RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A number of patients post-coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) report cognitive impairment (CI), even months after acute infection. We aimed to assess if COVID-19 is associated with increased incidence of CI in comparison to controls. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Mount Sinai Health System Post-COVID-19 Registry in New York City, a prospective cohort of patients post-COVID-19 ≥18 years of age and non-infected controls. CI was defined by scores ≥ 1.0 standard deviation below population norms, and was assessed using well-validated measures of attention, working memory, processing speed, executive functioning/cognitive flexibility, language, learning, and memory. Logistic regression models assessed odds for CI in each domain in patients post-COVID-19 vs. controls after adjusting for potential confounders. In exploratory analyses, we assessed odds for CI by site of acute COVID-19 care as a proxy for disease severity. FINDINGS: 417 patients post-COVID-19 and 151 controls (mean age 49 years, 63% female, 21% Black, 17% Latinx) were included. In adjusted analyses, patients were significantly more likely than controls to have CI in executive functioning (odds ratio [OR]: 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 4.67), particularly those treated in outpatient (OR: 2.22; 95% CI: 1.02 to 4.82) and inpatient hospital (OR: 3.59; 95% CI: 1.27 to 10.16) settings. There were no significant associations between CI in other domains and history of COVID-19 or site of acute care. INTERPRETATION: Patients post-COVID-19 have greater odds of executive dysfunction, suggesting that focused cognitive screening may be prudent, even in those with mild to moderate disease. Studies should explore the pathophysiology and potential treatments for CI in this population. FUNDING: This work was funded by the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Disfunção Cognitiva , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , COVID-19/complicações , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Função Executiva/fisiologia , AprendizagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients who have had COVID-19 often report persistent symptoms after resolution of their acute illness. Recent reports suggest that vaccination may be associated with improvement in post-acute symptoms. We used data from a prospective cohort to assess differences in post-acute sequelae of COVID (PASC) among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients. METHODS: We used data from a cohort of COVID-19 patients enrolled into a prospective registry established at a tertiary care health system in New York City. Participants underwent a baseline evaluation before COVID-19 vaccines were available and were followed 6 months later. We compared unadjusted and propensity score-adjusted baseline to 6-month change for several PASC-related symptoms and measures: anosmia, respiratory (cough, dyspnea, phlegm, wheezing), depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD; COVID-19-related and other trauma), and quality-of-life domains among participants who received vs. those who did not receive COVID-19 vaccination. RESULTS: The study included 453 COVID-19 patients with PASC, of which 324 (72%) were vaccinated between the baseline and 6-month visit. Unadjusted analyses did not show significant differences in the baseline to 6-month change in anosmia, respiratory symptoms, depression, anxiety, PTSD, or quality of life (p > 0.05 for all comparisons) among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated patients. Similar results were found in propensity-adjusted comparisons and in secondary analyses based on the number of vaccine doses received. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that COVID vaccination is not associated with improvement in PASC. Additional studies are needed to better understand the mechanisms underlying PASC and to develop effective treatments.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anosmia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , VacinaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Homebound older adults are medically complex and often have difficulty accessing outpatient medical care. Home-based primary care (HBPC) may improve care and outcomes for this population but data from randomized trials of HBPC in the United States are limited. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of HBPC versus office-based primary care for adults ages ≥65 years who reported ≥1 hospitalization in the prior 12 months and met the Medicare definition of homebound. HBPC was provided by teams consisting of a physician, nurse practitioner, nurse, and social worker. Data were collected at baseline, 6- and 12-months. Outcomes were quality of life, symptoms, satisfaction with care, hospitalizations, and emergency department (ED) visits. Recruitment was terminated early because more deaths were observed for intervention patients. RESULTS: The study enrolled 229 patients, 65.4% of planned recruitment. The mean age was 82 (9.0) years and 72.3% had dementia. Of those assigned to HBPC, 34.2% never received it. Intervention patients had greater satisfaction with care than controls (2.26, 95% CI 1.46-3.06, p < 0.0001; effect size 0.74) and lower hospitalization rates (-17.9%, 95% CI -31.0% to -1.0%; p = 0.001; number needed to treat 6, 95% CI 3-100). There were no significant differences in quality of life (1.25, 95% CI -0.39-2.89, p = 0.13), symptom burden (-1.92, 95% CI -5.22-1.37, p = 0.25) or ED visits (1.2%, 95% CI -10.5%-12.4%; p = 0.87). There were 24 (21.1%) deaths among intervention patients and 12 (10.7%) among controls (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: HBPC was associated with greater satisfaction with care and lower hospitalization rates but also more deaths compared to office-based primary care. Additional research is needed to understand the nature of the higher death rate for HBPC patients, as well as to determine the effects of HBPC on quality of life and symptom burden given the trial's early termination.
Assuntos
Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Pacientes Domiciliares , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Qualidade de Vida , MedicareRESUMO
Aim of the study: Biliary complications are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality after liver transplant (LT). However, national data on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) usage and outcomes in LT patients are lacking. Our study aims to identify the trends, outcomes, and predictors of ERCP and related complications in this patient subgroup. Material and methods: We derived our study cohort from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) between 2007 and 2017. LT patients were identified using ICD-9/10CM diagnosis codes and patients who underwent ERCP were identified by ICD-9/10-CM procedure codes. We utilized the Cochrane-Armitage trend test and multivariate logistic regression to analyze temporal trends, outcomes, and predictors. Results: A total of 372,814 hospitalizations occurred in LT patients between 2007 and 2017. ERCP was performed in 2.05% (n = 7632) of all hospitalizations. There was a rise in ERCP procedures from 1.96% (n = 477) in 2007 to 2.05% (n = 845) in 2017. Among LT patients who underwent ERCP, the in-hospital mortality rate was 1% (n = 73) and 8% (n = 607) were discharged to facilities. Mean length of hospital stay was 7 ±0.3 days. Septicemia was the most common periprocedural complication (18.3%, n = 1399) followed by post-ERCP pancreatitis (8.8%, n = 674). Conclusions: There has been an increase in ERCP procedures over the past decade among LT patients. Our study highlights the periprocedural complications and outcomes of ERCP in LT patients from a nationally representative dataset.
RESUMO
Background Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is one of the rising public health threats in the United States. It has imposed significant morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. However, the burden of the disease in the young population is unclear. This study aimed to identify hospitalization trends and outcomes of CDI in the young population. Methodology We obtained data from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) for hospitalizations with CDI between 2007 and 2017. We used the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Edition-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and ICD-10-CM to identify CDI and other diagnoses of interest. The primary outcome of our study was to identify the temporal trends and demographic characteristics of patients aged less than 50 years old hospitalized with CDI. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS), and discharge dispositions. We utilized the Cochran Armitage trend test and multivariable survey logistic regression models to analyze the trends and outcomes. Results From 2007 to 2017, CDI was present among 1,158,047 hospitalized patients. The majority (84.04%) of the patients were ≥50 years old versus 15.95% of patients <50 years old. From 2007 to 2017, there was a significant increase in CDI among <50-year-old hospitalized patients (12.6% from 2007 to 18.1% in 2017; p < 0.001). In trend analysis by ethnicities, among patients <50 years old, there was an increasing trend in Caucasians (63.9% versus 67.9%; p < 0.001) and Asian females (58.4% versus 62.6%; p < 0.001). We observed an increased trend of discharge to home (91.3% vs 95.8%; p < 0.001) in association with a decrease in discharge to facility (8.3% vs 4%; p < 0.001). The average LOS from 2007 to 2017 was 5 ± 0.03 days, which remained stable during the study period. Conclusions The proportion of young (<50 years old) hospitalized patients with CDI has been steadily increasing over the past decade. Our findings might represent new epidemiological trends related to non-traditional risk factors. Future CDI surveillance should extend to the young population to confirm our findings, and the study of emerging risk factors is required to better understand the increasing CDI hospitalization in the young population.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a hospital-acquired pneumonia that occurs more than 48 hours after mechanical ventilation. Studies showing temporal trends, predictors, and outcomes of VAP are very limited. OBJECTIVE: We used the National database to delineate the trends and predictors of VAP from 2009 to 2017. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for adult hospitalizations who received mechanical ventilation (MV) by using ICD-9/10-CM procedures codes. We excluded hospitalizations with length of stay (LOS) less than two days. VAP and other diagnoses of interest were identified by ICD-9/10-CM diagnosis codes. We then utilized the Cochran Armitage trend test and multivariate survey logistic regression models to analyze the data. RESULTS: Out of a total of 5,155,068 hospitalizations who received mechanical ventilation, 93,432 (1.81%) developed VAP. Incidence of VAP decreased from 20/1000 in 2008 to 17/1000 in 2017 with a 5% decrease. Patients who developed VAP had lower mean age (59 vs 61; p<0.001) and higher LOS (25 days vs. 12 days; p<0.001). In multivariable regression analysis, we identified that males, African Americans, teaching hospitals and co-morbidities like neurological disorders, pulmonary circulation disorders and electrolyte disorders are associated with the increased odds of developing VAP. VAP was also associated with higher rates of discharge to facilities and increased LOS. CONCLUSION: Our study identified the trends along with the risk predictors of VAP in MV patients. Our goal is to lay the foundation for further in-depth analysis of this trend for better risk stratification and development of preventive strategies to reduce the incidence of VAP among MV patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) plays an important role in causing peptic ulcer disease (PUD) in the general population. However, the role of H. pylori in cirrhotic patients for causing PUD is obscure. There are various studies evaluating H. pylori association with PUD in cirrhotic patients, but the results have been controversial. We sought to analyze the association of H. pylori with the development of PUD in cirrhotic patients from the largest United States population-based database. METHODS: We analyzed Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) and Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) data from 2017. Adult hospitalizations due to cirrhosis were identified by previously validated ICD-10-CM codes. PUD and H. pylori were identified with the presence of ICD-10-CM codes in primary and secondary diagnosis fields, respectively. We performed weighted analyses using Chi-Square and paired Student's t-test to compare the groups. Multivariable survey logistic regression was performed to find an association of H. pylori with PUD in cirrhotic patients. RESULTS: Our study showed that the prevalence of H. pylori infection was 2.2% in cirrhotic patients with PUD. In regression analysis, H. pylori was found to be associated with PUD in cirrhotic patients (OR 15.1; 95% CI: 13.9-16.4; p <0.001) and non-cirrhotic patients (OR 48.8; 95% CI: 47.5-50.1; p <0.001). In the studied population, H. pylori was more commonly seen in the age between 50 and 64 years (49.4% vs 44.1%; p <0.0001), male (63.4% vs 59.9%; p <0.0413), African American (16.3% vs 10.6%; p <0.0001), and Hispanic (26.2% vs 14.9%; p <0.0001). H. pylori is more likely to be associated with complicated PUD hospitalizations (51.2% vs 44.2%; p <0.0067). Alcoholism and smoking were more common in H. pylori group compared to those without (43.6% vs 35.8%; p <0.0001 and 33.7% vs 24.8% p <0.0001, respectively). Factors associated with increased odds of H. pylori infection include African American (OR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.5-3.6), Hispanic (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.7-4.0), and smoking (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.2). CONCLUSION: H. pylori are associated with PUD and concurrent cirrhosis, although it is less prevalent than general population. African American, Hispanic, and smoking were independently associated with increased odds of H. pylori infection. Further studies are required to better understand the epidemiology and confirm our findings.
RESUMO
Background The 30-day readmission rates are being used as a quality measure by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for specific medical and surgical conditions. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the important causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States (US). The characteristics and predictors of 30-day readmission in ARDS patients in the US are not widely known, which we have depicted in our study. Objective The aim of this study is to identify 30-day readmission rates, characteristics, and predictors of ARDS patients using the largest publicly available nationwide database. Methods We used the National Readmission Database from the year 2013 to extract the patients with ARDS by primary discharge diagnosis with ICD9-CM codes. All-cause unplanned 30-day readmission rates were calculated for patients admitted between January and November 2013. The independent predictors for unplanned 30-day readmission were identified by survey logistic regression. Results After excluding elective readmission, the all-cause unplanned 30-day readmission rate for ARDS patients was 18%. Index admissions readmitted within 30-day had a significantly higher baseline burden of comorbidities with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥1 as compared to those who were not readmitted within 30 days. In multivariate regression analysis, several predictors associated with 30-day readmission were self-pay/no charge/other (OR 1.19, 95%CI: 1.02-1.38; p = 0.02), higher-income class (OR 0.86, 95%CI:0.79-0.99; p = 0.03), private insurance (OR 0.81, 95%CI:0.67-0.94; p = 0.01), and teaching metropolitan hospital (OR 0.72, 95%CI:0.61-0.94; p = 0.01). Conclusion The unplanned 30-day readmission rates are higher in ARDS patients in the US. Several modifiable factors such as insurance, socioeconomic status, and hospital type are associated with 30-day readmission among ARDS patients.