Interaction between mental disorders and social disconnectedness on mortality: a population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recognised importance of mental disorders and social disconnectedness for mortality, few studies have examined their co-occurrence. AIMS: To examine the interaction between mental disorders and three distinct aspects of social disconnectedness on mortality, while taking into account sex, age and characteristics of the mental disorder. METHOD: This cohort study included participants from the Danish National Health Survey in 2013 and 2017 who were followed until 2021. Survey data on social disconnectedness (loneliness, social isolation and low social support) were linked with register data on hospital-diagnosed mental disorders and mortality. Poisson regression was applied to estimate independent and joint associations with mortality, interaction contrasts and attributable proportions. RESULTS: A total of 162 497 individuals were followed for 886 614 person-years, and 9047 individuals (5.6%) died during follow-up. Among men, interaction between mental disorders and loneliness, social isolation and low social support, respectively, accounted for 47% (95% CI: 21-74%), 24% (95% CI: -15 to 63%) and 61% (95% CI: 35-86%) of the excess mortality after adjustment for demographics, country of birth, somatic morbidity, educational level, income and wealth. In contrast, among women, no excess mortality could be attributed to interaction. No clear trends were identified according to age or characteristics of the mental disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality among men, but not women, with a co-occurring mental disorder and social disconnectedness was substantially elevated compared with what was expected. Awareness of elevated mortality rates among socially disconnected men with mental disorders could be of importance to qualify and guide prevention efforts in psychiatric services.

Satisfaction with life and SF-36 vitality predict risk of ischemic heart disease: a prospective cohort study.

The main objective of the current study was to investigate associations between two aspects of well-being - satisfaction with life and vitality - and incidence of and mortality from ischemic heart disease. Study design. The Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank (CAMB) was conducted from 2009 to 2011 and was used as baseline data with 6750 individuals having complete information on The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) and 6652 individuals with complete information on the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) vitality scale. Incidence of and mortality from ischemic heart disease were assessed using Danish register data and a total of 349 CAMB individuals were registered with either a diagnosis (n = 337) or had died (n = 12) from ischemic heart disease before the end of follow-up (31 December 2017). The hazard ratios of ischemic heart disease according to satisfaction with life and vitality scores were investigated using Cox proportional hazard regression adjusted for potential covariates. Results. A one standard deviation increase on the SWLS was associated with an 18% reduced risk of ischemic heart disease while a one standard deviation increase on the SF-36 vitality scale was associated with a 24% reduced risk of ischemic heart disease after adjustment for baseline socio-demographic factors. These associations remained when separately adjusting for lifestyle, objective health, and social factors, but became non-significant when adjusting for self-reported health. Conclusion. Our study indicates that both psychological and health-related components of wellbeing are important in relation to ischemic heart disease.

Loneliness and the risk of type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of type 2 diabetes is increasing globally. Recent research suggests that loneliness could be a potential risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to investigate the association between loneliness and type 2 diabetes and the modifying effect of mental disorders. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study including 465 290 adults (aged ≥16 years) who participated in either the Danish Health and Morbidity Survey or the Danish National Health Survey between 2000 and 2017. Loneliness was based on self-report, while type 2 diabetes was measured using an algorithm combining several health registers including type 2 diabetes patients treated both within the hospital sector and general practice. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: During a mean follow-up time of 6.3 years, 13 771 individuals (3%) developed type 2 diabetes. Feeling lonely once in a while was associated with a 14% increased risk of type 2 diabetes (95% CI 1.09 to 1.20), while feeling lonely often was associated with a 24% increased risk (95% CI 1.14 to 1.34), independent of sociodemographic factors and body mass index. The association was stronger among individuals without a mental disorder (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.34 among those feeling lonely often) compared with those with a mental disorder (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.23). CONCLUSIONS: Loneliness independently increased the risk of type 2 diabetes. The effect was more pronounced in individuals without a mental disorder, as having a mental disorder itself likely increases the risk of type 2 diabetes. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing loneliness as a modifiable risk factor in preventing type 2 diabetes.

Impact of Lifestyle and Socioeconomic Position on the Association Between Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Case-Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: It is unknown whether the cardiovascular risks associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use differ according to lifestyle and socioeconomic position. OBJECTIVE: We examined the association between NSAID use and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within subgroups defined by lifestyle and socioeconomic position. METHODS: We conducted a case-crossover study of all adult first-time respondents to the Danish National Health Surveys of 2010, 2013, or 2017, without previous cardiovascular disease, who experienced a MACE from survey completion through 2020. We used a Mantel-Haenszel method to obtain odds ratios (ORs) of the association between NSAID use (ibuprofen, naproxen, or diclofenac) and MACE (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, or all-cause death). We identified NSAID use and MACE via nationwide Danish health registries. We stratified the analyses by body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity level, marital status, education, income, and employment. RESULTS: Compared with non-use, the OR of MACE was 1.34 (95% confidence interval: 1.23-1.46) for ibuprofen, 1.48 (1.04-2.43) for naproxen, and 2.18 (1.72-2.78) for diclofenac. When comparing NSAID use with non-use or the individual NSAIDs with each other, we observed no notable heterogeneity in the ORs within subgroups of lifestyle and socioeconomic position for any NSAID. Compared with ibuprofen, diclofenac was associated with increased risk of MACE in several subgroups with high cardiovascular risk, e.g., individuals with overweight (OR 1.52, 1.01-2.39) and smokers (OR 1.54, 0.96-2.46). CONCLUSIONS: The relative increase in cardiovascular risk associated with NSAID use was not modified by lifestyle or socioeconomic position.