Are root cause analyses recommendations effective and sustainable? An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the strength of root cause analysis (RCA) recommendations and their perceived levels of effectiveness and sustainability. DESIGN: All RCAs related to sentinel events (SEs) undertaken between the years 2010 and 2015 in the public health system in Victoria, Australia were analysed. The type and strength of each recommendation in the RCA reports were coded by an expert patient safety classifier using the US Department of Veteran Affairs type and strength criteria. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Thirty-six public health services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The proportion of RCA recommendations which were classified as 'strong' (more likely to be effective and sustainable), 'medium' (possibly effective and sustainable) or 'weak' (less likely to be effective and sustainable). RESULTS: There were 227 RCAs in the period of study. In these RCAs, 1137 recommendations were made. Of these 8% were 'strong', 44% 'medium' and 48% were 'weak'. In 31 RCAs, or nearly 15%, only weak recommendations were made. In 24 (11%) RCAs five or more weak recommendations were made. In 165 (72%) RCAs no strong recommendations were made. The most frequent recommendation types were reviewing or enhancing a policy/guideline/documentation, and training and education. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small proportion of recommendations arising from RCAs in Victoria are 'strong'. This suggests that insights from the majority of RCAs are not likely to inform practice or process improvements. Suggested improvements include more human factors expertise and independence in investigations, more extensive application of existing tools that assist teams to prioritize recommendations that are likely to be effective, and greater use of observational and simulation techniques to understand the underlying systems factors. Time spent in repeatedly investigating similar incidents may be better spent aggregating and thematically analysing existing sources of information about patient safety.

Rotavirus detection and characterisation in outbreaks of gastroenteritis in aged-care facilities.

BACKGROUND: Although rotavirus is a major cause of gastroenteritis in children, its role in adult gastroenteritis and the sensitivity of different methods for its detection in specimens collected from adults are less well understood. OBJECTIVES: (1) To examine the frequency and seasonality of rotavirus-associated gastroenteritis outbreaks in aged-care facilities in Victoria, Australia. (2) To determine rotavirus type in these outbreaks. (3) To determine whether other enteropathogenic agents are present in specimens from these outbreaks. (4) To examine the sensitivity of different methods (electron microscopy (EM), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and latex agglutination (LA)) for the detection of rotavirus in specimens from adults. STUDY DESIGN: Specimens from gastroenteritis outbreaks in aged-care facilities forwarded to this laboratory for the years 1997-2000 were tested for enteropathogenic agents by various methods. Epidemiological, clinical and seasonal data from the rotavirus-positive outbreaks were analysed. RESULTS: Rotavirus was detected by EM in 18 out of 29 individuals associated with seven out of 53 (13%) gastroenteritis outbreaks in aged-care facilities; norovirus was detected in 22 outbreaks (42%) and astrovirus in one outbreak (2%). No mixed viral infection was found in any outbreak. All rotaviruses were typed as Group A by RT-PCR. The rotaviruses in the seven outbreaks were G-typed as follows: G2 (three outbreaks), G4 (two outbreaks), G1 (one outbreak) and G9 (one outbreak). The rotavirus-associated outbreaks were concentrated in mid-winter to mid-spring. The relative sensitivities of the Group A rotavirus detection methods (for the 29 specimens tested) were EM (18), first-round RT-PCR (11), second-round PCR (19), EIA-visual (19), EIA-photometric (19) and LA (13). CONCLUSIONS: In Victoria, Australia, outbreaks of gastroenteritis associated with rotavirus are quite common in aged-care facilities. They involve Group A rotavirus and have a winter/spring seasonality. G-types G1, G2, G4 and G9 were all detected. EIA, second-round PCR and EM proved sensitive methods for rotavirus detection whereas first-round RT-PCR and LA did not.