Selective Inhibition of NaV1.8 with VX-548 for Acute Pain.

BACKGROUND: The NaV1.8 voltage-gated sodium channel, expressed in peripheral nociceptive neurons, plays a role in transmitting nociceptive signals. The effect of VX-548, an oral, highly selective inhibitor of NaV1.8, on control of acute pain is being studied. METHODS: After establishing the selectivity of VX-548 for NaV1.8 inhibition in vitro, we conducted two phase 2 trials involving participants with acute pain after abdominoplasty or bunionectomy. In the abdominoplasty trial, participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive one of the following over a 48-hour period: a 100-mg oral loading dose of VX-548, followed by a 50-mg maintenance dose every 12 hours (the high-dose group); a 60-mg loading dose of VX-548, followed by a 30-mg maintenance dose every 12 hours (the middle-dose group); hydrocodone bitartrate-acetaminophen (5 mg of hydrocodone bitartrate and 325 mg of acetaminophen every 6 hours); or oral placebo every 6 hours. In the bunionectomy trial, participants were randomly assigned in a 2:2:1:2:2 ratio to receive one of the following over a 48-hour treatment period: oral high-dose VX-548; middle-dose VX-548; low-dose VX-548 (a 20-mg loading dose, followed by a 10-mg maintenance dose every 12 hours); oral hydrocodone bitartrate-acetaminophen (5 mg of hydrocodone bitartrate and 325 mg of acetaminophen every 6 hours); or oral placebo every 6 hours. The primary end point was the time-weighted sum of the pain-intensity difference (SPID) over the 48-hour period (SPID48), a measure derived from the score on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (range, 0 to 10; higher scores indicate greater pain) at 19 time points after the first dose of VX-548 or placebo. The main analysis compared each dose of VX-548 with placebo. RESULTS: A total of 303 participants were enrolled in the abdominoplasty trial and 274 in the bunionectomy trial. The least-squares mean difference between the high-dose VX-548 and placebo groups in the time-weighted SPID48 was 37.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.2 to 66.4) after abdominoplasty and 36.8 (95% CI, 4.6 to 69.0) after bunionectomy. In both trials, participants who received lower doses of VX-548 had results similar to those with placebo. Headache and constipation were common adverse events with VX-548. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with placebo, VX-548 at the highest dose, but not at lower doses, reduced acute pain over a period of 48 hours after abdominoplasty or bunionectomy. VX-548 was associated with adverse events that were mild to moderate in severity. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals; VX21-548-101 and VX21-548-102 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT04977336 and NCT05034952.).

Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is an intravenous anesthetic associated with hypotension, respiratory depression, and injection-site pain. HSK3486 injectable emulsion (ciprofol) is a 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivative with fast onset and quick, stable recovery. Previous studies support HSK3486 as an effective, safe anesthetic with substantially less injection-site pain than propofol. The primary objective of this study was to investigate the noninferiority of HSK3486 compared with propofol in successful general anesthesia induction. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-five participants were enrolled in HSK3486-304, a multicenter, randomized (2:1), double-blind, propofol-controlled, phase 3 study evaluating HSK3486 for general anesthesia induction in adults undergoing elective surgery with tracheal intubation. The primary endpoint was successful anesthesia induction, defined as 1 or less on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. Key secondary endpoints were proportion of participants with injection-site pain on the Numerical Rating Scale of 1 or greater and a composite endpoint, including the proportion of participants successfully induced while maintaining the desired anesthetic depth and without substantial cardiac and respiratory events. Safety endpoints included adverse events, abnormal vital signs, and injection-site pain. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-one participants (HSK3486, n = 168; propofol, n = 83) were included in the analyses. General anesthesia was successfully induced in 97.0% versus 97.6% of participants with HSK3486 and propofol, respectively. The difference in success rate was -0.57% (95% CI, -5.4 to 4.2%); the noninferiority boundary of -8% was not crossed. Thirty participants (18.0%) had injection-site pain with HSK3486 versus 64 (77.1%) with propofol (P < 0.0001). Eighty-one participants (48.2%) with HSK3486 versus 42 (50.6%) with propofol (P = 0.8780) satisfied the composite endpoint. When injection-site pain was excluded, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events related to study drug was 17.9% for HSK3486 and 14.5% for propofol. CONCLUSIONS: The study met its primary objective and endpoint, demonstrating noninferiority of HSK3486 compared with propofol in successful anesthetic induction. Substantially less injection-site pain was associated with HSK3486 than with propofol.

Cognitive and Cerebrospinal Fluid Alzheimer's Disease-related Biomarker Trajectories in Older Surgical Patients and Matched Nonsurgical Controls.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia and/or surgery accelerate Alzheimer's disease pathology and cause memory deficits in animal models, yet there is a lack of prospective data comparing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Alzheimer's disease-related biomarker and cognitive trajectories in older adults who underwent surgery versus those who have not. Thus, the objective here was to better understand whether anesthesia and/or surgery contribute to cognitive decline or an acceleration of Alzheimer's disease-related pathology in older adults. METHODS: The authors enrolled 140 patients 60 yr or older undergoing major nonneurologic surgery and 51 nonsurgical controls via strata-based matching on age, sex, and years of education. CSF amyloid ß (Aß) 42, tau, and p-tau-181p levels and cognitive function were measured before and after surgery, and at the same time intervals in controls. RESULTS: The groups were well matched on 25 of 31 baseline characteristics. There was no effect of group or interaction of group by time for baseline to 24-hr or 6-week postoperative changes in CSF Aß, tau, or p-tau levels, or tau/Aß or p-tau/Aß ratios (Bonferroni P > 0.05 for all) and no difference between groups in these CSF markers at 1 yr (P > 0.05 for all). Nonsurgical controls did not differ from surgical patients in baseline cognition (mean difference, 0.19 [95% CI, -0.06 to 0.43]; P = 0.132), yet had greater cognitive decline than the surgical patients 1 yr later (ß, -0.31 [95% CI, -0.45 to -0.17]; P < 0.001) even when controlling for baseline differences between groups. However, there was no difference between nonsurgical and surgical groups in 1-yr postoperative cognitive change in models that used imputation or inverse probability weighting for cognitive data to account for loss to follow up. CONCLUSIONS: During a 1-yr time period, as compared to matched nonsurgical controls, the study found no evidence that older patients who underwent anesthesia and noncardiac, nonneurologic surgery had accelerated CSF Alzheimer's disease-related biomarker (tau, p-tau, and Aß) changes or greater cognitive decline.

The Association of Guideline-Directed Prophylaxis With Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Adult Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis recommend a risk-based approach in which the number of antiemetics administered is based on a preoperative estimate of PONV risk. These guidelines have been adapted by the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG) to serve as measures of clinician and hospital compliance with guideline-recommended care. However, the impact of this approach on clinical outcomes is not known. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study of adult patients undergoing general anesthesia from 2018 to 2021. Risk factors for PONV were defined using MPOG definitions: female sex, history of PONV or motion sickness, nonsmoker, inhaled anesthesia >60 minutes, high-risk procedure (cholecystectomy, laparoscopic, gynecologic), and age <50 years. Adequate prophylaxis was defined using the MPOG PONV-05 metric: at least 2 agents for patients with 1 to 2 risk factors and at least 3 agents for patients with 3+ risk factors. PONV was defined as documented PONV or receipt of rescue antiemetics. To estimate the association between adequate prophylaxis and PONV, we used Bayesian binomial models with overlap propensity score weighting. RESULTS: We included 76,703 cases (43% receiving adequate prophylaxis) with PONV occurring in 19%. In unadjusted and unweighted comparison, adequate prophylaxis was associated with increased incidence of PONV: median odds ratio 1.21 (95% credible interval [1.16-1.25]). However, after propensity score weighting and multivariable adjustment, adequate prophylaxis was associated with reduced relative and absolute risk for PONV: weighted marginal median odds ratio 0.90 [0.84-0.98] and absolute risk reduction (ARR) 1.6% [0.6%-2.6%]. There was evidence for a differential effect of adequate prophylaxis across the guideline-defined risk spectrum, with benefit seen in patients with 1 to 5 risk factors (conditional probabilities of benefit >0.81), but not in those at high predicted risk. Patient-specific, covariate-adjusted ARR was heterogeneous, with a median patient-specific conditional probability of benefit of 0.84 (95% credible interval, 0.73-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Guideline-directed PONV prophylaxis is associated with a modest reduction in PONV, although this effect is small and heterogeneous on the absolute scale. We found evidence for a differential association between adequate prophylaxis and PONV across the guideline-defined risk spectrum, with diminution in patients at very high predicted preoperative risk. While patient-specific benefit was heterogenous, most patients had reasonably high predicted probabilities of absolute benefit from a guideline-directed strategy. Further assessment of these associations in a multicenter setting, with more robust investigation of risk prediction methods will allow for better understanding of the optimal approach to PONV prophylaxis.

Maternal Morbidity According to Mode of Delivery Among Pregnant Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary hypertension have a high risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. It is unknown if a trial of labor carries a lower risk of morbidity in these patients compared to a planned cesarean delivery. The objective of this study was to examine the association of delivery mode with severe maternal morbidity events during delivery hospitalization among patients with pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Premier inpatient administrative database. Patients delivering ≥25 weeks gestation from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020, and with pulmonary hypertension were included. The primary analysis compared intended vaginal delivery (ie, trial of labor) to intended cesarean delivery (intention to treat analysis). A sensitivity analysis was conducted comparing vaginal delivery to cesarean delivery (as treated analysis). The primary outcome was nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity during the delivery hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion (4 or more units) and readmission to the delivery hospital within 90 days from discharge from delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 727 deliveries. In the primary analysis, there was no difference in nontransfusion morbidity between intended vaginal delivery and intended cesarean delivery groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.15). In secondary analyses, intended cesarean delivery was not associated with blood transfusion (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.34-1.50) or readmission within 90 days (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32-1.14). In the sensitivity analysis, cesarean delivery was associated with a 3-fold higher risk of nontransfusion morbidity compared to vaginal delivery (aOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.54-3.93), a 3-fold higher risk of blood transfusion (aOR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.17-7.99), and a 2-fold higher risk of readmission within 90 days (aOR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.09-4.46) compared to vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Among pregnant patients with pulmonary hypertension, a trial of labor was not associated with a higher risk of morbidity compared to an intended cesarean delivery. One-third of patients who required an intrapartum cesarean delivery had a morbidity event, demonstrating the increased risk of adverse events in this group.

Postoperative analgesic consumption for primary versus first repeat Cesarean delivery: a historical cohort study.

PURPOSE: It is unclear if postoperative pain experience and opioid consumption differ in patients undergoing primary vs repeat Cesarean delivery (CD) as prior studies have yielded conflicting results and none used the same patients as their own controls. We sought to compare opioid consumption and pain scores in patients undergoing both a primary and a first repeat CD, using the same patients as their own controls. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre historical cohort study of patients who underwent both a primary and a first repeat CD under neuraxial anesthesia between 1 January 2016 and 30 November 2022. The same standardized multimodal analgesic regimen was used for all patients. The primary outcome was opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents (OME) at 48 hr after surgery. Secondary outcomes included area under the curve for pain scores at 24 and 48 hr, and opioid consumption at 24 hr. RESULTS: We included 409 patients. In unadjusted analysis, there were no significant differences between primary and repeat CD in median [interquartile range] opioid consumption at 48 hr (45 [15-89] mg vs 45 [15-83] mg OME) or in any of the secondary outcomes. In the multivariable model adjusting for age, body mass index, anxiety, depression, priority, surgery duration, gestational age, receipt of postoperative ketorolac, and neuraxial type, repeat CD was still not associated with increased opioid consumption compared with primary CD (adjusted rate ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.51). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, we found no differences in postoperative opioid consumption or reported pain scores in patients who underwent both a primary and a first repeat CD.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous ne savons pas si l'expérience de la douleur postopératoire et la consommation d'opioïdes diffèrent chez la patientèle accouchant par césarienne pour la première fois ou pour la seconde fois. En effet, les études antérieures ont donné des résultats contradictoires et aucune n'a utilisé la même patientèle comme témoins. Nous avons cherché à comparer la consommation d'opioïdes et les scores de douleur chez les personnes parturientes exposées à la fois à un premier puis un deuxième accouchement par césarienne en recrutant les mêmes personnes en tant que leurs propres témoins. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte historique monocentrique auprès de personnes parturientes ayant subi à la fois une première et une seconde césarienne sous anesthésie neuraxiale entre le 1er janvier 2016 et le 30 novembre 2022. Le même régime analgésique multimodal standardisé a été utilisé pour toutes les personnes dans l'étude. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la consommation d'opioïdes en équivalents morphine oraux (EMO) 48 heures après la chirurgie. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires comprenaient la surface sous la courbe pour les scores de douleur à 24 et 48 heures, et la consommation d'opioïdes à 24 heures. RéSULTATS: Nous avons inclus 409 personnes. Dans l'analyse non ajustée, il n'y avait pas de différence significative entre le premier et le deuxième accouchement par césarienne en ce qui concerne la consommation médiane d'opioïdes [écart interquartile] à 48 heures (45 [15 à 89] mg vs 45 [15­83] mg EMO) ou dans l'un des critères d'évaluation secondaires. Dans le modèle multivarié ajusté en fonction de l'âge, l'indice de masse corporelle, l'anxiété, la dépression, la priorité, la durée de la chirurgie, l'âge gestationnel, l'administration de kétorolac postopératoire et le type d'anesthésie neuraxiale, une deuxième césarienne n'était toujours pas associée à une consommation accrue d'opioïdes par rapport à une première césarienne (rapport de taux ajusté, 1,20; intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 0,95 à 1,51). CONCLUSION: Dans cette étude rétrospective, nous n'avons trouvé aucune différence dans la consommation d'opioïdes postopératoires ou les scores de douleur rapportés chez la patientèle ayant accouché par césarienne pour la première ou pour la deuxième fois.

The 90% effective dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in parturients with super obesity: an up-down sequential allocation study.

PURPOSE: To determine the 90% effective dose (ED90) of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) in parturients with super obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 50 kg·m-2). METHODS: We enrolled parturients with BMI ≥ 50 kg·m-2 with term, singleton vertex pregnancies undergoing elective Cesarean delivery under CSE. An independent statistician generated the 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine dosing regimen in increments of 0.75 mg using a biased-coin up-down sequential allocation technique. This was combined with 15 µg fentanyl, 150 µg morphine, and normal saline to a volume of 2.05 mL. The initial and maximum doses were 9.75 mg and 12 mg, respectively. Participants, clinical team, and outcome assessors were blinded to the dose. The primary outcome was block success, defined as T6 block to pinprick within ten minutes and no intraoperative analgesic supplementation within 90 min of spinal injection. We determined the ED90 using logistic regression. RESULTS: We enrolled 45 parturients and included 42 in the analysis. All doses achieved a T6 level within ten minutes, and the primary outcome occurred in 0/1 (0%) of the 9.75-mg doses, 2/3 (67%) of the 10.5-mg doses, 21/27 (78%) of the 11.25-mg doses, and 11/11 (100%) of the 12-mg doses. The ED90 of hyperbaric bupivacaine was 11.56 mg (95% confidence interval, 11.16 to 11.99). Four parturients (9.5%) had sensory level higher than T2, but none was symptomatic or required general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: The estimated ED90 of hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl and morphine in parturients with super obesity undergoing Cesarean delivery under CSE was approximately 11.5 mg. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03781388); first submitted 18 December 2018.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Notre objectif était de déterminer la dose efficace à 90 % (DE90) de bupivacaïne hyperbare intrathécale pour l'accouchement par césarienne sous péri-rachianesthésie combinée (PRC) chez les personnes parturientes atteintes de super obésité (indice de masse corporelle [IMC] ≥ 50 kg·m−2). MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté des personnes parturientes ayant un IMC ≥ 50 kg·m−2 présentant des grossesses uniques à terme, en présentation céphalique et bénéficiant d'un accouchement par césarienne programmée sous PRC. Un·e statisticien·ne indépendant·e a généré le schéma posologique de bupivacaïne hyperbare à 0,75 % par incréments de 0,75 mg à l'aide d'une technique d'allocation séquentielle en escalier. La bupivacaïne a été combinée à 15 µg de fentanyl, 150 µg de morphine et à une solution physiologique salée jusqu'à un volume de 2,05 mL. Les doses initiale et maximale étaient respectivement de 9,75 mg et 12 mg. Les participant·es, l'équipe clinique et les personnes évaluant les résultats n'avaient pas connaissance de la dose. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la réussite du bloc, définie comme un bloc à T6 à la piqûre dans les dix minutes et aucune supplémentation analgésique peropératoire dans les 90 minutes suivant l'injection rachidienne. Nous avons déterminé la DE90 à l'aide d'une méthode de régression logistique. RéSULTATS: Nous avons recruté 45 personnes parturientes et en avons inclus 42 dans l'analyse. Toutes les doses ont atteint le niveau T6 en dix minutes, et le critère d'évaluation principal a été obtenu pour 0/1 (0 %) des doses de 9,75 mg, 2/3 (67 %) des doses de 10,5 mg, 21/27 (78 %) des doses de 11,25 mg et 11/11 (100 %) des doses de 12 mg. La DE90 de bupivacaïne hyperbare était de 11,56 mg (intervalle de confiance à 95 %, 11,16 à 11,99). Quatre personnes parturientes (9,5 %) ont affiché un niveau sensoriel supérieur à T2, mais aucune n'était symptomatique ni n'a nécessité d'anesthésie générale. CONCLUSION: La DE90 estimée de bupivacaïne hyperbare avec fentanyl et morphine chez les personnes parturientes hyperobèses bénéficiant d'une césarienne sous PRC était d'environ 11,5 mg. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03781388); soumis pour la première fois le 18 décembre 2018.

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Gravidas With Chronic Hypertension Compared to Matched Controls: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk in gravidas with chronic hypertension (cHTN) did not control for obesity as a risk factor for OSA. We therefore performed this study to evaluate whether OSA is more prevalent among gravidas with cHTN compared to normotensive gravidas matched for body mass index (BMI) and gestational age (primary outcome). We also assessed whether OSA is more severe when comorbid with cHTN in pregnancy (secondary outcome). METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study. Adult gravidas at 10-20 weeks of gestation, with and without cHTN, were enrolled and BMI matched. All subjects answered OSA screening questionnaires and underwent a home sleep test when they were between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation. Pregnancy outcomes were followed for all subjects. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to model the relationship between cHTN status and OSA. RESULTS: A total of 100 pregnant subjects (50 with cHTN and 50 normotensive) completed a home sleep test of 2 hours or more. There were no differences in demographic variables between the 2 groups, except that gravidas with cHTN were significantly older than normotensive subjects (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 34 ± 4 vs 30 ± 6 years; P < .001). OSA was more prevalent (64% vs 38%; P = .009; odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] 2.90 [1.30-6.65]; P = .01) and more severe in gravidas with cHTN (moderate or severe OSA 59% vs 21%; P = .009). After controlling for age, we found no overall association between cHTN on OSA risk (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI] 2.22 [0.92-5.40]; P = .076). However, among gravidas older than 25 years of age, cHTN was associated with higher odds of OSA (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 2.64 [1.06-6.71], P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: cHTN and age are important risk factors for OSA in gravidas. Gravidas with cHTN should be screened for OSA in early pregnancy. Future studies may validate screening tools that include cHTN and age, and investigate the role of OSA therapy in blood pressure control.

The Association of Guideline-Directed Prophylaxis with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis in pediatric patients recommend escalation of the number of antiemetics based on a preoperative estimate of PONV risk. These recommendations have been translated into performance metrics, most notably by the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group (MPOG), used at over 25 children's hospitals. The impact of this approach on clinical outcomes is not known. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective study of pediatric general anesthetic cases from 2018 to 2021. PONV risk factors were defined using MPOG definitions: age ≥3 years, volatile use ≥30 minutes, PONV history, long-acting opioids, female ≥12 years, and high-risk procedure. Adequate prophylaxis was defined using the MPOG PONV-04 metric: 1 agent for 1 risk factor, 2 agents for 2 risk factors, and 3 agents for 3+ risk factors. PONV was defined as documented postoperative nausea/emesis or administration of a rescue antiemetic. Given the nonrandomized allocation of adequate prophylaxis, we used Bayesian binomial models with propensity score weighting. RESULTS: A total of 14,747 cases were included, with PONV in 11% (9% adequate prophylaxis versus 12% inadequate). Overall, there was evidence for reduced incidence of PONV with adequate prophylaxis: weighted median odds ratio 0.82 (95% credible interval, 0.66-1.02; probability of benefit, 0.97) and weighted marginal absolute risk reduction 1.3% (-0.1% to 3.1%). In unweighted estimates, there was an interaction between sum of risk factors and the association of adequate prophylaxis with PONV, with reduced incidence in patients with 1 to 2 risk factors (probability of benefit 0.96 and 0.95) but increased incidence in patients with 3+ risk factors receiving adequate prophylaxis (probability of benefit 0, 0.01, and 0.03 for 3, 4, and 5 risk factors). This was attenuated by weighting, with persistent benefit in 1 to 2 risk factors (probability of benefit 0.90 and 0.94) but equalization of risk in 3+ risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline-directed PONV prophylaxis is inconsistently associated with incidence of PONV across the guideline-defined risk spectrum. This phenomenon, and its attenuation with weighting, is consistent with 2 points: dichotomous risk-factor summation ignores differential effects of individual components, and prognostic information might exist beyond these risk factors. PONV risk at a given sum of risk factors is not homogeneous, but rather is determined by the unique composition of risk factors and other prognostic attributes. These differences appear to have been identified by clinicians, prompting use of more antiemetics. Even after accounting for these differences, however, addition of a third agent did not further reduce risk.

Opioid-Sparing Multimodal Analgesia Use After Cesarean Delivery Under General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study in 729 US Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing analgesia after cesarean delivery is essential to quality of patient recovery. The American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology recommend multimodal analgesia (MMA). However, little is known about clinical implementation of these guidelines after cesarean delivery under general anesthesia (GA). We performed this study to describe the use of MMA after cesarean delivery under GA in the United States and determine factors associated with use of MMA, variation in analgesia practice across hospitals, and trends in MMA use over time. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women over 18 years who had a cesarean delivery under GA between 2008 and 2018 was conducted using the Premier Healthcare database (Premier Inc). The primary outcome was utilization of opioid-sparing MMA (osMMA), defined as receipt of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen with or without opioids and without the use of an opioid-combination drug. Any use of either agent within a combination preparation was not considered osMMA. The secondary outcome was use of optimal opioid-sparing MMA (OosMMA), defined as use of a local anesthetic technique such as truncal block or local anesthetic infiltration in addition to osMMA. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with use of osMMA, as well as variation across hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 130,946 patients were included in analysis. osMMA regimens were used in 11,133 patients (8.5%). Use of osMMA increased from 2.0% in 2008 to 18.8% in 2018. Black race (7.9% vs 9.3%; odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] 0.87 [0.81-0.94]) and Hispanic ethnicity (8.6% vs 10.0%; OR, 0.86 [0.79-0.950]) were associated with less receipt of osMMA compared to White and non-Hispanic counterparts. Medical comorbidities were generally not associated with receipt of osMMA, although patients with preeclampsia were less likely to receive osMMA (9.0%; OR, 0.91 [0.85-0.98]), while those with a history of drug abuse (12.5%; OR, 1.42 [1.27-1.58]) were more likely to receive osMMA. There was moderate interhospital variability in the use of osMMA (intraclass correlation coefficient = 38%). OosMMA was used in 2122 (1.6%) patients, and utilization increased from 0.8% in 2008 to 4.1% in 2018. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in osMMA utilization was observed after cesarean delivery under GA in this cohort of US hospitals. While increasing trends in utilization of osMMA and OosMMA are encouraging, there is need for increased attention to postoperative analgesia practices after GA for cesarean delivery given low percentage of patients receiving osMMA and OosMMA.

Maternal Cardiovascular Morbidity Events Following Preeclampsia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with preeclampsia are at high risk for long-term cardiovascular events, yet the short-term, acute cardiovascular complications that follow preeclampsia are understudied. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term, acute maternal cardiovascular morbidity events after delivery among patients with a diagnosis of preeclampsia versus those without this diagnosis. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the Premier inpatient database was used to examine a cohort of obstetric patients older than 18 years, who delivered from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020. A diagnosis of preeclampsia and preeclampsia with severe features during delivery hospitalization were the exposures of interest. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events during delivery hospital admission. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events during a readmission within 90 days of delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: In total, 4,488,759 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 158,114 (3.5%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia without severe features, and 117,940 (2.6%) with preeclampsia with severe features. Adjusted odds of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events were higher in patients with preeclampsia and in those with preeclampsia with severe features compared with those without preeclampsia during delivery hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] 1.87 [1.78-1.97] and 4.74 [4.44-5.05], respectively) and within 90 days (adjusted OR [95% CI] 2.01 [1.83-2.21] and 2.32 [2.10-2.57], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with both preeclampsia and preeclampsia with severe features have higher rates of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events than those without preeclampsia. Future studies are necessary to examine which patients with preeclampsia are at highest risk for cardiovascular complications.

Inflammatory changes in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with persistent pain and postpartum depression after elective Cesarean delivery: an exploratory prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Severe acute pain after Cesarean delivery increases the risk of developing persistent pain (~20% incidence) and postpartum depression (PPD) (~15% incidence). Both conditions contribute to maternal morbidity and mortality, yet early risk stratification remains challenging. Neuroinflammation has emerged as a key mechanism of persistent pain and depression in nonobstetric populations. Nevertheless, most studies focus on plasma cytokines, and the relationship between plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytokine levels is unclear. Our primary aim was to compare inflammatory marker levels between patients who developed the composite outcome of persistent pain and/or PPD vs those who did not. METHODS: We recruited term patients with singleton pregnancies undergoing elective Cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia into an exploratory prospective cohort study. We collected baseline demographic, obstetric, and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale information, and performed quantitative sensory tests. Plasma was collected preoperatively and 48 hr postoperatively. In the operating room, 10 mL of CSF was collected, followed by a standardized anesthetic. Intra- and postoperative management were according to standard practice. We obtained Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and pain scores at six weeks and three months after delivery. The primary outcome was persistent pain and/or PPD at three months. We analyzed the difference in inflammatory marker levels between the groups (primary aim) using two-sided Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Eighty participants were enrolled, and 63 patients completed the study; 23 (37%) experienced the primary outcome at three months. Preoperative plasma transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-ß1) concentration was higher in patients who developed the primary outcome compared with those who did not (median [interquartile range (IQR)], 2,879 [2,241-5,494] vs 2,292 [1,676-2,960] pg·mL-1; P = 0.04), while CSF IL-1ß concentration was higher in patients who developed the primary outcome than in those who did not (median [IQR], 0.36 [0.29-0.39] vs 0.30 [0.25-0.35] pg·mL-1; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We observed differential levels of plasma and CSF inflammatory biomarkers in patients who developed persistent pain and PPD compared with those who did not. We showed the feasibility of collecting plasma and CSF samples at Cesarean delivery, which may prove useful for future risk-stratification. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04271072); registered 17 February 2020.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La douleur aiguë sévère après un accouchement par césarienne augmente le risque de douleur persistante (~20 % d'incidence) et de dépression post-partum (DPP) (~15 % d'incidence). Ces deux conditions contribuent à la morbidité et à la mortalité maternelles, mais la stratification précoce des risques demeure difficile. La neuroinflammation est apparue comme un mécanisme clé de la douleur persistante et de la dépression dans les populations non obstétricales. Néanmoins, la plupart des études se concentrent sur les cytokines plasmatiques, et la relation entre les taux de cytokines plasmatiques et de liquide céphalorachidien (LCR) n'est pas claire. Notre objectif principal était de comparer les taux de marqueurs inflammatoires entre les patient·es qui ont eu un résultat composite de douleur persistante et/ou de DPP vs les personnes qui n'en ont pas eu. MéTHODE: Nous avons recruté des patient·es à terme avec des grossesses uniques bénéficiant d'une césarienne programmée sous anesthésie neuraxiale dans une étude de cohorte prospective exploratoire. Nous avons recueilli des informations démographiques de base, obstétricales et tirées de l'Échelle de dépression postnatale d'Édimbourg, et effectué des tests sensoriels quantitatifs. Le plasma a été prélevé avant l'opération et 48 heures après l'opération. En salle d'opération, 10 mL de LCR ont été recueillis, suivis d'un anesthésie standardisée. La prise en charge per- et postopératoire était conforme à la pratique courante. Nous avons obtenu les scores sur l'Échelle de dépression postnatale d'Édimbourg et les scores de douleur six semaines et trois mois après l'accouchement. Le critère d'évaluation principal était la douleur persistante et/ou la DPP à trois mois. Nous avons analysé la différence dans les niveaux de marqueurs inflammatoires entre les groupes (objectif principal) en utilisant des tests bilatéraux de Mann-Whitney. RéSULTATS: Quatre-vingts personnes ont été recrutées et 63 patient·es ont terminé l'étude; 23 (37 %) ont rapporté le critère d'évaluation principal à trois mois. Le facteur TGF-ß1 (transforming growth factor beta 1) plasmatique préopératoire était plus élevé chez les patient·es qui ont manifesté le critère d'évaluation principal par rapport aux personnes qui ne l'ont pas manifesté (médiane [écart interquartile (ÉIQ)], 2879 [2241-5494] vs 2292 [1676­2960] pg·mL−1; P = 0,04), tandis que le IL-1ß dans le LCR était plus élevé chez les patient·es qui ont manifesté le critère d'évaluation principal que chez les personnes qui ne l'ont pas manifesté (médiane [ÉIQ], 0,36 [0,29-0,39] vs 0,30 [0,25­0,35] pg·mL−1; P = 0,03). CONCLUSION: Nous avons observé des taux différentiels de biomarqueurs inflammatoires plasmatiques et de LCR chez les patient·es qui ont manifesté une douleur persistante et une DPP par rapport aux personnes qui n'en ont pas manifesté. Nous avons montré la faisabilité de la collecte d'échantillons de plasma et de LCR lors de l'accouchement par césarienne, ce qui pourrait s'avérer utile pour la stratification future des risques. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04271072); enregistrée le 17 février 2020.

Quality of Labor Analgesia with Dural Puncture Epidural versus Standard Epidural Technique in Obese Parturients: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: The dural puncture epidural technique may improve analgesia quality by confirming midline placement and increasing intrathecal translocation of epidural medications. This would be advantageous in obese parturients with increased risk of block failure. This study hypothesizes that quality of labor analgesia will be improved with dural puncture epidural compared to standard epidural technique in obese parturients. METHODS: Term parturients with body mass index greater than or equal to 35 kg · m-2, cervical dilation of 2 to 7 cm, and pain score of greater than 4 (where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable) were randomized to dural puncture epidural (using 25-gauge Whitacre needle) or standard epidural techniques. Analgesia was initiated with 15 ml of 0.1% ropivacaine with 2 µg · ml-1 fentanyl, followed by programed intermittent boluses (6 ml every 45 min), with patient-controlled epidural analgesia. Parturients were blinded to group allocation. The data were collected by blinded investigators every 3 min for 30 min and then every 2 h until delivery. The primary outcome was a composite of (1) asymmetrical block, (2) epidural top-ups, (3) catheter adjustments, (4) catheter replacement, and (5) failed conversion to regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Secondary outcomes included time to a pain score of 1 or less, sensory levels at 30 min, motor block, maximum pain score, patient-controlled epidural analgesia use, epidural medication consumption, duration of second stage of labor, delivery mode, fetal heart tones changes, Apgar scores, maternal adverse events, and satisfaction with analgesia. RESULTS: Of 141 parturients randomized, 66 per group were included in the analysis. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the dural puncture epidural and standard epidural groups in the primary composite outcome (34 of 66, 52% vs. 32 of 66, 49%; odds ratio, 1.1 [0.5 to 2.4]; P = 0.766), its individual components, or any of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of differences in quality of labor analgesia between the two techniques in this study does not support routine use of the dural puncture epidural technique in obese parturients.

ED 90 of Intrathecal Chloroprocaine With Fentanyl for Prophylactic Cervical Cerclage: A Sequential Allocation Biased-Coin Design.

BACKGROUND: Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anesthetic that has been used for spinal anesthesia in outpatient surgery. There is limited experience with spinal chloroprocaine for prophylactic cervical cerclage placement. We sought to determine the effective dose of intrathecal chloroprocaine for 90% of patients (ED90) undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage placement. We hypothesized that the ED90 of intrathecal chloroprocaine when combined with 10-ug fentanyl would be between 33 and 54 mg. METHODS: In this prospective 2-center double-blinded study, we enrolled women undergoing prophylactic cervical cerclage placement under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. A predetermined dose of intrathecal 3% chloroprocaine with fentanyl 10 ug was administered. The initial dose was 45-mg intrathecal chloroprocaine. Subsequent dose adjustments were determined based on the response of the previous subject using an up-down sequential allocation with a biased-coin design. A dose was considered effective if at least a T12 block was achieved, and there was no requirement for epidural activation or intraoperative analgesic supplementation during the procedure. The primary outcome was the ED90 of intrathecal chloroprocaine with fentanyl 10 ug. Secondary outcomes included duration of surgery, anesthetic side effects, time to resolution of motor and sensory block, time to achieve recovery room discharge criteria, and patient satisfaction with anesthetic care. Isotonic regression was used to estimate the ED90. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled into the study. Two patients were excluded (1 protocol violation and 1 failed block). In total, 45 patients completed the study. The estimated ED90 (95% confidence interval) for intrathecal chloroprocaine combined with fentanyl 10 ug was 49.5 mg (45.0-50.1 mg). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) duration of surgery was 15 (10-24) minutes. Resolution of the motor (Bromage 0) and sensory block took a median time of 60 (45-90) minutes and 90 (75-105) minutes, respectively. The median time to achieve recovery room discharge criteria was 150 (139-186) minutes. Satisfaction with anesthetic management was high in all patients. There were no reports of postdural puncture headache or transient neurological symptoms postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The ED90 of intrathecal chloroprocaine combined with fentanyl 10 ug was 49.5 mg. Intrathecal chloroprocaine was associated with rapid block recovery and high patient satisfaction, which makes it well suited for outpatient obstetric procedures.

Uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair in Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on maternal outcomes associated with uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair in women undergoing Cesarean delivery. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials comparing uterine exteriorization with in situ repair during Cesarean delivery. Primary outcomes were intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) and perioperative decrease in hemoglobin concentration. Secondary outcomes were postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), estimated blood loss, fever, endometritis, wound infection, intraoperative and postoperative pain, postoperative analgesic use, duration of surgery and hospital stay, and time to return of bowel function. RESULTS: Twenty studies with 20,909 parturients were included. Exteriorization was associated with higher risk of IONV (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66 to 2.63; I2 = 0%), with no difference in perioperative hemoglobin concentration decrease (mean difference, - 0.06 g·dL-1; 95% CI, - 0.20 to 0.08; I2 = 97%) compared with in situ repair. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, PONV, duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay, time to return of bowel function, fever, endometritis, or wound infection. Postoperative pain (incidence of pain graded > 5/10) at six hours (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.03; I2 = 0%) was higher with exteriorization, but there was no difference in need for rescue analgesia (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 0.89 to 6.90; I2 = 94%) or pain scores at 24 hr compared with in situ repair. CONCLUSIONS: In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, uterine exteriorization was associated with an increased risk of IONV but no significant change in perioperative hemoglobin decrease compared with in situ repair. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020190074); registered 5 July 2020.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avons réalisé une mise à jour d'une revue systématique et une méta-analyse portant sur les issues maternelles associées à l'extériorisation de l'utérus par rapport à une réparation in situ chez les femmes accouchant par césarienne. MéTHODE: Nous avons recherché des études randomisées contrôlées comparant l'extériorisation de l'utérus à la réparation in situ pendant un accouchement par césarienne. Les critères d'évaluation principaux étaient les nausées et vomissements peropératoires (NVPerO) et la réduction périopératoire de l'hémoglobine. Les critères d'évaluation secondaires étaient les nausées et vomissements postopératoires (NVPO), la perte de sang estimée, la fièvre, l'endométrite, l'infection de la plaie, la douleur per- et postopératoire, l'utilisation d'analgésiques postopératoires, la durée de la chirurgie et du séjour à l'hôpital, et le délai jusqu'au retour du transit. RéSULTATS: Vingt études portant sur 20 909 parturientes ont été incluses. L'extériorisation était associée à un risque plus élevé de NVPerO (rapport de cotes [RC], 2,09; intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC], 1,66 à 2,63; I2 = 0 %), sans différence dans la réduction de l'hémoglobine périopératoire (différence moyenne, − 0,06 g·dL-1; IC 95 %, − 0,20 à 0,08; I2 = 97 %) par rapport à une réparation in situ. Il n'y avait pas de différences significatives dans la perte de sang estimée, les besoins transfusionnels, les NVPO, la durée de la chirurgie, la durée du séjour à l'hôpital, le délai jusqu'au retour du transit, la fièvre, l'endométrite ou l'infection de la plaie. La douleur postopératoire (incidence de la douleur graduée > 5/10) à six heures (RC, 1,64; IC 95 %, 1,31 à 2,03; I2 = 0 %) était plus élevée avec une extériorisation, mais il n'y avait aucune différence dans les besoins d'analgésie de secours (RC, 2,48; IC 95 %, 0,89 à 6,90; I2 = 94 %) ou les scores de douleur à 24 heures par rapport à une réparation in situ. CONCLUSION: Dans cette revue systématique et méta-analyse mises à jour, l'extériorisation utérine était associée à un risque accru de NVPerO, mais à aucun changement significatif dans la réduction de l'hémoglobine périopératoire par rapport à la réparation in situ. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42020190074); enregistrée le 5 juillet 2020.

Transfusion Requirements with Hybrid Management of Placenta Accreta Spectrum Incorporating Targeted Embolization and a Selective Use of Delayed Hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the number of units of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) treated with or without a multidisciplinary algorithm that includes placental uterine arterial embolization (P-UAE) and selective use of either immediate or delayed hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study of deliveries conducted at a tertiary care hospital from 2001 to 2018 with pathology-confirmed PAS. Those with previable pregnancies or microinvasive histology were excluded. To improve the equity of comparison, analyses were made separately among scheduled and unscheduled cases, therefore patients were assigned to one of four cohorts as follows: (1) scheduled/per-algorithm, (2) scheduled/off-algorithm, (3) unscheduled/per-algorithm, or (4) unscheduled/off-algorithm. Primary outcomes included RBCs transfused and estimated blood loss (EBL). Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and disposition. RESULTS: Overall, 95 patients were identified, with 87 patients meeting inclusion criteria: 36 treated per-algorithm (30 scheduled and 6 unscheduled) and 51 off-algorithm patients (24 scheduled and 27 unscheduled). Among scheduled deliveries, 9 (30.0%) patients treated per-algorithm received RBCs compared with 20 (83.3%) patients treated off-algorithm (p < 0.01), with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) and 6.0 (2.5, 7.5) units transfused (p = 0.13), respectively. Among unscheduled deliveries, 5 (83.3%) per-algorithm patients were transfused RBCs compared with 25 (92.6%) off-algorithm patients (p = 0.47) with a median (IQR) of 4.0 (2.0, 6.0) and 8.0 (3.0, 10.0) units transfused (p = 0.47), respectively. Perioperative complications were similar between cohorts. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary algorithm including P-UAE and selective use of delayed hysterectomy is associated with a lower rate of blood transfusion in scheduled but not unscheduled cases. KEY POINTS: · An algorithm with delayed hysterectomy had less transfusion in scheduled, but not unscheduled, cases.. · Over time, more cases were managed per algorithm; among scheduled cases, the transfusion rate and volume transfused decreased.. · There were similar transfusion outcomes among off-algorithm cases, regardless if delivery was scheduled..

The association between intravenous iron for antenatal anemia and postnatal depression: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: Determine if intravenous iron for antenatal anemia is associated with reduced incidence of postnatal depression (PND) within 12 months. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult women with antenatal anemia (hemoglobin value of < 11.0 g/dL within 3 months before delivery). PND was defined as Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) or Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) ≥ 10. Data on intravenous iron, lowest hemoglobin concentration, EPDS and PHQ-9 scores, insurance status, history of anxiety, depression, chronic pain, and substance use, obstetric complications, labor analgesia, and mode of delivery were obtained. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was estimated and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed with adjustment for potential confounders with absolute SMD of ≥ 0.1. RESULTS: Data from 3988 women were analyzed. The 368 (9.2%) women who received intravenous iron therapy had lower antenatal hemoglobin levels, were more likely to be African American or single/widowed women, and more commonly had  Medicaid coverage, repeat cesarean delivery, and history of depression compared to those who did not receive intravenous iron therapy. Unadjusted analysis showed women who received intravenous iron had higher incidence of PND (18.5%) than those who did not (13.4%) (p = 0.008). Multivariable analysis showed no significant association between intravenous iron and PND incidence (aOR 1.21, 95%CI 0.89-1.63, p = 0.232), although history of depression (aOR 2.42, 95%CI 1.91-3.08, p < 0.001), higher gravidity (aOR 1.09, 95%CI 1.02-1.17, p = 0.016), and Medicaid insurance (aOR 1.44, 95%CI 1.16-1.80, p = 0.001) were independently associated with PND. CONCLUSION: Intravenous iron for antenatal anemia was not associated with significant change in the incidence of PND.

A quality improvement initiative to reduce venous thromboembolism on a gynecologic oncology service.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the effects of implementation of a venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis quality improvement (QI) initiative on a gynecologic oncology service at a single institution. METHODS: Prior to 2018, no consensus gynecologic oncology VTE prophylaxis protocol existed at the authors' academic institution. Published, evidence-based guidelines were reviewed to create a standardized VTE risk stratification algorithm. Interventions to improve perioperative heparin administration and sequential compression device (SCD) compliance as well as provider/patient education efforts were introduced in January 2018. Initial efforts included nursing and patient SCD education, internal dissemination of VTE prophylaxis guidelines, and creation of a VTE 'dashboard' to track performance. During a second phase, VTE prophylaxis guidelines were reviewed and further refined, non-compliant operative cases reviewed weekly, and guidelines incorporated into the electronic medical record. Performance was measured using Tableau data software (www.tableau.com) and by separately evaluating adherence to the developed guidelines in three retrospective cancer-enriched surgical cohorts (2016-2017, 2018, 2019). RESULTS: Compared to the baseline period, we observed a reduction in VTE rate during the 2018-2019 VTE QI implementation period from 2.1% (19/905) to 1.0% (20/2015, p = 0.02) among gynecologic oncology inpatients. In the retrospective cancer-enriched cohorts, adherence to evidence based guidelines improved: 31.0% in 2016-2017, 69.1% in 2018, and 82.4% in 2019 (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of peri-operative blood transfusion, surgical site infections, hematomas, or vaginal cuff dehiscences. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a robust VTE prophylaxis QI initiative has resulted in improved VTE prophylaxis guideline adherence and higher rates of pre-operative heparin administration.

Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology: Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean.

The purpose of this article is to provide a summary of the Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean delivery (ERAC) protocol written by a Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP) committee and approved by the SOAP Board of Directors in May 2019. The goal of the consensus statement is to provide both practical and where available, evidence-based recommendations regarding ERAC. These recommendations focus on optimizing maternal recovery, maternal-infant bonding, and perioperative outcomes after cesarean delivery. They also incorporate management strategies for this patient cohort, including recommendations from existing guidelines issued by professional organizations such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Society of Anesthesiologists. This consensus statement focuses on anesthesia-related and perioperative components of an enhanced recovery pathway for cesarean delivery and provides the level of evidence for each recommendation.

Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery in the United States 2008-2018: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Optimizing analgesia after cesarean delivery is a priority and requires balancing adequate pain relief with the risk of analgesics-associated adverse effects. Current recommendations are for use of a multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesic regimen that includes neuraxial morphine combined with scheduled nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and scheduled acetaminophen. Furthermore, recent studies recommend scheduled acetaminophen with as-needed opioids in lieu of acetaminophen-opioid combination drugs to reduce opioid consumption and optimize analgesia. However, the extent of utilization of this recommended regimen in the United States is unclear. We therefore performed this retrospective study to evaluate postoperative analgesic regimens utilized after cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia, examine variability across institutions, evaluate changes over time in postoperative analgesic practice, and examine factors associated with the use of neuraxial morphine and of multimodal analgesia. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was approved by the Duke University Institutional Review Board. Parturients who underwent cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia from 2008 to 2018 were included. Data were extracted from a nationwide inpatient administrative-financial database (Premier Inc, Charlotte, NC) and included parturient characteristics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and charges for administered medications. The primary outcome was the postoperative analgesic regimen utilized during hospitalization, including utilization of neuraxial morphine and of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain control. We also examined the factors associated with the use of neuraxial morphine and of the multimodal regimen incorporating neuraxial morphine, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen. RESULTS: Data from 804,752 parturients were analyzed. Of this cohort, 75.8% received neuraxial morphine, 93.2% received NSAIDs, 28.4% received acetaminophen, and 81.3% received acetaminophen-opioid combination drugs. Only 6.1% received the currently recommended regimen of neuraxial morphine with NSAIDs and acetaminophen, with this percentage increasing from 1.3% in 2008 to 15.0% in 2018. On the other hand, 58.9% received neuraxial morphine, NSAIDs, and an acetaminophen-opioid combination drug, with this regimen being utilized in 57.0% of cases in 2008 and 58.1% in 2018. The hospital in which the patient was treated accounted for 54.7% of the variation in receipt of neuraxial morphine and 41.2% in the variation in receipt of multimodal analgesia with neuraxial morphine, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen, with this variability in receipt of neuraxial morphine and of multimodal analgesia being largely independent of patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively few parturients received the currently recommended multimodal analgesic regimen of neuraxial morphine with NSAIDs and acetaminophen after cesarean delivery. Additionally, the majority received acetaminophen-opioid combination drugs rather than plain acetaminophen. Further studies should investigate the implications for patient outcomes.