Measuring patient-centredness in publicly funded fertility care: A New Zealand validation and international comparison of the Patient-Centred Questionnaire-Infertility.

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Centred Questionnaire-Infertility (PCQ-Infertility) has proven to be a reliable instrument to assess the extent of patient-centredness of fertility care in European countries. AIMS: To validate the PCQ-Infertility in New Zealand (NZ) and to compare results with international experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional 46-item questionnaire study among 409 women undergoing publicly funded fertility care (intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilisation / intracytoplasmic sperm injection) in three fertility clinics in the Northern Auckland region was performed between October 2015 and September 2016. Inclusion of eligible participants was both retro- and prospective. The questionnaire was distributed by email link and women were asked to complete it with their partner. Internal consistency and construct validity were determined and correction for case mix was performed. Mean dimension scores, adjusted for 'current pregnancy', 'educational level' and 'treatment type', were calculated for each dimension of the PCQ-Infertility. NZ results were compared with PCQ-Infertility results from five countries. RESULTS: Of 409 invited women, 255 questionnaires were submitted (response rate 62%), of which 216 (53%) were analysable. The dimension 'Care organization' had poor internal consistency, but overall the questionnaire had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.93). Construct validity was also good. International comparison showed NZ to have the second highest overall score. In New Zealand, the lowest scoring domain was 'Continuity and transition'. CONCLUSIONS: The NZ version of the PCQ-infertility proved a valid instrument for the assessment of patient-centredness of publicly funded fertility care. Future research should focus on international inequities in patient-centred fertility care and use of the tool for quality improvement. Local use of the PCQ-Infertility is encouraged.

Perspectives of mild cycle IVF: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of mild cycle IVF adds to the repertoire of fertility treatments. However, its place is still novel and is contested within the literature. Women's experiences of mild cycle IVF have received minimal attention. The aim of the study was to explore women's perspectives regarding mild cycle IVF. METHODS: In this qualitative thematic analysis study, 17 women, and 2 partners were interviewed regarding their perceptions of 'mild' cycle IVF. Data were thematically analysed to identify the key aspects of participants' perceptions. RESULTS: Participants reported that 'mild' cycle IVF offered a number of positive aspects, including the reduction in the intrusion of IVF procedures in women's lives, the short timeframe spent in awaiting the results and the way mild cycle worked with women's natural hormonal cycles. CONCLUSIONS: 'Mild' cycle IVF was perceived positively by the participants particularly in terms of timeframes and the impact on their physical and emotional wellbeing.

A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic ovarian diathermy versus gonadotropin therapy for women with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic ovarian diathermy with gonadotropin ovulation induction for women with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary referral fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Women with anovulatory infertility secondary to clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome. Inclusion criteria were age of <39 years, body mass index of <35 kg/m(2), failure to ovulate with 150 mg of clomiphene citrate for 5 days in the early follicular phase, >12 months of infertility, and no other causes of infertility. INTERVENTION(S): Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy versus three cycles of urinary or recombinant gonadotropins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cumulative pregnancy and miscarriage rates. RESULT(S): Cumulative pregnancy rates were 28% at 6 months for laparoscopic ovarian diathermy and 33% for three cycles of ovulation induction with gonadotropins. There were three miscarriages in each group. Women in the laparoscopic ovarian diathermy arm of the study had four additional spontaneous pregnancies 6 to 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSION(S): There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy or miscarriage rates during the 6-month follow-up period or the three cycles. Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy is a safe and effective alternative to ovulation induction with gonadotropins.