Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(3): e1208-e1216, 2023 02 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35640877

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The CLEAR Trial demonstrated that a multisite body decolonization regimen reduced post-discharge infection and hospitalization in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers. Here, we describe decolonization efficacy. METHODS: We performed a large, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of MRSA decolonization among adult patients after hospital discharge with MRSA infection or colonization. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either MRSA prevention education or education plus decolonization with topical chlorhexidine, oral chlorhexidine, and nasal mupirocin. Participants were swabbed in the nares, throat, axilla/groin, and wound (if applicable) at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after randomization. The primary outcomes of this study are follow-up colonization differences between groups. RESULTS: Among 2121 participants, 1058 were randomized to decolonization. By 1 month, MRSA colonization was lower in the decolonization group compared with the education-only group (odds ration [OR] = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], .36-.54; P ≤ .001). A similar magnitude of reduction was seen in the nares (OR = 0.34; 95% CI, .27-.42; P < .001), throat (OR = 0.55; 95% CI, .42-.73; P < .001), and axilla/groin (OR = 0.57; 95% CI, .43-.75; P < .001). These differences persisted through month 9 except at the wound site, which had a relatively small sample size. Higher regimen adherence was associated with lower MRSA colonization (P ≤ .01). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized, clinical trial, a repeated post-discharge decolonization regimen for MRSA carriers reduced MRSA colonization overall and at multiple body sites. Higher treatment adherence was associated with greater reductions in MRSA colonization.


Assuntos
Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Adulto , Humanos , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Alta do Paciente , Assistência ao Convalescente , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Portador Sadio/prevenção & controle , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Hospitais
2.
N Engl J Med ; 380(7): 638-650, 2019 02 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30763195

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients who are colonized with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are at high risk for infection after discharge. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of postdischarge hygiene education, as compared with education plus decolonization, in patients colonized with MRSA (carriers). Decolonization involved chlorhexidine mouthwash, baths or showers with chlorhexidine, and nasal mupirocin for 5 days twice per month for 6 months. Participants were followed for 1 year. The primary outcome was MRSA infection as defined according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. Secondary outcomes included MRSA infection determined on the basis of clinical judgment, infection from any cause, and infection-related hospitalization. All analyses were performed with the use of proportional-hazards models in the per-protocol population (all participants who underwent randomization, met the inclusion criteria, and survived beyond the recruitment hospitalization) and as-treated population (participants stratified according to adherence). RESULTS: In the per-protocol population, MRSA infection occurred in 98 of 1063 participants (9.2%) in the education group and in 67 of 1058 (6.3%) in the decolonization group; 84.8% of the MRSA infections led to hospitalization. Infection from any cause occurred in 23.7% of the participants in the education group and 19.6% of those in the decolonization group; 85.8% of the infections led to hospitalization. The hazard of MRSA infection was significantly lower in the decolonization group than in the education group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 0.96; P=0.03; number needed to treat to prevent one infection, 30; 95% CI, 18 to 230); this lower hazard led to a lower risk of hospitalization due to MRSA infection (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.99). The decolonization group had lower likelihoods of clinically judged infection from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.99) and infection-related hospitalization (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.93); treatment effects for secondary outcomes should be interpreted with caution owing to a lack of prespecified adjustment for multiple comparisons. In as-treated analyses, participants in the decolonization group who adhered fully to the regimen had 44% fewer MRSA infections than the education group (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.86) and had 40% fewer infections from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.78). Side effects (all mild) occurred in 4.2% of the participants. CONCLUSIONS: Postdischarge MRSA decolonization with chlorhexidine and mupirocin led to a 30% lower risk of MRSA infection than education alone. (Funded by the AHRQ Healthcare-Associated Infections Program and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01209234 .).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Desinfecção , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Adulto , Idoso , Portador Sadio , Comorbidade , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Higiene/educação , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão
3.
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord ; 35(1): 80-83, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31821186

RESUMO

Recruitment registries are novel tools to accelerate Alzheimer disease research accrual. Optimal methods to populate such registries remain largely unstudied. We sent postcards with 3 unique taglines (Alzheimer's Prevention Research, brain health research, general research) to 100,000 local residents aged 50 years and older to assess the effectiveness of recruiting to an online recruitment registry by mail. The postcard campaign recruited 273 new registry enrollees (0.27% overall response rate). Neither the response rate nor the demographic characteristics of recruited participants differed by the postcard tagline. These results suggest that direct mail may not be the most cost-effective approach to recruit participants to online registries.


Assuntos
Seleção de Pacientes , Sistema de Registros , Pesquisa , Idoso , Doença de Alzheimer , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
4.
Lancet ; 393(10177): 1205-1215, 2019 Mar 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30850112

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Universal skin and nasal decolonisation reduces multidrug-resistant pathogens and bloodstream infections in intensive care units. The effect of universal decolonisation on pathogens and infections in non-critical-care units is unknown. The aim of the ABATE Infection trial was to evaluate the use of chlorhexidine bathing in non-critical-care units, with an intervention similar to one that was found to reduce multidrug-resistant organisms and bacteraemia in intensive care units. METHODS: The ABATE Infection (active bathing to eliminate infection) trial was a cluster-randomised trial of 53 hospitals comparing routine bathing to decolonisation with universal chlorhexidine and targeted nasal mupirocin in non-critical-care units. The trial was done in hospitals affiliated with HCA Healthcare and consisted of a 12-month baseline period from March 1, 2013, to Feb 28, 2014, a 2-month phase-in period from April 1, 2014, to May 31, 2014, and a 21-month intervention period from June 1, 2014, to Feb 29, 2016. Hospitals were randomised and their participating non-critical-care units assigned to either routine care or daily chlorhexidine bathing for all patients plus mupirocin for known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers. The primary outcome was MRSA or vancomycin-resistant enterococcus clinical cultures attributed to participating units, measured in the unadjusted, intention-to-treat population as the HR for the intervention period versus the baseline period in the decolonisation group versus the HR in the routine care group. Proportional hazards models assessed differences in outcome reductions across groups, accounting for clustering within hospitals. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02063867. FINDINGS: There were 189 081 patients in the baseline period and 339 902 patients (156 889 patients in the routine care group and 183 013 patients in the decolonisation group) in the intervention period across 194 non-critical-care units in 53 hospitals. For the primary outcome of unit-attributable MRSA-positive or VRE-positive clinical cultures (figure 2), the HR for the intervention period versus the baseline period was 0·79 (0·73-0·87) in the decolonisation group versus 0·87 (95% CI 0·79-0·95) in the routine care group. No difference was seen in the relative HRs (p=0·17). There were 25 (<1%) adverse events, all involving chlorhexidine, among 183 013 patients in units assigned to chlorhexidine, and none were reported for mupirocin. INTERPRETATION: Decolonisation with universal chlorhexidine bathing and targeted mupirocin for MRSA carriers did not significantly reduce multidrug-resistant organisms in non-critical-care patients. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Banhos/métodos , Clorexidina/administração & dosagem , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Intranasal , Idoso , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/administração & dosagem , Portador Sadio/sangue , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade
5.
N Engl J Med ; 368(24): 2255-65, 2013 Jun 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23718152

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Both targeted decolonization and universal decolonization of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) are candidate strategies to prevent health care-associated infections, particularly those caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: We conducted a pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial. Hospitals were randomly assigned to one of three strategies, with all adult ICUs in a given hospital assigned to the same strategy. Group 1 implemented MRSA screening and isolation; group 2, targeted decolonization (i.e., screening, isolation, and decolonization of MRSA carriers); and group 3, universal decolonization (i.e., no screening, and decolonization of all patients). Proportional-hazards models were used to assess differences in infection reductions across the study groups, with clustering according to hospital. RESULTS: A total of 43 hospitals (including 74 ICUs and 74,256 patients during the intervention period) underwent randomization. In the intervention period versus the baseline period, modeled hazard ratios for MRSA clinical isolates were 0.92 for screening and isolation (crude rate, 3.2 vs. 3.4 isolates per 1000 days), 0.75 for targeted decolonization (3.2 vs. 4.3 isolates per 1000 days), and 0.63 for universal decolonization (2.1 vs. 3.4 isolates per 1000 days) (P=0.01 for test of all groups being equal). In the intervention versus baseline periods, hazard ratios for bloodstream infection with any pathogen in the three groups were 0.99 (crude rate, 4.1 vs. 4.2 infections per 1000 days), 0.78 (3.7 vs. 4.8 infections per 1000 days), and 0.56 (3.6 vs. 6.1 infections per 1000 days), respectively (P<0.001 for test of all groups being equal). Universal decolonization resulted in a significantly greater reduction in the rate of all bloodstream infections than either targeted decolonization or screening and isolation. One bloodstream infection was prevented per 54 patients who underwent decolonization. The reductions in rates of MRSA bloodstream infection were similar to those of all bloodstream infections, but the difference was not significant. Adverse events, which occurred in 7 patients, were mild and related to chlorhexidine. CONCLUSIONS: In routine ICU practice, universal decolonization was more effective than targeted decolonization or screening and isolation in reducing rates of MRSA clinical isolates and bloodstream infection from any pathogen. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; REDUCE MRSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00980980).


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Desinfecção/métodos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Bacteriemia/psicologia , Banhos , Clorexidina/efeitos adversos , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Infecção Hospitalar/transmissão , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mupirocina/efeitos adversos , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Cavidade Nasal/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/transmissão
6.
Clin Trials ; 12(5): 457-66, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26374685

RESUMO

Pragmatic research that compares interventions to improve the organization and delivery of health care may overlap, in both goals and methods, with quality improvement activities. When activities have attributes of both research and quality improvement, confusion often arises about what ethical oversight is, or should be, required. For routine quality improvement, in which the delivery of health care is modified in minor ways that create only minimal risks, oversight by local clinical or administrative leaders utilizing institutional policies may be sufficient. However, additional consideration should be given to activities that go beyond routine, local quality improvement to first determine whether such non-routine activities constitute research or quality improvement and, in either case, to ensure that independent oversight will occur. This should promote rigor, transparency, and protection of patients' and clinicians' rights, well-being, and privacy in all such activities. Specifically, we recommend that (1) health care organizations should have systematic policies and processes for designating activities as routine quality improvement, non-routine quality improvement, or quality improvement research and determining what oversight each will receive. (2) Health care organizations should have formal and explicit oversight processes for non-routine quality improvement activities that may include input from institutional quality improvement experts, health services researchers, administrators, clinicians, patient representatives, and those experienced in the ethics review of health care activities. (3) Quality improvement research requires review by an institutional review board; for such review to be effective, institutional review boards should develop particular expertise in assessing quality improvement research. (4) Stakeholders should be included in the review of non-routine quality improvement and quality improvement-related research proposals. Only by doing so will we optimally leverage both pragmatic research on health care delivery and local implementation through quality improvement as complementary activities for improving health.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/ética , Pesquisa Biomédica/normas , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/ética , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/ética , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Atenção à Saúde/ética , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Comitês de Ética em Pesquisa , Humanos , Estados Unidos
7.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(3): 573-9, 2012 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22205805

RESUMO

Studies of U.S. epidemics of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) suggested differences in MRSA strains in adults and those in children. Comprehensive population-based studies exploring these differences are lacking. We conducted a prospective cohort study of inpatients in Orange County, CA, collecting clinical MRSA isolates from 30 of 31 Orange County hospitals, to characterize differences in MRSA strains isolated from children compared to those isolated from adults. All isolates were characterized by spa typing. We collected 1,124 MRSA isolates from adults and 159 from children. Annual Orange County population estimates of MRSA inpatient clinical cultures were 119/100,000 adults and 22/100,000 children. spa types t008, t242, and t002 accounted for 83% of all isolates. The distribution of these three spa types among adults was significantly different from that among children (χ(2) = 52.29; P < 0.001). Forty-one percent of adult isolates were of t008 (USA300), compared to 69% of pediatric isolates. In multivariate analyses, specimens from pediatric patients, wounds, non-intensive care unit (ICU) wards, and hospitals with a high proportion of Medicaid-insured patients were significantly associated with the detection of t008 strains. While community- and health care-associated MRSA reservoirs have begun to merge, significant differences remain in pediatric and adult patient populations. Community-associated MRSA spa type t008 is significantly more common in pediatric patients.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Tipagem Molecular , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Feminino , Genótipo , Hospitais , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Epidemiologia Molecular , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia
8.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35409893

RESUMO

Adolescent COVID-19 vaccination has stalled at 53% in the United States. Vaccinating adolescents remains critical to preventing the continued transmission of COVID-19, the emergence of variants, and rare but serious disease in children, and it is the best preventive measure available to return to in-person schooling. We investigated parent-adolescent COVID-19 vaccine decision-making. Between 24 February and 15 March 2021, we conducted surveys and 12 focus groups with 46 parent-adolescent dyads in Southern California. Parents and adolescents completed a survey prior to participation in a focus group discussion, which focused on exploring COVID-19 vaccine acceptance or uncertainty and was guided by the 5C vaccine hesitancy model. Parents uncertain about vaccinating adolescents expressed low vaccine confidence and high COVID-19 disease risk complacency. Parents who accepted COVID-19 vaccination for adolescents expressed high confidence in health authority vaccine recommendations, high perceived COVID-19 risk, and collective responsibility to vaccinate children. Additionally, unique pandemic-related factors of vaccine acceptance included vaccinating for emotional health, resuming social activities, and vaccine mandates. Among parents, 46% were willing to vaccinate their adolescent, 11% were not, and 43% were unsure. Among adolescents, 63% were willing to vaccinate. Despite vaccine availability, 47% of adolescents remain unvaccinated against COVID-19. Factors associated with vaccine uncertainty and acceptability inform health care practitioner, school, community, and public health messaging to reach parents and adolescents.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , California , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Vacinação/psicologia
9.
J Alzheimers Dis ; 63(3): 1055-1063, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29710723

RESUMO

Potential participant registries are tools to address the challenge of slow recruitment to clinical research. In particular, registries may aid recruitment to secondary prevention clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease (AD), which enroll cognitively normal older individuals meeting specific genetic or biomarker criteria. Evidence of registry effectiveness is sparse, as is guidance on optimal designs or methods of conduct. We report our experiences of developing a novel local potential participant registry that implemented online enrollment and data collection. In the first year of operation, 957 individuals submitted email addresses to the registry, of whom 592 self-reported demographic, family history, and medical data. In addition, registrants provided information related to their interest and willingness to be contacted about studies. Local earned media and community education were the most effective methods of recruitment into the registry. Seventy-six (26%) of 298 registrants contacted about studies in the first year enrolled in those studies. One hundred twenty-nine registrants were invited to enroll in a preclinical AD trial, of whom 25 (18%) screened and 6 were randomized. These results indicate that registries can aid recruitment and provide needed guidance for investigators initiating new local registries.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Seleção de Pacientes , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
10.
Am J Infect Control ; 45(11): 1177-1182, 2017 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28757088

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The east-to-west spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) represents an opportunity to explore strategies to limit spread in nonendemic areas. We evaluated CRE emergence and regional support for containment strategies. METHODS: A 17-question cross-sectional survey was administered to infection prevention programs in Orange County, CA (31 hospitals serving 3 million residents), between January and September 2014. Questions addressed newly detected hospital- and community-onset CRE cultures (2008-2013), current CRE control strategies, and support for prevention strategies for a hypothetical regional intervention. RESULTS: Among 31 hospitals, 21 (68%, representing 17 infection prevention programs) completed the survey. CRE was scarcely detected between 2009-2010; within 4 years, 90% of hospitals reported CRE, with 2.5-fold higher community-onset than hospital-onset CRE. Between 2011 and 2013, annual CRE incidence increased 4.7-fold (1.4-6.3 cases/10,000 admissions). Support for a regional CRE prevention bundle was unanimous. Although 22% bathed patients positive for CRE with chlorhexidine gluconate and 11% actively screened for CRE, 86% and 57%, respectively, would consider these strategies in a regional intervention. CONCLUSIONS: CRE epidemiology in Orange County parallels early progression previously seen in now-endemic areas, representing an opportunity to consider interventions to prevent endemic spread. Many facilities would consider proactive strategies, such as chlorhexidine bathing, in the setting of a regional collaborative.


Assuntos
Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California/epidemiologia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
11.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(12): 1485-1488, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27671022

RESUMO

Nursing home residents are at risk for acquiring and transmitting MDROs. A serial point-prevalence study of 605 residents in 3 facilities using random sampling found MDRO colonization in 45% of residents: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, 26%); extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL, 17%); vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE, 16%); carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE, 1%). MDRO colonization was associated with history of MDRO, care needs, incontinence, and catheters. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;1485-1488.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Casas de Saúde , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/isolamento & purificação , beta-Lactamases/isolamento & purificação
12.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 16(1): 70-79, 2016 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26631833

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common health-care-associated infections. Bacteriuria commonly precedes UTI and is often treated with antibiotics, particularly in hospital intensive care units (ICUs). In 2013, a cluster-randomised trial (REDUCE MRSA Trial [Randomized Evaluation of Decolonization vs Universal Clearance to Eradicate MRSA]) showed that body surface decolonisation reduced all-pathogen bloodstream infections. We aim to further assess the effect of decolonisation on bacteriuria and candiduria in patients admitted to ICUs. METHODS: We did a secondary analysis of a three-group, cluster-randomised trial of 43 hospitals (clusters) with patients in 74 adult ICUs. The three groups included were either meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and isolation, targeted decolonisation (screening, isolation, and decolonisation of MRSA carriers) with chlorhexidine and mupirocin, and universal decolonisation (no screening, all patients decolonised) with chlorhexidine and mupirocin. Protocol included chlorhexidine cleansing of the perineum and proximal 6 inches (15·24 cm) of urinary catheters. ICUs within the same hospital were assigned the same strategy. Outcomes included high-level bacteriuria (≥50 000 colony forming units [CFU]/mL) with any uropathogen, high-level candiduria (≥50 000 CFU/mL), and any bacteriuria with uropathogens. Sex-specific analyses were specified a priori. Proportional hazards models assessed differences in outcome reductions across groups, comparing an 18-month intervention period to a 12-month baseline period. FINDINGS: 122 646 patients (48 390 baseline, 74 256 intervention) were enrolled. Intervention versus baseline hazard ratios (HRs) for high-level bacteriuria were 1·02 (95% CI 0·88-1·18) for screening or isolation, 0·88 (0·76-1·02) for targeted decolonisation, and 0·87 (0·77-1·00) for universal decolonisation (no difference between groups, p=0·26), with no sex-specific reductions (HRs for men: 1·09 [95% CI 0·85-1·40] for screening or isolation, 1·01 [0·79-1·29] for targeted decolonisation, and 0·78 [0·63-0·98] for universal decolonisation, p=0·12; HRs for women: 0·97 [0·80-1·17] for screening and isolation, 0·83 [0·70-1·00] for targeted decolonisation, and 0·93 [0·79-1·09] for universal decolonisation, p=0·49). HRs for high-level candiduria were 1·14 (0·95-1·37) for screening and isolation, 0·99 (0·83-1·18) for targeted decolonisation, and 0·83 (0·70-0·99) for universal decolonisation (p=0·05). Differences between sexes were due to reductions in men in the universal decolonisation group (HRs: 1·21 [95% CI 0·88-1·68] for screening or isolation, 1·01 [0·73-1·39] for targeted decolonisation, and 0·63 [0·45-0·89] for universal decolonisation, p=0·02). Bacteriuria with any CFU/mL was also reduced in men in the universal decolonisation group (HRs 1·01 [0·81-1·25] for screening or isolation, 1·04 [0·83-1·30] for targeted decolonisation, and 0·74 [0·61-0·90] for universal decolonisation, p=0·04). INTERPRETATION: Universal decolonisation of patients in the ICU with once a day chlorhexidine baths and short-course nasal mupirocin could be a potential preventive strategy in male patients because it significantly decreases candiduria and any bacteriuria, but not for women. FUNDING: HAI Program from AHRQ, US Department of Health and Human Services as part of the Developing Evidence to Inform Decisions about Effectiveness (DEcIDE) program, CDC Prevention Epicenters Program.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Candidíase/prevenção & controle , Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriúria/microbiologia , Bacteriúria/prevenção & controle , Candida/isolamento & purificação , Candidíase/microbiologia , Candidíase/urina , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Portador Sadio/prevenção & controle , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Análise por Conglomerados , Desinfecção/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Fatores Sexuais , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Infecções Urinárias/urina
13.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 35(11): 1417-20, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25333439

RESUMO

We surveyed infection prevention programs in 16 hospitals for hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci, extended-spectrum ß-lactamase, and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter acquisition, as well as hospital-associated MRSA bacteremia and Clostridium difficile infection based on defining events as occurring >2 days versus >3 days after admission. The former resulted in significantly higher median rates, ranging from 6.76% to 45.07% higher.


Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter/diagnóstico , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Portador Sadio/diagnóstico , Clostridioides difficile , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Acinetobacter , Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , California , Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/microbiologia , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina , Resistência beta-Lactâmica
14.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 35 Suppl 3: S17-22, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25222893

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of blood culture contamination comparing 3 strategies to prevent intensive care unit (ICU) infections: screening and isolation, targeted decolonization, and universal decolonization. DESIGN: Pragmatic cluster-randomized trial. SETTING: Forty-three hospitals with 74 ICUs; 42 of 43 were community hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to adult ICUs from July 1, 2009, to September 30, 2011. METHODS: After a 6-month baseline period, hospitals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 strategies, with all participating adult ICUs in a given hospital assigned to the same strategy. Arm 1 implemented methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares screening and isolation, arm 2 targeted decolonization (screening, isolation, and decolonization of MRSA carriers), and arm 3 conducted no screening but universal decolonization of all patients with mupirocin and chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing. Blood culture contamination rates in the intervention period were compared to the baseline period across all 3 arms. RESULTS: During the 6-month baseline period, 7,926 blood cultures were collected from 3,399 unique patients: 1,099 sets in arm 1, 928 in arm 2, and 1,372 in arm 3. During the 18-month intervention period, 22,761 blood cultures were collected from 9,878 unique patients: 3,055 sets in arm 1, 3,213 in arm 2, and 3,610 in arm 3. Among all individual draws, for arms 1, 2, and 3, the contamination rates were 4.1%, 3.9%, and 3.8% for the baseline period and 3.3%, 3.2%, and 2.4% for the intervention period, respectively. When we evaluated sets of blood cultures rather than individual draws, the contamination rate in arm 1 (screening and isolation) was 9.8% (N = 108 sets) in the baseline period and 7.5% (N = 228) in the intervention period. For arm 2 (targeted decolonization), the baseline rate was 8.4% (N = 78) compared to 7.5% (N = 241) in the intervention period. Arm 3 (universal decolonization) had the greatest decrease in contamination rate, with a decrease from 8.7% (N = 119) contaminated blood cultures during the baseline period to 5.1% (N = 184) during the intervention period. Logistic regression models demonstrated a significant difference across the arms when comparing the reduction in contamination between baseline and intervention periods in both unadjusted (P = .02) and adjusted (P = .02) analyses. Arm 3 resulted in the greatest reduction in blood culture contamination rates, with an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.044-0.71) and an adjusted OR of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.43-0.71). CONCLUSION: In this large cluster-randomized trial, we demonstrated that universal decolonization with CHG bathing resulted in a significant reduction in blood culture contamination.


Assuntos
Banhos/métodos , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Desinfetantes/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cavidade Nasal/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle
15.
Am J Infect Control ; 41(2): 126-30, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22748841

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A range of strategies and approaches have been developed for preventing health care-associated infections. Understanding the variation in practices among facilities is necessary to improve compliance with existing programs and aid the implementation of new interventions. METHODS: In 2009, HCA Inc administered an electronic survey to measure compliance with evidence-based infection prevention practices as well as identify variation in products or methods, such as use of special approach technology for central vascular catheters and ventilator care. Responding adult intensive care units (ICUs) were those considering participation in a clinical trial to reduce health care-associated infections. RESULTS: Responses from 99 ICUs in 55 hospitals indicated that many evidenced-based practices were used consistently, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening and use of contact precautions for MRSA-positive patients. Other practices exhibited wide variability including discontinuation of precautions and use of antimicrobial technology or chlorhexidine patches for central vascular catheters. MRSA decolonization was not a predominant practice in ICUs. CONCLUSION: In this large, community-based health care system, there was substantial variation in the products and methods to reduce health care-associated infections. Despite system-wide emphasis on basic practices as a precursor to adding special approach technologies, this survey showed that these technologies were commonplace, including in facilities where improvement in basic practices was needed.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
16.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 34(6): 581-7, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23651888

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify hospital characteristics associated with community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) carriage among inpatients. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Orange County, California. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty hospitals in a single county. METHODS: We collected clinical MRSA isolates from inpatients in 30 of 31 hospitals in Orange County, California, from October 2008 through April 2010. We characterized isolates by spa typing to identify CA-MRSA strains. Using California's mandatory hospitalization data set, we identified hospital-level predictors of CA-MRSA isolation. RESULTS: CA-MRSA strains represented 1,033 (46%) of 2,246 of MRSA isolates. By hospital, the median percentage of CA-MRSA isolates was 46% (range, 14%-81%). In multivariate models, CA-MRSA isolation was associated with smaller hospitals (odds ratio [OR], 0.97, or 3% decreased odds of CA-MRSA isolation per 1,000 annual admissions; P < .001, hospitals with more Medicaid-insured patients (OR, 1.2; P = .002), and hospitals with more patients with low comorbidity scores (OR, 1.3; P < .001). Results were similar when restricted to isolates from patients with hospital-onset infection. CONCLUSIONS: Among 30 hospitals, CA-MRSA comprised nearly half of MRSA isolates. There was substantial variability in CA-MRSA penetration across hospitals, with more CA-MRSA in smaller hospitals with healthier but socially disadvantaged patient populations. Additional research is needed to determine whether infection control strategies can be successful in targeting CA-MRSA influx.


Assuntos
Portador Sadio/epidemiologia , Portador Sadio/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , California/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Comorbidade , Feminino , Número de Leitos em Hospital , Hospitais , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
17.
PLoS One ; 8(4): e62117, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23637976

RESUMO

There is a need for a regional assessment of the frequency and diversity of MRSA to determine major circulating clones and the extent to which community and healthcare MRSA reservoirs have mixed. We conducted a prospective cohort study of inpatients in Orange County, California, systematically collecting clinical MRSA isolates from 30 hospitals, to assess MRSA diversity and distribution. All isolates were characterized by spa typing, with selective PFGE and MLST to relate spa types with major MRSA clones. We collected 2,246 MRSA isolates from hospital inpatients. This translated to 91/10,000 inpatients with MRSA and an Orange County population estimate of MRSA inpatient clinical cultures of 86/100,000 people. spa type genetic diversity was heterogeneous between hospitals, and relatively high overall (72%). USA300 (t008/ST8), USA100 (t002/ST5) and a previously reported USA100 variant (t242/ST5) were the dominant clones across all Orange County hospitals, representing 83% of isolates. Fifteen hospitals isolated more t008 (USA300) isolates than t002/242 (USA100) isolates, and 12 hospitals isolated more t242 isolates than t002 isolates. The majority of isolates were imported into hospitals. Community-based infection control strategies may still be helpful in stemming the influx of traditionally community-associated strains, particularly USA300, into the healthcare setting.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Pacientes Internados , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/classificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , California/epidemiologia , Análise por Conglomerados , Variação Genética , Hospitais , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Tipagem Molecular , Estudos Prospectivos
18.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 33(11): 1166-9, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23041819

RESUMO

We calculated hospital-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HO-MRSA) rates for Orange County, California, hospitals using survey and state data. Numerators were variably defined as HO-MRSA occurring more than 48 hours (37%), more than 2 days (30%), and more than 3 days (33%) postadmission. Survey-reported denominators differed from state-reported patient-days. Numerator and denominator choices substantially impacted HO-MRSA rates.


Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Viés , California/epidemiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA