Pharmacokinetics of teriparatide (rhPTH[1-34]) and calcium pharmacodynamics in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Teriparatide (rhPTH[1-34]) affects calcium metabolism in a pattern consistent with the known actions of endogenous parathyroid hormone (PTH). This report describes the pharmacokinetics and resulting serum calcium response to teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Pharmacokinetic samples for this analysis were obtained from 360 women who participated in the Fracture Prevention Trial. Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received daily subcutaneous injections of either teriparatide 20 µg (4.86 µmol) or placebo, median 21 months' treatment. Serum teriparatide and calcium concentrations were measured throughout the study. An indirect-response model was developed to describe the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship between teriparatide concentrations and serum calcium response. The pharmacokinetics of teriparatide were characterized by rapid absorption (maximum concentration achieved within 30 min) and rapid elimination (half-life of 1 h), resulting in a total duration of exposure to the peptide of approximately 4 h. Teriparatide transiently increased serum calcium, with the maximum effect observed at approximately 4.25 h (median increase 0.4 mg/dl [0.1 mmol/l]). Calcium concentrations returned to predose levels by 16-24 h after each dose. Persistent hypercalcemia was not observed; one teriparatide 20 µg-treated patient had a predose serum calcium value above the normal range but <11.0 mg/dl (2.75 mmol/l). Following once-daily subcutaneous administration, teriparatide produces a modest but transient increase in serum calcium, consistent with the known effects of endogenous PTH on mineral metabolism. The excursion in serum calcium is brief, due to the short length of time that teriparatide concentrations are elevated.

Safety and efficacy of neurostimulation with a miniaturised vagus nerve stimulation device in patients with multidrug-refractory rheumatoid arthritis: a two-stage multicentre, randomised pilot study.

Background The inflammatory reflex plays a role in regulating innate and adaptive immunity by modulating cellular and molecular inflammatory pathways. The vagus nerve is a major constituent of the inflammatory reflex and studies have shown that the reflex can be activated by electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve. In this first in-human pilot study, we assessed the safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturised vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) device for the treatment of multidrug-refractory rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Participants with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis and prior insufficient response to two or more biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or Janus kinase inhibitors with at least two different modes of action were enrolled in a two-stage study done at five clinical research sites in the USA. Stage 1 was open label; participants were implanted with a miniaturised VNS device, which was activated for 1 min once a day. In stage 2, participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive active stimulation (1 min once a day or 1 min four times a day) or sham stimulation (device implanted but not activated), with the sites and participants masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Clinical efficacy was assessed as a key secondary outcome. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03437473. FINDINGS: 14 patients were enrolled between March 13 and Aug 8, 2018. Three patients received stimulation in stage 1 and, following safety review board approval, the remaining 11 patients were implanted during stage 2 and randomly assigned to receive 1 min of stimulation once daily (n=3), 1 min of stimulation four times daily (n=4), or no stimulation (n=4) for 12 weeks. There were no device-related or treatment-related serious adverse events. Surgery-related adverse events were Horner's syndrome and vocal cord paralysis (in one patient each), which resolved without clinically significant sequelae. No deaths were recorded. INTERPRETATION: VNS with a miniaturised neurostimulator was safe and well tolerated and reduced signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with multidrug-refractory disease. These results support further evaluation in a larger randomised sham-controlled study. FUNDING: SetPoint Medical.

Effects of previous antiresorptive therapy on the bone mineral density response to two years of teriparatide treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION: EUROFORS was a 2-yr prospective, randomized trial of postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis, designed to investigate various sequential treatments after teriparatide 20 microg/d for 1 yr. The present secondary analysis examined the effects of 2 yr of open-label teriparatide in women previously treated with antiresorptive drugs for at least 1 yr. METHODS: A subgroup of 245 women with osteoporosis who had 2 yr of teriparatide treatment were stratified by previous predominant antiresorptive treatment into four groups: alendronate (n=107), risedronate (n=59), etidronate (n=30), and non-bisphosphonate (n=49). Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine and hip was determined after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and bone formation markers were measured after 1 and 6 months. RESULTS: Significant increases in bone formation markers occurred in all groups after 1 month of teriparatide treatment. Lumbar spine BMD increased at all visits, whereas a transient decrease in hip BMD, which was subsequently reversed, was observed in all groups. BMD responses were similar in all previous antiresorptive groups. Previous etidronate users showed a higher increase at the spine but not at the hip BMD. Duration of previous antiresorptive therapy and lag time between stopping previous therapy and starting teriparatide did not affect the BMD response at any skeletal site. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar to those reported in treatment-naive postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with teriparatide. CONCLUSIONS: Teriparatide induces positive effects on BMD and markers of bone formation in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis, regardless of previous long-term exposure to antiresorptive therapies.

Effects of teriparatide and alendronate on vertebral strength as assessed by finite element modeling of QCT scans in women with osteoporosis.

UNLABELLED: FE modeling was used to estimate the biomechanical effects of teriparatide and alendronate on lumbar vertebrae. Both treatments enhanced predicted vertebral strength by increasing average density. This effect was more pronounced for teriparatide, which further increased predicted vertebral strength by altering the distribution of density within the vertebra, preferentially increasing the strength of the trabecular compartment. INTRODUCTION: Teriparatide 20 microg/day (TPTD) and alendronate 10 mg/day (ALN) increase areal, measured by DXA, and volumetric, measured by QCT, lumbar spine BMD through opposite effects on bone remodeling. Using finite element (FE) modeling of QCT scans, we sought to compare the vertebral strength characteristics in TPTD- and ALN-treated patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A subset of patients (N = 28 TPTD; N = 25 ALN) from the Forteo Alendronate Comparator Trial who had QCT scans of the spine at baseline and postbaseline were analyzed. The QCT scans were analyzed for compressive strength of the L(3) vertebra using FE modeling. In addition, using controlled parameter studies of the FE models, the effects of changes in density, density distribution, and geometry on strength were calculated, a strength:density ratio was determined, and a response to bending was also quantified. RESULTS: Both treatments had positive effects on predicted vertebral strength characteristics. At least 75% of the patients in each treatment group had increased strength of the vertebra at 6 months compared with baseline. Patients in both treatment groups had increased average volumetric density and increased strength in the trabecular bone, but the median percentage increases for these parameters were 5- to 12-fold greater for TPTD. Larger increases in the strength:density ratio were also observed for TPTD, and these were primarily attributed to preferential increases in trabecular strength. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide new insight into the effects of these treatments on estimated biomechanical properties of the vertebra. Both treatments positively affected predicted vertebral strength through their effects on average BMD, but the magnitudes of the effects were quite different. Teriparatide also affected vertebral strength by altering the distribution of density within the vertebra, so that overall, teriparatide had a 5-fold greater percentage increase in the strength:density ratio.

Development of an algorithm for using PINP to monitor treatment of patients with teriparatide.

INTRODUCTION: Teriparatide effects are mediated via the preferential stimulation of osteoblastic activity over osteoclastic activity. Amino-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP) is an indicator of osteoblastic activity. OBJECTIVE: Develop an algorithm using PINP as an aid in the management of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with teriparatide. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: For inclusion in this post-hoc analysis, trials had to be investigations of teriparatide 20 microg/day in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis having measurements of PINP at 3 months and bone mineral density (BMD) at 12 months. Signal-to-noise ratio was calculated for a series of markers of bone turnover in the Fracture Prevention Trial. An algorithm was developed to monitor patients treated with teriparatide using PINP. RESULTS: Three trials met inclusion criteria and included the Fracture Prevention, Forteo-Alendronate Comparator and Anabolic After Antiresorptive trials. PINP had the highest signal-to-noise ratio of all bone-turnover markers. Positive PINP responses defined as increases > 10 microg/L were observed in 77-79% of teriparatide- and in 6% of placebo-treated patients after 3 months of study drug. Mean lumbar spine BMD increases after 12 months of teriparatide in patients having PINP changes > 10 microg/L ranged from 8.3% to 9.5% and in patients with PINP changes < or = 10 microg/L ranged from 5.9% to 7.6%. In the algorithm, PINP is measured at baseline and after 1-3 months of therapy. Patients with PINP increases > 10 microg/L are given a positive message. Patients with PINP increases < or = 10 microg/L are assessed for adherence, teriparatide administration and storage techniques, and for the presence of medical conditions that might limit their therapeutic response, and these issues are addressed as appropriate. Patients without these issues and with PINP increases < or = 10 microg/L should be given a neutral message because BMD may significantly increase with continued therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The PINP algorithm provides information regarding the anabolic response to teriparatide therapy and has the potential to identify patients requiring help with issues of adherence, injection technique, teriparatide storage, and medical problems limiting therapeutic responsiveness to teriparatide treatment. Data assessing the relationship of changes in PINP to fracture risk reduction are not available. We recommend physicians audit the use of the algorithm in practice so that improvements can be made.

Combination teriparatide and raloxifene therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from a 6-month double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

UNLABELLED: We compared combination treatment with teriparatide plus raloxifene with teriparatide alone in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis in a 6-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that measured biochemical markers of bone turnover and BMD. Markers of bone formation and spine BMD increased similarly with teriparatide alone and combination therapy. However, combination therapy induced a significantly smaller increase in bone resorption versus teriparatide alone and significantly increased total hip BMD versus baseline. INTRODUCTION: The effects of combining two approved treatments for osteoporosis with different modes of action were examined by comparing teriparatide [rhPTH(1-34)] monotherapy with combination teriparatide and raloxifene therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 6-month randomized, double-blind trial comparing teriparatide plus raloxifene (n = 69) versus teriparatide plus placebo (n = 68) was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. RESULTS: Bone formation (N-terminal propeptide of type 1 collagen [PINP]) increased similarly in both treatment groups. However, the increase in bone resorption (serum C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen [CTx]) in the combination group was significantly smaller than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.015). Lumbar spine BMD significantly increased 5.19 +/- 0.67% from baseline in the teriparatide-alone group. In the combination group, lumbar spine (6.19 +/- 0.65%), femoral neck (2.23 +/- 0.64%), and total hip (2.31 +/- 0.56%) BMD significantly increased from baseline to study endpoint, and the increase in total hip BMD was significantly greater than in the teriparatide-alone group (p = 0.04). In the teriparatide-alone group, mean serum calcium levels increased from baseline to endpoint (0.30 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001), whereas mean serum phosphate remained unchanged. In the combination group, mean serum calcium was unchanged, and mean serum phosphate decreased (-0.20 +/- 0.06 mg/dl, p < 0.001) from baseline to endpoint. Changes in serum calcium (p < 0.001) and phosphate (p < 0.004) were significantly different between treatment groups. The safety profile of combination therapy was similar to teriparatide alone. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy increased bone formation to a similar degree as teriparatide alone. However, the increase in bone resorption was significantly less and total hip BMD significantly increased for combination therapy compared with teriparatide alone. Combination treatment with raloxifene may thus enhance the bone forming effects of teriparatide. Further studies over longer treatment duration that include fracture endpoints are necessary to fully ascertain the clinical significance of combination raloxifene plus teriparatide therapy in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Bone mineral and collagen quality in iliac crest biopsies of patients given teriparatide: new results from the fracture prevention trial.

CONTEXT: Evidence suggests that both bone mineral density and bone quality should be taken into account when assessing bone strength and fracture risk. Bone quality is a multifactor entity, of which bone architecture and material properties are two important components. Matrix mineralization, hydroxyapatite characteristics, and collagen cross-link ratio are key determinants of material properties. Fourier transform infrared imaging (FTIRI) yields data on these characteristics from bone sections. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine collagen cross-link ratios and matrix mineralization of bone from patients randomized to teriparatide [recombinant human PTH (1-34)] treatment using FTIRI. DESIGN: The Fracture Prevention Trial was randomized, double blind, and placebo-controlled. SETTING: The trial was conducted at global clinical research centers. PATIENTS: Patients consisted of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive daily sc injections of placebo (n = 12) or 20 microg (n = 13) or 40 microg (n = 13) teriparatide. Biopsies were obtained after 12 months of treatment or at the end of treatment (range, 19-24 months for end of treatment paired biopsies). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Biopsies were analyzed by FTIRI to determine the matrix mineralization (mineral to matrix), mineral crystallinity, and collagen cross-link ratio (pyridinoline/dehydrodihydroxylysinonorleucine) with a spatial resolution of approximately 6.3 microm. RESULTS: Patients administered teriparatide 20 and 40 microg/d exhibited significantly lower matrix mineralization, mineral crystallinity, and collagen cross-link ratio when compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the bone-forming effect of teriparatide results in bone with a molecular profile reminiscent of younger bone.

The effects of teriparatide on the incidence of back pain in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

OBJECTIVES: Back pain is a major cause of suffering, disability, and cost. The risk of developing back pain was assessed following treatment with teriparatide [rh(PTH 1-34)] in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A secondary analysis of back pain findings from the global, multi-site Fracture Prevention Trial was conducted where postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures were administered teriparatide 20 microg (n = 541) or placebo (n = 544) for a median of 19 months. Treatment-emergent back pain data were collected during adverse event monitoring, and spine radiographs were obtained at baseline and study endpoint. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The risk of back pain stratified by severity of new or worsening back pain and the risk of back pain associated with both number and severity of new vertebral fractures. RESULTS: Women randomized to teriparatide 20 microg had a 31% reduced relative risk of moderate or severe back pain (16.5% vs. 11.5%, P = 0.016) and a 57% reduced risk of severe back pain (5.2% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.011). Compared with placebo, teriparatide-treated patients experienced reduced relative risk of developing back pain associated with findings of: one or more new vertebral fractures by 83% (6.5% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001), two or more new vertebral fractures by 91% (2.5% vs. 0.20%, P = 0.004), and one or more new moderate or severe vertebral fractures by 100% (5.1% vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Teriparatide-treated women had reduced risk for moderate or severe back pain, severe back pain, and back pain associated with vertebral fractures. The mechanism of the back pain reduction likely includes the reduction both in severity and number of new vertebral fractures.

Teriparatide [PTH(1-34)] strengthens the proximal femur of ovariectomized nonhuman primates despite increasing porosity.

UNLABELLED: OVX monkeys treated for 18 months with 1 or 5 microg/kg/d teriparatide [PTH (1-34)] had significantly stronger proximal femora relative to ovariectomized controls. Teriparatide enhancement of cortical area, cortical width, and trabecular bone volume seemed to more than compensate for the dose-dependent increase in cortical porosity. Beneficial effects of teriparatide treatment on the proximal femur persisted beyond the treatment period and may extend to the marrow. INTRODUCTION: We conducted a detailed quantitative analysis of the effects of teriparatide on the proximal femur of ovariectomized monkeys. Teriparatide increased bone mass, enhanced structural architecture, and strengthened the hip, despite increasing cortical porosity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Monkeys were treated with vehicle (sham or OVX controls), 1 microg/kg/day teriparatide [parathyroid hormone (1-34); PTH1], or 5 microg/kg/day teriparatide (PTH5) for 18 months or for 12 months followed by 6 months of treatment withdrawal (PTH1W and PTH5W, respectively). Excised proximal femora were analyzed by microCT, conventional histomorphometry, and biomechanics. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The femoral neck showed significant reduction in trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) for OVX compared with sham, whereas PTH1 BV/TV was restored to sham levels and PTH5 BV/TV was greater than sham and OVX. The withdrawal groups had BV/TVs intermediate between sham and OVX. PTH1 had trabecular number (Tb.N) greater than OVX, and PTH5 Tb.N was greater than sham and OVX. The withdrawal groups had Tb.Ns intermediate between sham and OVX. No differences between groups were observed for trabecular orientation or trabecular thickness. Teriparatide dose-dependently increased bone formation rate and activation frequency in the femoral neck. Cellular composition analyses suggested a tendency of ovariectomy to increase adiposity of marrow by 100%, whereas PTH tended to reduce adipocyte number and increase osteoblast number compared with OVX. Analyses of the cortex showed dose-dependent elevation of cortical porosity, which was consistent with enhanced bone turnover with treatment. Cortical porosity was reduced after withdrawal of teriparatide, because PTH1W cortical porosity was lower than OVX, whereas PTH5W cortical porosity was intermediate between sham and OVX. Increased cortical porosity did not weaken the proximal femora. Biomechanics showed that ovariectomy weakened proximal femora compared with sham, but PTH1, PTH5, and PTH1W were stronger than OVX and not different from sham. PTH5W strength was intermediate between sham and OVX. Therefore, teriparatide had beneficial effects on the proximal femur, despite increasing cortical porosity. Cortical porosity did not adversely affect the mechanical integrity of the proximal femora, because enhanced cortical area and trabecular bone volume more than compensated for the porosity. Much of the beneficial effects of teriparatide were retained after 6 months withdrawal from treatment. PTH effects on the femoral neck were not limited to bone but may include inhibition of OVX-stimulated adiposity of the marrow.

Eliminating Dermatophagoides farinae spp. (Acari: Pyroglyphidae) and their allergens through high temperature treatment of textiles.

House dust mite allergens cause allergy and asthma in sensitized individuals. The allergens they produce are known to resist decay under natural household conditions and are thought to accumulate until removed. We sought to evaluate the effects of high temperature (96 degrees C) generated by a hard surface cleaner on live mite populations of American house dust mites, Dermatophagoides farinae Hughes and their allergens in carpet and mattresses. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) mite mortality (100%) was observed in response to treatment in both textile surfaces. Similar effects were observed on Der f1 fecal allergen. Allergen reductions in carpet with two or five pass treatment regimes were 61.4 and 100%, respectively. These results demonstrate the potential of employing a hard surface steam cleaner as a novel method to eliminate house dust mite populations and their allergens in a residential setting and appeal particularly promising as an environmental control strategy.

Use of an amplified ELISA technique for detection of a house dust mite allergen (Der f 1) in skin and coat dust samples from dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To use an amplified ELISA technique to document the presence and quantify the concentration of the house dust mite allergen, Der f 1, in skin and coat dust samples collected from dogs. ANIMALS: 29 pet dogs of various breeds. PROCEDURE: Dogs were weighed, and body surface area in square meters was determined. Skin and coat dust samples were obtained by vacuuming dogs. Collected dust was analyzed by use of standard and amplified ELISA techniques. RESULTS: By use of the standard ELISA technique, Der f 1 was detected in skin and coat dust samples from 6 of 29 (21%) dogs. Mean concentration of Der f 1 in the 6 samples with positive assay results was 16.16 ng/mL (range, 5.61 to 31.24 ng/mL). Samples with negative assay results were retested for dust mite allergen by use of an amplified ELISA technique; an additional 14 dogs had positive assay results. Mean concentration of allergen was 0.36 ng/mL (range, 0.19 to 2.20 ng/mL). Combining both techniques, 20 of 29 (69%) dogs had positive assay results for Der f 1. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results of our study indicate that house dust mite allergens are present on the skin and in the coat of dogs, and this source of allergen may act as a reservoir for allergen exposure in hypersensitive dogs. Use of an amplified ELISA technique to determine environmental concentrations of house dust mite allergens in homes and on dogs will help to identify the relationship between immunologic findings and environmental exposures in dogs with atopic dermatitis.

Teriparatide and raloxifene reduce the risk of new adjacent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Results from two randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Vertebral fractures increase the risk of new vertebral fractures; however, we are not aware of any study addressing the risk of new vertebral fractures adjacent to existing vertebral fractures. Therefore, we sought to determine the influence of the number and severity of prevalent (preexisting) vertebral fractures on the risk of new adjacent vertebral fractures and to determine whether teriparatide (rhPTH [recombinant human parathyroid hormone] [1-34]) or raloxifene treatment reduces the incidence of adjacent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. METHODS: Data from the Fracture Prevention Trial and the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation trial were analyzed to determine the incidences of new adjacent and new nonadjacent vertebral fractures in the placebo groups and the effect of treatment with raloxifene and teriparatide on the incidence of new adjacent vertebral fractures as compared with that of new nonadjacent vertebral fractures. RESULTS: Of 1226 untreated postmenopausal women with one or more prevalent vertebral fractures at baseline, 196 (16.0%) had a total of 292 new vertebral fractures during the two-year follow-up period, with 108 (8.8%) of the 1226 women having at least one new fracture adjacent to a prevalent fracture. Of the 292 new vertebral fractures, 136 (47%) were adjacent to a previously existing vertebral fracture. The risk of a new adjacent vertebral fracture was 2.5-fold higher than the risk of a new nonadjacent vertebral fracture (4.03% compared with 1.59%). The incidence of new adjacent vertebral fractures increased with both the number and the severity of prevalent vertebral fractures. Teriparatide reduced the risk of any new, new adjacent, and new nonadjacent vertebral fractures by 72%, 75%, and 70%, respectively, compared with the rates in the placebo group. Similarly, compared with the placebo, raloxifene treatment reduced the risk of any new vertebral fracture, new adjacent vertebral fracture, and new nonadjacent vertebral fracture by 54%, 54%, and 53%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In untreated postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, nearly half of the incident vertebral fractures occur adjacent to an existing vertebral fracture. Both teriparatide and raloxifene can significantly reduce the occurrence of new adjacent and nonadjacent vertebral fractures.

Effects of teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis on prior alendronate or raloxifene: differences between stopping and continuing the antiresorptive agent.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to assess adding vs. switching to teriparatide 20 microg/d in patients on alendronate or raloxifene. DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, open-label trial. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis on alendronate or raloxifene for at least 18 months added teriparatide (Add groups) or switched to teriparatide (Switch groups) for 18 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured bone turnover markers (BTM) and bone mineral density (BMD). RESULTS: In the alendronate stratum, increases in BTM were smaller in the Add vs. Switch group [6-month PINP (64 vs. 401%); bone ALP (15 vs. 71%); betaCTX (27 vs. 250%); all P < 0.001]. However, at 6 months, total hip BMD increased more in the Add vs. Switch group (1.4 vs. -0.8%; P = 0.002). In the Add vs. Switch group, 18-month BMD increments were higher in lumbar spine (8.4 vs. 4.8%; P = 0.003) and total hip (3.2 vs. 0.9%; P = 0.02), but not in femoral neck (2.7 vs. 2.3%; P = 0.75). In the raloxifene stratum, increases in BTM were also smaller in the Add vs. Switch group [6-month PINP (131 vs. 259%; P < 0.001), bone ALP (31 vs. 44%; P = 0.035), and betaCTX (67 vs. 144%; P = 0.001)]. At 6 months, total hip BMD increase was greater in the Add vs. Switch group (1.8 vs. 0.5%; P = 0.028). At 18 months, increases in lumbar spine (9.2 vs. 8.1%), total hip (2.8 vs. 1.8%), and femoral neck (3.8 vs. 2.2%) were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In women with osteoporosis treated with antiresorptives, greater bone turnover increases were achieved by switching to teriparatide, whereas greater BMD increases were achieved by adding teriparatide.

Reduced risk of back pain following teriparatide treatment: a meta-analysis.

Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fracture and may result in back pain with functional limitations and diminished quality of life. Teriparatide [rhPTH (1-34)] has been shown to increase bone mass and reduce the risk of vertebral and other osteoporotic fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of teriparatide on the risk of back pain in patients with osteoporosis. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and five trials were identified and included in our analyses. All trials were randomized, double-blinded, and parallel with either new vertebral fracture (n=1) or bone mineral density as the primary endpoint (n=4). Four studies were in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and one was in men with idiopathic or hypogonadal osteoporosis. Two trials were placebo controlled, two trials were alendronate controlled, and one trial involved teriparatide plus hormone replacement therapy versus hormone replacement therapy alone. Reports of back pain, defined as new or worsened back pain after initiating the study drug, were obtained from adverse event databases, and the risk of back pain was analyzed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Results were not statistically heterogeneous (P=0.60) across trials, and there were no differences between groups administered teriparatide 20 or 40 mcg/day doses (P=0.64). The rates of back pain, moderate or severe back pain, and severe back pain per 100 patient-years were numerically lower in the teriparatide versus comparator groups in each study. Compared with the pooled comparator, patients in the pooled teriparatide group had reduced risk for any back pain [relative risk, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.55-0.80)], moderate or severe back pain [relative risk, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.48-0.75)] and severe back pain [relative risk, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.28-0.68)]. Separate meta-analyses comparing teriparatide versus placebo or antiresorptive drugs gave similar results. In conclusion, patients randomized to teriparatide had a reduced risk of new or worsening back pain compared to patients randomized to placebo, hormone replacement therapy or alendronate.