Utility of an anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based fusion assay for diagnosis of soft tissue tumors in cytology.

BACKGROUND: Fine-needle aspiration specimens from soft tissue tumors are complicated by lack of tissue architecture and limited material for ancillary testing. There are little data on the feasibility of next-generation sequencing techniques for fusion detection on soft tissue cytology specimens. This study explored the role of an anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based gene fusion assay in aiding the diagnosis of mesenchymal neoplasms on cytology samples. METHODS: The laboratory information system was queried for cytology specimens that had undergone testing by anchored multiplex PCR. After exclusion of epithelial and hematolymphoid neoplasms, clinical and pathologic information was collected on the remaining cases. RESULTS: There were 1609 cytology specimens tested with anchored multiplex PCR. Of these, 48 (3%) were cytology specimens from mesenchymal tumors. Anchored multiplex PCR was positive for a reportable fusion transcript in 14 of 48 cases (29%); there was no fusion detected in 32 cases (67%), and there was insufficient tissue for analysis in two cases (4%). The detectable fusion partners included ALK (n = 4), STAT6 (n = 4), EWSR1 (n = 3), and one each of SS18, YAP1, and PHF1. Of the cases in which a fusion partner was detected, eight of 14 were disease-defining on cytology preparation, and six of 14 provided molecular confirmation of a metastatic focus of a previously diagnosed tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The anchored, multiplex PCR-based gene fusion assay is a powerful orthogonal tool in helping diagnose mesenchymal neoplasms on cytology specimens. The material obtained for cytologic analysis yields sufficient quality/quantity of tissue in the majority of cases tested.

Interobserver agreement and diagnostic challenges of Congo red staining for amyloid detection on fat pad aspiration biopsies.

INTRODUCTION: Congo red staining of fat pad fine needle aspiration specimens is a method utilized for evaluation of amyloid deposition. However, these specimens can pose diagnostic challenges for cytopathologists. As part of ongoing internal quality improvement measures, the objective of this study was to evaluate the intradepartmental interobserver agreement of these specimens and to identify factors that affect the variability of the interpretations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 7 participants, which included 3 trainees, 3 cytopathologists, and 1 cytotechnologist. Each participant reviewed 50 Congo red stained fat pad fine needle aspiration slides. The interpretations were categorized into 3 groups: negative, indeterminate/suspicious, and positive. The participants also noted any interpretation challenges they encountered for each case. RESULTS: There was only slight interobserver agreement among all participants (κ = 0.133). Stratified by participant group, the interobserver agreement among the trainees was slight bordering on poor (κ = 0.028) and among cytopathologists was fair (κ = 0.249). The highest agreement between 2 observers was between 2 cytopathologists and the level of agreement was moderate bordering on fair (κ = 0.426). There were only 3 cases (6.0%) with full agreement among observers, while in 25 cases (50.0%), there were 2 category differences in interpretations. The primary diagnostic challenge reported by participants was when weak or focal birefringence was encountered as well as cases complicated by poor stain quality and overstaining. CONCLUSIONS: We found only slight interobserver agreement among all study participants. A major area of challenge was cases with weak birefringence resulting in high variance of interpretation among participants.