Rehabilitating the neurological patient in the ICU: what is important?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe recent literature evaluating the effectiveness of early rehabilitation in neurocritical care patients. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a drive for early rehabilitation within the ICU; however, there are unique considerations for the neurocritically ill patient that include hemiplegia, cognitive impairments and impaired conscious state that can complicate rehabilitation. Additionally, neurological complications, such as hemorrhage expansion and cerebral edema can lead to the risk of further neurological damage. It is, therefore, important to consider the effect of exercise and position changes on cerebral hemodynamics in patients with impaired cerebral autoregulation. There is a paucity of evidence to provide recommendations on timing of early rehabilitation postneurological insult. There are also mixed findings on the effectiveness of early mobilization with one large, multicenter RCT demonstrating the potential harm of early and intensive mobilization in stroke patients. Conversely, observational trials have found early rehabilitation to be well tolerated and feasible, reduce hospital length of stay and improve functional outcomes in neurological patients admitted to ICU. SUMMARY: Further research is warranted to determine the benefits and harm of early rehabilitation in neurological patients. As current evidence is limited, and given recent findings in stroke studies, careful consideration should be taken when prescribing exercises in neurocritically ill patients.

Can gait outcomes be predicted early after a stroke?

PURPOSE: To determine the ability of clinical measures collected within 72 hours of neurological insult to predict independent gait 6 and 12 months after a stroke. METHODS: Patients with a confirmed stroke diagnosis were eligible for inclusion in this prospective cohort study. Sitting balance, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) motor leg, NIHSS motor arm, and Motricity Index (MI) were measured within 72 hours post-stroke. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 6 and 12 months post-stroke to measure gait recovery. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients were included at baseline for analysis. At 6 and 12 months, 38% (n = 38) and 35% (n = 42) of patients used a gait aid, and 80% and 87% were independently ambulant, respectively. Sitting balance, NIHSS motor leg, and NIHSS motor arm were not significantly associated with ambulation at 6 or 12 months or with the use of a gait aid. Thrombolysis was significantly associated with independent outdoors ambulation at 6 months (p = .011). A worse MI score was significantly associated with a higher number of falls at 6 months (p < .010) but not with the need for a gait aid. The number of falls at 6 months was independently predicted by urinary incontinence post-stroke (p < .001), NIHSS leg score (p < .005), and depression and anxiety while in acute care (p < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical bedside assessments may be less important in predicting safe, independent gait than previously thought. Urinary incontinence and poor mental health should be addressed in the hospital. Increased utilization of reperfusion techniques may alter functional recovery patterns.