133.5±63.8 ms) than BB-naïve patients (171.3±87.7 ms, P=0.01), lower RR interval increases during apneas (58.5±28.5 versus 74.6±40.2 ms, P=0.01), and lower RR interval decreases after apneas (75.0±42.4 versus 96.7±55.5 ms, P<0.05). Conclusions BB appear to be safe in patients with obstructive sleep apnea because they are not associated with worse episodes of nocturnal bradyarrhythmias and even seem protective in terms of apnea-induced changes of heart rate.