Collaborative international partnership: Enabling the development of a state-of-the-art minimally invasive surgical center in rural Uganda through telementoring.

BACKGROUND: Access to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is limited in Sub-Saharan African countries. In 2019, the Mount Sinai Department of Surgery in New York collaborated with local Ugandans to construct the Kyabirwa Surgical Center (KSC), an independent, replicable, self-sustaining ambulatory surgical center in Uganda. We developed a focused MIS training program using a combination of in-person training and supervised telementoring. We present the results of our initial MIS telementoring experience. METHODS: We worked jointly with Ugandan staff to construct the KSC in the rural province of Jinja. A solar-powered backup battery system ensured continuous power availability. Underground fiber optic cables were installed to provide stable high-speed Internet. The local Ugandan general surgeon (JOD) underwent a mini-fellowship in MIS and then trained extensively using the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery program. After a weeklong in-person session to train the Ugandan OR team, JOD performed laparoscopic cases with telementoring, which was conducted remotely by surgeons in New York via audiovisual feeds from the KSC OR. RESULTS: From October 2021 to February 2024, JOD performed 61 telementored laparoscopic operations at KSC including 37 appendectomies and 24 cholecystectomies. Feedback was provided regarding patient positioning, port placement, surgical technique, instrument use, and critical steps of the operation. There were no intra-operative complications. Postoperatively, field medical workers visited patients at home to collect follow-up information. Two superficial wound infections (3.3%) were reported in the short-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Telementoring can be safely implemented to assist surgeons in previously underserved areas to provide advanced laparoscopic surgical care to the local patient population.

Sleeve gastrectomy facilitates weight loss and permits cardiac transplantation in patients with severe obesity and a left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

INTRODUCTION: Patients suffering from advanced heart failure may undergo left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. However, those with a BMI above 35 kg/m2 are generally not considered eligible for transplant due to their elevated cardiac risk. We review our experience with bariatric surgery in this high-risk population to assess its safety and efficacy in reducing BMI to permit cardiac transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients on durable LVAD support who underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG) at Mount Sinai Hospital between August 2018 and December 2022. Electronic medical records were reviewed to analyze patient demographics, surgical details, and outcomes regarding weight loss and heart transplantation. RESULTS: We identified twelve LVAD patients who underwent SG. Three were performed laparoscopically and 9 via robotic approach. Four patients (33.3%) underwent an orthotopic heart transplant (OHTx). Half of these patients were female. For patients who underwent OHTx, mean age at LVAD placement was 41.0 (R30.6-52.2), at SG was 43.9 (R32.7-55.0) and at OHTx was 45.3 years (R33.3-56.8). Mean BMI increased from 38.8 at LVAD placement to 42.5 prior to SG. Mean time from SG to OHTx was 17.9 months (R6-7-27.5) during which BMI decreased to mean 32.8 at the time of OHTx. At most recent follow-up, mean BMI was 31.9. All patients were anticoagulated prior to surgery; one required return to the operating room on post-operative day 1 after SG for bleeding and one was re-admitted on post-operative day 7 for hematochezia treated conservatively. CONCLUSION: SG is a safe and effective operation in patients with severe obesity and heart failure requiring an LVAD. 66.7% of our cohort achieved target BMI < 35 and 33.3% underwent heart transplantation. Longer term follow-up is needed to clarify full bridge-to-transplant rate and long-term survival outcomes.

Long-term quality of life and pelvic floor dysfunction after bariatric surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of bariatric surgery on pelvic floor mediated quality of life in morbidly obese women. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of 44 women undergoing bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-six women gave data at baseline and at mean follow-up of 3.15 years following bariatric surgery. Although urinary impact questionnaire scores improved (-34.92, P = .0020), colorectal-anal impact questionnaire and pelvic organ prolapse impact questionnaire scores did not improve despite significant weight loss. Baseline female sexual function index scores were low (17.70 ± 8.38) and did not improve with weight loss (16.91 ± 9.75, P = .5832). Pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire scores did improve (35.78 ± 6.06 preoperatively vs 38.22 ± 6.03 postoperatively, P = .0193). CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery is associated with significant improvement in the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. Sexual function was poor, and improved only on the pelvic organ prolapse/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire that evaluated urinary incontinence.

Is expert peer review obsolete? A model suggests that post-publication reader review may exceed the accuracy of traditional peer review.

BACKGROUND: The peer review process is the gold standard by which academic manuscripts are vetted for publication. However, some investigators have raised concerns regarding its unopposed supremacy, including lack of expediency, susceptibility to editorial bias and statistical limitation due to the small number of reviewers used. Post-publication review-in which the article is assessed by the general readership of the journal instead of a small group of appointed reviewers-could potentially supplement or replace the peer-review process. In this study, we created a computer model to compare the traditional peer-review process to that of post-publication reader review. METHODS: We created a mathematical model of the manuscript review process. A hypothetical manuscript was randomly assigned a "true value" representing its intrinsic quality. We modeled a group of three expert peer reviewers and compared it to modeled groups of 10, 20, 50, or 100 reader-reviewers. Reader-reviewers were assumed to be less skillful at reviewing and were thus modeled to be only » as accurate as expert reviewers. Percentage of correct assessments was calculated for each group. RESULTS: 400,000 hypothetical manuscripts were modeled. The accuracy of the reader-reviewer group was inferior to the expert reviewer group in the 10-reviewer trial (93.24% correct vs. 97.67%, p < 0.0001) and the 20-reviewer trial (95.50% correct, p < 0.0001). However, the reader-reviewer group surpassed the expert reviewer group in accuracy when 50 or 100 reader-reviewers were used (97.92 and 99.20% respectively, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a mathematical model of the peer review process, the accuracy of public reader-reviewers can surpass that of a small group of expert reviewers if the group of public reviewers is of sufficient size. Further study will be required to determine whether the mathematical assumptions of this model are valid in actual use.

An Initial Test of the Efficacy of a Digital Health Intervention for Bariatric Surgery Candidates.

BACKGROUND: Rigorous research on smartphone apps for individuals pursuing bariatric surgery is limited. A digital health intervention was recently developed using standard behavioral weight loss programs with specific modifications for bariatric surgery. The current study evaluated this intervention for improving diet, exercise, and psychosocial health over 8 weeks prior to surgery in an academic medical center. METHODS: Fifty patients were randomized to receive either the digital intervention or treatment as usual prior to a surgical procedure. Measures of anxiety, depression, stress, quality of life, physical activity, and diet were administered at baseline and at 8-week follow-up. Statistical power of 80% estimated for N = 50 to detect ES = 0.68 with alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: Results of intent-to-treat (N = 50 baseline, N = 36 follow-up) analyses indicated significant moderate differences in stress and anxiety (ES = - 0.58 to - 0.62) favoring the digital intervention. Effects of the program on total daily calories consumed, body mass index, quality of life, and eating disorder symptoms were small (ES = - 0.24 to 0.33) and not significant. Given small effects for these domains, the sample size of the study likely affected the ability to detect significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: The digital health intervention appears to significantly impact several measures of physical activity and emotional functioning in candidates for bariatric surgery, which could augment surgical outcomes.

Routine management of stricture after gastric bypass and predictors of subsequent weight loss.

BACKGROUND: Gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture is the most commonly occurring short-term complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Endoscopic balloon dilation is the first-line treatment for stricture. However, an optimal dilation protocol has not been identified. This study aimed to document routine management of stricture after laparoscopic gastric bypass and its impact on postoperative weight loss. METHODS: Charts of patients who underwent gastric bypass from 2000 to 2006 were reviewed using a standardized abstraction form. Patients with stricture were matched with control subjects based on age +/-5 years, gender, and preoperative body mass index (BMI +/- 5). Patients with at least 6 months of follow-up assessment were included in the study. RESULTS: Of the 113 patients included in the study, 20% were male, 26% black, 19% Hispanic, and 51% white. Their mean age was 42 +/- 10 years (range, 22-66 years). The mean preoperative BMI was 47.0 +/- 5.4 kg/m(2) for the case group and 46.6 +/- 5.5 kg/m(2) for the control group (p = 0.3). After adjustment for patient characteristics, using a larger balloon was associated with reduced odds of stricture recurrence (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.85; p = 0.02). All the patients were without signs or symptoms of stricture at the last follow-up visit (20 +/- 17 months). Weight loss was similar between the two groups. The percentage of estimated weight loss (%EWL) at 12 months postoperatively was 66% for the study participants and 67% for the control subjects (p = 0.5). Baseline alcohol use and higher preoperative BMI were associated with a higher BMI 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Initial dilation with a larger balloon is safe and may prevent stricture recurrence. Further study of modifiable risk factors for reduced weight loss after surgery, such as alcohol use, may improve patient outcomes.

Intrathoracic Sleeve Migrations After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Compilation of Case Reports.

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure in the United States. Postoperative migration of the stomach into the chest is a rare complication of this procedure. In this study, we present a compilation of acute and chronic intrathoracic sleeve migrations (ITSMs) after LSG and present possible underlying mechanisms of this complication, as described in the literature. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative course of patients who had an ITSM after LSG between 2011 and 2019. Results: Two patients presented with this complication in the acute setting, whereas 3 patients developed ITSM as a chronic issue years after the primary procedure. All 5 were female patients, with a mean age and body mass index of 55.6 ± 9.5 (years) and 37.8 ± 2.9 kg/m2, respectively. None of the cases had a hiatal hernia repair during the initial operation. All cases were completed laparoscopically with reduction of the migrated sleeve into the abdomen and primary hiatal hernia repair. One case required a return to the operating room for an acute reherniation. Conclusion: In this article, we report a compilation of cases of ITSMs after LSG with distinct clinical features that highlight the diversity of possible reasons and risk factors for its development.

Ketorolac Use Shortens Hospital Length of Stay After Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Center 5-Year Experience.

INTRODUCTION: There has been a recent increased interest in the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ketorolac for post-operative pain management to minimize opioid use and decrease hospital length of stay (LOS). Although NSAID use has been controversial following bariatric surgery due to anecdotal concerns for increased gastric bleeding, the impact of ketorolac as an adjunct to opioids needs further investigation on LOS and post-operative complications like bleeding. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the impact of post-operative ketorolac use on opioid consumption, LOS, and bleeding risk after bariatric surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of all bariatric surgery patients who either underwent sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB) at a tertiary center between 2011 and 2015. Patients were stratified into 2 groups based on post-operative pain control regimen as follows: (1) ketorolac and opioids and (2) opioids alone. RESULTS: A total of 1555 patients were identified who underwent either SG (n = 1255) or RYGB (n = 300). The overall LOS was 1.81 ± .059 days for ketorolac-opioid patients vs. 2.09 ± .065 days for opioid-only patients (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the risk of post-operative bleeding was similar between the two groups (P = 0.097). CONCLUSION: Patients who received ketorolac as an adjunct to opioids had a significantly shorter LOS compared to opioid-only patients. Additionally, ketorolac use was not associated with increased risk of post-operative bleeding complications. Therefore, if not contraindicated, ketorolac should be considered routinely for post-operative pain control among bariatric surgery patients.

Gastric bypass pouch and stoma reduction using a transoral endoscopic anchor placement system: a feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: Weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass may be caused by pouch enlargement or dilatation of the gastrojejunostomy (stoma). In order to avoid the substantial morbidity of revisional bariatric surgery, investigators have recently demonstrated the feasibility of reducing stoma diameter using transoral endoscopic suturing techniques. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of performing both pouch and stomal reduction using transoral endoscopically placed tissue anchors in an ex vivo and acute animate model. METHODS: Part I: We created an ex vivo model of a dilated gastric pouch and stoma using four explanted porcine stomachs. The stomach was divided to create an upper pouch of approx. 100 ml volume, which was reconnected to the lower portion of the stomach (gastric remnant) via an anastomosis of 18 to 20 mm diameter. Endoscopically placed anchors were then used to create plications of the stoma and reduce its diameter. In two stomachs, anchor plications were also used to decrease pouch volume. Pouch volumes and stoma diameters were measured pre- and post-procedure. Part II: A similar experimental model was created in vivo using three pigs. Anchors were placed in the stoma and pouch. The animals were immediately sacrificed and similar measurements were obtained. RESULTS: In the ex vivo model, stoma diameter was successfully reduced in all four stomachs by a mean of 8 mm (41%). This represented a mean decrease in cross-sectional area of 65%. Pouch volume was reduced by a mean of 28 ml (30%) in two stomachs. Stomal plications were successfully placed in two of the live animals, with a mean stoma diameter reduction of 11.5 mm (53%). Feasibility of pouch reduction using plicating anchors was confirmed. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility of using endoscopically placed tissue anchors to reduce both stoma diameter and pouch volume. This technique may ultimately be clinically useful in treating weight regain after gastric bypass surgery.

Postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective comparison of sutures versus tacks.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mesh fixation in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair typically involves the use of tacks, transabdominal permanent sutures, or both of these. We compared postoperative pain after repair with either of these 2 methods. METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at the Mount Sinai Medical Center were prospectively enrolled in the study. They were sorted into 2 groups (1) those undergoing hernia repairs consisting primarily of transabdominal suture fixation and (2) those undergoing hernia repairs consisting primarily of tack fixation. The patients were not randomized. The technique of surgical repair was based on surgeon preference. A telephone survey was used to follow-up at 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months postoperatively. RESULTS: From 2004 through 2005, 50 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-nine had hernia repair primarily with transabdominal sutures, and 21 had repair primarily with tacks. Both groups had similar average age, BMI, hernia defect size, operative time, and postoperative length of stay. Pain scores at 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months were similar. Both groups also had similar times to return to work and need for narcotic pain medication. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with primarily transabdominal sutures or tacks experience similar postoperative pain. The choice of either of these fixation methods during surgery should not be based on risk of postoperative pain.

Resolution of Symptomatic Obstructive Sleep Apnea Not Impacted by Preoperative Body Mass Index, Choice of Operation Between Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery, or Severity.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a serious obesity-associated disorder that causes significant short- and long-term medical consequences. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the 6-month and 1-year postoperative symptomatic OSA remission rates of patients undergoing bariatric surgery based on their preoperative body mass index (BMI) stratification, type of bariatric operation-sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB)-and OSA severity. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 297 obese patients with a diagnosis of OSA who had undergone either SG or RYGB between 2011 and 2015. RESULTS: The overall 6-month symptomatic OSA remission rate for patients (n = 255) was 74.5%. At 6 months, patients with a preoperative BMI of 30-34.9 kg/m2 (class I), 35-39.9 kg/m2 (class II), and 40+ kg/m2 (class III) had 100, 70.0, and 75.0% (p = 0.2164) remission rates, respectively. The 6-month remission rates for SG and RYGB were 75.3 and 70.8% (p = 0.5165), respectively. The overall 1-year symptomatic OSA remission rate for patients (n = 162) was 87.1%. At 1 year, class I, II, and III patients had 100, 85.7, and 87.5% (p = 0.5740) remission rates, respectively. The 1-year remission rates for SG and RYGB were 89.2 and 81.2% (p = 0.2189), respectively. A sub-analysis (n = 69) based on preoperative OSA severity levels did not affect the remission outcome at either the 6-month (p = 0.3670) or 1-year (p = 0.3004) follow-up. CONCLUSION: Most obese patients experience symptomatic remission of their OSA after bariatric surgery, regardless of their preoperative BMI, choice of operation, or OSA severity.

Is bariatric surgery effective for co-morbidity resolution in the super-obese patients?

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D), obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), hypertension (HTN), and hyperlipidemia (HLD) are common co-morbidities that are strongly associated with obesity. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of obesity-related co-morbidity remission and percent total body weight loss of super-obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥50 kg/m2 with bariatric patients who have a BMI of 30 to 49.9 kg/m2. SETTING: Academic hospital, United States. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of outcomes of a prospectively maintained database was done on obese patients with a diagnosis of ≥1 co-morbidity (T2D, OSA, HTN, or HLD) who at the time of initial visit had undergone either a sleeve gastrectomy or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at our hospital between 2011 and 2015. The patients were stratified based on their preoperative BMI class, BMI of 30 to 49.9 kg/m2 versus BMI ≥50 kg/m2. RESULTS: Of the 930 patients, 732 underwent sleeve gastrectomy and 198 underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The 6-month follow-up co-morbidity remission rates for patients with a BMI of 30 to 49.9 kg/m2 (n = 759) versus super-obese patients (n = 171) were 46.0% and 36.7% (P = .348) for T2D; 75.0% and 73.2% (P = .772) for OSA; 35.0% and 22.0% (P = .142) for HTN; and 37.0% and 21.0% (P = .081) for HLD, respectively. The 1-year follow-up co-morbidity remission rates for patients with a BMI of 30 to 49.9 kg/m2 versus super-obese patients were 54.2% and 45.5% (P = .460) for T2D; 87.0% and 89.7% (P = .649) for OSA; 37.4% and 23.9% (P = .081) for HTN; and 43.2% and 34.6% (P = .422) for HLD, respectively. Furthermore, there was no difference in the mean percent total weight loss for patients with a preoperative BMI of 30 to 49.9 kg/m2 versus the super-obese at the 6-month (21.4%, 20.9%, P = .612) and 1-year (28.0%, 30.7%, P = .107) follow-ups. CONCLUSION: In our study, preoperative BMI did not have an impact on postoperative co-morbidity remission rates or percent total body weight loss. Future studies should investigate the effect of other factors, such as disease severity and duration.

Preoperative insulin therapy as a marker for type 2 diabetes remission in obese patients after bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Obesity not only increases the chances of developing diabetes-one of the top causes of death in the United States-but it also results in further medical complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the 6-month and 1-year postoperative remission rates of type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients after bariatric surgery based on preoperative glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) stratification and pharmacologic therapy: insulin-dependent diabetic (IDD) versus noninsulin-dependent diabetic (NIDD). SETTING: Academic hospital, United States. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database of 186 obese patients with a diagnosis T2D who had undergone either a sleeve gastrectomy or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery at our hospital. RESULTS: At 6 months (n = 180), patients who were stratified by preoperative A1C levels (<6.5; ≥6.5 to<8; ≥8) had 70.5%, 51.7%, and 30.0% remission rates (P<.001) and at 1 year (n = 118) patients had 72.0%, 54.0%, and 42.8% remission rates (P = .053), respectively. When patients were substratified by preoperative pharmacologic therapy, IDD and NIDD patients had different remission rates within the same A1C level. At 6-months follow-up within A1C ≥6.5 to<8 (IDD versus NIDD), the remission rate was 23.5% versus 64.1% (odds ratio [OR]: .173, confidence interval [CI]: .0471, .6308, P = .0079), and within A1C ≥8 the remission was 24.0% versus 37.5% (OR: .5263, CI: .2115, 1.3096, P = .1676), respectively. At 1-year follow-up within A1C ≥6.5 to<8, the remission rate was 30.0% versus 62.9% (OR: .2521, CI: .0529, 1.2019, P = .0838), and within A1C ≥8 the remission was 31.4% versus 61.9% (OR: .2821, CI: .0908, .8762, P = .0286), respectively. Furthermore, when IDD patients were compared between A1C ≥6.5 to<8 and A1C ≥8 the remission rates were nearly identical, and for NIDD patients A1C was not significantly associated with remission regardless of the level, except at 6 months. CONCLUSION: While a difference was observed between overall A1C levels-the lower the A1C level, the higher the remission rate-IDD patients had lower remission rates than NIDD patients irrespective of A1C levels; further, IDD patients performed similarly across A1C levels.

Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity--a cure for metabolic syndrome?

At present there is no single medication that targets the metabolic syndrome directly. Bariatric surgery, a treatment option for morbidly obese individuals who fail medical therapy, has been shown to be very effective in treating multiple aspects of the metabolic syndrome. The decrease in insulin resistance is because of significant weight loss and by enhancing secretion of gut hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1).

Laparoscopic retrieval of intraabdominal foreign bodies.

UNLABELLED: The use of laparoscopy has been described as the means of removing intraabdominal foreign bodies, both intraperitoneal and intraluminal, from the stomach or bowel. An early report detailed the laparoscopic removal of translocated intrauterine devices from the peritoneal cavity. Laparoscopic removal of a retained surgical sponge also has been reported. For large ingested objects that cannot be retrieved by flexible endoscopy, laparoscopic gastrotomy and foreign body removal have been described. The authors recently had three cases of laparoscopic foreign body retrieval. The first case involved a young man who had ingested latex gloves, causing gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic retrieval was unsuccessful. A laparoscopic gastrotomy was performed, with the retrieval of four gloves, followed by intracorporeal, sutured closure of the gastrotomy. The second case involved the laparoscopic removal of a Penrose drain around the distal esophagus. The patient had initially undergone a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, vagotomy, and gastrojejunostomy for the management of reflux and a duodenal stricture. He had persistent dysphagia after surgery, prompting takedown of the fundoplication several months later. When his dysphagia did not improve, a retained Penrose drain that had been placed around the distal esophagus at the initial operation was discovered on computed tomography. This was removed laparoscopically. At this writing, 18 months after the initial operation, the patient has complete resolution of dysphagia. The third case involved a duodenojejunal fistula caused by multiple ingested magnets that had eroded through the bowel wall. The fistula was divided laparoscopically, and 16 disk-shaped magnets were removed. The duodenum and jejunum were repaired with laparoscopic suturing and stapling. All three patients did well after surgery. Laparoscopy can be an excellent method for abdominal foreign body retrieval. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9011-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: intraoperative safety, immediate morbidity, and delayed complications with 500 cases.

BACKGROUND: Several large series of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) have been published, largely focusing on immediate results and short-term complications. The aim of this study was to examine the results of LDN and collect medium-term and long-term donor followup. METHODS: We examined the results of two surgeons who performed 500 consecutive LDNs from 1996 to 2005. Prospective databases were reviewed for both donors and recipients to record demographics, medical history, intraoperative events, and complications. Patients were followed between 1 month and 9 years after surgery to assess for delayed complications, especially hypertension, renal insufficiency, incisional hernia, bowel obstruction, and chronic pain. RESULTS: Left kidneys were procured in 86.2% of cases. Mean operative time was 3.5 h, and warm ischemia time averaged 3.4 min. Hand-assistance was used in 13.8%, and conversion rate was 1.8%. Intraoperative complication rate was 5.8% and was predominantly bleeding (93.1%). Most (86.2%) of the operative complications occurred during the initial 150 cases of a surgeon, compared with 10.3% in the subsequent 150 cases (p = 0.003). Operative time decreased by 87 min after the initial 150 cases (p < 0.001). Immediate graft survival was 97.5%. Delayed graft function occurred in 3.0% of recipients, and acute tubular necrosis occurred in 7.0%. Thirty-day donor complication rate was 9.8%. Mean donor creatinine was 1.24 on the first postoperative day, 1.27 at 2 weeks, and 1.24 at 1 year. At a mean followup of 32.8 months, long-term donor complications consisted of 11 cases of hypertension, 9 cases of prolonged pain or paresthesia, 2 incisional hernias, 1 small bowel obstruction requiring laparoscopic lysis of adhesions, and 1 hydrocele requiring repair. CONCLUSIONS: LDN can be performed with acceptable immediate morbidity and excellent graft function. Operative time and complications decreased significantly after a surgeon performed 150 cases. Long-term complications were uncommon but included a likely underestimated incidence of hypertension.

Nutritional deficiencies following bariatric surgery: what have we learned?

Deficiencies in vitamins and other nutrients are common following the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS), and may become clinically significant if not recognized and treated with supplementation. This paper presents a review of the current literature and evidence of the most commonly deficient vitamins and minerals following weight loss surgery, including protein, iron, vitamin B12, folate, calcium, the fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K), and other micronutrients. The deficiencies appear to be more substantial following malabsorptive procedures such as BPD, but occur with restrictive procedures as well. The review suggests that further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical significance of the nutritional deficiencies, and to determine guidelines for supplementation.

The surgical management of severe obesity.

The prevalence of obesity in the United States is increasing to epidemic proportions. At present, more than 60% of Americans are overweight. While a variety of medications are available for the treatment of obesity, none results in the long-term loss of more than 10% of body weight. The current standard for the treatment of severe obesity, defined as a body mass index of greater than 35 40 kg/m 2, is surgical. Several surgical procedures are currently available, including gastric bypass, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, and the adjustable gastric band. These operations may be performed using laparoscopic surgical techniques to minimize perioperative morbidity and postoperative recovery time. To optimize the outcome of this type of procedure, bariatric surgery should be performed on carefully selected patients, in centers specially equipped to care for the obese, within a broadly based, multidisciplinary setting providing lifelong postoperative care.