Rescuer fatigue in the elderly: standard vs. hands-only CPR.

BACKGROUND: Hands-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (HO-CPR) is recommended as an alternative to standard CPR (STD-CPR). Studies have shown a degradation of adequate compressions with HO-CPR after 2 min when performed by young, healthy medical students. Elderly rescuers' ability to maintain an adequate compression rate and depth until emergency medical services (EMS) arrives is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The specific aim of this study was to compare elderly rescuers' ability to maintain adequate compression rate and depth during HO-CPR and STD-CPR in a manikin model. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized crossover study, 17 elderly volunteers performed both HO-CPR and STD-CPR, separated by at least 2 days, on a manikin model for 9 min each. The primary endpoint was the number of adequate chest compressions (> 38 mm) delivered per minute. Secondary endpoints were total compressions, compression rate, and the number of breaks taken for rest. RESULTS: There was no difference in the number of adequate compressions between groups in the first minute; however, the STD-CPR group delivered significantly more adequate chest compressions in minutes 2-9 (p<0.05). The total number of compressions delivered was significantly greater in the HO-CPR than STD-CPR group when considering the entire resuscitation period. A significantly greater number of rescuers took breaks for rest during HO-CPR than STD-CPR. CONCLUSIONS: Although HO-CPR resulted in a greater number of overall compressions than STD-CPR, STD-CPR resulted in a greater number of adequate compressions in all but the first minute of resuscitation.

Single rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: can anyone perform to the guidelines 2000 recommendations?

BACKGROUND: The Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care recommend that for adult cardiac arrest the single rescuer performs "two quick breaths followed by 15 chest compressions." This cycle is continued until additional help arrives. Previous studies have shown that lay persons and medical students take 16 +/- 1 and 14 +/- 1 s, respectively, to perform these "two quick breaths." The purpose of this study was to determine the time required for trained professional paramedic firefighters to deliver these two breaths and the effects that any increase in the time it takes to perform rescue breathing would have on the number of chest compressions delivered during single rescuer BLS CPR. We hypothesized that trained professional rescuers would also take substantially longer then the Guidelines recommendation for delivering the two rescue breaths before every 15 compressions during simulated single rescuer BLS CPR. METHODS: Twenty-four paramedic firefighters currently certified to perform BLS CPR were evaluated for their ability to deliver the two recommended breaths within 4 s according to the AHA 2000 CPR Guidelines. Alternatively, a simplified technique of continuous chest compression BLS CPR (CCC) was also taught and compared with standard BLS CPR (STD). Without revealing the purpose of the study the paramedics were asked to perform single rescuer BLS CPR on a recording Resusci Anne while being videotaped. RESULTS: The mean length of time needed to provide the "two quick breaths" during STD-CPR was 10 +/- 1 s. The mean number of chest compressions/min delivered with AHA BLS CPR was only 44 +/- 2. Continuous chest compression CPR resulted in 88 +/- 5 compressions delivered per minute (STD versus CCC; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Trained professional emergency rescue workers perform rescue breathing somewhat faster than lay rescuers or medical students, but still require two and one half times longer than recommended. The time required to perform these breaths significantly decreases the number of chest compressions delivered per minute. This may affect outcome as experimental studies have shown that more than 80 compressions delivered per minute are necessary for survival from prolonged cardiac arrest.

Uninterrupted chest compression CPR is easier to perform and remember than standard CPR.

INTRODUCTION: It has long been observed that CPR skills rapidly decline regardless of the modality used for teaching or criteria used for testing. Uninterrupted chest compression CPR (UCC-CPR) is a proposed alternative to standard single rescuer CPR (STD-CPR) for laypersons in witnessed unexpected cardiac arrest in adults. It delivers substantially more compressions per minute and may be easier to remember and perform than standard CPR. METHODS: In this prospective study, 28 medical students were taught STD-CPR and UCC-CPR and then were tested on each method at baseline (0), 6, and 18 months after training. The students' performance for at least 90 s of CPR was evaluated based on video and Laerdal Skillreporter Resusci Anne recordings. RESULTS: The mean number of correct chest compressions delivered per minute trended down over time in STD-CPR (23 +/- 3, 19 +/- 4 , and 15 +/- 3; P = 0.09) but stayed the same in UCC-CPR (43 +/- 9, 38 +/- 7, and 37 +/- 7 = 0.91) at 0, 6, and 18 months, respectively. The mean percentage of chest compressions delivered correctly fell over time in STD-CPR (54 +/- 6%, 35 +/- 6%, and 32 +/- 6%; P = 0.02) but stayed the same in UCC-CPR (34 +/- 5%, 41 +/- 7%, and 38 +/- 8%) at 0, 6, and 18 months, respectively. The number of chest compressions delivered per minute was higher in UCC-CPR at 0, 6, and 18 months (113 versus 44, P < 0.0001; 94 versus 47, P < 0.0001; and 92 versus 44, P < 0.001). The greater number of chest compressions was due to a mean ventilaroty pause of 13-14 s during STD-CPR at all three time points. CONCLUSIONS: Chest compression performance during STD-CPR declined in repeated testing over 18 months whereas there was minimal decline in chest compressions performance on repeated testing of UCC-CPR. In addition, substantially more chest compressions were delivered during UCC-CPR compared to STD-CPR at all time points primarily because of long pauses accompanying rescue breathing.

Single-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 'two quick breaths'--an oxymoron.

The Guidelines 2000 for CPR and ECC recommend for single lay-rescuers performing basic life support, "two quick breaths followed by 15 chest compressions", repeated until professional help arrives. It is uncertain that this can actually be accomplished by the majority of lay rescuers. We evaluated 53 first-year medical students after completing BLS CPR training to determine if they could deliver the goal of 80 compressions per minute when following this AHA BLS recommendation. Alternatively, a simplified technique of uninterrupted chest compression (UCC) BLS CPR was also taught and compared with standard BLS CPR (STD). The mean number of chest compressions/minute delivered with AHA BLS CPR was only 43 +/- 1 immediately after initial training and 49 +/- 2 when tested 6 months later. Uninterrupted chest compression BLS resulted in 113 +/- 2 compressions/min delivered immediately after training and 91 +/- 4 six months later (STD versus UCC; P < 0.0001). The mean length of time needed to provide the two breaths during STD-CPR was 14 +/- 1 and 12 +/- 1s (immediately after first training and six months after training). For STD-CPR, the mean minute ventilation was poor immediately after initial training (3.3 +/- 0.3 l/min) and further declined (1.9 +/- 0.4 l/min) at 6 months (P = 0.003). For single rescuer basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation, motivated BLS CPR-trained medical students take nearly as long as previously reported for middle-aged lay individuals to deliver these "two quick breaths". The "Guidelines 2000" recommendation for "two quick breaths" is an oxymoron, as it averages more than 13s. New recommendations for single-rescuer CPR should be considered that emphasize uninterrupted chest compressions.

Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

OBJECTIVES: Continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCC-CPR) has been advocated as an alternative to standard CPR (STD-CPR). Studies have shown that CCC-CPR delivers substantially more chest compressions per minute and is easier to remember and perform than STD-CPR. One concern regarding CCC-CPR is that the rescuer may fatigue and be unable to maintain adequate compression rate or depth throughout an average emergency medical services response time. The specific aim of this study was to compare the effects of fatigue on the performance of CCC-CPR and STD-CPR on a manikin model. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized crossover study involving 53 medical students performing CCC-CPR and STD-CPR on a manikin model. Students were randomized to their initial CPR group and then performed the other type of CPR after a period of at least two days. Students were evaluated on their performance of 9 minutes of CPR for each method. The primary endpoint was the number of adequate chest compressions (at least 38 mm of compression depth) delivered per minute during each of the 9 minutes. The secondary endpoints were total compressions, compression rate, and the number of breaks taken for rest. The students' performance was evaluated on the basis of Skillreporter Resusci Anne (Laerdal, Wappingers Falls, NY) recordings. Primary and secondary endpoints were analyzed by using the generalized linear mixed model for counting data. RESULTS: In the first 2 minutes, participants delivered significantly more adequate compressions per minute with CCC-CPR than STD-CPR, (47 vs. 32, p = 0.004 in the 1st minute and 39 vs. 29, p = 0.04 in the 2nd minute). For minutes 3 through 9, the differences in number of adequate compressions between groups were not significant. Evaluating the 9 minutes of CPR as a whole, there were significantly more adequate compressions in CCC-CPR vs. STD-CPR (p = 0.0003). Although the number of adequate compressions per minute declined over time in both groups, the rate of decline was significantly greater in CCC-CPR compared with STD-CPR (p = 0.0003). The mean number of total compressions delivered in the first minute was significantly greater with CCC-CPR than STD-CPR (105 per minute vs. 58 per minute, p < 0.001) and did not change over 9 minutes in either group. There were no differences in compression rates or number of breaks between groups. CONCLUSIONS: CCC-CPR resulted in more adequate compressions per minute than STD-CPR for the first 2 minutes of CPR. However, the difference diminished after 3 minutes, presumably as a result of greater rescuer fatigue with CCC-CPR. Overall, CCC-CPR resulted in more total compressions per minute than STD-CPR during the entire 9 minutes of resuscitation.