Effect of Sevoflurane Anesthesia on Diastolic Function: A Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of sevoflurane on left ventricular diastolic function is not well understood. We hypothesized that parameters of diastolic function may improve under sevoflurane anesthesia in patients with preexisting diastolic dysfunction compared to patients with normal diastolic function. METHODS: This observational study included 60 patients undergoing breast surgery or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were assigned to diastolic dysfunction (n = 34) or normal (n = 26) groups of septal e' < 8 or ≥ 8.0 cm/s on the first thoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed before anesthesia. During anesthesia, sevoflurane was maintained at 1 to 2 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) to maintain the bispectral index at 40 to 50. At the end of surgery, the second TTE was performed under 0.8 to 1 MAC of sevoflurane with the patient breathing spontaneously without ventilator support. Primary end point was the percentage change (Δ) of e' on 2 TTEs (Δe'). Secondary end points were ΔE/e', Δleft atrial volume index (ΔLAVI), and Δtricuspid regurgitation maximum velocity (ΔTR Vmax). These percentage changes (Δ) were compared between diastolic dysfunction and normal groups. RESULTS: e' (Δe': 30 [6, 64] vs 0 [-18, 11]%; P < .001), mitral inflow E wave velocity (E), mitral inflow E/A ratio (E/A), and mitral E velocity deceleration time (DT) improved significantly in diastolic dysfunction group compared to normal group. LAVI decreased in diastolic dysfunction group but did not reach statistical significance between the 2 groups (ΔLAVI:-15 [-31, -3] vs -4 [-20, 10]%, P = .091). ΔE/e' was not different between the 2 groups (11 [-16, 26] vs 12 [-9, 22]%, P = .853) (all: median [interquartile range, IQR]). TR was minimal in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function, including septal e', E, E/A, and DT, improved with sevoflurane anesthesia in patients with preexisting diastolic dysfunction, but remained unchanged in patients with normal diastolic function.

Driving pressure-guided ventilation and postoperative pulmonary complications in thoracic surgery: a multicentre randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Airway driving pressure, easily measured as plateau pressure minus PEEP, is a surrogate for alveolar stress and strain. However, the effect of its targeted reduction remains unclear. METHODS: In this multicentre trial, patients undergoing lung resection surgery were randomised to either a driving pressure group (n=650) receiving an alveolar recruitment/individualised PEEP to deliver the lowest driving pressure or to a conventional protective ventilation group (n=650) with fixed PEEP of 5 cm H2O. The primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary complications within 7 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The modified intention-to-treat analysis included 1170 patients (mean [standard deviation, sd]; age, 63 [10] yr; 47% female). The mean driving pressure was 7.1 cm H2O in the driving pressure group vs 9.2 cm H2O in the protective ventilation group (mean difference [95% confidence interval, CI]; -2.1 [-2.4 to -1.9] cm H2O; P<0.001). The incidence of pulmonary complications was not different between the two groups: driving pressure group (233/576, 40.5%) vs protective ventilation group (254/594, 42.8%) (risk difference -2.3%; 95% CI, -8.0% to 3.3%; P=0.42). Intraoperatively, lung compliance (mean [sd], 42.7 [12.4] vs 33.5 [11.1] ml cm H2O-1; P<0.001) and Pao2 (median [inter-quartile range], 21.5 [14.5 to 30.4] vs 19.5 [13.5 to 29.1] kPa; P=0.03) were higher and the need for rescue ventilation was less frequent (6.8% vs 10.8%; P=0.02) in the driving pressure group. CONCLUSIONS: In lung resection surgery, a driving pressure-guided ventilation improved pulmonary mechanics intraoperatively, but did not reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications compared with a conventional protective ventilation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04260451.

Driving Pressure during Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: Driving pressure (plateau minus end-expiratory airway pressure) is a target in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, and is proposed as a target during general anesthesia for patients with normal lungs. It has not been reported for thoracic anesthesia where isolated, inflated lungs may be especially at risk. WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: In a double-blinded, randomized trial (292 patients), minimized driving pressure compared with standard protective ventilation was associated with less postoperative pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome. BACKGROUND: Recently, several retrospective studies have suggested that pulmonary complication is related with driving pressure more than any other ventilatory parameter. Thus, the authors compared driving pressure-guided ventilation with conventional protective ventilation in thoracic surgery, where lung protection is of the utmost importance. The authors hypothesized that driving pressure-guided ventilation decreases postoperative pulmonary complications more than conventional protective ventilation. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized, controlled study, 292 patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery were included in the analysis. The protective ventilation group (n = 147) received conventional protective ventilation during one-lung ventilation: tidal volume 6 ml/kg of ideal body weight, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cm H2O, and recruitment maneuver. The driving pressure group (n = 145) received the same tidal volume and recruitment, but with individualized PEEP which produces the lowest driving pressure (plateau pressure-PEEP) during one-lung ventilation. The primary outcome was postoperative pulmonary complications based on the Melbourne Group Scale (at least 4) until postoperative day 3. RESULTS: Melbourne Group Scale of at least 4 occurred in 8 of 145 patients (5.5%) in the driving pressure group, as compared with 18 of 147 (12.2%) in the protective ventilation group (P = 0.047, odds ratio 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.99). The number of patients who developed pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome was less in the driving pressure group than in the protective ventilation group (10/145 [6.9%] vs. 22/147 [15.0%], P = 0.028, odds ratio 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Application of driving pressure-guided ventilation during one-lung ventilation was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications compared with conventional protective ventilation in thoracic surgery.

Safety of pre-incisional low-dose ropivacaine infiltration in bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy: a retrospective study.

Introduction: Ropivacaine is widely used as a local analgesic, but it has toxicity that is related to the concentration, and highly concentrated ropivacaine can induce motor nerve blockage. Aim: To investigate the safety of low-concentration pre-incisional ropivacaine injection for postoperative pain control and compare postoperative adverse events between a low-concentration ropivacaine injection group and a high-concentration ropivacaine injection group. Material and methods: Patients who underwent thyroidectomy via the bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) between June 2017 and October 2021 performed by a single surgeon at Samsung Medical Center were retrospectively identified. These outcomes were compared between the two groups after 1 : 1 propensity score matching. Results: From a total of 633 patients, 620 patients were selected. There were 527 in the low-concentration ropivacaine group and 93 in the high-concentration ropivacaine group. After propensity score matching, two comparable groups with 93 patients in each were obtained. The incidence of ropivacaine-related adverse events was similar between the two groups (p = 0.186) but the occurrence of postoperative bradycardia (p = 0.048) was lower in the low-concentration ropivacaine group than in the high-concentration ropivacaine group. Other outcomes such as postoperative pain scores (p = 0.363), postoperative nausea and vomiting (p > 0.999), and postoperative opioid consumption (p = 0.699) were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: Pre-incisional low-concentration ropivacaine injection was effective for postoperative pain control and can be safely used in BABA thyroidectomy.

Physiological benefits of lung recruitment in the semi-lateral position after laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study.

We evaluated the physiological benefits of performing lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) in the semi-lateral position compared in the supine position. Seventy-nine patients undergoing laparoscopic prostatectomy were randomly assigned to either the supine or semi-lateral group according to body position during the LRM. At the end of surgery, LRM (35 cmH2O for 20 s) was performed twice in the assigned posture. The primary outcome was the maximal decrease in systolic arterial pressure during LRM. Secondary outcomes were changes in PaO2/FiO2 and the regional lung volume distribution after LRM. The decrease in systolic arterial pressure during the LRM was significantly higher in the supine group than in the semi-lateral group (mean ± standard deviation, [-] 27.6 ± 14.6% vs. [-] 18.6 ± 9.9%, P = 0.001). Improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio after the LRM was evident in both groups but was more prominent in the semi-lateral group than in the supine group (median [interquartile range], 39.3% [20.2, 63.6] vs. 18.2% [8.4, 29.2], P = 0.001). Among the horizontal lung divisions, regional lung volume in the most dependent portion (the dorsal division) was significantly increased after the LRM only in the semi-lateral group (P = 0.024). Performing lung recruitment in a semi-lateral position protected against hemodynamic deterioration during the LRM and increased regional lung ventilation in the dependent portion of the lung, leading to an improvement in arterial oxygenation after laparoscopic procedures.Trial registration Clinical Research Information Service ( https://cris.nih.go.kr/ ). Identifier: KCT0003756.

Effects of Increased Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter on Inadequate Emergence from Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Prospective Observational Study.

(1) Background: Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is preferred over open prostatectomy because it offers superior surgical outcomes and better postoperative recovery. The steep Trendelenburg position and pneumoperitoneum required in Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, however, increase intracranial pressure (ICP). The present study aimed to evaluate the effects of elevated ICP on the quality of emergence from anesthesia. (2) Methods: Sixty-seven patients undergoing RALP were enrolled. We measured optic nerve sheath diameter at four timepoints during surgery. Primary outcome was inadequate emergence in the operating room (OR). Secondary outcomes were postoperative neurologic deficits of dizziness, headache, delirium, cognitive dysfunction, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). (3) Results: A total of 69 patients were screened for eligibility and 67 patients completed the study and were included in the final analysis. After establishing pneumoperitoneum with the Trendelenburg position, ONSD increased compared to baseline by 11.4%. Of the 67 patients, 36 patients showed an increase of 10% or more in optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). Patients with ΔONSD ≥ 10% experienced more inadequate emergence in the OR than those with ΔONSD < 10% (47.2% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.003). However, other variables related to the quality of emergence from anesthesia did not different significantly between groups. Similarly, neurologic deficits, and PONV during postoperative day 3 showed no significant differences. (4) Conclusions: ICP elevation detected by ultrasonographic ONSD measurement was associated with a transient, inadequate emergence from anesthesia.

Decreased Incidence of Postoperative Delirium in Robot-assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy Compared With Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is one of messy complications related with increased mortality and hospital costs. Patients undergoing esophagectomy are more in danger of delirium than other kinds of surgeries. We investigated the impact of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy on the incidence of POD compared with open transthoracic esophagectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was completed for the patients who underwent esophagectomy from December 2, 2012 and April 15, 2015 (n=529). POD was assessed using Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. The comparison of group differences between the robotic esophagectomy group (R group) and the open esophagectomy group (O group) was conducted with and without propensity score (PS) matching method. Univariate model was used for 247 PS-matched patients to calculate the odds ratio of potential risk factors of POD. RESULTS: The incidence rate of POD was significantly lower among R group patients than O group (30% vs. 42%; P=0.035) after PS matching method. The risk of POD in R group was 0.55-fold lower than that of O group. Operative time and intraoperative blood loss were also significantly lower in R group patients. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, robotic thoracoscopic esophagectomy lowers the incidence of POD 0.55-fold compared with open transthoracic esophagectomy.

Bioreactance Is Not Interchangeable with Thermodilution for Measuring Cardiac Output during Adult Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Thermodilution technique using a pulmonary artery catheter is widely used for the assessment of cardiac output (CO) in patients undergoing liver transplantation. However, the unclearness of the risk-benefit ratio of this method has led to an interest in less invasive modalities. Thus, we evaluated whether noninvasive bioreactance CO monitoring is interchangeable with thermodilution technique. METHODS: Nineteen recipients undergoing adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation were enrolled in this prospective observational study. COs were recorded automatically by the two devices and compared simultaneously at 3-minute intervals. The Bland-Altman plot was used to evaluate the agreement between bioreactance and thermodilution. Clinically acceptable agreement was defined as a percentage error of limits of agreement <30%. The four quadrant plot was used to evaluate concordance between bioreactance and thermodilution. Clinically acceptable concordance was defined as a concordance rate >92%. RESULTS: A total of 2640 datasets were collected. The mean CO difference between the two techniques was 0.9 l/min, and the 95% limits of agreement were -3.5 l/min and 5.4 l/min with a percentage error of 53.9%. The percentage errors in the dissection, anhepatic, and reperfusion phase were 50.6%, 56.1%, and 53.5%, respectively. The concordance rate between the two techniques was 54.8%. CONCLUSION: Bioreactance and thermodilution failed to show acceptable interchangeability in terms of both estimating CO and tracking CO changes in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Thus, the use of bioreactance as an alternative CO monitoring to thermodilution, in spite of its noninvasiveness, would be hard to recommend in these surgical patients.

Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: During carotid endarterectomy (CEA), hemodynamic stability and adequate fluid management are crucial to prevent perioperative cerebral stroke, myocardial infarction and hyperperfusion syndrome. Both pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV), dynamic preload indices derived from the arterial waveform, are increasingly advocated as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of PPV and SVV for predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing CEA. METHODS: Twenty seven patients undergoing CEA were enrolled in this study. PPV, SVV and cardiac output (CO) were measured before and after fluid loading of 500 ml of hydroxyethyl starch solution. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in CO ≥ 15%. The ability of PPV and SVV to predict fluid responsiveness was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Both PPV and SVV measured before fluid loading are associated with changes in CO caused by fluid expansion. The ROC analysis showed that PPV and SVV predicted response to volume loading (area under the ROC curve = 0.854 and 0.841, respectively, P < 0.05). A PPV ≥ 9.5% identified responders (Rs) with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 90.9%, and a SVV ≥ 7.5% identified Rs with a sensitivity of 92.9% and a specificity of 63.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Both PPV and SVV values before volume loading are associated with increased CO in response to volume expansion. Therefore, PPV and SVV are useful predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing CEA.