A case report of an endoscopically removed colonic lipoma.

Management of colonic lipomas is still debated due to rarity and lack of long term data primarily. We report a case of colonic lipoma removed endoscopically with synchronous polypectomy. This report discusses the various aspects to consider how to manage this neoplasia. Conventionally, lipomas greater than 2 cm are removed surgically. However, in selected cases, skilled endoscopists may remove larger colonic lipomas safely.

[Response rates following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast preserving treatment in patients with locally advanced breast cancer]. / A neoadjuváns, avagy primer szisztémás kemoterápia eredményei es az ezt követo emlomegtartó mutétek aránya a loko- regionálisan elorehaladott emlorákos betegeknél.

INTRODUCTION: The neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being used in the treatment of patients with locally advanced breast cancer. We describe the hypothesis of the biological behaviour of breast cancer supporting the reason for the existence of this treatment. The improvement of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being discussed as well as the advantages, disadvantages and problems of the treatment. THE AIM OF EXAMINATION: To study the results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and the proportion of breast preserving surgery after the treatment. METHODS: Sixty seven patients were given neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment between 01.01.1999 and 12.31.2003. Twenty three patients were stage III A while 35 stage III B and 9 stage III C. 63% of the patients received CEF chemotherapy and 19% were given MMM. 18% were given neoadjuvant Taxotere + Carboplatin and 4% were given Taxotere + Farmorubicin chemotherapy. RESULTS: After neoadjuvant chemotherapy 5 patients had SD (stable disease), 32 patients had MR (minor response) and in 28 cases patients had PR (partial response). Two patients showed pCR (complete pathologic response). Twenty patients (30%) had breast preserving surgery. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of our own experience neoadjuvant therapy is justified in patients with locally advanced breast cancer as they have bigger chance for breast preserving surgery. If mastectomy and axillary block dissection has to be carried out they are easier to perform. Taxans must be introduced for neoadjuvant treatment in order to improve our results. A longer follow-up is necessary before drawing final conclusions.

Measurement issues when assessing quality of life outcomes for different types of hernia mesh repair.

INTRODUCTION: The NHS is required to collect data from patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for inguinal hernia surgery. We explored the use of one such measure, the Carolinas Comfort Scale(®) (CCS), to compare long-term outcomes for patients who received two different types of mesh. The CCS questionnaire asks about mesh sensation, pain and movement limitations, and combines the answers into a total score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 684 patients were treated between January 2007 and August 2008 and were followed up in November 2009. RESULTS: Data on 215 patients who met the inclusion criteria were available (96 patients who received Surgipro™ mesh and 119 who received Parietene™ Progrip™ mesh). Recurrence rates were similar in the Surgipro™ group (2/96, 2.1%) and Progrip™ group (3/118, 2.5%) (Fisher's exact test = 1.0). Chronic pain occurred less frequently in the Surgipro™ group (11/95, 11.6%) than in the Progrip™ group (22/118, 18.6%) (p<0.157). Overall, 90% of CCS total scores indicated a good outcome (scores of 10 or less out of 115). A principal component analysis of the CCS found that responses clustered into two subscales: 'mesh sensation' and 'pain+movement limitations'. The Progrip™ group had a slightly higher mesh sensation score (p<0.051) and similar pain+movement limitations scores (p<0.120). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of quality of life outcomes related to different mesh types, the CCS subscales were more sensitive to differences in outcome than the total CCS score for the whole questionnaire. Future research should consider using the CCS subscales rather than the CCS total score.