Risk Factors for Femoral Head Collapse in Osteonecrosis.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) affects at least 20,000 patients annually in the United States; however, the pathophysiology of disease progression is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative importance of three distinct elements and their relationship to the collapse of the femoral head: (1) identifiable risk factors; (2) femoral head anatomy; and (3) the extent of the necrotic lesion. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed on patients ≥ 18 years old who presented with ONFH. Ficat classification and femoral head anatomic parameters were measured on radiographs. Osteonecrotic lesion size was measured on magnetic resonance imaging using four validated methods. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of femoral head collapse. RESULTS: There were 105 patients and 137 hips included in the final cohort, of which 50 (36.5%) had collapse of the femoral head. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that medical risk factors (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.15), alcohol exposure (aOR: 1.23), and increased alpha angle (aOR: 4.51) were predictive of femoral head collapse. Increased femoral head offset (aOR: 0.54) was protective against collapse. An increased size of the osteonecrotic lesion was significantly predictive of collapse with all four measure methods evaluated: three-dimensional (3D) volumetric (aOR: 3.73), modified Kerboul (aOR: 2.92), index of necrotic extent (aOR: 1.91), and modified index of necrotic extent (aOR: 2.05). CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patients who had ONFH, we identified risk factors such as alcohol exposure, high alpha angle, increased lesion size, and decreased femoral offset as increasing the risk of femoral head collapse. Given the challenges of studying this patient population, large prospective studies of patients who have ONFH should seek to identify whether these factors are reliable indicators of femoral head collapse.

Delivery of Growth Factors to Enhance Bone Repair.

The management of critical-sized bone defects caused by nonunion, trauma, infection, malignancy, pseudoarthrosis, and osteolysis poses complex reconstruction challenges for orthopedic surgeons. Current treatment modalities, including autograft, allograft, and distraction osteogenesis, are insufficient for the diverse range of pathology encountered in clinical practice, with significant complications associated with each. Therefore, there is significant interest in the development of delivery vehicles for growth factors to aid in bone repair in these settings. This article reviews innovative strategies for the management of critical-sized bone loss, including novel scaffolds designed for controlled release of rhBMP, bioengineered extracellular vesicles for delivery of intracellular signaling molecules, and advances in regional gene therapy for sustained signaling strategies. Improvement in the delivery of growth factors to areas of significant bone loss has the potential to revolutionize current treatment for this complex clinical challenge.

Evaluating the Bariatric Safety Net: Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors and Outcomes at a Bariatric Safety Net Program Compared to an Affiliated Private Center.

PURPOSE: Obesity is prevalent among economically disadvantaged and racially underrepresented populations. It has been suggested that socioeconomic factors, race, and lifestyle habits are important factors associated with weight loss and comorbidity remission after bariatric surgery. This study analyzes outcomes of bariatric surgery at a private hospital (PH) versus an affiliated safety-net hospital (SNH). METHODS: Retrospective review of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (LSG) performed by the same surgeons at a PH and SNH in a large metropolitan setting. Demographics, socioeconomic status, insurance status, weight metrics, and perioperative outcomes were compared. A postoperative telephone survey was conducted to study dietary and lifestyle differences between cohorts. RESULTS: Of the 243 LSG performed, 141 (58%) occurred at PH versus 102 (42%) at SNH. Most patients at SNH were Hispanic, lower socioeconomic status, and had government-sponsored insurance. Based off the results from the postoperative telephone survey, there were no significant differences in dietary and lifestyle habits between both cohorts. Postoperative weight loss outcomes were similar across cohorts. The two groups had similar percent excess weight loss (EWL) at all time points up to 36 months and similar rates of failure to achieve 50% EWL at 12 months. However, patients at PH had greater resolution of diabetes and hypertension after surgery. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates outcomes after bariatric surgery are similar at a PH and its affiliated SNH. Despite differences in race and socioeconomic factors between the two cohorts, perioperative outcomes, short-term postoperative weight loss, and weight loss failure rates were equivalent between SNH and PH patients.