CRH stimulation improves 18F-FDG-PET detection of pituitary adenomas in Cushing's disease.

OBJECTIVE: In MRI-negative cases Cushing's disease (CD), surgeons perform a more extensive exploration of the pituitary gland, with fewer instances of hormonal remission. 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has a limited role in detecting adenomas that cause CD (corticotropinomas). Our previous work demonstrated corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation leads to delayed, selective glucose uptake in corticotropinomas. Here, we prospectively evaluated the utility of CRH stimulation in improving 18F-FDG-PET detection of adenomas in CD. METHODS: Subjects with a likely diagnosis of CD (n = 27, 20 females) each underwent two 18F-FDG-PET studies [without and with ovine-CRH (oCRH) stimulation] on a high-resolution PET platform. Standardized-uptake-values (SUV) in the sella were calculated. Two blinded neuroradiologists independently read 18F-FDG-PET images qualitatively. Adenomas were histopathologically confirmed, analyzed for mutations in the USP8 gene and for glycolytic pathway proteins. RESULTS: The mean-SUV of adenomas was significantly increased from baseline (3.6 ± 1.5) with oCRH administration (3.9 ± 1.7; one-tailed p = 0.003). Neuroradiologists agreed that adenomas were visible on 21 scans, not visible on 26 scans (disagreed about 7, kappa = 0.7). oCRH-stimulation led to the detection of additional adenomas (n = 6) not visible on baseline-PET study. Of the MRI-negative adenomas (n = 5), two were detected on PET imaging (one only after oCRH-stimulation). USP8 mutations or glycolytic pathway proteins were not associated with SUV in corticotropinomas. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest that oCRH-stimulation may lead to increased 18F-FDG uptake, and increased rate of detection of corticotropinomas in CD. These results also suggest that some MRI invisible adenomas may be detectable by oCRH-stimulated FDG-PET imaging. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: 18F-FDG-PET imaging with and without CRH stimulation was performed under the clinical trial NIH ID 12-N-0007 (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01459237). The transsphenoidal surgeries and post-operative care was performed under the clinical trial NIH ID 03-N-0164 (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00060541).

Cytokine Microdialysis for Real-Time Immune Monitoring in Glioblastoma Patients Undergoing Checkpoint Blockade.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignancy of the brain, with a dismal prognosis. Immunomodulation via checkpoint inhibition has provided encouraging results in non-CNS malignancies, but prediction of responders has proven to be challenging in glioblastoma patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of patients who have a measurable increase of interferon gamma levels in brain tumor tissue after their first dose of nivolumab, and to evaluate the safety of using brain tumor microdialysis to monitor for immune response while evaluating the safety of the combination of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) and anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) checkpoint inhibition. METHODS: The study design is a single-center, nonrandomized phase 1 clinical trial. Up to 15 adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma will be enrolled with the goal of 10 patients completing the trial over an anticipated 18 mo. Patients will undergo biopsy; placement of microdialysis catheters and lumbar drains; treatment with anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibition; comprehensive immune biomarker collection; tumor resection; and then treatment with anti-PD-1 and anti-LAG-3 checkpoint inhibition until progression. EXPECTED OUTCOMES: We expect interferon gamma levels to increase in the brain as measured via microdialysis in treated patients. Based on published reports, microdialysis in this patient population is expected to be safe, and anti-LAG-3 and anti-PD-1 combined will likely have a similar side effect profile to other checkpoint inhibitor combinations. DISCUSSION: The failure of recent trials of immune therapies in glioblastoma underscores the need to appropriately measure response in the treated tissue. This trial may provide insight on indicators of which patients will respond to immune therapy.