Improving outcomes in single chamber leadless pacemakers: strategies for minimizing vascular complications.

BACKGROUND: Leadless pacemaker therapy is associated with a significant reduction in lead-related complication rate compared to conventional transvenous single chamber pacemaker therapy. However, a significant complication rate of 1.2% was observed in vascular access due to the use of large delivery femoral sheath (27Fr). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of real-time ultrasound guidance and Z suture technique in reducing total and major vascular complications in leadless pacemaker therapy. METHOD: In this study, we performed a retrospective and prospective analysis of all adverse events associated with leadless pacemaker (Micra) implantation by two operators at a single tertiary center from December 2016 to December 2018. To mitigate the risk of vascular complications, all patients underwent real-time ultrasound-guided venipuncture for vascular access, as well as the application of a Z-suture technique for hemostasis at the end of the procedure. Data were collected on implant indications, implant procedure details, complications, and follow-up information. RESULTS: In this study, 45 patients with an age range of 24 to 94 years (mean 76 ± 14 years) were recruited, with 21 (46.6%) being female. The pacing indications for the patients included atrial fibrillation (24, 53.3%), vascular (7, 15.5%), infection (9, 20%), cognitive/frailty (3, 6.6%), and occupational (2, 4.4%). The implant procedures were performed under general anesthesia in 6 (13.3%) of the cases, and under local anesthesia and sedation in 39 (86.6%) of the cases. A single deployment was achieved in 43 (95.5%) of the patients, while 2 deployments were required in 2 (4.4%) of the patients. Notably, no vascular or major complications were reported in our cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this observational study indicate that incorporating real-time ultrasound guidance during venipuncture and the use of a Z-suture technique significantly reduce the occurrence of both total and major vascular complications associated with the implantation of leadless pacemaker. However, more robust and larger studies are required in order to confirm these results and implications for clinical practice.

The primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

During the recent 'first wave' of the COVID-19 pandemic, the National Health Service (NHS) has triaged planned services to create surge capacity. The primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was in a grey area of triage guidance, but it was suggested as a procedure that could be reasonably stopped. Recent reports have highlighted deaths of patients awaiting ICDs who may have been deferred during the pandemic. In our trust we reorganised our device service and continued to implant primary prevention ICDs during the 'first wave' and, here, report that most patients wished to proceed and underwent uncomplicated implantations. One patient later died from COVID-19, although the transmission site cannot be definitively concluded. With strict adherence to public health guidance and infection prevention strategies, we believe that ICD implantation can be performed safely during the pandemic, and this should be standard practice during subsequent surges.

Triage-HF Plus: a novel device-based remote monitoring pathway to identify worsening heart failure.

AIMS: Remote monitoring of patients with physiological data derived from cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs) offers potential to reconfigure clinical services. The 'Heart Failure Risk Score' (HFRS) uses input from integrated device physiological monitoring to risk-stratify patients as low-risk, medium-risk, or high-risk of a heart failure event in the next 30 days. This study aimed to evaluate a novel clinical pathway utilizing a combination of CIED risk-stratification and telephone triage to identify patients with worsening heart failure (WHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective, single-centre, real-world evaluation of the 'Triage-HF Plus' clinical pathway (HFRS in combination with telephone triage) over a 27 month period. One hundred and fifty-seven high-risk HFRS transmissions were referred for telephone triage assessment. Interventions were at the discretion of the clinical assessor acting in accordance with clinical guidelines. An additional 3month consecutive sample of low and medium HFRS transmissions (control group) were also contacted for telephone triage assessment (n = 98). Successful telephone contact was made in 127 (81%) of referred high-risk HFRS cases: 71 (55.9%) were confirmed to have WHF requiring intervention; 19 (14.9%) had an alternative acute medical problem; one patient had been recently discharged from hospital with WHF; and 36 (28.0%) had no apparent cause for the high score. In the control group, only one patient had symptoms of WHF. The sensitivity and specificity of CIED-based remote monitoring to identify WHF 98.6% (92.5-100.0%) and 63.4% (55.2-71.0%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Triage-HF Plus clinical pathway is a potentially useful remote monitoring tool for patients with heart failure and in situ CIEDs.