RESUMO
The rapid growth in the number of electric bicycles (e-bicycles) has greatly improved daily commuting for residents, but it has also increased traffic collisions involving e-bicycles. This study aims to develop an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system for e-bicycles to reduce rear-end collisions. A framework for the AEB system composed of the risk recognition function and collision avoidance function was designed, and an e-bicycle following model was established. Then, numerical simulations were conducted in multiple scenarios to evaluate the effectiveness of the AEB system under different riding conditions. The results showed that the probability and severity of rear-end collisions involving e-bicycles significantly decreased with the application of the AEB system, and the number of rear-end collisions resulted in a 68.0% reduction. To more effectively prevent rear-end collisions, a low control delay (delay time) and suitable risk judgment criteria (TTC threshold) for the AEB system were required. The study findings suggested that when a delay time was less than or equal to 0.1 s and the TTC threshold was set at 2 s, rear-end collisions could be more effectively prevented while minimizing false alarms in the AEB system. Additionally, as the deceleration rate increased from 1.5 m/s2 to 4.5 m/s2, the probability and average severity of rear-end collisions also increased by 196.5% and 42.9%, respectively. This study can provide theoretical implications for the design of the AEB system for e-bicycles. The established e-bicycle following model serves as a reference for the microscopic simulation of e-bicycles.
RESUMO
Work zone area on roads is a critical component of road networks which concerns the safety of workers and passing by drivers. However, the passive speed reduction and lane changes caused by lane closure have led to frequent rear-end collisions in work zone areas. To help drivers better anticipate work zone situation and reduce collision risks, this paper proposes two types of in-vehicle warnings for work zone areas: Leading Vehicle Brake Warning (LVBW), and Lane-Closed Warning & Leading Vehicle Brake Warning (LCW & LVBW). The LVBW delivers a danger warning message to drivers upon the brake of the leading vehicle, while the LCW & LVBW provides an additional work-zone position message to remind drivers to decelerate in advance. A driving simulator experiment was conducted with 44 participants (24 males and 20 females) to test drivers' performance in work zone area under different conditions, comprising two warning types (LVBW vs. LCW & LVBW), four warning times (3 s, 5 s, 7 s and 9 s) and two visibility conditions (clear and foggy weather). The results showed significant safety benefits of the lane-closed warning message under the LCW & LVBW condition. In contrast, the warning of leading vehicle's brake in both LVBW and LCW & LVBW conditions had limited efficacy, which indicates that earlier warning about lane-closure is important to assist drivers in anticipating the complex situations in work zones. Drivers' speed control and collision avoidance performances were impaired in fog, but the impairment was compensated by the warning messages. Compared with male drivers, female drivers tend to be more cautious when approaching the work zone areas. Overall, this study plays a pioneering role in developing effective safety countermeasures for work zone areas and providing strong support for implementing in-vehicle warning technologies.
Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito , Condução de Veículo , Acidentes de Trânsito/prevenção & controle , Simulação por Computador , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Equipamentos de Proteção , Tempo de Reação , Tempo (Meteorologia)RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: To assist drivers in avoiding rear-end collisions, many early warning systems have been developed up to date. Autonomous braking technology is also used as the last defense to ensure driver's safety. METHOD: By taking the accuracy and timeliness of automatic system control into account, this paper proposes a rear-end Real-Time Autonomous Emergency Braking (RTAEB) system. The system inserts brake intervention based on drivers' real-time conflict identification and collision avoidance performance. A driving simulator-based experiment under different traffic conditions and deceleration scenarios were conducted to test the different thresholds to trigger intervention and the intervention outcomes. The system effectiveness is verified by four evaluation indexes, including collision avoidance rate, accuracy rate, sensitivity rate, and precision rate. RESULTS: The results showed that the system could help avoid all collision events successfully and enlarge the final headway distance, and a TTC threshold of 1.5â¯s and a maximum deceleration threshold of -7.5â¯m/s2 could achieve the best collision avoidance effect. The paper demonstrates the situations that are more inclined to trigger the RTAEB (i.e., a sudden brake of the leading vehicle and a small car-following distance). Moreover, the study shows that driver characteristics (i.e., gender and profession) have no significant association with system trigger. Practical Applications: The study suggests that development of collision avoidance systems design should pay attention to both the real-time traffic situation and drivers' collision avoidance capability under the present situation.