Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr ; 248: 119-121, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35644225

RESUMO

In a cross-sectional study of 89 736 adolescents in Kentucky, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination provided an estimated protection against infection of 81% when the highly transmissible Delta variant was predominant. Vaccination provided added benefit to those with a history of prior infection. These findings support the recommendation that all adolescents receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacinação
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 70(32): 1081-1083, 2021 Aug 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383732

RESUMO

Although laboratory evidence suggests that antibody responses following COVID-19 vaccination provide better neutralization of some circulating variants than does natural infection (1,2), few real-world epidemiologic studies exist to support the benefit of vaccination for previously infected persons. This report details the findings of a case-control evaluation of the association between vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in Kentucky during May-June 2021 among persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 in 2020. Kentucky residents who were not vaccinated had 2.34 times the odds of reinfection compared with those who were fully vaccinated (odds ratio [OR] = 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.58-3.47). These findings suggest that among persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, full vaccination provides additional protection against reinfection. To reduce their risk of infection, all eligible persons should be offered vaccination, even if they have been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Reinfecção/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reinfecção/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Adulto Jovem
3.
COPD ; 17(4): 373-377, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32586139

RESUMO

Obesity has been shown to have a paradoxical benefit in a number of conditions, but the long-term effects in obesity after chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation is still unclear. In this study, the effects of obesity on short- and long-term outcomes after a COPD exacerbation were evaluated. This was a secondary analysis of the Rapid Empiric Treatment with Oseltamivir Study (RETOS): a prospective, randomized, unblinded clinical trial. Patients were included in the study if they were hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD. Obesity was noted as patients with BMI >30. Clinical outcomes of time to clinical stability, length of stay, and mortality were compared. A total of 301 patients were included in the study, 122 (41%) patients were obese. There was no significant difference in the length of stay and time to clinical stability between patients with and without obesity. Mortality for patients with and without obesity was 3% and 3% at 30 days, 7% and 18% at six months, and 8% and 28% at one year, respectively. After adjusting with multivariable regression analysis, patients with obesity had a significant reduction in odds of dying at one year (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.58; p = .004) and at six months (aOR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.09-0.89; p = .031). Our study showed that obesity was associated with reduced mortality at one year and six months after a COPD exacerbation. Although patients with obesity had higher rates of comorbidities, they had reduced mortality at one year after multivariable regression analysis.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Obesidade/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Idoso , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Índice de Massa Corporal , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade/mortalidade , Oseltamivir/uso terapêutico
4.
J Adolesc Health ; 73(3): 536-542, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37318408

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is influenced by SARS-CoV-2 variant and history of prior infection. Data regarding protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection among adolescents, accounting for prior infection and time since vaccination, are limited. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 testing and immunization data from the Kentucky Electronic Disease Surveillance System and the Kentucky Immunization Registry, August-September 2021 (Delta predominance) and January 2022 (Omicron Predominance) among adolescents aged 12-17 years, were used to assess association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with mRNA vaccination and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Estimated protection was derived from prevalence ratios ([1-PR] × 100%). RESULTS: During Delta predominance, 89,736 tested adolescents were evaluated. Completion of primary series (second dose of mRNA vaccine ≥ 14 days prior to testing) and history of prior infection (> 90 days prior to testing) were both protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection (primary series: 81%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 79.7-82.3; prior infection: 66%, 95% CI 62.0-69.6). Prior infection plus primary series provided the greatest protection (92.3%, 95% CI 88.0-95.1). During Omicron predominance, 67,331 tested adolescents were evaluated. Primary series alone provided no benefit against SARS-CoV-2 infection after 90 days; prior infection was protective for up to one year (24.2%, 95% CI 17.2-30.7). Prior infection plus booster vaccination provided the greatest protection against infection (82.4%, 95% CI 62.1-91.8). DISCUSSION: Strength and duration of protection against infection provided by COVID-19 vaccination and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection differed by variant. Vaccination provided additional benefit to the protection offered by prior infection alone. Remaining up to date with vaccination is recommended for all adolescents regardless of infection history.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Humanos , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Kentucky/epidemiologia , Vacinação
5.
Int J Infect Dis ; 114: 21-28, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34649001

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As vaccine supply and access remain limited in many parts of the world, understanding the duration of protection from reinfection after natural infection is important. METHODS: Distinct individuals testing positive and negative for SARS-CoV-2 between March 6, 2020, and August 31, 2020, in Kentucky, USA, were identified using the Kentucky National Electronic Disease Surveillance System. Individuals were followed for occurrence of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 from 91 days after their initial test result through December 31, 2020. Protection from reinfection provided by a prior infection was calculated and additional analyses evaluated impact of age, sex, symptom status, long-term care facility connection, testing occurrence and frequency, and time from initial infection. RESULTS: The protective effect from prior infection was 80.3% (95% CI, 78.2%-82.2%) for those aged 20-59 years and 67.4% (95% CI, 62.8%-71.4%) for those aged ≥60 years. At 30-day time periods through 270 days (with limited exceptions), protection was estimated to be >75% for those aged 20-59 years and >65% for those aged ≥60 years. Factors associated with repeat positive testing included a connection to a long-term care facility, duration of potential exposure, and absence of symptoms during initial infection. CONCLUSIONS: Natural infection provides substantial and persistent immunologic protection for a period of several months for most individuals, although subpopulations may be at greater risk of repeat positive testing and potential poor outcomes associated with reinfection. These subgroups include individuals aged ≥60 years, residents and staff of long-term care facilities, and those who have mild or asymptomatic illness with initial infection. Continued emphasis on vaccination and infection prevention and control strategies remains critically important in reducing the risk of reinfection and associated severe outcomes for these groups.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Humanos , Kentucky/epidemiologia , Casas de Saúde
6.
ERJ Open Res ; 7(1)2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33778059

RESUMO

The obesity paradox postulates that increased body mass index (BMI) is protective in certain patient populations. We aimed to investigate the association of BMI and different weight classes with outcomes in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This cohort study is a secondary data analysis of the University of Louisville Pneumonia Study database, a prospective study of hospitalised adult patients with CAP from June, 2014, to May, 2016, in Louisville, KY, USA. BMI as a predictor was assessed both as a continuous and categorical variable. Patients were categorised as weight classes based on World Health Organization definitions: BMI of <18.5 kg·m-2 (underweight), BMI of 18.5 to <25 kg·m-2 (normal weight), BMI of 25.0 to <30 kg·m-2 (overweight), BMI of 30 to <35 kg·m-2 (obesity class I), BMI of 35 to <40 kg·m-2 (obesity class II), and BMI of ≥40 kg·m-2 (obesity class III). Study outcomes, including time to clinical stability, length of stay, clinical failure and mortality, were assessed in hospital, at 30 days, at 6 months and at 1 year. Clinical failure was defined as the need for noninvasive ventilation, invasive ventilation or vasopressors within 1 week of admission. Patient characteristics and crude outcomes were stratified by BMI categories, and generalised additive binomial regression models were performed to analyse the impact of BMI as a continuous variable on study outcomes adjusting for possible confounding variables. 7449 patients were included in the study. Median time to clinical stability was 2 days for every BMI group. There was no association between BMI as a continuous predictor and length of stay <5 days (chi-squared=1.83, estimated degrees of freedom (EDF)=2.74, p=0.608). Clinical failure was highest in the class III obesity group, and higher BMI as a continuous predictor was associated with higher odds of clinical failure. BMI as a continuous predictor was significantly associated with 30-day (chi-squared=39.97, EDF=3.07, p<0.001), 6-month (chi-squared=89.42, EDF=3.44, p<0.001) and 1-year (chi-squared=83.97, EDF=2.89, p<0.001) mortalities. BMI ≤24.14 kg·m-2 was a risk factor whereas BMI ≥26.97 kg·m-2 was protective for mortality at 1-year. The incremental benefit of increasing BMI plateaued at 35 kg·m-2. We found a protective benefit of obesity on mortality in CAP patients. However, we uniquely demonstrate that the association between BMI and mortality is not linear, and no incremental benefit of increasing BMI levels is observed in those with obesity classes II and III.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA