Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 186
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet Oncol ; 22(10): e430-e434, 2021 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34592192

RESUMO

During the past decade, health technology assessment bodies have faced new challenges in establishing the benefits of new drugs for individuals and health-care systems. A topic of increasing importance to the field of oncology is the so-called agnostic regulatory approval of targeted therapies for cancer (independent of tumour location and histology) granted on the basis of basket trials. Basket trials in oncology offer the advantage of simultaneously evaluating treatments for multiple tumours, even rare cancers, in a single clinical trial. To address the novel challenges introduced by these trials, an interdisciplinary panel was convened on behalf of the Transparency Committee of the French National Authority for Health to clarify an approach designed to guarantee a transparent, reproducible, and fair assessment of histology-agnostic treatments for reimbursement by the French National Health Insurance Fund. The requirements of this approach include the need for randomisation, clinically relevant endpoints, appropriate correction for multiple significance testing, characterisation of subgroup heterogeneity, and validation of underlying biomarker assays. A prospectively designated external control is encouraged when the implementation of a direct comparison is deemed infeasible. We also underline the importance of recording outcomes from basket trials in a registry for use as future external controls.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , França , Órgãos Governamentais , Humanos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Cancer ; 148(11): 2789-2798, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33428772

RESUMO

This retrospective observational study aimed to determine the effectiveness, safety and patterns of the use of nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma in real-world clinical practice in France using data from a Temporary Authorization for Use Program (ATU). Data were collected from patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma enrolled in a French national database (Réseau pour la Recherche et l'Investigation Clinique sur le Mélanome: Ric-Mel) and treated with nivolumab during the ATU program (12 September 2014 to 31 August 2015). The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the effect of patient characteristics on clinical response and overall survival (OS). Among 400 included patients (median age 66 years), the majority (83%) received nivolumab as second- or subsequent-line therapy. The median durations of progression-free survival and OS were 3.3 and 14.1 months, respectively, and 31.6% of patients achieved an objective response with a median duration of 20.1 months (range: 0-34.7). The safety profile of nivolumab was manageable and consistent with those of previous clinical trials, with an incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events of 13.8%. The safety and effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with advanced melanoma in real-world clinical practice in France were in line with the data reported in the Phase 3 trials CheckMate 066 and 037 of nivolumab in this patient population.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Nivolumabe/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Bases de Dados Factuais , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nivolumabe/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Cancer ; 127(13): 2262-2270, 2021 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33764524

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The arrival of immunotherapies and targeted therapies challenged the authorities to make them available as soon as possible. France has effective tools, such as clinical trials (CTs) and a national early access program (temporary authorizations for use [ATUs] and temporary recommendations for use [RTUs]), allowing the use of innovative drugs, whether or not they have been authorized or used off-label, for cases that have reached a therapeutic impasse. METHODS: The methodology involved real-time data collection from ATUs, RTUs (between September 1, 2009 and September 1, 2019), and CT authorizations (from December 1, 2017 to September 1, 2019) that were filed and reviewed by the French National Agency for Medicines for metastatic melanoma (MM). RESULTS: In total, 45 CTs were authorized for MM (51% early phase trials and 44% phase 2 and 3 trials), mainly for the metastatic line (86%) and with an industrial sponsor (73%). Immunotherapies and targeted therapies (63% and 24%, respectively) mostly were used in combination. Three RTUs were authorized for the adjuvant treatment of MM, whereas 13 drugs were available through nominal ATUs (nATUs), of which 5 were awarded a cohort ATU (cATU). This enabled the treatment of 6538 patients (28% through nATUs and 72% through cATUs). All of these drugs were granted marketing authorization and were included in the reimbursement list. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to CTs and the national early access program, patients in France have been able to benefit from innovative MM treatments. LAY SUMMARY: Several tools allow the use of innovative drugs in France, even if they are not yet authorized or used off-label. From December 1, 2017 to September 1, 2019, 45 clinical trials have been authorized for metastatic melanoma, mostly using immunotherapy (63%) and targeted therapy (24%) at an early phase (51%). Since 2010, the national early access program has treated 6538 patients, including 28% under nominative temporary authorizations for use and 72% under cohort temporary authorizations for use. Fourteen drugs are available through nominative temporary authorizations for use, and 5 are available through cohort temporary authorizations for use, and all of these drugs were granted marketing authorization.


Assuntos
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutâneas , França , Humanos , Imunoterapia , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia
4.
Doc Ophthalmol ; 142(2): 257-263, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975694

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome due to antibodies targeting bipolar retinal cells. Its evolution, particularly in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), is currently poorly understood. In the few cases published, patients' visual function got worse when these molecules were prescribed. Here, we present a case of a patient with severe MAR treated with an ICI for melanoma progression. METHODS: A 68-year-old woman with a history of melanoma of the palpebral conjunctiva presented with sudden and gradually worsening visual disturbances. Simultaneously, a metastatic evolution of the melanoma was diagnosed and surgically treated exclusively. Visual acuity assessment, static automated perimetry and ERG results lead to the diagnosis of MAR. Since systemic corticosteroid therapy did not improve her symptoms, repeated intraocular corticosteroid injections were performed with a positive outcome. Later on, metastatic progression of the patient's melanoma led to the introduction of pembrolizumab, an ICI targeting PD-1. Immunotherapy has changed the prognosis of patient affected by metastatic melanoma, but these molecules may induce various immune-related adverse effects. In our case, intraocular corticosteroid injections were still performed simultaneously. Visual acuity assessment, static automated perimetry and ERG were performed during the course of this treatment. RESULTS: Full-field ERGs results suggested the possibility that the ophthalmologic treatment might restore the patient's retinal function despite the continued immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: We report the first case of MAR with a positive outcome after 1 year of ICI, possibly thanks to intravitreal corticosteroid therapy.


Assuntos
Síndromes Paraneoplásicas Oculares , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Eletrorretinografia , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intravítreas , Síndromes Paraneoplásicas Oculares/diagnóstico , Síndromes Paraneoplásicas Oculares/tratamento farmacológico
5.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 101(2): adv00384, 2021 Feb 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33313939

RESUMO

Low-dose methotrexate is widely used in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome, but few studies have evaluated this treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit/risk ratio of this regimen on skin lesions. A retrospective survey of a series of patients treated for mycosis fungoides or Sézary syndrome with low-dose methotrexate and followed for at least one year in a tertiary referral centre was performed. From a total of 48 patients, complete response and partial response were achieved in 10 (21%) and 25 (52%) patients, respectively, with no significant difference in response rates between mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Of the responders, 20 out of 35 (57%) relapsed after a median time of 11 months. Forty-four of the total of 48 patients discontinued methotrexate, mainly due to primary or secondary failure and/or limiting toxicity (9 patients). Overall, the benefit/risk ratio of low-dose methotrexate in mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome appears favorable and this treat-ment remains a valid option in mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome. However, its activity is limited in duration and significant toxicity may occur in some patients.


Assuntos
Micose Fungoide , Síndrome de Sézary , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Micose Fungoide/diagnóstico , Micose Fungoide/tratamento farmacológico , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Sézary/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Sézary/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico
6.
Cancer ; 126(3): 611-618, 2020 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31639198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Significant progress was recently observed in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM). With >50% of patients now reaching a second line of treatment and a significant improvement in the survival rate, an assessment of quality of life (QoL) during the whole course of the disease becomes necessary. The objective of this study was to describe the QoL of patients with MM in France, from their diagnosis of advanced disease to their death, in real life. METHODS: QoL data were collected through MelBase, a prospective, French, multicentric cohort dedicated to the follow-up of adults with MM. QoL was assessed using the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT)-Melanoma questionnaire at the time of study inclusion, every 3 months, and at the time of each treatment change until death. To assess longitudinal changes from baseline to death, mixed-effect models for repeated-measures analyses were used to control for baseline covariates. RESULTS: QoL was assessed in 1435 patients who were included in the study between 2013 and 2018. The median follow-up was 9.4 months, and 47% of patients died during follow-up. During first-line treatment, the model-based, mean utility score was 0.830 (95% CI, 0.818-0.843), the mean FACT-General score was 77.22 (95% CI, 76.23-78.22), and the mean FACT-Melanoma score was 129.46 (95% CI, 128.02-130.90). At the time of a change in treatment line, there was a decrease of -0.027 (95% CI, -0.03, -0.02) in the utility score, -1.82 (95% CI, -1.88, -1.76) in the FACT-General score, and -2.98 (95% CI, -3.05, -2.91) in the FACT-Melanoma score compared with first-line treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the MelBase cohort, the QoL among patients with MM seems to be fairly stable over the whole disease course, although a small but significant decrease at time therapy is changed is observed.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Melanoma/terapia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/imunologia , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Metástase Neoplásica , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/imunologia , Segunda Neoplasia Primária/patologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
7.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 69(8): 1663-1672, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32306076

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Adoptive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) therapy and interleukin-2 (IL-2) have been investigated in melanoma. AIM: To confirm previously observed preventive effects of TIL + IL2 in a subgroup of patients with relapsing metastatic stage III melanoma. METHODOLOGY: Open-label, randomized two-group, multicenter five-year trial in adult stage III melanoma patients with only one invaded lymph node after complete resection. Patients received TIL + IL2 or abstention. TIL + IL2 was administered within 8 weeks after lymph node resection and 4 weeks after. Disease-free survival was assessed every 2 months up to month 18, every 3 months up to month 36 and every 4 months up to 5 years. A once-a-year follow-up was scheduled beyond the five-year follow-up. Safety was assessed throughout the trial. RESULTS: Overall, 49 patients accounted for the modified intent-to-treat and 47 for the PP. Slightly more male than female patients participated; mean age was 57.7 ± 11.4 years in the TIL + IL2 group and 53.5 ± 13.0 years in the abstention group. After 5 years of follow-up, 11/26 patients in the TIL + IL2 group and 13/23 in the abstention group had relapsed. There was no statistical difference between the groups (HR: 0.63 CI 95% [0.28-1.41], p = 0.258), nine patients in the TIL + IL2 and 11 in the abstention group died with no significant difference between the two groups (HR: 0.65 CI95% [0.27 - 1.59], p = 0.34). Safety was good. CONCLUSION: We did not confirm results of a previous trial. However, ulceration of the primary melanoma may be considered predictive of the efficacy of TIL in melanoma in adjuvant setting, in a manner similar to interferon α.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia Adotiva/métodos , Interleucina-2/administração & dosagem , Linfonodos/imunologia , Linfócitos do Interstício Tumoral/imunologia , Melanoma/terapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Adjuvantes Imunológicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Melanoma/imunologia , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/imunologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto Jovem
10.
Lancet Oncol ; 19(7): 916-929, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908991

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite newly approved treatments, metastatic melanoma remains a life-threatening condition. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic in patients with stage IIIB or IIIC melanoma in the adjuvant setting. METHODS: DERMA was a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done in 31 countries and 263 centres. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and had histologically proven, completely resected, stage IIIB or IIIC, MAGE-A3-positive cutaneous melanoma with macroscopic lymph node involvement and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1. Randomisation and treatment allocation at the investigator sites were done centrally via the internet. We randomly assigned patients (2:1) to receive up to 13 intramuscular injections of recombinant MAGE-A3 with AS15 immunostimulant (MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic; 300 µg MAGE-A3 antigen plus 420 µg CpG 7909 reconstituted in AS01B to a total volume of 0·5 mL), or placebo, over a 27-month period: five doses at 3-weekly intervals, followed by eight doses at 12-weekly intervals. The co-primary outcomes were disease-free survival in the overall population and in patients with a potentially predictive gene signature (GS-positive) identified previously and validated here via an adaptive signature design. The final analyses included all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment; analyses for efficacy were in the as-randomised population and for safety were in the as-treated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00796445. FINDINGS: Between Dec 1, 2008, and Sept 19, 2011, 3914 patients were screened, 1391 randomly assigned, and 1345 started treatment (n=895 for MAGE-A3 and n=450 for placebo). At final analysis (data cutoff May 23, 2013), median follow-up was 28·0 months [IQR 23·3-35·5] in the MAGE-A3 group and 28·1 months [23·7-36·9] in the placebo group. Median disease-free survival was 11·0 months (95% CI 10·0-11·9) in the MAGE-A3 group and 11·2 months (8·6-14·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·01, 0·88-1·17, p=0·86). In the GS-positive population, median disease-free survival was 9·9 months (95% CI 5·7-17·6) in the MAGE-A3 group and 11·6 months (5·6-22·3) in the placebo group (HR 1·11, 0·83-1·49, p=0·48). Within the first 31 days of treatment, adverse events of grade 3 or worse were reported by 126 (14%) of 894 patients in the MAGE-A3 group and 56 (12%) of 450 patients in the placebo group, treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse by 36 (4%) patients given MAGE-A3 vs six (1%) patients given placebo, and at least one serious adverse event by 14% of patients in both groups (129 patients given MAGE-A3 and 64 patients given placebo). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neoplasms (33 [4%] patients in the MAGE-A3 group vs 17 [4%] patients in the placebo group), general disorders and administration site conditions (25 [3%] for MAGE-A3 vs four [<1%] for placebo) and infections and infestations (17 [2%] for MAGE-A3 vs seven [2%] for placebo). No deaths were related to treatment. INTERPRETATION: An antigen-specific immunotherapeutic alone was not efficacious in this clinical setting. Based on these findings, development of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic for use in melanoma has been stopped. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Neoplasias/efeitos dos fármacos , Imunoconjugados/uso terapêutico , Imunoterapia/métodos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas de Neoplasias/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos de Neoplasias/genética , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Internacionalidade , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidade , Melanoma/patologia , Melanoma/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Melanoma Maligno Cutâneo
12.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 97(7): 834-837, 2017 Jul 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28206666

RESUMO

The aim of this 10-year monocentric prospective study was to determine a cut-off value of Fas/CD95 expression by peripheral blood CD4+ T lymphocytes in discriminating patients with mycosis fungoides from controls with cutaneous benign lymphocytic conditions. CD95 expression in peripheral blood CD4+ T lymphocytes was measured using flow cytometry in 330 patients referred for diagnosis: 104 with mycosis fungoides and 226 with eczema, psoriasis, drug reaction, etc. The sensitivity and specificity of different thresholds of CD95 expression were calculated regarding the final diagnosis of patients with mycosis fungoides or controls. CD95 expression higher than 30% reached a specificity of 91% in ruling out a diagnosis of mycosis fungoides, although overall CD95 expression was not significantly different from that of controls (p = 0.309) and sensitivity was very low (5%). Thus, peripheral CD95 expression higher than 30% could be used among the exclusion criteria in a multicomponent score for mycosis fungoides diagnosis.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Linfócitos T CD4-Positivos/imunologia , Micose Fungoide/sangue , Neoplasias Cutâneas/sangue , Receptor fas/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Área Sob a Curva , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Citometria de Fluxo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Micose Fungoide/diagnóstico , Micose Fungoide/imunologia , Fenótipo , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Regulação para Cima
14.
J Cutan Pathol ; 43(8): 702-6, 2016 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27080562

RESUMO

Cutaneous clear cell hidradenoma is an uncommon benign adnexal tumor which is not supposed to metastasize, contrary to its rare malignant counterpart, hidradenocarcinoma. We report the case of a 49-year-old man, who had had a stable inguinal lymph node enlargement for 6 years. An excision was performed and revealed an intra-nodal tumor, made of large clear cells with abundant cytoplasm and round nuclei without atypia or mitosis. The immunohistochemical staining showed diffuse positivity for keratin AE1/AE3, keratin 5/6 and p63, and focal staining with keratin 7, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and carcinous epithelial antigen (CEA), which underlined some ductular structures. Tumor cells were negative for renal markers PAX8 and CD10. Ki67 stained less than 1% of tumor cells. A translocation involving MAML2 gene was evidenced by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. No primary cutaneous tumor was found after extensive examination. Altogether, these results are in favor of an isolated nodal hidradenoma, for which we discuss two hypothesis: a primary nodal lesion, or a 'benign metastasis' of a cutaneous tumor. Cases of morphologically benign hidradenoma with lymph node involvement are exceptional. Our case, similar to every other reported case, was associated with an excellent prognosis, supporting the idea that these patients should not be overtreated.


Assuntos
Acrospiroma/patologia , Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias das Glândulas Sudoríparas/patologia , Acrospiroma/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Neoplasias das Glândulas Sudoríparas/genética , Transativadores , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Translocação Genética
15.
Dermatology ; 232(6): 721-730, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28384639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Previous reports highlighted the potential interest of cetuximab alone or in combination with chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To further evaluate the efficiency and safety of cetuximab in advanced cSCC, a single-center retrospective study including all patients treated with cetuximab alone or combined with carboplatin for locally advanced or metastatic cSCC was conducted in a tertiary referral center. The primary end point was the overall response rate (ORR) after 2 cycles of treatment. Secondary end points were best overall disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), best response duration, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profile. RESULTS: Of the 14 enrolled patients, no complete response was obtained after 2 cycles of treatment, but 3 partial responses and 6 stable diseases were observed. ORR and DCR were 21.4 and 64.3%, respectively. Median OS and PFS were 9.25 and 2.65 months, respectively. Median PFS was longer with combined treatment compared with cetuximab monotherapy (9.03 vs. 3.55 months). The safety profile was acceptable with a trend toward a relationship between acne-like rash and longer response (median PFS 5.2 vs. 2.2 months). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In all series including ours, disease control is usually rapidly obtained with cetuximab alone or combined with conventional chemotherapy, although with a minority of partial responses and no complete response. However, this control is of short duration in most cases. The safety profile is acceptable. A randomized phase III trial is warranted to better assess the benefit/risk ratio.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Cetuximab/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
16.
Lancet Oncol ; 16(6): 729-36, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25981813

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The Hedgehog pathway inhibitor vismodegib has shown clinical benefit in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma and is approved for treatment of patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma for whom surgery is inappropriate. STEVIE was designed to assess the safety of vismodegib in a situation similar to routine practice, with a long follow-up. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label trial, adult patients with histologically confirmed locally advanced basal cell carcinoma or metastatic basal cell carcinoma were recruited from regional referral centres or specialist clinics. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, and adequate organ function. Patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma had to have been deemed ineligible for surgery. All patients received 150 mg oral vismodegib capsules once a day on a continuous basis in 28-day cycles. The primary objective was safety (incidence of adverse events until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects), with assessments on day 1 of each treatment cycle (28 days) by principal investigator and coinvestigators at the site. Efficacy variables were assessed as secondary endpoints. The safety evaluable population included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Patients with histologically confirmed basal cell carcinoma who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the efficacy analysis. An interim analysis was pre-planned after 500 patients achieved 1 year of follow-up. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01367665. The study is still ongoing. FINDINGS: Between June 30, 2011, and Nov 6, 2014, we enrolled 1227 patients. At clinical cutoff (Nov 6, 2013), 499 patients (468 with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma and 31 with metastatic basal cell carcinoma) had received study drug and had the potential to be followed up for 12 months or longer. Treatment was discontinued in 400 (80%) patients; 180 (36%) had adverse events, 70 (14%) had progressive disease, and 51 (10%) requested to stop treatment. Median duration of vismodegib exposure was 36·4 weeks (IQR 17·7-62·0). Adverse events happened in 491 (98%) patients; the most common were muscle spasms (317 [64%]), alopecia (307 [62%]), dysgeusia (269 [54%]), weight loss (162 [33%]), asthenia (141 [28%]), decreased appetite (126 [25%]), ageusia (112 [22%]), diarrhoea (83 [17%]), nausea (80 [16%]), and fatigue (80 [16%]). Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. We recorded serious adverse events in 108 (22%) of 499 patients. Of the 31 patients who died, 21 were the result of adverse events. As assessed by investigators, 302 (66·7%, 62·1-71·0) of 453 patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma had an overall response (153 complete responses and 149 partial responses); 11 (37·9%; 20·7-57·7) of 29 patients with metastatic basal cell carcinoma had an overall response (two complete responses, nine partial responses). INTERPRETATION: This study assessed the use of vismodegib in a setting representative of routine clinical practice for patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma. Our results show that treatment with vismodegib adds a novel therapeutic modality from which patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma can benefit substantially. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.


Assuntos
Anilidas/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Basocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/patologia , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anilidas/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/classificação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia
18.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 95(7): 835-40, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25784178

RESUMO

The prognostic value of the sentinel lymph node in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) has been examined previously in heterogeneous retrospective studies. The current retrospective study included a homogeneous population of patients with a localized MCC, all staged with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Factors associated with 3-year progression-free survival were analysed using logistic regression. The sentinel lymph node was positive in 32% of patients. The recurrence rate was 26.9%. In first analyses (n = 108), gender (p = 0.0115) and the presence of immunosuppression (p = 0.0494) were the only significant independent factors. In further analyses (n = 80), excluding patients treated with regional radiotherapy, sentinel lymph node status was the only significant prognostic factor (p = 0.0281). Immunosuppression and positive sentinel lymph node are associated with a worse prognosis in patients with MCC. Nodal irradiation impacts on the prognostic value of the sentinel lymph node status.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/terapia , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Linfonodos/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/imunologia , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/patologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , França , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Fatores Sexuais , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
19.
Ann Pathol ; 35(2): 159-63, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25746660

RESUMO

Basal cell carcinoma with matrical differentiation is a very rare variant of basal cell carcinoma. To our knowledge, less than 30 cases have been reported. This tumor is composed of basaloid lobules showing a differentiation toward the pilar matrix cells. Recently, it has been demonstrated that beta-catenin would interfer with physiopathogenesis of matrical tumors, in particular pilomatricomas, but also basal cell carcinomas with matrical differentiation. This is a new case, with immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of beta-catenin, in order to explain its histogenesis.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Mãos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos
20.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 94(1): 45-9, 2014 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23824275

RESUMO

Treatment with ipilimumab, a monoclonal antibody that antagonizes cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), results in improved survival of patients with stage IIIc-IV melanoma. However, there is a lack of data on the efficacy of ipilimumab in patients with brain metastases. To evaluate the efficacy of ipilimumab for the treatment of brain metastasis in melanoma, a multicentre, retrospective analysis of 38 patients with brain metastases in melanoma, treated with ipilimumab in the context of the French Expanded Access Program, was performed. Three patients had a 3 partial response, 5 stable disease, 15 disease progression and 15 patients died during the induction phase due to disease progression. Median overall survival was 101 days (range 54-154). The brain metastases control rate was 16% (6/38). Ipilimumab may be effective in a few patients with central nervous system metastasis. However, patients with brain metastases and a low life expectancy may not benefit sufficiently from treatment with ipilimumab.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Ipilimumab , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Melanoma/secundário , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA