Conditional Overall Survival After Diagnosis of Non-Metastatic Colon Cancer: Impact of Laterality, MSI, and KRAS Status.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic relevance of laterality, microsatellite instability (MSI), and KRAS status in colon cancer has been established. However, their effect on conditional overall survival (COS) remains unknown. METHODS: COS is the probability of surviving additional years after a time from diagnosis. The National Cancer Database (2010-2017) was queried for adults with non-metastatic colon cancer and known mutation status undergoing curative resection. COS was investigated at 2 years. RESULTS: Of 4838 patients, 3716 survived at least 2 years: 15% had stage I, 38% stage II, and 46% stage III disease. Fifty-nine percent had a right-sided tumor, 16% were MSI-high, and 37% were mutated KRAS (mKRAS). The proportion of patients alive at 2 years was higher for stage I compared with stage II and III (65 vs. 61 vs. 54%). The 5-year overall survival for stage I-III was 80, 76, and 67% for the initial cohort, and 90, 88, and 86% for those alive at 2 years. After adjustment, higher pathologic T and N stage, tumor deposits, and no chemotherapy were associated with worse COS (p < 0.01). While laterality and MSI status were not associated with COS, mKRAS was independently associated with decreased COS (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.12-1.62). CONCLUSION: Patients with mKRAS had worse COS, suggesting that these mutations confer an aggressive biologic behavior, with patients remaining at higher risk of death 2 years after diagnosis. Routine evaluation of KRAS status should be considered in patients with non-metastatic disease for prognostication and to identify those who might benefit from modified surveillance protocols.

Pathologic Complete Response, Total Neoadjuvant Therapy and the Survival Paradox in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response (pCR) after preoperative chemoradiation (nCRT) correlates with improved overall survival for patients with locally advanced rectal cancers (LARCs). Escalation protocols including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which delivers multi-agent chemotherapy and chemoradiation before surgery, are associated with increased complete response rates. However, TNT is not associated with improved overall survival. The authors hypothesized that the route to pCR may be an important predictor of oncologic outcome. METHODS: Adults with LARC between 2006 and 2017 were identified in the National Cancer Database. The cohort was limited to those who received neoadjuvant radiation (45-70 Gy) and underwent proctectomy. RESULTS: Of 25,880 patients, 16 % received TNT and 84 % had nCRT followed by either multi-agent (27 %), single-agent (14 %), or no adjuvant chemotherapy (44 %). Overall, 18 % achieved pCR, with higher rates in the TNT cohort than in the nCRT (18 %) or multi-agent (14 %) chemotherapy cohorts. With control for covariates, the OS in the pCR cohort was similar for the patients that received single-agent therapy and those that received multi-agent adjuvant therapy, and superior to the TNT and no adjuvant therapy cohorts. Conversely, among the patients who did not achieve pCR, those who received single-agent chemotherapy had OS comparable with those who had multi-agent adjuvant therapy and TNT, which was better than no adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients achieving pCR after TNT had worse OS than those who had CRT alone, suggesting that the neoadjuvant route by which pCR is achieved is prognostically relevant. Therefore, in the era of neoadjuvant therapy escalation, pCR does not necessarily portend a uniformly favorable prognosis.

Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response for Rectal Cancer Based on Pretreatment Factors Using Machine Learning.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy is an important prognostic indicator for locally advanced rectal cancer and may give insights into which patients might be treated nonoperatively in the future. Existing models for predicting pathologic complete response in the pretreatment setting are limited by small data sets and low accuracy. OBJECTIVE: We sought to use machine learning to develop a more generalizable predictive model for pathologic complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer. DESIGN: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgical resection were identified in the National Cancer Database from years 2010 to 2019 and were split into training, validation, and test sets. Machine learning techniques included random forest, gradient boosting, and artificial neural network. A logistic regression model was also created. Model performance was assessed using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. SETTINGS: This study used a national, multicenter data set. PATIENTS: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and proctectomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pathologic complete response defined as T0/xN0/x. RESULTS: The data set included 53,684 patients. Pathologic complete response was experienced by 22.9% of patients. Gradient boosting showed the best performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.777 (95% CI, 0.773-0.781), compared with 0.684 (95% CI, 0.68-0.688) for logistic regression. The strongest predictors of pathologic complete response were no lymphovascular invasion, no perineural invasion, lower CEA, smaller size of tumor, and microsatellite stability. A concise model including the top 5 variables showed preserved performance. LIMITATIONS: The models were not externally validated. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning techniques can be used to accurately predict pathologic complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer in the pretreatment setting. After fine-tuning a data set including patients treated nonoperatively, these models could help clinicians identify the appropriate candidates for a watch-and-wait strategy. See Video Abstract . EL CNCER DE RECTO BASADA EN FACTORES PREVIOS AL TRATAMIENTO MEDIANTE EL APRENDIZAJE AUTOMTICO: ANTECEDENTES:La respuesta patológica completa después de la terapia neoadyuvante es un indicador pronóstico importante para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado y puede dar información sobre qué pacientes podrían ser tratados de forma no quirúrgica en el futuro. Los modelos existentes para predecir la respuesta patológica completa en el entorno previo al tratamiento están limitados por conjuntos de datos pequeños y baja precisión.OBJETIVO:Intentamos utilizar el aprendizaje automático para desarrollar un modelo predictivo más generalizable para la respuesta patológica completa para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.DISEÑO:Los pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que se sometieron a terapia neoadyuvante seguida de resección quirúrgica se identificaron en la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer de los años 2010 a 2019 y se dividieron en conjuntos de capacitación, validación y prueba. Las técnicas de aprendizaje automático incluyeron bosque aleatorio, aumento de gradiente y red neuronal artificial. También se creó un modelo de regresión logística. El rendimiento del modelo se evaluó utilizando el área bajo la curva característica operativa del receptor.ÁMBITO:Este estudio utilizó un conjunto de datos nacional multicéntrico.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado sometidos a terapia neoadyuvante y proctectomía.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Respuesta patológica completa definida como T0/xN0/x.RESULTADOS:El conjunto de datos incluyó 53.684 pacientes. El 22,9% de los pacientes experimentaron una respuesta patológica completa. El refuerzo de gradiente mostró el mejor rendimiento con un área bajo la curva característica operativa del receptor de 0,777 (IC del 95%: 0,773 - 0,781), en comparación con 0,684 (IC del 95%: 0,68 - 0,688) para la regresión logística. Los predictores más fuertes de respuesta patológica completa fueron la ausencia de invasión linfovascular, la ausencia de invasión perineural, un CEA más bajo, un tamaño más pequeño del tumor y la estabilidad de los microsatélites. Un modelo conciso que incluye las cinco variables principales mostró un rendimiento preservado.LIMITACIONES:Los modelos no fueron validados externamente.CONCLUSIONES:Las técnicas de aprendizaje automático se pueden utilizar para predecir con precisión la respuesta patológica completa para el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado en el entorno previo al tratamiento. Después de realizar ajustes en un conjunto de datos que incluye pacientes tratados de forma no quirúrgica, estos modelos podrían ayudar a los médicos a identificar a los candidatos adecuados para una estrategia de observar y esperar. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Evaluation of association between center colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm volume and survival among patients with colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Although correlation between center volume and survival has been reported for several complex cancers, it remains unknown if this is true for colorectal neuroendocrine carcinomas (CRNECs). We hypothesized that higher center annual volume of colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm resections would be associated with overall survival (OS) for patients with CRNECs. METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stages I-III CRNEC between 2006 and 2018 and who underwent surgical resection were identified. The mean annual colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm resection volume threshold associated with significantly worse mortality hazard was determined using restricted cubic splines. Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to compare OS, while Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariable analysis. RESULTS: There were 694 patients with CRNEC who met inclusion criteria across 1229 centers. Based on the cubic spline, centers treating fewer than one colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasm patient every 3 years on average had worse outcomes. Centers below this threshold were classified as low-volume (LV) centers corresponding with 42% of centers and about 15% of the patient cohort. In unadjusted survival analysis, LV patients had a median OS of 14 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10-19) while those treated at HV centers had a median OS of 33 months (95% CI: 25-49). In multivariable analysis, resection at a LV center was associated with increased risk of mortality (1.42 [95% CI: 1.01-2.00], p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: CRNEC patients have a dire prognosis; however, treatment at an HV center may be associated with decreased risk of mortality.

Incomplete cytoreductive surgery for appendiceal and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: Characteristics and outcomes of an overlooked group.

BACKGROUND OND OBJECTIVES: Complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) may prolong survival for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, there is a paucity of data on outcomes following incomplete procedures. METHODS: Patients with incomplete CRS for well-differentiated (WD) and moderate/poorly-differentiated (M/PD) appendiceal cancer, right and left CRC were identified at a single tertiary center (2008-2021). RESULTS: Of 109 patients, 10% were WD and 51% M/PD appendiceal cancers, and 16% right and 23% left CRC. There were no differences in gender, BMI (mean = 27), ASA score, previous abdominal surgery (72%), and extent of CRS. The PC Index differed between appendiceal and colorectal cancers (mean = 27 vs. 17, p < 0.01). Overall, the perioperative outcomes were similar among the groups, with 15% experiencing complications. Postoperatively, 61% received chemotherapy, and 51% required ≥1 subsequent procedure. The 1 and 3-year survival for the WD, M/PD, right and left CRC subgroups were 100%, 67%, 44%, 51%, and 88%, 17%, 12%, and 23%, respectively (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete CRS was associated with significant morbidity and number of subsequent palliative procedures. Prognosis correlated with histologic subtype; WD appendiceal cancer patients having superior outcomes, while those with right sided CRC the worst survival. These data may help guiding expectations in the setting of incomplete procedures.

Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Comparison of Short- and Long-term Oncologic Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant multi-agent systemic chemotherapy and radiation (TNT) vs neoadjuvant single-agent chemoradiation (nCRT) and multi-agent adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS), tumor downstaging, and circumferential resection margin (CRM) status in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Outside of clinical trials and small institutional reports, there is a paucity of data regarding the short and long-term oncologic impact of TNT as compared to nCRT. METHODS: Adult patients with stage II-III rectal adenocarcinoma were identified in the National Cancer Database [2006-2015]. RESULTS: Out of 8,548 patients, 36% received TNT and 64% nCRT. In the cohort, 13% had a pCR and 20% a neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score <8. In multivariable analysis, as compared to nCRT, TNT demonstrated numerically higher pCR rates ( P = 0.05) but had similar incidence of positive CRM ( P = 0.11). Similar results were observed with NAR scores <8 as the primary endpoint. After adjusting for confounders, OS was comparable between the 2 groups. Additional factors independently associated with lower OS included male gender, uninsured status, low income status, high comorbidity score, poorly differentiated tumors, abdominoperineal resection, and positive surgical margins (all P <0.01). In separate models, both pCR and a NAR score <8 were associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION: In this national cohort, TNT was not associated with better survival and/or CRM negative status in comparison with nCRT, despite numerically higher downstaging rates. Further refinement of patient selection and treatment regimens are needed to establish effective neoadjuvant platforms to improve outcomes of patients with rectal cancer.

The "Classification Pendulum" of Stage I Colorectal Cancer: A National Level Analysis of the Survival Difference Between T1 and T2 Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classifies nonmetastatic, node-negative colorectal cancers invading the submucosa (T1) and muscularis propria (T2) as stage I tumors without additional subclassification. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare survival of T1N0M0 versus T2N0M0 colorectal cancers and to investigate factors associated with decreased survival. DESIGN: This was an analysis of 2 large population-based data sets. SETTINGS: The study was conducted analyzing data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result program and the National Cancer Database. PATIENTS: Adult patients undergoing major resection without additional therapy for stage I colorectal cancer were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall and disease-specific survival for T1 versus T2 cancers were measured. Subgroup analyses by tumor location (colon versus rectum) were performed. RESULTS: A total of 30,228 (36.4% T1 and 63.6% T2) and 41,670 (41.1% T1 and 58.9% T2) patients were identified in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database and the National Cancer Database. The 5-year overall survival rates were 87.1% and 86.2% for patients with T1 versus 82.7% and 80.7% for patients with T2 (p < 0.001) in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database and the National Cancer Database. The 10-year overall survival rates were 71.3% and 66.3% for patients with T1 versus 62.2% and 57.2% for patients with T2 tumors (p < 0.001) in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database and the National Cancer Database. The 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival for colorectal cancer in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database was 97.0% (T1) versus 95.2% (T2) and 94.1% (T1) versus 90.3% (T2). Black race (HR = 1.26 and 1.65 for overall survival and disease-specific survival in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Result database; HR = 1.20 for overall survival in the National Cancer Database) was associated with worse survival. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by intrinsic biases related to large administrative data sets. CONCLUSIONS: Within stage I colorectal cancer, T2 tumors have decreased overall survival and disease-specific survival as compared with T1 cancers. This survival difference may justify revising the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system to include the subclassification of stage Ia (T1N0M0) and stage Ib (T2N0M0). See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B659. LA CLASIFICACIN PNDULO PARA EL CNCER COLORRECTAL EN ESTADIO I UN ANLISIS A NIVEL NACIONAL DE LA DIFERENCIA DE SOBREVIDA ENTRE EL CNCER COLORRECTAL T Y T: ANTECEDENTES:La octava edición del American Joint Committee on Cancer, clasifica los cánceres colorrectales no metastásicos con ganglios negativos, que invaden la submucosa (T1) y la muscularis propia (T2) como tumores en estadio I sin subclasificación adicional.OBJETIVO:El objetivo del estudio fue comparar la sobrevida de los cánceres colorrectales T1N0M0 versus T2N0M0 e investigar los factores asociados con la disminución de la sobrevida.DISEÑO:Análisis de dos grandes conjuntos de datos poblacionales.MARCO:El estudio se realizó analizando datos del Programa de Epidemiología de Vigilancia y Resultados Finales (SEER) y la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer.PACIENTES:Pacientes adultos en los cuales se realizó una resección mayor sin terapia adicional por cáncer colorrectal en estadio I.PRINCIPALES VARIABLES ANALIZADAS:Sobrevida global y específica de la enfermedad para los cánceres T1 versus T2. Se realizó un análisis de subgrupos según la ubicación del tumor (colon versus recto).RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron un total de 30.228 (36,4% T1 y 63,6% T2) y 41.670 (41,1% T1 y 58,9% T2) pacientes en las bases de datos SEER y la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer, respectivamente. La sobrevida global a 5 años fue del 87,1% y el 86,2% para los pacientes con T1 frente al 82,7% y el 80,7% de los pacientes con T2 (p < 0,001) en el SEER y la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer, respectivamente. La sobrevida global a 10 años fue del 71,3% y el 66,3% para los pacientes con T1 frente al 62,2% y el 57,2% de los pacientes con tumores T2 (p < 0,001) en el SEER y la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer, respectivamente. La sobrevida específica de la enfermedad a 5 y 10 años para el cáncer colorrectal en el SEER fue del 97,0% (T1) frente al 95,2% (T2) y del 94,1% (T1) frente al 90,3% (T2), respectivamente. La grupo étnico afroamericano se asoció con una sobrevida menor (Hazard Ratio -HR 1,26 y 1,65 para la sobrevida general y sobrevida específica de la enfermedad-SEER; HR 1,20 para la sobrevida general-Base de de Datos Nacional del Cáncer).LIMITACIONES:Sesgos intrínsecos relacionados con el análisis de grandes conjuntos de datos.CONCLUSIONES:Dentro del cáncer colorrectal en estadio I, los tumores T2 han disminuido la sobrevida general y la sobrevida específica de la enfermedad, en comparación con los cánceres T1. Esta diferencia de sobrevida puede justificar la revisión del sistema de estadificación del American Joint Committee on Cancer para incluir la subclasificación del estadio Ia (T1N0M0) y el estadio Ib (T2N0M0). Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B659.

Male gender, smoking, younger age, and preoperative pain found to increase postoperative opioid requirements in 592 elective colorectal resections.

PURPOSE: With increased awareness of the opioid epidemic, understanding contributing factors to postoperative opioid use is important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient and perioperative factors that contribute to postoperative opioid use after colorectal resections and their relation to pre-existing pain conditions and psychiatric diagnoses. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted identifying adult patients who underwent elective colorectal resection at a single tertiary center between 2015 and 2018. Patient demographics, preoperative factors, surgical approach, and perioperative pain management were evaluated to determine standard conversion morphine milligram equivalents required for postoperative days 0 to 3 and total hospital stay. RESULTS: Five hundred and ninety-two patients: 46% male, median age 58 years undergoing colorectal resections for indications including cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, and diverticulitis were identified. Less opioid use was found to be associated with female gender (ß = - 42), patients who received perioperative lidocaine infusion (ß = - 30), and older adults (equivalents/year) (ß = - 4, all p < 0.01). Preoperative opioid use, preoperative abdominal pain, epidural use, and smoking were all independently associated with increased postoperative opioid requirements. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients undergoing elective colorectal resection, factors that were associated with higher perioperative opioid use included male gender, smoking, younger age, preoperative opioid use, preoperative abdominal pain, and epidural use. Perioperative administration of lidocaine was associated with decreased opioid requirements. Understanding risk factors and stratifying postoperative pain regimens may aid in improved pain control and decrease long-term dependency.

Presentation, Management, and Prognosis of Primary Gastrointestinal Melanoma: A Population-Based Study.

BACKGROUND: Primary gastrointestinal (GI) melanomas, compared with cutaneous melanomas, have a much lower incidence. As a result, there is a paucity of data regarding their presentation, treatment, and prognosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival of primary GI melanomas in comparison with cutaneous melanomas using a population-based cohort. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with primary GI and cutaneous melanomas were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 1973-2016 data. RESULTS: A total of 872 primary GI melanomas and 319,327 cutaneous melanomas were identified. GI melanoma incidence increased by an annual percent change of 1.82 (P < 0.05) during the study period. The most common sites for GI melanoma were the anus (50%) and rectum (34%). Compared to cutaneous melanoma, patients diagnosed with GI melanomas were older, women (58% versus 45%), non-White (16% versus 6%), and presented with a higher stage (36% versus 4% distant stage, all P < 0.001). GI melanomas had significantly worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) than cutaneous melanoma. Despite the poor prognosis, the CSS has increased in recent years. Among patients with anorectal melanomas, local excision with chemotherapy and/or radiation had a similar CSS compared with those with major surgery only. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a steady increasing incidence since 1975, GI melanomas are rare, present with advanced stages, and have worse outcomes than cutaneous melanomas. The improved prognosis of these tumors in recent years might reflect the impact of novel targeted treatments and the more common use of local tumor excision over major resections.

Impact of KRAS status on tumor response and survival after neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mutation of the KRAS oncogene (mKRAS) in colorectal cancer has been associated with aggressive tumor biology, resistance to epidermal growth factor inhibitors, and decreased overall survival (OS). The aim of the current study was to analyze the association of mKRAS with pathologic complete response (pCR) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score, and its impact on the survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who were managed with multimodality therapy. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for stage II-III rectal cancer patients with a known KRAS status who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) and proctectomy between 2004 and 2015. RESULTS: In total, 1886 patients were identified; 12% had pCR and 36% had mKRAS. Patients with mKRAS were more likely to have advanced pathologic T stage, tumor deposits, perineural invasion, and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels (all p ≤ .05). After adjustment for available confounders, mKRAS status was not associated with pCR or NAR score. In multivariable analysis, patients with pCR and lower NAR score had better OS, whereas mKRAS was independently associated with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent proctectomy after nCRT, mKRAS was not associated with lower pCR rates or NAR scores; however, these patients experienced worse survival.

Optimizing Bariatric Surgery outcomes: the impact of preoperative elevated hemoglobin A1c levels on composite perioperative outcome measures.

INTRODUCTION: The use of bariatric surgery in the management of obesity and its related morbidity has significantly increased in the US over the past decade. There is a lack of data on the impact of optimal preoperative glycemic control on the morbidity and mortality following bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of hemoglobin (Hb) A1c > 7 on outcomes among patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). METHODS: Data were extracted from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (2017) and limited to patients undergoing an elective laparoscopic RYGB or SG. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to adjust for other preoperative variables. RESULTS: A total number of 31,060 (69.3%) patients underwent SG, while 13,754 (30.7%) received RYGB. Patients who were older, male, non-Hispanic, smokers, and those with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologist Classification (ASA) score were more likely to have elevated HbA1c levels. Compared to individuals with normal HbA1c levels, patients with elevated levels had no significant difference in mortality (p = 0.902) but did have a difference in composite morbidity and mortality (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, elevated HbA1c, older age, increasing body mass index (BMI), elevated creatinine, longer operations, African American race, receiving RYGB, and having a trainee as surgical assistant were found to increase the odds of having an adverse outcome. No significant difference was found within smoking status, sex, ASA Classification, robotic vs laparoscopic, or if a second attending surgeon was assisting. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c levels and presence of trainees in the OR are modifiable preoperative risk factors for adverse events following bariatric surgery. Improving preoperative glycemic control may be an effective and achievable quality improvement measure.

Treatment of Stage IV Colon Cancer in the United States: A Patterns-of-Care Analysis.

BACKGROUND: National guidelines recommend chemotherapy as the mainstay of treatment for stage IV colon cancer, with primary tumor resection (PTR) reserved for patients with symptomatic primary or curable disease. The aims of this study were to characterize the treatment modalities received by patients with stage IV colon cancer and to determine the patient-, tumor-, and hospital-level factors associated with those treatments. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage IV colon cancer in 2014 were extracted from the SEER Patterns of Care initiative. Treatments were categorized into chemotherapy only, PTR only, PTR + chemotherapy, and none/unknown. RESULTS: The total weighted number of cases was 3,336; 17% of patients received PTR only, 23% received chemotherapy only, 41% received PTR + chemotherapy, and 17% received no treatment. In multivariable analyses, compared with chemotherapy only, PTR + chemotherapy was associated with being married (odds ratio [OR], 1.9), having bowel obstruction (OR, 2.55), and having perforation (OR, 2.29), whereas older age (OR, 5.95), Medicaid coverage (OR, 2.46), higher T stage (OR, 3.51), and higher N stage (OR, 6.77) were associated with PTR only. Patients who received no treatment did not have more comorbidities or more severe disease burden but were more likely to be older (OR, 3.91) and non-Hispanic African American (OR, 2.92; all P<.05). Treatment at smaller, nonacademic hospitals was associated with PTR (± chemotherapy). CONCLUSIONS: PTR was included in the treatment regimen for most patients with stage IV colon cancer and was associated with smaller, nonacademic hospitals. Efforts to improve guideline implementation may be beneficial in these hospitals and also in non-Hispanic African American and older populations.

Practice Patterns and Outcomes of Pediatric Thyroid Surgery: An NSQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric thyroid cancer rates are rising. The aim of this study was to determine the state of current practice and outcomes for pediatric thyroidectomies using the pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP-P) with specific attention to differences based on surgeon type/specialty. METHODS: All cases of pediatric thyroidectomies and neck dissections within the NSQIP-P database were identified from 2015 to 2017. Patient, disease, and treatment-related factors affecting 30-day outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1300 cases were identified. Mean age at time of surgery was 14.0 (SD 3.5) years. The majority of patients were female (78%) and Caucasian (72%). Pediatric general surgeons performed the largest proportion of cases (42%) followed by pediatric otolaryngologists (33%). Malignancies were present in 29% of cases. The overall rate of complications was 3.0%. On multivariate analysis, non-pediatric surgeons were more likely to operate on Caucasian children, malignant pathology, and perform modified radical neck dissections. Pediatric surgeons were more likely to have longer operative times, have specialized in otolaryngology, and operate on sicker children (ASA>2). There were no differences in length of stay or overall complications rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that pediatric surgeons currently perform the majority of thyroid surgeries in children. While unable to assess surgeon volume, our data show that thyroid surgery is being safely performed at NSQIP-affiliated hospitals by both non-pediatric and pediatric surgeons. Further studies are needed to determine if there are differences in specific procedure-related complications and long-term outcomes between surgeon types.

Positive circumferential resection margins following locally advanced colon cancer surgery: Risk factors and survival impact.

BACKGROUND: While the prognostic implications of positive circumferential resection margins (CRM) have been established for rectal cancer, its significance in colon cancer has not been well defined. The aim of the current study was to determine national rates for positive CRM in locally advanced colon cancer, associated factors, and survival impact. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with stage II-III adenocarcinoma of the colon (2004-2015). RESULTS: Positive CRM was identified in 9% of stage II and 12% of stage III patients. Factors associated with negative CRM included surgery in a high-volume facility, adequate lymph-node harvest, and negative distal/proximal margins. No difference in CRM rates was observed between surgical approaches, although having a positive CRM was significantly associated with higher conversion rates. Positive CRM was associated with significantly lower overall survival on both univariate and multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Positive CRM rates exceeded 10% nationally and have an adverse impact on survival. While several tumor characteristics were identified as independent risk factors, oncologic resections and surgery at high-volume centers were associated with lower rates of positive CRM. These findings emphasize the need for process improvement initiatives targeting modifiable factors, including adoption of appropriate oncologic techniques, standardized pathology reporting, and potential neoadjuvant strategies.