Medical Procedure Services in Internal Medicine Residencies in the US: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The number of procedures performed by internal medicine residents in the United States (US) is declining. An increasing proportion of residents do not feel confident performing essential invasive bedside procedures and, upon graduation, desire additional training. Several residency programs have utilized the medical procedure service (MPS) to address this issue. We aim to summarize the current state of evidence by systematically evaluating the effect of the MPS on resident education, comfort, and training, as well as patient safety and procedural outcomes in the US. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of all studies reporting the use of an MPS with supervision from a board-certified physician in internal medicine residencies in the US. Database search was performed on PubMed, Embase, ERIC, and Cochrane Library from January 2000 to November 2020 for relevant studies. Quality of evidence assessment and random-effects proportion meta-analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of nine studies reporting on 3879 procedures performed by MPS were identified. Procedures were safely performed, with a pooled complication rate of 2.1% (95% CI: 1.0-3.5) and generally successful, with a pooled success rate of 94.7% (95% CI: 90.8-97.7). The range of procedures performed by residents under MPS was 6.7-72.8 procedures per month (n = 9) compared to 4.3-64.4 procedures (n = 4) without MPS. MPS significantly increased confidence, comfort, and use of appropriate safety measures among residents. CONCLUSION: There are a limited number of published studies on MPS supervised by a board-certified physician in US internal medicine residencies. Procedures performed by MPS are generally successfully completed and safe. MPS benefits internal medicine residents training by improving competency, comfort, and confidence.

Creation of a medical procedure service in a tertiary medical center: Blueprint and procedural outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Medical Procedure Services (MPS) may represent a solution to the educational gap in procedural training among internal medicine residents and the unmet need for the clinical provision of non-urgent inpatient procedures. However, there is little guidance available to help launch an MPS. Furthermore, procedural outcomes from a newly initiated MPS, including those comparing trainees versus attending physicians, are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To describe the blueprint used in the design, implementation, and ongoing oversight of an MPS and to report its procedural outcomes. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), Nashville, Tennessee. INTERVENTION: The launch of an MPS at a large tertiary academic hospital. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: 6,152 procedural consultations resulting in 5,320 attempted procedures over a four-and-a-half year period. RESULTS: The primary proceduralist was a supervised resident in 58.7% (3124 /5,320) and an attending in 41.3% (2,196/5,320) of procedures. The overall success rate was 91.1% (95% CI: 90.3-91.9%) and the major complication rate was 0.7% (95% CI: 0.5-1.0%). There was no difference in the mean number of attempts required to complete a procedure (1.6 vs 1.5 attempts, p=0.68) and the complication rates between supervised residents and attending proceduralists, respectively (20/3,124 vs 20/2,196, p=0.26). CONCLUSION: At a tertiary academic medical center, the implementation and maintenance of MPS is feasible, safe, and results in high rates of successful procedures performed by supervised residents. Procedures performed by supervised residents require comparable number of attempts for completion and carry similar risks as those performed alone by attendings.