RESUMO
Spondylolisthesis is a common finding in middle-aged and older adults with back pain. The pathophysiology of degenerative spondylolisthesis is a subject of controversy regarding not only its etiology but also the mechanisms of its progression. It is theorized that degeneration of the facets and discs can lead to segmental instability, leading to displacement over time. Kirkaldy-Willis divided degenerative spondylolisthesis into three phases: dysfunction, instability, and finally, restabilization. There is a paucity of literature on the unification of the radiological hallmarks seen in spondylolisthesis within these phases. The radiographic features include (1) facet morphology/arthropathy, (2) facet effusion, (3) facet vacuum, (4) synovial cyst, (5) interspinous ligament bursitis, and (6) vacuum disc as markers of dysfunction, instability, and/or restabilization. We discuss these features, which can be seen on X-ray, CT, and MRI, with the intention of establishing a timeline upon which they present clinically. Spondylolisthesis is initiated as either degeneration of the intervertebral disc or facet joints. Early degeneration can be seen as facet vacuum without considerable arthropathy. As the vertebral segment becomes increasingly dynamic, fluid accumulates within the facet joint space. Further degeneration will lead to the advancement of facet arthropathy, degenerative disc disease, and posterior ligamentous complex pathology. Facet effusion can eventually be replaced with a vacuum in severe facet osteoarthritis. Intervertebral disc vacuum continues to accumulate with further cleft formation and degeneration. Ultimately, autofusion of the vertebra at the facets and endplates can be observed. With this review, we hope to increase awareness of these radiographical markers and their timeline, thus placing them within the framework of the currently accepted model of degenerative spondylolisthesis, to help guide future research and to help refine management guidelines.
Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares , Espondilolistese , Espondilolistese/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Progressão da Doença , Degeneração do Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term sexual potency and attrition in sexual function after iodine-125 ((125)I) seed radiotherapy and the effect of sildenafil on radiation-induced erectile dysfunction (ED). METHODS: This prospective study consisted of 86 sexually active patients (mean age 63.5 +/- 7.7 years) who underwent (125)I seed implantation from 1997 to 1999 to treat low-volume prostate cancer (prostate-specific antigen less than 10 ng/mL, Gleason score 6 or less, stage T1-T2). All patients were followed up every 6 to 8 months for 4 years. Patients prescribed sildenafil citrate for ED completed the abridged five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaires. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 49.7 months (range 36 to 66). Of 86 patients, 43 (50%) did not initiate drug therapy; and only 36 (83.7%) of the 43 were interviewed at 4 years. Twenty-three (63.8%) of the 36 patients had erections sufficient for vaginal penetration, with a total mean +/- SD IIEF-5 score of 15.76 +/- 1.13. The other 50% (43 of 86) initiated sildenafil citrate for treatment of ED after seed implantation, with a minimal follow-up of 6 months. At 4 years, 32 (74%) of the 43 were responding positively to sildenafil citrate, with a total IIEF-5 score of 18.3 +/- 1.2. The mean EDITS +/- SD score was 76.5 +/- 3.2, and the spousal satisfaction rate was 72% (31 of 43). The dropout rate was 37% (16 of 43); 10 (63%) of the 16 discontinued because of a lack of efficacy, 3 (19%) because of a return of natural erections sufficient for vaginal penetration, and 3 (19%) discontinued because of side effects (headaches). CONCLUSIONS: ED is a major long-term issue after (125)I seed radiotherapy, with a long-term potency rate of 29%. Sildenafil citrate improves erections in most patients after (125)I seed implantation.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Disfunção Erétil/etiologia , Radioisótopos do Iodo/uso terapêutico , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Vasodilatadores/uso terapêutico , Adenocarcinoma/complicações , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Disfunção Erétil/tratamento farmacológico , Seguimentos , Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Purinas , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Parceiros Sexuais/psicologia , Citrato de Sildenafila , Sulfonas , Vasodilatadores/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term effect and safety of sildenafil citrate for the treatment of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS: The study consisted of 91 patients with erectile dysfunction from our institution who received oral sildenafil citrate after RP. We surveyed these patients using a self-administered questionnaire during the first year of sildenafil citrate use to determine treatment satisfaction, patient compliance, and safety. Those who had responded positively to the drug were surveyed again 3 years later (n = 48). Sildenafil citrate was prescribed at a dose of 50 mg and increased to 100 mg if needed. Data were collected from a self-administered questionnaire using the abridged five-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire, referred to as the Sexual Health Inventory of Men, and the Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction. The patients were stratified according to the type of nerve-sparing (NS) RP procedure they underwent: bilateral NS, unilateral NS, and non-NS. RESULTS: At 3 years, 31 (71%) of the 43 patients who had returned the second surveys were still responding to sildenafil. Of these 31 respondents, 10 (31%) had augmented their dose from 50 to 100 mg. The dropout rate was 27%; 6 of 12 had discontinued because of the return of natural erections, 5 because of a loss of efficacy, and 1 because his spouse had died. No differences were found in the 1-year and 3-year five-item International Index of Erectile Function (Sexual Health Inventory of Men) and Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction scores between the NS groups. The most common side effects at 3 years were headache (12%), flushing (10%), and blue or blurred vision (2%). No patient discontinued the drug at 3 years because of side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the vast majority of patients with erectile dysfunction after RP who initially respond to sildenafil continue to do so at 3 years and are satisfied and compliant with the treatment regimen.