Early Implementation and Outcomes Among People with HIV who Accessed Long Acting Injectable-Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine at Two Ryan White Clinics in the U.S. South.

BACKGROUND: Using long-acting injectable cabotegravir/rilpivirine (LAI-CAB/RPV) as maintenance therapy for persons with HIV (PWH) may improve treatment access and outcomes, though real-world data on uptake are limited. SETTING: Two Ryan White clinics in Atlanta, Georgia Methods: Among PWH referred from 4/1/2021-9/15/2022 to switch to LAI-CAB/RPV, characteristics were ascertained at time of referral; and disposition (initiated; ineligible; uninterested; pending) was recorded as of 9/15/2022. Among patients initiated on CAB/RPV, we assessed the drug procurement process and clinical outcomes through 6/1/2023. RESULTS: Among 149 PWH referred, 74/149 (50%) initiated CAB/RPV as of 9/15/2022, of whom, characteristics were: median age 47 (Q1-Q3 36-55) years, 16% cisgender female, 72% Black race, median HIV duration 15 (Q1-Q3 9-19) years, and 64% had commercial health insurance. Of the 75 PWH not initiated, 35 were ineligible due to a clinical concern (n=16) or insurance issue (n=19); 15 patients changed their mind about switching; and 25 were pending eligibility review or therapy initiation. Median time from CAB/RPV prescription to initiation was 46 (Q1-Q3 29-78) days. Of 731 total injections administered (median 11 injections/patient), 95% were given within 7 days of the target treatment date. Nearly all patients were virally suppressed upon referral and remained suppressed through follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: At two clinics in the U.S. South, half of patients referred for LAI-CAB/RPV successfully accessed therapy nearly two years after U.S. drug approval. We identified barriers to uptake at the patient- and structural-levels, highlighting key areas to invest resource and personnel support to sustain and scale long-acting antiretroviral therapy programming.

Estimation of HIV-1 Incidence Using a Testing History-Based Method; Analysis From the Population-Based HIV Impact Assessment Survey Data in 12 African Countries.

BACKGROUND: Estimating HIV incidence is essential to monitoring progress in sub-Saharan African nations toward global epidemic control. One method for incidence estimation is to test nationally representative samples using laboratory-based incidence assays. An alternative method based on reported HIV testing history and the proportion of undiagnosed infections has recently been described. METHODS: We applied an HIV incidence estimation method which uses history of testing to nationally representative cross-sectional survey data from 12 sub-Saharan African nations with varying country-specific HIV prevalence. We compared these estimates with those derived from laboratory-based incidence assays. Participants were tested for HIV using the national rapid test algorithm and asked about prior HIV testing, date and result of their most recent test, and date of antiretroviral therapy initiation. RESULTS: The testing history-based method consistently produced results that are comparable and strongly correlated with estimates produced using a laboratory-based HIV incidence assay (ρ = 0.85). The testing history-based method produced incidence estimates that were more precise compared with the biomarker-based method. The testing history-based method identified sex-, age-, and geographic location-specific differences in incidence that were not detected using the biomarker-based method. CONCLUSIONS: The testing history-based method estimates are more precise and can produce age-specific and sex-specific incidence estimates that are informative for programmatic decisions. The method also allows for comparisons of the HIV transmission rate and other components of HIV incidence among and within countries. The testing history-based method is a useful tool for estimating and validating HIV incidence from cross-sectional survey data.