A phase II randomized trial of metastasis-directed therapy with alpha emitter radium-223 in men with oligometastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (MEDAL).

BACKGROUND: The significance of metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer has been widely discussed, and targeted therapy for progressive sites is a feasible option as a multidisciplinary treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). When oligometastatic CRPC with only bone metastases progresses after targeted therapy, it tends to progress as multiple bone metastases. The progression of oligometastatic CRPC after targeted therapy may be due in part to the presence of micrometastatic lesions that, though undetected on imaging, were present prior to targeted therapy. Thus the systemic treatment of micrometastases in combination with targeted therapy for progressive sites is expected to enhance the therapeutic effect. Radium-223 dichloride (radium-223) is a radiopharmaceutical that selectively binds to sites of increased bone turnover and inhibits the growth of adjacent tumor cells by emitting alpha rays. Therefore, for oligometastatic CRPC with only bone metastases, radium-223 may enhance the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy for active metastases. METHODS: This phase II, randomized trial of Metastasis-Directed therapy with ALpha emitter radium-223 in men with oligometastatic CRPC (MEDAL) is designed to assess the utility of radium-223 in combination with metastasis-directed radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic CRPC confined to bone. In this trial, patients with oligometastatic CRPC with three or fewer bone metastases on whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-DWI) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive radiotherapy for active metastases plus radium-223 or radiotherapy for active metastases alone. The prior use of androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy and prostate-specific antigen doubling time will be used as allocation factors. The primary endpoint will be radiological progression-free survival against progression of bone metastases on WB-DWI. DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomized trial to evaluate the effect of radium-223 in combination with targeted therapy in oligometastatic CRPC patients. The combination of targeted therapy for macroscopic metastases with radiopharmaceuticals targeting micrometastasis is expected to be a promising new therapeutic strategy for patients with oligometastatic CRPC confined to bone. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) (jRCTs031200358); Registered on March 1, 2021, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031200358.

[Multidisciplinary Treatment Aids Long-Term Stage â £ Pancreatic Cancer Survival-A Case Report].

A 56-year-old man presented at a local hospital with nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, and white stool. CT scan showed hypovascular mass in pancreatic uncinate process and multiple peritoneal nodules. The diagnosis was stage Ⅳ pancreatic cancer(unresectable), and the patient underwent chemotherapy with GEM plus nab-PTX. He also claimed a severe cancer pain at presentation and was prescribed oxycodone 60 mg/day. After 43 months of chemotherapy, the duodenum was obstructed by tumor growth on CT scan, then he underwent duodenal stent placement. He eventually needed a total of 3 duodenal stenting for re-obstruction. He could keep adequate oral intake after the treatment. He also suffered from severe pain by progressed tumor, then underwent celiac plexus block and palliative radiation therapy(20 Gy/5 Fr). Afterwards his cancer pain has been under control. He underwent chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX for next step. A patient with stage Ⅳ pancreatic cancer may survive for a long period with adequate QOL as a result of multidisciplinary treatment.

[A Case of Pulmonary Metastasis from Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Treated by Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy].

We report a case of pulmonary metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma successfully treated by stereotactic body radiotherapy. The patient was a 70-year-old woman who underwent extended left hemi-hepatectomy with bile duct reconstruction for hilar cholangiocarcinoma at the age of 67. Pathological diagnosis indicated a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma. We followed up the patient without adjuvant chemotherapy. Nineteen months after the initial resection, a solitary pulmonary metastasis was detected in the right upper lobe. The patient received gemcitabine plus cisplatin(GC)therapy. After 4 courses of GC therapy, the size of the pulmonary metastasis was unchanged. Therefore, we performed a thoracoscopic wedge resection. Pathological diagnosis indicated that the pulmonary metastasis originated from the cholangiocarcinoma. Fifteen months after the pulmonary resection, another solitary pulmonary metastasis was detected in the left lower lobe. As the patient refused further chemotherapy, we performed stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)(50 Gy/4 Fr). An adverse event of Grade 1 radiation pneumonitis was observed. The metastasis disappeared after SBRT. Twenty-eight months after SBRT and 70 months after the initial surgery, the patient is alive without recurrence.

Combination Therapy for a Severe Axillary Keloid with Abscesses: A Case Report.

Keloids are laterally growing fibroproliferative skin disorders. Severe keloids spread widely, sometimes over joints, thus significantly limiting motor function. They are associated with recurrent, very painful draining infections. Here, we report a case of a giant keloid that was successfully treated by combination therapy comprising surgery (partial resection followed by local flap transposition) and subsequent radiotherapy and steroid-plaster therapy. The keloid was first noticed when the patient was 7 years old at the site of a Bacille Calmette-Guérin vaccination she had received on her left shoulder in infancy. The keloid grew rapidly and widely after adulthood. A malignant tumor was suspected at another hospital, but a biopsy at age 45 years indicated the lesion was a keloid. Later, the keloid grew from the shoulder onto the chest and back and over the anterior axilla. At age 62 years, the patient was referred to our hospital. Under general anesthesia, the keloid was partially resected and the wound was covered with a local flap. Postoperative radiotherapy was performed 1 week later. The residual keloid was treated for 18 months with steroid tape. At 18 months after surgery, no recurrence of the keloid was observed. The patient had no pain or movement restriction. She was extremely satisfied with the results and considered the treatment to have improved her quality of life. While a standard strategy for severe keloid remains to be established, combination therapy comprising surgery, postoperative radiotherapy, and steroid-plaster therapy that aims to reduce inflammation and skin tension may be an option.

The outcome of a multidisciplinary approach incorporating neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S1 for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Aim: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of a multidisciplinary approach incorporating neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with S1 (S1-NACRT) for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Methods: The medical records of 132 patients who received S1-NACRT for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from 2010 to 2019 were reviewed. The S1-NACRT regimen consisted of S1 at a dose of 80-120 mg/body/day together with 1.8 Gy of radiation in 28 fractions. The patients were re-evaluated 4 weeks after S1-NACRT completion, and a pancreatectomy was then considered. Results: Adverse events of S1-NACRT ≥grade 3 occurred in 22.7% of the patients, and 1.5% discontinued therapy. Of the 112 patients who underwent a pancreatectomy, 109 underwent R0 resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy with relative dose intensity ≥50% was administered to 74.1% of the patients who underwent resection. The median overall survival of all patients was 47 months, and the median overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients who underwent resection was 71 and 32 months, respectively. According to the multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival in patients who underwent resection, negative margin status (hazard ratio: 0.182; P = 0.006) and relative dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy ≥50% (hazard ratio 0.294; P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary approach incorporating S1-NACRT for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma demonstrated acceptable tolerability and good local control and resulted in comparable survival benefits.

Preliminary Study on Establishing a Heart Rate Variability-based Method for Objectively Evaluating Bone Metastasis Pain.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to establish an objective evaluation method for pain due to bone metastasis, based on heart rate variability (HRV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, patients who underwent radiotherapy for painful bone metastases were enrolled. Pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS), and anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Autonomic and physical activities were evaluated by measuring HRV using a wearable device. NRS, HADS, and R-R interval (RRI) values were obtained upon starting, completing, and 3-5 weeks after radiotherapy. RESULTS: Between July 2020 and July 2021, 11 patients were enrolled. The median average NRS score was 5 (range=2-10). HADS-assessed median anxiety and depression scores were 8 (range=1-13 and 2-21). For patients with an NRS score ≥4, NRS score was significantly associated with low-frequency/high-frequency (LF/HF) component ratio (p=0.03). Heart rate during physical activity was significantly higher than resting heart rate; however, mean resting LF/HF was significantly higher than LF/HF during physical activity. During rest, excluding patients with a HADS depression score ≥7 in an NRS score 1-3, there was a trend for a positive correlation between the NRS score and the mean LF/HF (p=0.07). CONCLUSION: HRV measurements can objectively evaluate pain due to bone metastasis. However, we must consider that the effects of mental status, such as depression, on LF/HF also affect HRV in patients with cancer with mild pain.

Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Separation Surgery Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a postoperative treatment option for spinal metastases. Because data on surgery with SBRT are limited to retrospective studies, this single-center, single-arm, phase 2 study aimed to prospectively evaluate the outcomes of separation surgery and SBRT for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with symptomatic MESCC due to a solid carcinoma were enrolled. The protocol for treatments comprised preoperative embolization, separation surgery, and spine SBRT. Surgical procedures were performed via the posterior approach, with decompression and a fixation procedure. The prescribed dose for spine SBRT was 24 Gy in 2 fractions. The primary endpoint was the 12-month local failure rate. The secondary endpoints were ambulatory functions and adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 33 patients were registered between November 2017 and October 2019. All patients met the inclusion criteria, and all but 1 completed the protocol treatment. Of the included patients, 23 (70%) had radioresistant lesions. The Bilsky grade at registration was 1c in 3 patients, 2 in 8 patients, and 3 in 21 patients. The median follow-up duration after registration was 15 months (range, 3-35 months). Three months after the administration of treatments according to the protocol, 90% of patients (26 of 29) had disease of Bilsky grade ≤1. The 12-month local failure rate was 13%. Twenty patients could walk normally or with a cane 12 months after registration. Radiation-induced myelopathy, radiculopathy, and vertebral compression fracture were observed in 0, 1, and 6 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Separation surgery with SBRT for MESCC was effective in decompression and long-term local control. These findings suggest that larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to compare SBRT with conventional radiation therapy.

Safety of biliary stent placement followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer with bile duct obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with malignant bile duct obstruction due to pancreatic cancer are often initially treated with biliary stent placement, concurrent chemoradiotherapy with stents poses a potential risk of increased toxicity. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the safety of biliary stent placement followed by definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent either a plastic stent or a self-expanding metallic stent placement for malignant bile duct obstruction before definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50.4 Gy. Gemcitabine, TS-1 plus Gemcitabine, or TS-1 was the concurrent chemotherapy/regimen. The primary endpoint was the rate of biliary stent-related toxicities, defined as biliary bleeding, duodenal perforation, or bile duct perforation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. Plastic stents were placed in 23 patients and self-expanding metallic stent in seven patients at the start of irradiation. The median follow-up time was 20 (range, 2-63) months, and 27 patients (90%) completed concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Biliary stent-related toxicity (grade 3 biliary bleeding) was confirmed in one patient (3%) with a plastic stent 9 months after concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The median duration of locoregional control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 31.1, 7.3, and 10.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stent placement followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy was not associated with an apparent increase in toxicity and may be an appropriate treatment for patients with locally advanced pancreatic head cancer with bile duct obstruction.

Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer-A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: Although stereotactic body radiation therapy is one of the standard treatments for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer, in the case of central tumors it carries the risk of severe adverse events for serial organs. Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is considered a reasonable alternative to treat central tumors. We have been treating central tumors with accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy using a 75 Gy/25 fr/5 weeks regimen, and we compared the results with those of stereotactic body radiation therapy using 48 Gy/4 fr/1 week. METHODS: Patients with central tumors and/or unfit for 1-hour fixation were candidates for accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy. Based on the proximity to the biologically effective dose at 10 Gy, above accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen was adopted. RESULTS: From October 2003 to December 2010, 159 patients, who received either accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy (103 cases) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (56 cases), were included in the analysis. In the accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy group, 40 (39%) cases were central tumors, whereas all cases were peripheral tumors in the stereotactic body radiation therapy group. Overall 5-year local control and survival rates were 81.9% (95% confidence interval 73.6%-90.1%) and 46.5% (95% confidence interval 36.7%-56.2%), respectively for the accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy group, and 75.4% (95% confidence interval 63.0%-87.8%) and 44.6% (95% confidence interval 31.6%-57.7%), respectively for the stereotactic body radiation therapy group (n.s.). Among central tumors, ultracentral tumors (21 cases) and the remaining central tumors (19 cases) were similar in both local control and survival. On multivariate analysis, hazard ratios for accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiation therapy were <1 for both local control and survival. Pulmonary toxicity was similar in both groups. No serial organ toxicity was observed for central tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with a 75 Gy/25 fr/5 weeks regimen is promising in that it can obtain similar local control and survival results to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and it can control both central and peripheral tumors without any serial organ toxicities. Based on these results, prospective multicenter trials are worth conducting, especially for ultracentral tumors.