RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adrenal surgery has been radically changed by laparoscopy and it is reasonable to wonder whether the increase in the number of adrenalectomies is entirely justified. There is still debate on the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach, the advantages and drawbacks of which are discussed here. METHODS: Between 1983 and 2007, we performed 279 adrenalectomies in 264 consecutive patients, divided into two groups: before and after the advent of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). We analyzed the factors that increased the number of adrenalectomies in recent years. The LAs were further divided into three consecutive periods and the morbidity and conversion rates, and mean operating times were compared. RESULTS: More procedures were performed after the advent of LA, i.e., 55 (19.7%) beforehand versus 224 (80.3%) afterwards, irrespective of the type of disease, for instance: incidentaloma, 17.6% versus 82.4% (p \ 0.0001); pheochromocytoma, 20.7% versus 79.3% (p\0.0001); Conn's disease, 19.8% versus 80.2% (p \ 0.0001); Cushing's disease, 17.2% versus 82.8% (p\0.0001); cortical carcinoma, 30% versus 70% (p\0.001). Analyzing the three LA periods, operating times were the only statistically significant variable (p\0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The progressive increase in the number of adrenalectomies performed is due more to a better understanding of adrenal disease than to the availability of minimally invasive techniques. The choice of a laparoscopic approach (trans- or retroperitoneal) should depend on the surgeon's experience.
Assuntos
Doenças das Glândulas Suprarrenais/cirurgia , Adrenalectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estatísticas não ParamétricasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the gold standard technique for almost all the adrenal masses, but several Authors still debate about LA in pheochromocytoma. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare feasibility and safety of LA for pheo and analyze the results relative to LA for incidentaloma, Conn's disease and Cushing's disease. METHODS: Between January 1994 and March 2006, 167 LAs were carried out in 160 consecutive patients at our Department and 46 of them were affected by pheo, 60 by Conn's disease, 34 by adrenal incidentaloma and 20 by Cushing's disease. The following parameters were statistically analysed: Side and size of lesion, conversion to open adrenalectomy (OA), operating time, length of hospital stay, intraoperative blood pressure variations, blood loss, blood transfusion, need for postoperative analgesia, resumption of oral nutrition and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Successful LA was performed in 159 out of 167 cases (95.2%). Significant statistical advantages were observed for pheo, even if its average size was larger (p > 0.001), in terms of average operating time (p < 0.001), average length of hospital stay (p < 0.001), average intraoperative blood loss (p > 0.001), postoperative analgesia (p < 0.001), oral nutrition (p < 0.001). LA for patients with Cushing's disease (average length of hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss, p < 0.023 and p > 0.002 respectively) and with adrenal incidentaloma (intraoperative blood loss p < 0.009) seems to be a more challenging procedure. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of this relatively large monoinstitutional experience suggests that LA could be considered the most suitable method for removing pheochromocytoma. This tumour tends to be larger than most functional cortical adenomas, nevertheless it allows even a significant reduction in operating time with a faster recovery.