Rising age-specific rates of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: Report from an Italian Breast Unit.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) represents a fundamental part in the management of patients receiving mastectomy. In recent years, there has been an increasing trend in the use of IBR in all age groups. The study aims were to evaluate the age-specific trend of IBR, and to discuss its effects in work organization at an Italian Breast Unit. METHODS: We searched for women diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2019, focusing on IBR rates in patients who received mastectomy. Age-specific trends were assessed using the Cochrane-Armitage test. Differences in operative times and hospital stay between women undergoing mastectomy + IBR (Ma + IBR) or mastectomy alone (Ma) were evaluated by Student's t test or χ2 test. RESULTS: Among 1915 patients, 62.4% underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS), and 37.6% mastectomy. Overall, rates of Ma + IBR increased from 32% in 2010 to 58% in 2019 (p < 0.001). Although rates of IBR rose in all age groups, the trend was significantly increased among patients aged 50-59 (p < 0.001), 60-69 (p < 0.0001), and 70-79 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of Ma + IBR have increased over years, especially among older women. Ma + IBR resulted in longer operative times and hospital stay than Ma alone. These findings imply that, in the near future, resources should be implemented to improve and strengthen the surgical activity of Breast Units, to support the increasing use of IBR in women of all age groups.

The importance of the multidisciplinary team in the decision-making process of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent literature suggests that rates of breast conservation surgery (BCS) are lower than expected in patients submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to underscore the role of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the decision-making process of patients who underwent breast surgery after NAC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on patients with breast cancer treated according to an algorithm developed at the Breast Unit of Northern Sardinia between January 2019 and May 2023. Data collected included demographics, tumor characteristics, upfront treatment (surgery or NAC), type of primary surgery (BCS or mastectomy [Ma]) and patients' adherence to the treatment proposed by the MDT. RESULTS: Overall, 1061 women were treated during the study period, of whom 164 received NAC (Group A) and 897 upfront surgery (Group B). In group A, conversion from BCS ineligibility to BCS eligibility was observed in 47 patients (40.1%). Final surgery in patients who became BCS-eligible after NAC was BCS in 42 cases (89.3%) and Ma in 5 (10.6%). Rates of patients' adherence to the treatment proposed by the MDT were significantly better in the Group A (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the MDT has a pivotal role in increasing the rates of breast conservation in women submitted to NAC.

Breast-conserving therapy leads to better survival outcomes compared to mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer: evidences from the recent literature.

Classical studies comparing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy (Mx) focused on the non-inferiority of BCT in terms of survival outcomes. However, recent large retrospective studies have provided evidence that BCT could confer a survival advantage over Mx. The prognostic benefit of BCT was observed in all molecular subgroups, including triple negative breast cancer, and also in young patients affected from the disease, who are often submitted to Mx irrespective of tumor size. This new concept, regarding the prognostic importance related to the type of surgical treatment of breast cancer, is of particular relevance in current times. In fact, in the last two decades there has been a rise in Mx rates in BCT-eligible women, as well as a rise in bilateral mastectomy in patients with unilateral breast cancer. This phenomenon occurs despite lack of scientific evidence supporting the necessity of a more extensive surgery, and is primarily a patient-driven trend. The results of recent studies, demonstrating that BCT achieves better overall survival than Mx, should be incorporated in the multidisciplinary decision-making process. Patients with early breast cancer for whom either BCT or Mx are surgical options, should be properly informed that the prognosis of their disease is largely dependent from the biological behaviour of the tumor, and that Mx should not be considered equal to BCT in terms of survival. The present review underscored that BCT, when feasible, should be considered the option of choice also due to its advantage in survival outcomes.

Benefits of Organized Mammographic Screening Programs in Women Aged 50 to 69 years: A Surgical Perspective.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of organized mammographic screening programs (OMSPs) in reducing breast cancer mortality have been addressed by several studies. This study was designed to specifically evaluate the advantages of OMPSs in terms of surgical management of patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical treatment of 201 patients with breast cancer aged 50 to 69 years coming from OMSPs was compared with that of 532 non-OMSP patients in same age group. The likelihood of receiving BCS was analyzed through a multivariable regression model. RESULTS: The mean tumor size was smaller in the OMSP patients (14 mm vs. 18 mm; P < .01). The proportion of patients having metastatic lymph nodes was higher in the non-OMSP group (33.3% vs. 17.9%; P < .01). Rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were significantly higher in the OMSP group (89.1% vs. 59.1%; P < .01). Sentinel node biopsy was carried out in 84.1% and 62.5% of patients in the OMSP and non-OMSP groups, respectively (P < .01). Rates of axillary lymph node dissection were significantly different (24.9% in the OMSP group and 35.8% in the non-OMSP group; P = .02). Re-excisions for infiltrated margins after BCS were lower in the OMSP group (4.8% vs. 12.7%; P < .01). Hospital stay was shorter in the OMSP group (2.13 vs. 3.02 days; P < .01). OMPS women had a 3-fold higher probability of receiving BCS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with breast cancer belonging to OMSPs had a higher probability to receive less invasive surgery and to have shorter hospital stay. Our results support the use of campaigns aimed at increasing adhesion to mammography screening.

Sentinel node biopsy in early breast cancer: lessons learned from more than 1000 cases at a single institution.

AIMS: The aims of this paper are to report the development of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer at a single institution and to discuss the relevant issues on SNB still to be elucidated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2010, 1021 SNBs with frozen section examination were carried out in patients with breast cancer. In the early period (1998-2002) SNB was always combined with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). From 2002 onwards, only patients with a positive SNB result underwent ALND (late period). The characteristics of patients with infiltrating carcinoma (IC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and the histological status of the sentinel nodes were examined. The survival outcomes of node-negative patients were compared between patients submitted to SNB and ALND (ALND group) during the early period and patients who underwent only SNB during the late period (SNB group). RESULTS: The sentinel node was identified intraoperatively in 98.3% of cases. During the early period the overall accuracy of SNB was 97.0%. During the late period, 700 patients with IC and 140 with DCIS underwent SNB. In the IC group, 149 patients (21.3%) had sentinel node macrometastases and 36 (5.1%) micrometastases; of that subgroup, 21 underwent ALND and no other metastatic lymph nodes were found, and 15 underwent SNB only. Axillary recurrences were observed in 4 patients (0.77%) with negative SNB; none of these were among the patients with micrometastatic SNB. Two patients (1.4%) with DCIS had a positive SNB. In node-negative patients the 5-year overall survival was 96.7% in the ALND group and 96.5% in the SNB group (P = 0.63). The 5-year disease-free survival was 93.8% and 93.2% in the ALND and SNB groups, respectively (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Overall and disease-free survival in patients with a negative SNB result and no further axillary surgery were equal to those in patients with negative ALND. Intraoperative assessment of the sentinel node in expert hands has a low false-negative rate and allows immediate ALND in patients with sentinel node metastases, avoiding the need for a second operation. ALND for sentinel node micrometastases may be safely omitted in most patients with early stage breast cancer.