Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Braz J Urol ; 45(4): 732-738, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31184455

RESUMO

Minimally invasive urologic surgery has been developing in Brazil and now is a routine part of care in many regions and patients with different conditions benefit from it. Training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery has evolved and concerns exist both over the quality of surgical training and the practical effect on results of the urological training. This is an unprecedented study which undertook a census to determinate the current state of laparoscopic and robotic urological practice and to know the mains barriers to adequate practice in Brazil. In august 2017, surveys, consisting of an anonymous questionnaire with 15 questions, were sent via internet to the mailing list of the Brazilian Society of Urology (SBU). With these data, activities related to laparoscopy and robotic surgery of our urologists and the mains difficulties and barriers to practice laparoscopy and robotic surgery were evaluated. In our survey, 413 questionnaires were completed. Majority of the responders were currently working in the southeast region of Brazil (52.1%) and 75.5% of the surgeons performed laparoscopic surgery while, only 12.8%, robotic surgery. The lack of experience on the technique and the lack of equipment were the mains barriers and difficulties for not executing laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, respectively. Proper longitudinal training and access to good equipment in minimally invasive surgery are still barriers for urologists in our country.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/normas , Urologistas/normas , Brasil , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Urologia/normas
2.
Eur Urol ; 52(3): 687-94, 2007 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17587488

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess overall safety, histopathological outcomes, and early functional results after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) with a new lateral approach for the interfascial dissection of the neurovascular bundles without tension and any use of electrocautery. METHODS: Between April and September 2006, 100 consecutive patients with organ-confined prostate cancer (age < 70 yr, PSA < or = 10 microg/dl, Gleason score < or = 7, and IIEF > or = 17) underwent RALP by the same senior surgeon. Pre-, intra-, and perioperative data were recorded. The operative technique is described step by step. Patients were assessed at the 4-mo follow-up. RESULTS: RALP was successfully completed in all patients. Neither blood transfusions nor reintervention were necessary. One week following catheter removal, complete early urinary continence was achieved in 80% of patients, and spontaneous erections or penile tumescence was reported by 46 patients. Positive surgical margins were 12.1% in the pT2 group and 29% in the pT3 group. Ninety-three patients were available for analysis at the 4-mo follow-up. Of them, 92.4% were completely continent, 5.4% used 1 pad a day, and 2.2% used 2 or more pads a day. Concerning the IIEF-EF domain score, 64.5% of the patients reported a total score > or = 17, and 17.2% of them scored > or = 26. CONCLUSIONS: The novel approach described for RALP is safe and allows excellent dissection. It maintains good margin status and provides encouraging early continence and erectile functional results in selected patients. Long-term follow-up is necessary to assess the impact of this approach on oncological outcome.


Assuntos
Dissecação/métodos , Fasciotomia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Robótica/métodos , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Idoso , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Bexiga Urinária/irrigação sanguínea , Bexiga Urinária/inervação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA