A randomized controlled phase III study comparing hadrontherapy with carbon ions versus conventional radiotherapy - including photon and proton therapy - for the treatment of radioresistant tumors: the ETOILE trial.

BACKGROUND: Some cancers such as sarcomas (bone and soft tissue sarcomas) and adenoid cystic carcinomas are considered as radioresistant to low linear energy transfer radiation (including photons and protons) and may therefore beneficiate from a carbon ion therapy. Despite encouraging results obtained in phase I/II trials compared to historical data with photons, the spread of carbon ions has been limited mainly because of the absence of randomized medical data. The French health authorities stressed the importance of having randomized data for carbon ion therapy. METHODS: The ETOILE study is a multicenter prospective randomized phase III trial comparing carbon ion therapy to either advanced photon or proton radiotherapy for inoperable or macroscopically incompletely resected (R2) radioresistant cancers including sarcomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas. In the experimental arm, carbon ion therapy will be performed at the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) in Pavia, Italy. In the control arm, photon or proton radiotherapy will be carried out in referent centers in France. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints are overall survival and local control, toxicity profile, and quality of life. In addition, a prospective health-economic study and a radiobiological analysis will be conducted. To demonstrate an absolute improvement in the 5-year PFS rate of 20% in favor of carbon ion therapy, 250 patients have to be included in the study. DISCUSSION: So far, no clinical study of phase III has demonstrated the superiority of carbon ion therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy, including proton therapy, for the treatment of radioresistant tumors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02838602 . Date of registration: July 20, 2016. The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

Characteristics of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients at Admission and Factors Associated with Clinical Severity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Observational Study.

Despite the numerous articles published on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 with regard to high-income countries, little is known about patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) in this context. The objective of this observational, prospective, hospital-based multicentric study was to describe clinical features and outcomes of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in each of the participating centers in Bangladesh, Guinea, Ivory Coast, Lebanon, Madagascar, and Mali during the first year of the pandemic (March 5, 2020 to May 4, 2021). The study outcome was the clinical severity of COVID-19, defined as hospitalization in intensive care unit or death. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify independent variables associated with disease severity. Overall, 1,096 patients were included. The median age was 49.0 years, ranging from 38.0 in Mali to 63.0 years in Guinea. The overall clinical severity of COVID-19 was 12.3%, ranging from 6.4% in Mali to 18.8% in Guinea. In both groups of patients <60 and ≥60 years old, cardiovascular diseases (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.13-3.50, P = 0.02; aOR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.33-4.57, P = 0.004) were independently associated with clinical severity, whereas in patients <60 years, diabetes (aOR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.11-4.10, P = 0.02) was also associated with clinical severity. Our findings suggest that COVID-19-related severity and death in LMICs are mainly driven by older age. However, the presence of chronic diseases can also increase the risk of severity especially in younger patients.

Adverse drug reactions associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: An exploratory nested case-control study in a historical cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Data on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used in oncology are mainly derived from clinical trials or cancer-specific reviews. We aim to analyze ADRs that occurred in patients treated with ICIs in real life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational study on a historical cohort of the University Hospitals of Lyon. All patients who initiated an ICI treatment for any cancer in 2017 were included. Patients were followed from the first infusion until 90 days after the last one, death, date of last news or end of the study period (28 February 2019), whichever came first. Two pharmacovigilance specialists assessed the accountability and the severity of each ADR using Naranjo algorithm and common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) classification, respectively. RESULTS: 248 patients were included. They were treated with anti-PD-(L)-1, mainly nivolumab (70.6%) and pembrolizumab (25.8%). Lung cancer (62.1%) and melanoma (20.2%) were the most represented cancers. 139 ADRs occurred in 93 patients (37.5%), on average at the 6th cure (±6.8). ADRs mainly concerned skin (29.5%), endocrine (19.4%) and digestive (10.8%) systems. 17.3% of ADRs were grades III-V and two patients died because of ADRs. By comparing patients with (N=93) or without (N=155) ADRs, all characteristics appeared similar except for age, number of infusions received and death status. The spontaneous notification rate found in this study was 5.8% for all grade ADRs (N = 8) but raised to 23.8% when only grades higher than III were considered (N = 5). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Our results are consistent with literature data in frequency and type of serious ADRs. We found a lower frequency of ADRs of any grade, which could be explained by a fairer causality assessment in our study than in clinical trials.